<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Exploring Climate Change and Its Impact on Agriculture Using Volunteered Geographic Information</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Hamed Mehdipoor</string-name>
          <email>h.mehdipoor@utwente.nl</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Department of Geo-Information Processing, Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Enschede</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="NL">The Netherlands</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>The PhD research exposed in this paper aims to develop workflows for fine scale study of climate change and its impact on agriculture using volunteered geographic information in phenology. First, a consistency checking workflow was developed to ensure the quality of volunteered observations. Next, by using novel predictors, spatio-temporal variation in plant phenology is modeled so that we can move from point-related to gridded phenological products. After that, long term gridded time series of phenological data relevant to agriculture is generated using the developed phenological models.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>VGI</kwd>
        <kwd>consistency checking</kwd>
        <kwd>spatio-temporal modelling</kwd>
        <kwd>machine learning</kwd>
        <kwd>contextual geo-information</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1 Introduction</title>
      <p>
        Progress on information and communication technologies and on location‐
aware devices has radically eased the way in which “non‐experts” can
produce geo-information. Many “non‐experts” can now collect distribute and, even,
analyze geo-information on a voluntary basis. This has resulted in a variety of new
data, which fall into the realm of what has been called volunteered geographic
information or VGI (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ). VGI-based projects monitoring the status of our planet at
relatively fine spatial and temporal scales provide scientists with a novel source of
geo-information.
      </p>
      <p>
        VGI consistency is, however, a major concern, especially when it is used in
modelling activities (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2 ref3">2, 3</xref>
        ). This is because there is always a degree of spatial and
temporal inconsistencies in the actual locations and time of the volunteered
observations. Volunteers do not often follow scientific principles of sampling design,
and levels of expertise vary among them (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4 ref5 ref6">4-6</xref>
        ). Moreover, unlike traditional
geographic information, VGI typically lacks automated consistency checks as current
approaches mostly rely on human interventions (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3 ref7">3, 7</xref>
        ). Human-based approaches
are costly and time-consuming, and are impracticable in many situations such as
monitoring of fast-changing phenomena.
      </p>
      <p>
        Another concern with use of the fine resolution VGI is finding a robust
modelling approach which accounts for potential spatial and temporal bias in
volunteered observations. For example, often, VGI is collected where is near to human
residences or on weekends or public holidays (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8 ref9">8, 9</xref>
        ). Current spatio-temporal
modelling approaches that solely rely on statistical algorithms cannot provide accurate
predictions in the presence of such biases in the data. In addition, a variety of
spatio-temporal contextual information is now available more than ever before, while,
the modelling approaches are not efficient to apply such valuable, but
highdimensional, sources of input data.
      </p>
      <p>Yet, there is a lack of robust workflows that address the above mentioned
concerns. This PhD research aims to design and to test workflows that facilitate the
use of VGI in terms of consistency check and spatio-temporal modelling. These
workflows use VGI, contextual geo-information and computational processing
power to achieve the aim using VGI in phenology.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2 Volunteered phenological observations</title>
      <p>The world is experiencing climate change and this raises several pressing
questions. An important one is “How does climate change affect human abilities to
secure agricultural products?”. Phenology, the science of the timing of seasonal
plant and animal activities, provides relevant spatio-temporal information to
answer this question. Phenological ground observations contain the location and
time of species life cycle events (e.g. plant first flowering) and are often collected
by volunteers, called volunteered phenological observations (VPOs) in this
research.</p>
      <p>
        VPOs provide timely phenological data at almost no cost as well as extensive
spatial and temporal coverage (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
        ). However, there are differences in the
collection protocols and in the quality level of VPOs, which negatively affects the
consistency and modelling of the phenological observations (11). Alternatively,
phenological models are another way to obtain information about seasonal plant and
animal activities. They predict the timing of events according to contextual
environmental information such as climatic information, which typically are available
at larger coverage and longer time than VPOs (12). In this way, the lack of
complete period-of-observations on phenology could be compensated (13).
      </p>
      <p>The most of current phenological models have been calibrated using spatially
and temporally biased and inconsistent VPOs as well as point-related climatic
information (14, 15). These affect the accuracy of model outputs at locations other
than the location where climatic data and VPOs are available. In this PhD
research, we develop workflows that facilitate the study of climate change and its
impact on agriculture by 1) providing consistent VPOs about plants, 2) modelling
spatio-temporal variation in plant phenology at fine spatial and temporal scales
using heterogeneous data sources and machine learning and 3) generating long term
gridded time series of phenological data relevant to agriculture by making use of
VPOs and correlated observations relevant to agriculture. This information can
feed agricultural decision-makers and farmers to understand how to secure
agricultural products from climate change. From a geoscience point of view, realizing
the workflows introduces potentially novel computational approaches to analyze,
model and mine VGI.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3 The workflows</title>
      <p>To date, the checking consistency workflow (16) was designed and tested on a
dataset that contains the location, the year and the day of the year of the first
flower of cloned lilac shrubs (17). The geographic extent of this dataset covers the
contiguous United States and observations were available from 1980 to 2013. The
most detailed set of climatic data for the US, namely the DAYMET database1 was
used as contextual spatio-temporal geo-information.</p>
      <p>The proposed workflow requires three steps to identify inconsistent
observations (Fig 1). Clustering the observations based on the contextual condition in
which they were collected provides considerable information about the variability
that one should expect in the observations. When the contextual information is
high-dimensional, mapping it to a low-dimensional space facilitates both the
clustering and the subsequent visualization steps. Once the observations are assigned
to clusters, inconsistency is identified by looking at the outliers present in each
cluster.</p>
      <p>Fig 1. The main steps of the workflow for identifying inconsistencies in VPOs
The second workflow (Fig 2) aims to create a novel plant phenology model.
For this purpose, appropriate machine learning methods will be applied on gridded
meteorological data, gridded digital elevation model data and available VPOs. In
the third workflow (Fig 3) gridded time series of phenological data relevant to
agriculture are generated. On one hand, ground-based observations relevant to
agri1 http://daymet.ornl.gov/dataaccess.html
culture are sparse and thus less appropriate than gridded time series of
phenological data to study trends and changes potentially attributable to climate change. On
the other hand, the generation of gridded time series of phenological data relevant
to agriculture faces lack of data at appropriate scales to link contextual
environmental information to ground-based relevant to agriculture.</p>
      <p>Correlation
checking
yes interpolation
Fig 2. The workflow for creating the spatio-temporal plant phenology model
In summary, VGI-based initiatives can use the workflows in phenology but
also in other environmental applications. The workflows are based on machine
power which clearly makes quality checking and data modelling less
timeconsuming and more accurate respectively. However, the efficiency of the
workflows needs to be evaluated in other real-world case studies, which is considered
as the perspective of this study.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Acknowledgements</title>
      <p>
        I am grateful to AGILE for providing opportunities to develop this position paper
through third AGILE PhD-School 2015. I would like to thank Prof. Alexis
Comber for his valuable comments during the school.
economic impact, proceedings 31 March to 2 April, 2003 Wageningen, The
Netherlands. 2004.
11. Yanenko O, Schlieder C. Enhancing the Quality of Volunteered
Geographic Information: A Constraint-Based Approach. Bridging the Geographic
Information Sciences. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography:
Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2012. p. 429-46.
12. Chuine I, de Cortazar-Atauri IG, Kramer K, Hänninen H. Plant
Development Models. Phenology: An Integrative Environmental Science:
Springer; 2013. p. 275-93.
13. Schwartz MD. Monitoring global change with phenology: the case of the
spring green wave. Int J Biometeorol. 1994;38(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ):18-22.
14. Hamunyela E, Verbesselt J, Roerink G, Herold M. Trends in Spring
Phenology of Western European Deciduous Forests. Remote Sensing.
2013;5(12):6159-79.
15. Chmielewski F-M. Phenology in Agriculture and Horticulture.
Phenology: An Integrative Environmental Science: Springer; 2013. p. 539-61.
16. Mehdipoor H, Zurita-Milla R, Rosemartin AH, Gerst K, Weltzin JF.
Developing a Workflow to Identify Inconsistencies in Volunteered Geographic
Information: A Phenological Case Study. PLoS ONE. 2015.
17. Rosemartin AH, Denny EG, Weltzin JF, Lee Marsh R, Wilson BE,
Mehdipoor H, et al. Lilac and honeysuckle phenology data 1956–2014. Sci Data.
2015;2:150038.
      </p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Goodchild</surname>
            <given-names>MF</given-names>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography</article-title>
          .
          <source>Geojournal</source>
          .
          <year>2007</year>
          ;
          <volume>69</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>211</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>21</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Flanagin</surname>
            <given-names>AJ</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Metzger MJ</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>The credibility of volunteered geographic information</article-title>
          .
          <source>Geojournal</source>
          .
          <year>2008</year>
          ;
          <volume>72</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>137</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>48</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Goodchild</surname>
            <given-names>MF</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Li</surname>
            <given-names>L. Assuring</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>the quality of volunteered geographic information</article-title>
          .
          <source>Spat Stat</source>
          .
          <year>2012</year>
          ;
          <volume>1</volume>
          :
          <fpage>110</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>20</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kelling</surname>
            <given-names>S</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Yu</surname>
            <given-names>J</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gerbracht</surname>
            <given-names>J</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wong</surname>
            <given-names>WK</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , editors.
          <source>Emergent Filters: Automated Data Verification in a Large-scale Citizen Science Project. eScienceW;</source>
          <year>2011</year>
          : IEEE.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5.
          <string-name>
            <surname>See</surname>
            <given-names>L</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Comber</surname>
            <given-names>A</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Salk</surname>
            <given-names>C</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fritz</surname>
            <given-names>S</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>van der Velde</surname>
            <given-names>M</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Perger</surname>
            <given-names>C</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , et al.
          <article-title>Comparing the quality of crowdsourced data contributed by expert and nonexperts</article-title>
          .
          <source>PLoS ONE</source>
          .
          <year>2013</year>
          ;
          <volume>8</volume>
          (
          <issue>7</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>e69958</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Comber</surname>
            <given-names>A</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Brunsdon</surname>
            <given-names>C</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>See</surname>
            <given-names>L</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fritz</surname>
            <given-names>S</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>McCallum</surname>
            <given-names>I</given-names>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Comparing Expert and Non-expert Conceptualisations of the Land: An Analysis of Crowdsourced Land Cover Data</article-title>
          .
          <source>Spatial Information Theory. Lecture Notes in Computer Science</source>
          .
          <volume>8116</volume>
          : Springer International Publishing;
          <year>2013</year>
          . p.
          <fpage>243</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>60</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Elwood</surname>
            <given-names>S</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Goodchild</surname>
            <given-names>M</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sui</surname>
            <given-names>D</given-names>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Prospects for VGI Research and the Emerging Fourth Paradigm</article-title>
          . Crowdsourcing Geographic Knowledge: Springer Netherlands;
          <year>2013</year>
          . p.
          <fpage>361</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>75</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          8.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Reddy</surname>
            <given-names>S</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dávalos</surname>
            <given-names>LM</given-names>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Geographical sampling bias and its implications for conservation priorities in Africa</article-title>
          .
          <source>J Biogeogr</source>
          .
          <year>2003</year>
          ;
          <volume>30</volume>
          (
          <issue>11</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>1719</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>27</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          9.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sparks</surname>
            <given-names>TH</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Huber</surname>
            <given-names>K</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Tryjanowski P.
          <article-title>Something for the weekend? Examining the bias in avian phenological recording</article-title>
          .
          <source>Int J Biometeorol</source>
          .
          <year>2008</year>
          ;
          <volume>52</volume>
          (
          <issue>6</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>505</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>10</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          10.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Vliet</surname>
            <given-names>AJH</given-names>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Challenging times: towards an operational system for monitoring, modelling and forecasting of phenological changes and their socio-</article-title>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>