<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>International Workshop
on Socio-Technical Perspective held on June</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2016</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>14</volume>
      <issue>2016</issue>
      <abstract>
        <p>Importance of socio-technical perspective in research and practice A socio-technical perspective sees an organization as an emergent whole of multiple systems view - in this perspective a multiplicity of emergent combinations of what may appear as two systems is a key feature - a social system and a technical system as one indivisible whole. The real pattern of behaviour in the organization is determined by the interaction of two. While analysing management problems of getting things done by people, adequate consideration should be given to technology as well as informal and formal interactions of people. Despite that a socio-technical perspective has been around for over a half century, it is often forgotten in the IS discourse today. Consequently, many “new approaches” appear to reflect on IS systems problems, such as modern IT systems poorly adjusted to the external or/and internal environment (e.g. market, organizational culture) of organizations in which they are (to be) deployed. We strongly believe that it is high time the social-technical perspective took its proper place in IS research, practice and teaching.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>per we discuss the potential to Educate Students to Gamified Design Thinking. With
the fourth paper we continue with a more technical concern and discuss Hyper
Contextual Security Knowledge Management for Open Source Software. In the fifth and
last paper of the session we explore the potential with Evaluating Socio-Technical
Systems with Heuristics – a Feasible Approach?</p>
      <p>The last session of the workshop is discussing how to conduct research and
teaching in the socio-technical domain. It is designed to capture both the breadth and depth
of socio-technical perspective. All and all, these second workshop proceedings have
hopefully set a good broad base for discussion and debate on the strength and
weakness of a socio-technical perspective in the information systems research and teaching
domain.</p>
      <p>Acknowledgements
The organizers are grateful to the members of Program Committee for their excellent
work of reviewing submitted papers in short time. We are also thankful to Easy-Chair
for providing us with a tool to manage the workshop free of charge. Weare also much
obliged to the CAISE'16 organizers for their support in organizing the second STPIS
workshop.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Stockholm May 30, 2016</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>STPIS’16 organizers Stewart Kowalski Peter Bednar Ilia Bider</title>
      <sec id="sec-3-1">
        <title>Program Committee</title>
        <p>Peter Bednar University of Portsmouth
Ilia Bider Stockholm University/IbisSoft
Federico Cabitza Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca
Umberto Fiaccadori Informatics at Lund University
John Paul Kawalek University of Sheffield</p>
        <p>Department of Computer and Systems Sciences,
Stewart Kowalski Stockholm University</p>
        <p>Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne,
Gil Regev Switzerland
Moufida Sadok Iset'Com Tunis
Paolo Spagnoletti LUISS "Guido Carli"
Lars Taxén Linköping University
David Wastell Nottingham University
Christine Welch Portsmouth Business School</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-2">
        <title>Additional reviewers</title>
      </sec>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list />
  </back>
</article>