=Paper=
{{Paper
|id=Vol-1549/article-10
|storemode=property
|title=None
|pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1549/article-10.pdf
|volume=Vol-1549
|dblpUrl=https://dblp.org/rec/conf/semweb/Merono-PenuelaH13
}}
==None==
Detecting and Reporting Extensional Concept
Drift in Statistical Linked Data
Albert Meroño-Peñuela1,2 , Christophe Guéret2 , Rinke Hoekstra1,3 , and Stefan
Schlobach1
1
Department of Computer Science, VU University Amsterdam, NL
albert.merono@vu.nl
2
Data Archiving and Networked Services, KNAW, NL
3
Leibniz Center for Law, Faculty of Law, University of Amsterdam, NL
Abstract. The RDF Data Cube vocabulary is a catalyst for the avail-
ability of statistical Linked Data: raw statistical Linked Data are easy
to model in, publish to, and retrieve from the Linked Data cloud. In
statistical datasets, concepts are central entities represented by variables
and their values. The meaning of these concepts is often assumed to be
stable, but in fact it can change over time: we call this concept drift. Ex-
tensional concept drift is one type of change of meaning that affects the
things the concept extends to. It occurs frequently in historical datasets,
and it can have drastic consequences on longitudinal querying. In this
paper we propose and use a method to detect extensional concept drift
in a dataset modelled using the RDF Data Cube vocabulary: the Dutch
historical censuses. We analyze, model and publish back the occurrence
of extensional concept drift in concepts of the occupation census, advo-
cating straightforward publishing of results in a pull-push workflow.
Keywords: Concept Drift, Semantic Web, Statistical Linked Data
1 Introduction
Availability of statistical Linked Data is growing4,5 . The RDF Data Cube vo-
cabulary, now a W3C candidate recommendation, is a catalyst for statistical
data exchange in the Semantic Web. It implements the hypercube model that
underlies SDMX. Most datasets that use RDF Data Cube, like statistical data in
general, assume some degree of stability in the concepts (variables, values) they
refer to. But these concepts can change their meaning over time, especially when
a wide time range is covered. In this paper we find and report back this change of
meaning of concepts, or concept drift, in a historical census dataset. We identify
the concepts that changed their meaning, and we upload these results to the
Linked Data cloud to improve their reusability and reproducibility.
This paper proposes a solution for the problem of identifying concept drift.
Concept drift refers to the change of meaning of concepts, as the reality they
4
http://lod-cloud.net/state/
5
http://eurostat.linked-statistics.org/
model changes continuously. Concept drift can have drastic consequences on the
use of a concept in an application. A concept may replace the meaning of other
concepts, or other concepts can take over its meaning. This produces errors in
data retrieval that are very difficult to trace and address. Concept drift can
happen at the concept identifier level (label drift), in the basic properties of the
concept (intensional drift), or to the things the concept refers to (extensional
drift) [22]. This paper proposes a statistics-based solution for the latter.
Other approaches propose solutions to solve concept drift (see Section 2), but
they rely on a) availability of data about individuals, or b) some formalization
(often OWL ontologies) of the concepts. In statistical data none of these may
be available (see Section 4), and therefore our proposal exploits the statistical
properties of quantifiable observations.
We apply our method to the Dutch historical censuses dataset (1795-1971).
One fundamental problem with time series like these is backwards comparability.
Several techniques have been developed to allow consistent comparison across
versions, like classification schemes and mapping of concepts. In our case, year-
dependent classification schemes and mappings of occupations with a historical
standardized classification are available. We apply extensional drift detection to
support these knowledge engineering tasks, finding that 42 out of 217 (19.35%)
concepts suffer extensional concept drift.
This is useful for three different user communities. First, users without sta-
tistical skills will be aware of data anomalies without the need of running any
concept drift detection method again. Second, social historians will gain insight
on social dynamics of the past, as they may recognise drifted concepts that ex-
plain some historical reality. Third, generic users will benefit of concept drift
aware applications, that will retrieve more reliable data considering these drifts.
Tracing the dynamics of meaning is not free of obstacles. First, since concept
drift can take years to occur, data covering a large time range is necessary. Such
historical datasets are often very messy and heterogeneous, and querying them
successfully and reliably is not trivial. Second, finding an appropriate implemen-
tation for extensional drift is an arduous task because of the existence of multiple
statistical tests covering a large variety of situations. To answer the first ques-
tion, we propose a SPARQL query template for RDF Data Cube datasets. This
template can be used to generate all the queries needed to retrieve statistical
data. With respect to the second question, we study our source data distribution
and we propose a statistical hypothesis that can be accepted or rejected using a
statistical test.
This paper is organised as follows. In Section 2 we describe the state of
the art in concept drift and statistical data publishing. In Section 3 we set
the formal framework for the study of concept drift. In Section 4 we describe an
experiment to detect and report extensional concept drift in the Dutch historical
occupational census dataset. Finally, in Section 5 we establish some conclusions
and further work.
2
2 Related Work
Concept drift is a very active research topic in Machine Learning [21], where it
is defined as the situation in which the statistical properties of a target variable
change over time in unforeseen ways. Learning from data streams in such a situ-
ation requires a concept drift detection method [1,4,8,17]. On the Semantic Web,
concept drift relates to the study of the dynamics of meaning. In ontologies, this
is addressed in ontology change and evolution management ([7,10,14]). Fanizzi et
al. [5] propose a method based on clustering similar instances. But Description
Logics have also addressed the related problem of detecting differences between
ontologies [9]. To the best of our knowledge, the work of Wang et al. [22,15] is
the only concept drift formalization in a Semantic Web setting.
Although concept drift is the central topic in this paper, we also consider
important to mention contributions about statistical data publishing on the Web.
SDMX6 is the ISO standard for statistical data exchange. The representation
of statistical data as Linked Data started with SCOVO [12] and continued with
the RDF Data Cube vocabulary [3], which is SDMX compatible. Closely related
to our use case, there is work on publishing statistical Linked Open Government
Data [20], and concretely census data7 [6,16,18].
3 Concept Drift
The world is continuously changing, and concepts also change over time. A con-
cept refers to different objects, real or abstract, at different points in time. For
instance, the concept Manager refers to different types of occupations in 1795
and in 2013. We use the formalisation framework described by Wang et al. [22]
in order to address change of meaning over time.
Definition 1. The meaning of a concept C is a triple (label(C),int(C),ext(C)),
where label(C) is a string, int(C) a set of properties (the intension of C), and
ext(C) a subset of the universe (the extension of C).
All the elements of the meaning of a concept can change. To address concept
identity over time, Wang et al. [22] assume that the intension of a concept C
is the disjoint union of a rigid and a non-rigid set of properties (i.e. (intr (C) ∪
intnr (C))). Then, a concept is uniquely identified by some essential properties
that do not change. The notion of identity allows the comparison of two variants
of a concept at different points in time, even if a change on its meaning occurs.
Definition 2. Two concepts C1 and C2 are considered identical if and only if,
their rigid intension are equivalent, i.e., intr (C1 ) = intr (C2 ).
If two variants of a concept at two different times have the same meaning,
there is no concept drift. We define intensional, extensional, and label similarity
6
http://www.sdmx.org/
7
See the US case, http://www.rdfabout.com/demo/census/
3
functions simint , simext , simlabel to quantify meaning similarity. Each of these
functions has range [0, 1], and a similarity value of 1 indicates equality.
Definition 3. A concept has extensionally drifted in two of its variants C’ and
C”, if and only if, simext (C 0 , C 00 ) 6= 1. Intensional and label drift are defined
similarly.
To apply this framework of concept drift it is required to define intension, ex-
tension and labelling functions, and to define similarity functions over intension,
extension and labels. We define these functions in Section 4.4.
4 Concept Drift in the Dutch Historical Censuses
Concept drift is a fundamental issue to be addressed in the Semantic Web,
especially in historical datasets. In this section we describe the implementation
of a method to identify and report extensional concept drift in a subset of the
Dutch historical occupational censuses. Due to the time period the censuses
cover (1795-1971) many concepts may have drifted [2]. We preprocess data in
a typical data mining setting, and we detect extensional concept drift using
standard statistical tools. Additionally, we propose and illustrate a pull-push
statistical workflow that enriches the queried endpoint back with our results.
4.1 Linking and Publishing the Census
The Dutch historical censuses dataset8 comprises 507 Excel workbooks con-
taining 2,288 census tables. These tables have been created by hand, using the
digitized images of the original census books. Census data refers here only to
aggregated data (i.e. counts of people meeting certain conditions). Microdata
(i.e. data about individuals) is not available in this dataset. Each census table
describes a portion of the population, occupation or housing census of a certain
year. In this experiment we use tables of the occupational census in the province
of Noord-Holland in the years 1889 and 1899. Due to the late industrialization
of the Netherlands in the 19th century, data of this time and region are inclined
to contain more drastic changes in the occupational landscape.
Figure 1 shows the layout of one of these tables. In order to publish them as
Linked Data, we implement a supervised Excel to RDF Converter: TabLinker9 .
TabLinker uses markup of cells to distinguish the different table elements: table
name, data cells, column headers, row properties, row headers, hierarchical row
headers, and metadata. Users need to manually style these table regions.
TabLinker uses a per-cell data model according to the RDF Data Cube vo-
cabulary. We use the term observation to describe a data cell and its context
(d2s:isObservation a qb:Observation). A data cell is linked to a number of
dimensions (d2s:dimension a qb:DimensionProperty) that correspond to the
8
http://www.volkstellingen.nl
9
https://github.com/Data2Semantics/TabLinker
4
Fig. 1: Table of the occupational census of 1889, province of Noord-Holland. Legend
illustrates identified cell regions (colours are merely indicative).
column and row headers of that cell. The content of a data cell is always a number
counting population (d2s:populationSize a qb:MeasureProperty). TabLinker
generates an interpretation of the table layout, reading table cell regions (see leg-
end in Figure 1). Data cells contain the census counts. ColHeaders and RowHead-
ers contain classifications of age ranges and occupations, describing the numbers
in their respective columns and rows. RowProperties link dimension nodes within
an anonymous qb:Observation node, which is attached to a d2s:Data instance
via a d2s:isObservation property. Cells marked as HRowHeaders contain hier-
archical classifications, and TabLinker generates skos:broader triples for these
conveniently. Data cells are linked to their corresponding ColHeader and Row-
Header cells as Data Cube dimensions (CellN28 d2s:dimension A, B). One
named graph is built per table.
4.2 Querying Cubes
After the table markup, we run TabLinker on the selected files, and we expose
the generated named graphs in a SPARQL endpoint.10
Querying these graphs in an homogeneous way is challenging [16]. The tables
from which they are generated are messy and inconsistent with respect to the
layout (i.e. where things are located). They are extremelly sensitive to language
changes (i.e. how things are labelled). In some cases, modelling and political
decisions (e.g. in which group an individual has to be counted) also make com-
parisons difficult. To solve this, we design a SPARQL template that exploits
10
http://lod.cedar-project.nl:8080/sparql/cedar
5
1 PREFIX qb:
2 PREFIX d2s:
3 PREFIX skos:
4 PREFIX ns:
5
6 SELECT ?d1label ... ?dnlabel ?p1label ... ?pmlabel ?population
7 FROM
8 WHERE {
9 ?cell d2s:isObservation [ a qb:Observation ;
10 qb:DimensionProperty ?d1 ... ?dn ;
11 ns:property1 ?p1 ;
12 ...
13 ns:propertym ?pm ;
14 qb:MeasureProperty ?population ] .
15 OPTIONAL {
16 ?cell d2s:isObservation [ns:propertyk ?pk ] .
17 ?pk skos:prefLabel ?pk label . }
18 ...
19 OPTIONAL {
20 ?cell d2s:isObservation [qb:DimensionProperty ?dl ] .
21 ?dl skos:prefLabel ?dllabel . }
22 ?pt skos:broader ?pu .
23 ?pu skos:broader ?pv .
24 d1 ... dn skos:prefLabel ?d1label ... ?dnlabel .
25 p1 ... pm skos:prefLabel ?p1label ... ?pmlabel .
26 FILTER (?d1 IN (v1 , ..., vr )) ...
27 FILTER (?dn IN (w1 , ..., ws ))
28 }
Listing 1.1: SPARQL template for homogeneous querying. qb:DimensionProperty and
qb:MeasureProperty can be replaced by other predicates of the same type.
the different cell regions (see Section 4.1) and accommodates a generic querying
situation.
This query template is shown in Listing 1.1. To fill the template and generate
valid SPARQL, first the user must manually choose which variables to query
(line 6). Second, other more trivial queries aid the user to fill in the row property
predicates (property1 ...propertym , lines 11-13). Third, optional variables must be
enclosed in OPTIONAL graph patterns (lines 15-21). Fourth, hierarchical properties
must be traversed if necessary (lines 22-23). Fifth, labels need to be retrieved
to avoid the presence of URIs in the resultset (lines 24-25). Finally, valid values
for selected dimension variables need to be filtered out (lines 26-27). Some other
queries help the user to assign which values belong to which variables.
We follow this procedure to generate the queries needed for our case.11 As
a result, we get translations of RDF Data Cube into very redundant resultsets
that can be mined in a statistical environment. In this experiment we use R [19].
11
https://raw.github.com/albertmeronyo/ConceptDrift/master/sparql/
queries.txt
6
4.3 Preprocessing Census Data
We use the method presented in Section 4.2 to query RDF Data Cube census data
and get them into R via the SPARQL R package [11]. We select the variables age
range, position, gender, marital status, municipality, occupation and population
for the two years. A sample of the retrieved data frames is shown in Table 1.
Age range Position Gender M. status Municipality Occupation Population
36-50 A M G Velsen Aanemers 3
51-60 B V O Zaandam Agenten 1
23-35 C VROUWEN O. Haarlem Ambtenaren 2
en beambten
36-50 A MANNEN G. Weesp Afwerken van 5
huizen
Table 1: Sample rows of the data frame returned by the SPARQL queries. The first two
belong to the first dataset, last two to the second. Position stands for an occupational
rank (A indicates directors or business owners, C ordinary workers). M, MANNEN
stand for men; V, VROUWEN for women; and G, O for married and unmarried, re-
spectivelly. Aanemers are contractors, agenten are manufacturer’s agents, ambtenaren
en beambten are civil workers and afwerken van huizen are house finishers.
However, data still present the issue of non normalized values. Some variable
values may not be comparable by design, like age ranges (e.g. 21-26 and 26-31
versus 21-23 and 24-31), although in our constrained data age ranges are totally
compatible. Normalization of factor labels in comparable variables is solved by
replacing the original values with standard ones. This is the case for the variables
gender (M/V and MANNEN/VROUWEN are replaced by Male/Female) and marital
status (G/O and G./O. by Married/Unmarried). The variable position is already
normalized in the raw data (values A/B/C/D).
We use external data sources to normalize complex variables that radically
changed between time periods, like municipality and occupation. Concretely, we
rely on existing mappings between occupation labels and unique identifiers of
the Historical International Standard Classification of Occupations (HISCO).12
These mappings are manually established by experts, pairing each occupation
appearance in the census tables with one (and only one) HISCO code.13 HISCO
codes follow a tree-like structure: code 12310, for instance, refers to occupational
titles under the micro group 12310 (Notary), unit group 123 (Notaries), minor
group 12 (Jurists), and major group 1 (Professional, technical and related work-
ers). Only mappings with micro groups (i.e. five number codes), which are the
leaves of the tree, are allowed.
Finally, we perform some cleaning, removing incomplete rows, partial total
population aggregations, aggregations at the province level, and aggregations of
smaller villages that only appear in one of the two datasets.
12
http://historyofwork.iisg.nl/
13
See https://github.com/albertmeronyo/ConceptDrift/tree/master/stats
7
Normal Q−Q Plot Normal Q−Q Plot
1500
2000
Sample Quantiles
Sample Quantiles
1000
1000
500
500
0
0
−4 −2 0 2 4 −4 −2 0 2 4
Theoretical Quantiles Theoretical Quantiles
Fig. 2: Normal QQ-plots of all population counts of the 1889 and 1899 occupation tables
of Noord-Holland. Both plots reveal non-normality of their distributions.
4.4 Extensional Concept Drift
We are interested in identifying extensionally drifted concepts in the census, that
is, simext (C 0 , C 00 ) 6= 1 for two given variants C 0 , C 00 of a concept C (see Section
3). Intuitively, this means that the instances of C have changed significantly.
We interpret extensional concept drift in a statistical setting. We define the
extension function ext(C) as the function that returns the number of individuals
that belong to C, and the extension similarity function simext (C 0 , C 00 ) as the
function that returns the probablity that C 0 and C 00 have identical populations.
Hence, we assume that the extension of C has drifted between C 0 and C 00 iff
the populations of C 0 and C 00 are non identical (there is a shift between the
populations of C 0 and C 00 ) (see Section 3).
Using the data of Section 4.3, we want to know if population counts of people
having the same occupations in Noord-Holland have identical data distributions
between the years 1889 and 1899. Without assuming the data to have normal dis-
tribution (see Figure 2), we want to test at .05 significance level if the population
counts for a given occupation have identical data distributions.
The null hypothesis H0 is that the population counts of the two sample years
are identical populations. To test the hypothesis, we run the Wilcoxon signed-
rank test that comes with the R distribution [23]. Since the Wilcoxon test is
symmetric, we assume simext (C 0 , C 00 ) = simext (C 00 , C 0 ).
For example, the occupation Contractors, which has been normalized in both
datasets with the HISCO code 21240 (see Section 4.3), has the population data
arrays shown in Listing 1.2. We run the wilcox.test function using these arrays,
concluding that the population of contractors in Noord-Holland in the years 1889
and 1899 are statistically identical populations (p > 0.05, N = 42, Wilcoxon
signed-rank test). Consequently, there is no extensional drift in this case.
In order to have a complete overview on what occupational concepts drifted in
this period, we extract all common HISCO codes in both datasets and iteratively
run the Wilcoxon test on their population data. The first and second dataset have
57 and 88 non-common HISCO codes, respectivelly. 42 out of the 217 (19.35%)
common HISCO codes are found to have p-values under the 0.05 threshold,
8
1 > x <- df1889[df1889.hisco$HISCO == ’21240’,’population’]
2 [1] 3 1 1 2 2 1 3 1 1 10 10 5 2 1 1 1 1 4 1 4 1 1
3 1 2 1 8 2 1 2 5 1 50 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1
4 [41] 1 1
5 > y <- df1899[df1899.hisco$HISCO == ’21240’,’population’]
6 [1] 20 3 1 3 1 30 10 5 4 1 4 10 1 9 1 3 1 8 1 4 4 1
7 1 2 1 1 1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1
8 [41] 1 2
9 > wilcox.test(x, y)
10
11 Wilcoxon rank sum test with continuity correction
12
13 data: x and y
14 W = 830, p-value = 0.6063
15 alternative hypothesis: true location shift is not equal to 0
Listing 1.2: Arrays of population counts in 1889 and 1899 in Noord-Holland of HISCO
code 21240 (contractors).
resulting in rejection of H0 and consequently denoting extensional concept drift.
Table 2 shows extensionally drifted and stable codes and major groups.
4.5 Reporting Back
The statistical linked data workflow we have followed works only one way. In
Section 4.2 we connect the endpoint and the statistical environment online. In
Section 4.4, we execute the drift method task offline, and chances are that the
results are kept offline too. This generates a pull-not-push workflow, where data
consumers are limited to only read SPARQL endpoints. Further queries will not
retrieve these results, lowering their reusability and reproducibility. We propose
to provide straightforward updates to the endpoint to push results. In particular,
our recommendation is that every statistical analysis on the Web should start
with a SPARQL SELECT and end up with one (or more) SPARQL UPDATEs.
We want users to know that some occupational concepts extensionally drifted
between two time periods. Since the different variants of these concepts and the
time they belong to are encoded in their URIs, we link these with an appropriate
predicate and assign it a weight. We define this weight as the previously com-
puted p-value between the two variants (see Section 4.4). We build a SPARQL
UPDATE query (see Listing 1.3) iterating over all common HISCO codes URIs.
We execute it against the same endpoint and named graph the original data
were retrieved from.
5 Conclusions and Further Work
In this paper we present a workflow to detect and report extensional concept drift
in statistical Linked Data, raising the importance of concept drift in statistical
9
HISCO Occupation p-value HISCO Occupation p-value
97125 Loader of ship, truck, 1.83e-10 53190 Other cooks 1.00
wagon or airplane 75452 Lace weaver 1.00
21110 General manager 4.23e-09 75490 Other weavers 1.00
41025 Working proprietor 1.52e-08 75990 Other spinners, 1.00
(wholesale, retail weavers, knitters,
trade) dyers
79100 Tailor 7.75e-07 77690 Other bakers, pas- 1.00
57030 Barber, hairdresser 1.17e-04 try cooks and confec-
88010 Jeweller 1.84e-04 tionery makers
(a) Occupations with stronger ext. drift. (b) Occupations with greater ext. stability.
Group Type p-value Group Type p-value
7, 8, 9 Production, trans- 2.03e-19 6 Agriculture, an- 0.38
port, operators imal husbandry,
5 Service workers 1.88e-12 fishermen, hunters
4 Sales workers 2.94e-08 0, 1 Professional and 0.16
2 Administrative and 4.20e-08 technical
managerial 3 Clerical 1.40e-04
(c) Major groups with stronger ext. drift. (d) Major groups with greater ext. stability.
Table 2: Wilcoxon test p-values per HISCO code ((a),(b)) and major group ((c),(d)).
analyses. The study of the dynamics of meaning in variables and values is critical,
because uncontrolled concept drift produces wrong results in queries. In our use
case, about one fifth of all analysed concepts present extensional concept drift.
These results are consistent with the slow industrialization of the Netherlands
in the 19th century. Entrepreneurs put emphasis on trade rather than industry,
although results show important variations in both groups. In this paper we only
take extensional drift into account. Deciding to what extent this extensional drift
implies a change on the meaning of a concept without a joint analysis of intension
and labelling drift can be misleading. We address this below as future work.
We motivate the straightforward good practice of publishing such results
back to the endpoint, closing a pull-push cycle. Non statistically versed Linked
Data users will appreciate relevant statistical conclusions shared by others. Other
domain experts, social historians in our case, will find out new metadata pushing
forward their historical theses. Generic users will benefit from reusability and
reproduciblity of results. All workflows in statistical Linked Data should begin
with a SPARQL SELECT and finish with at least one SPARQL UPDATE.
We plan further work at several levels. First, we are working on releasing
the HISCO normalization mappings we use as Linked Data, as well as an RDF
version of HISCO. Additionally, we will make available a description of the d2s
vocabulary as TabLinker matures, as well as a drift vocabulary when the study
of its semantics becomes broader. Second, we plan to scale up the study of
extensional drift in this dataset by including more census tables, minimizing
user intervention on normalization of values by using embedded value mappings
[13]. We will put special emphasis on how the method works depending on the
10
1 PREFIX d2s:
2 PREFIX d2s1889:
3 PREFIX d2s1899:
4
5 INSERT DATA {
6 GRAPH {
7 d2s1889:Sjouwerlieden d2s:isDrift [
8 d2s:extDrift d2s1899:Expeditie_bevrachters_bestellers_sjouwerlieden ,
9 d2s1899:Personeel_voor_laden_en_lossen ,
10 d2s1899:Personeel_voor_lading_en_lossing ,
11 d2s1899:Sjouwerlieden ;
12 d2s:weight 1.83e-10 ] . } }
Listing 1.3: Excerpt of the SPARQL query reporting back extensionally drifted occu-
pational concepts. Only the drift for one occupational concept is shown. Inverse drifts
from the second graph to the first are also issued.
time gap between the data snapshots. We will study how the method works for
other variables, like age ranges and municipalities. Finally, we aim at completing
the study of concept drift by integrating intensional and labelling drift. We will
leverage Linked Data to obtain additional knowledge about basic properties of
these concepts and their linguistic characteristics.
Acknowledgements The work on which this paper is based has been partly supported by the
Computational Humanities Programme of the Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences,
under the auspices of the CEDAR project. For further information, see http://ehumanities.nl. This
work has been supported as well by the Dutch national program COMMIT.
References
1. Baena-García, M., del Campo-Ávila, J., Fidalgo, R., Bifet, A., Gavaldà, R.,
Morales-Bueno, R.: Early Drift Detection Method. In: Proc. ECML/PKDD 2006,
Workshop on Knowledge Discovery from Data Streams. pp. 77–86 (2006)
2. Boonstra, O., Doorn, P., van Horik, M., van Maarseveen, J., Oudhof, J.: Twee
eeuwen Nederland geteld. Onderzoek met de digitale Volks-, Beroeps- en Won-
ingtellingen 1795–2001. DANS en CBS (2007)
3. Cyganiak, R., Reynolds, D., Tennison, J.: The RDF Data Cube Vocabu-
lary. Tech. rep., World Wide Web Consortium (2013), http://www.w3.org/TR/
vocab-data-cube/
4. Dries, A., Rückert, U.: Adaptive Concept Drift Detection. Statistical Analysis and
Data Mining 2(5–6), 311–327 (2009)
5. Fanizzi, N., d’Amato, C., Esposito, F.: Conceptual Clustering: Concept Formation,
Drift and Novelty Detection. In: The Semantic Web: Research and Applications,
5th European Semantic Web Conference. LNCS 5021. pp. 318–332. Springer (2008)
6. Fernández, J.D., Martínez-Prieto, M.A., Gutiérrez, C.: Publishing open statistical
data: the Spanish census. In: Proceedings of the 12th Annual International Confer-
ence on Digital Government Research, DG.O 2011. pp. 20–25. ACM International
Conference Proceeding Series (2011)
7. Flouris, G., Manakanatas, D., Kondylakis, H., Plexousakis, D., Antoniou, G.: On-
tology change: classification and survey. The Knowledge Engineering Review 23(2),
117–152 (2008)
11
8. Gama, J., Medas, P., Castillo, G., Rodrigues, P.P.: Learning With Drift Detection.
In: Advances in Artificial Intelligence - SBIA 2004, 17th Brazilian Symposium on
Artificial Intelligence. LNCS 3171. vol. 3171, pp. 286–295. Springer (2004)
9. Gonçalves, R.S., Parsia, B., Sattler, U.: Analysing Multiple Versions of an Ontol-
ogy : A Study of the NCI Thesaurus. In: Proceedings of the 24th International
Workshop on Description Logics (DL 2011). vol. 745. CEUR Workshop Proceed-
ings (2011), http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-745/
10. Gulla, J.A., Solskinnsbakk, G., Myrseth, P., Haderlein, V., Cerrato, O.: Semantic
Drift in Ontologies. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Web
Information Systems and Technologies. vol. 2. INSTICC Press (2010)
11. van Hage, W.R., with contributions from: Tomi Kauppinen, Graeler, B., Davis,
C., Hoeksema, J., Ruttenberg, A., Bahls., D.: SPARQL: SPARQL client (2013),
http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=SPARQL, R package version 1.15
12. Hausenblas, M., Halb, W., Raimond, Y., Feigenbaum, L., Ayers, D.: SCOVO: Us-
ing Statistics on the Web of Data. In: The Semantic Web: Research and Applica-
tions, 6th European Semantic Web Conference. LNCS 5554. vol. 5554, pp. 708–722.
Springer (2009)
13. Jaiswal, A.: On Statistical Schema Matching with Embedded Value Mappings.
Ph.D. thesis, The Pennsylvania State University (2012)
14. Klein, M.: Change Management for Distributed Ontologies. Ph.D. thesis, VU Uni-
versity Amsterdam (2004)
15. Meroño-Peñuela, A.: Semantic Web for the Humanities. In: The Semantic Web:
Semantics and Big Data, 10th European Semantic Web Conference. LNCS 7882.
pp. 645–649. Springer (2013)
16. Meroño-Peñuela, A., Ashkpour, A., Rietveld, L., Hoekstra, R., Schlobach, S.:
Linked Humanities Data: The Next Frontier? A Case-study in Historical Cen-
sus Data. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Linked Science
(LISC2012). International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC). vol. 951. CEUR
Workshop Proceedings (2012), http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-951/
17. Nishida, K., Yamauchi, K.: Detecting Concept Drift Using Statistical Testing. In:
Discovery Science, 10th International Conference. Proceedings of DS 2007. LNCS
4755. vol. 4755, pp. 264–269. Springer (2007)
18. Petrou, I., Papastefanatos, G., Dalamagas, T.: Publishing Census as Linked Open
Data. A Case Study. In: 2nd International Workshop on Open Data, WOD
2013 (2013), http://www-etis.ensea.fr/WOD2013/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/
casestudyPetrou.pdf
19. R Core Team: R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foun-
dation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria (2013), http://www.R-project.
org/
20. Salas, P.E.R., Martin, M., Mota, F.M.D., Auer, S., Breitman, K., Casanova, M.A.:
Publishing Statistical Data on the Web. In: Proceedings, 6th IEEE International
Conference on Semantic Computing. pp. 285–292. IEEE Computer Society (2012)
21. Tsymbal, A.: The problem of concept drift: definitions and related work. Tech. Rep.
TCD-CS-2004-15, Computer Science Department, Trinity College Dublin (2004)
22. Wang, S., Schlobach, S., Klein, M.C.A.: What Is Concept Drift and How to Measure
It? In: Knowledge Engineering and Management by the Masses - 17th International
Conference, EKAW 2010. Proceedings. pp. 241–256. Lecutre Notes in Computer
Science, 6317, Springer (2010)
23. Wilcoxon, F.: Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics Bulletin
1(6), 80–83 (1945)
12