<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>" Journal of
Machine Learning Research</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Improving E-Commerce User Experience with Data-Driven Personalized Persuasion &amp; Social Network Analysis</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Ifeoma Adaji</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>University of Saskatchewan Saskatchewan</institution>
          ,
          <country country="CA">Canada</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2009</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>10</volume>
      <abstract>
        <p>Simply selling products online can no longer guarantee profits for e-businesses especially for new comers to the e-commerce industry, as the competition among companies is more intense. In order to keep existing customers and make new ones, e-businesses have to provide products and services that feel personal to their clients. This research proposes a framework for improving a user's e-commerce experience by using personalized persuasion techniques and social network analysis. The proposed framework proposes the use of persuasion profiles in implementing a customer segmentation strategy. The framework also proposes the analysis of social networks to improve customers' shopping experience.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>User modelling</kwd>
        <kwd>personalization</kwd>
        <kwd>persuasive technology</kwd>
        <kwd>social network analysis</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. INTRODUCTION</title>
      <p>
        E-businesses can stay ahead of their competitors by offering
personalized products and services tailored to individual users using
existing data about their clients, recommender systems and
persuasive technology [1]. Recommender systems suggest products
to users according to their interests. However, research shows that
the most accurate recommender algorithms do not always generate
choices that the users are satisfied with [2]. Many factors, including
the way recommended products are presented to a client play a role
in whether a customer will eventually buy the product [3], [4]. In
essence, the presentation of an online product to a customer is key
in the final purchase decision of the client. As the client is not able
to touch the product as he/she would do in a brick and mortar store,
it is essential that items are presented to online clients in a way that
they are encouraged to buy it. Persuasive technology attempts to
favorably change the clients’ perception of products or services to
convince them to buy the items or use the services. Since the target
audience for persuasive systems are usually heterogeneous, a
onesize-fits-all approach is usually ineffective [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">5</xref>
        ]. As people differ in
their motivations and perceptions; in order to be successful,
persuasive technologies need to be tailored to the individual user [4].
Fogg and Eckles [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">6</xref>
        ] suggest that for a persuasion technique to be
effective, it has to deliver 1) the right message 2) at the right time
and 3) in the right way. Online recommendation systems focus on
1) delivering the right message; generating suggestions about
products that are tailored to a user’s interests, based on their history
of interactions. My proposed research studies parts 2) and 3) of Fogg
and Eckles’ definition of an effective persuasive system; delivering
a message at the right time and in the right way, bearing in mind that
both the right time and the right way differ from one individual to
another.
      </p>
      <p>This research aims at developing a framework that will make
product selection and presentation more personalized and
persuasive to customers with the aim of increasing the success of
ebusinesses.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. RESEARCH OBJECTIVES</title>
      <p>
        Companies collect data of their clients including demographics data,
browsing patterns, product reviews and ratings, and purchase
history. This data is a huge repository of information and can tell a
company a lot about their clients. In addition, a large proportion of
online shoppers are active social media users. These users also
generate a lot of online data that companies can take advantage of
in designing products and services to meet their customers’ needs. I
propose to develop a data driven framework to support a dynamic
personalized persuasion approach. Using user generated data, this
research will answer questions such as:
1. How likely is a customer to complete a purchase in a session?
2. How focused or distracted does the customer appear to be?
3. How likely is it that the customer leaves the site?
To investigate how to deliver a persuasive message in e-commerce
in the right way, my research will focus on human behavior through
design and user studies addressing these questions:
1. What influence strategies can be adopted in displaying a
product in e-commerce?
2. How do people respond to these strategies?
3. How can we measure people’s response to the various ways in
which product information is presented?
The potential contributions of this proposed research will be
important and novel for several reasons:
1. Personalized Persuasion in the context of e-commerce has not
been researched sufficiently so far.
2. A novel method for data-driven user behavior modeling in the
area of e-commerce will be developed that will be able to
achieve e-commerce success in terms of the four core success
metrics of e-businesses; customer loyalty, conversion,
retention and average order size [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">7</xref>
        ].
3. A novel method for building user persuasive profiles based on
their susceptibility to visual and strategic persuasion will be
developed, that will be used for tailoring the display and
persuasive interventions to optimize the user experience in the
e-commerce system.
      </p>
      <p>This research will lead to results that will be beneficial to new and
existing e-commerce businesses.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3. PROPOSED SOLUTION</title>
      <p>The aim of this research is to improve the success of e-businesses.
In order to achieve this, I propose a framework which implements
persuasive interventions and mines social media data as shown in
figure 1.</p>
      <p>
        To implement the persuasive technology module of the proposed
framework, I intend to use the Persuasive Systems Design model
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">8</xref>
        ]. Although there are currently several frameworks and strategies
for designing persuasive systems in different domains, I choose to
use this model for two reasons. First, the framework this model was
derived from, Fogg’s functional triad [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">9</xref>
        ], has been studied
extensively over the years, but there is little or no research on newer
models derived from it. Second, as noted by Oinas-Kukkonen and
Harjumaa [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">8</xref>
        ], Fogg’s framework and principles are too general to
be useful in designing and evaluating persuasive systems.
The PSD framework consists of 28 persuasive principles grouped
into four categories based on the task the principle aims to
accomplish. Table 1 lists the principles and their categories. Though
this model comprises of several persuasive techniques, I propose to
include (or exclude) other principles, like visual contrast, that might
enhance the persuasiveness of the proposed system.
      </p>
      <p>
        To implement the social media module of the framework, I propose
to use two methods. First is to implement an internal social network
in the proposed e-commerce platform as is evident in successful
ecommerce companies like Amazon and E-bay. The internal social
network will provide a medium for customers to interact with each
other, ask questions about products, read and write reviews and earn
virtual rewards. This is to enhance user participation which could
lead to more sales for the e-business. The second implementation
method I propose is to take advantage of existing social networks in
order to understand current business trends from the view point of
1 The authors defined these as principles. For a detailed explanation
of these principles, please see [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">8</xref>
        ]
the customers. This will be done using data mining techniques with
data from the popular social networks.
      </p>
      <p>
        This proposed system, including the effectiveness of the persuasive
techniques, will be evaluated using the four core success metrics of
e-businesses; customer loyalty, conversion, retention and average
order size [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">7</xref>
        ].
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4. RELATED WORK</title>
      <p>
        My research aims at improving the persuasiveness of an e-business
by adopting several principles of the Persuasive Systems Design
(PSD) framework for designing and evaluating persuasive systems.
The PSD framework categorizes and maps the elements of
persuasion in a system and also describes the software functionality
expected in the end product [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">8</xref>
        ]. The framework consists of 28
persuasive principles categorized according to the task they are to
accomplish. The PSD framework, though partly derived from B.J.
Fogg’s functional triad [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">9</xref>
        ], is different from it. The PSD framework,
unlike B.J. Fogg’s functional triad, suggests how the principles of
persuasion can and should be translated to software requirements
which are thereafter implemented as features of the system [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">8</xref>
        ]. To
the best of my knowledge, there is currently no e-commerce
platform developed based on this model. On the other hand,
Cialdini’s six principles of persuasion [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">10</xref>
        ] have been used
extensively in various domains. I however did not adopt this model
because the principles are not extensive and do not suggest possible
implementation as systems features, while the PSD framework does.
In order to give customers relevant shopping experiences that feels
personal to them, I propose to use personalization. There have been
several attempts at personalization in the past. Kaptein and Parvinen
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">11</xref>
        ] developed a process framework for personalization in
ecommerce. Their implementation of personalization is similar to
that of the PSD framework, hence I adopted it in my research. They
suggest that for personalization in e-commerce to be successful, it
should have a positive effect on the outcome of the business, this
effect should be different between customers and the effect on
clients should be stable.
      </p>
      <p>
        To ensure that the effect of personalization is different among users,
several researchers have adopted the use of persuasion profiles, also
referred to as personas [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">7</xref>
        ], [4], [1], [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">12</xref>
        ], [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">13</xref>
        ], [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">14</xref>
        ]. Persuasion
profiles use persuasive strategies and data such as demographic
information, purchase patterns, buying history, click behavior and
shopping cart items of clients to personalize their shopping
experience [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">7</xref>
        ]. Kaptein et al [4] implemented persuasion profiles by
evaluating the effect of several persuasive principles on a user. They
implemented both explicit and implicit profiling. In explicit
profiling, the user has to fill out a questionnaire stating their
preferences before using the system. With implicit profiling, the
system infers the user’s preferences based on actions and responses
of the user. My proposed implementation of persuasion profiles is
implicit using data such as demographic information, purchase
patterns, buying history, click behavior and shopping cart items of
clients when they launch the e-commerce platform. It however
differs from Kaptein et al’s implementation because while they used
only six influence principles to build the user’s profile, I propose to
use a combination of the 28 influence principles of the PSD model
as described in figure 1. While the customer browses products on
the e-commerce platform, products will be displayed with a
combination of several of these principles until a profile is generated
successfully for the user. The selection will be based on the user’s
response to the principles at runtime.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>5. PROGRESS AND FUTURE RESEARCH</title>
      <p>This research aims at improving the success of e-business
companies by enhancing users’ experience with data-driven
personalized persuasion and social network analysis. I propose to
achieve this using the framework described in Figure 1 and the
success metrics; customer loyalty, conversion, retention and average
order size.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>5.1 Progress Made So Far</title>
      <p>
        To gain insight into designing the persuasive module, I evaluated
two well-known systems using the PSD framework. Using Stack
Overflow as a case study, I identified how the persuasive principles
of the PSD framework were implemented in a question and answer
social network [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">15</xref>
        ]. All but four of the 21 principles I investigated
were identified in Stack Overflow2. This study is important because
the proposed solution will incorporate a social network module
where users can ask and answer questions in addition to review
products and earn points. Knowing how a successful question and
answer social network implements persuasion will be beneficial in
the design of the internal social network module of my proposed
solution. I am currently extending this work by carrying out a user
study where the implementations of the identified persuasive
principles will be validated by Stack Overflow users. This user study
will determine the persuasiveness or otherwise of these persuasive
principles.
      </p>
      <p>
        In order to discern the implementation of persuasion in a typical
ecommerce platform, I evaluated Amazon’s persuasion strategies
using the PSD framework [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">16</xref>
        ]. In this study, I was able to identify
all 21 principles of persuasion that were investigated. Furthermore,
I was also able to identify the personalization strategies
implemented by Amazon in tailoring content and recommendations
to users’ preferences. This study is very important to my research as
it sheds light on what strategies I can adopt in my proposed solution
to enhance personalization and successfully implement the
persuasive principles of the PSD framework. The study on Amazon
is still in progress; I am working on a user-study that will enable
users describe the effect of the identified personalization strategies
on them and identify the persuasive principles that work best. This
is important in creating a personalized user experience.
The System Credibility Support persuasive principles of the PSD
framework deserve special attention in the context of e-commerce.
My PhD research will incorporate visual complexity contrast as one
of the persuasive strategies to be implemented in the proposed
model. Visual complexity contrast refers to how complex an image
is compared to surrounding images [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">17</xref>
        ]. A study I conducted with
colleagues in our group [3] reveals that visual persuasion can be
achieved through visual complexity contrast. This conclusion is
important in designing the proposed system to ensure that products
are presented to users in a way that will positively influence them to
buy the products.
      </p>
      <p>
        In another study carried out in our group, I investigated customer
trust in reviewers’ credibility [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">18</xref>
        ]. This study revealed, among other
conclusions, that reviewers with mixed positive and negative
reviews tends to be perceived as being more trustworthy. The result
of this study is important as it can be used to implement persuasion
profiles that are tailored to the users’ preferences. Persuasion
profiles will also ensure that the right content is presented to the user
at the right time and in the right way. For example, when displaying
2 For this study, I only investigated 21 of the 28 principles
product recommendations to clients, one can opt for products with
mixed reviews as these reviews are perceived to be more trustworthy
and hence could be more persuasive to the customer.
      </p>
      <p>
        In evaluating the success of the personalized persuasive
interventions generated by my proposed framework, I propose to
adopt the core metrics for e-commerce success of [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">7</xref>
        ]: loyalty,
conversion, retention and average order size. In order to ensure
customer retention, it is imperative to predict customer churn; when
a client is no longer satisfied with doing business with a company
and decides to stop using their service. Being able to predict
customer churn is important as it will enable the e-businesses put
strategies in place to prevent the loss of customers. In a study I
carried out on e-commerce data, I was able to identify what data
mining algorithm to use for churn prediction in e-commerce. The
result of the study is under review for publication in an e-commerce
journal.
      </p>
      <p>
        Since high quality answers keep a question and answer forum active,
it is also important to identify and predict the churn of expert
respondents; the users who give the best answers to most of the
questions. In view of this, I conducted a study on a successful
question and answer social network, Stack overflow. This study [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">19</xref>
        ]
identifies expert respondents and successfully predicts their churn
using data mining techniques. This study is essential to my research
because the social network module is an integral part of the proposed
solution and research has shown that overall success of a business is
partly owed to a successful social media strategy [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">20</xref>
        ].
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>5.2 Future Research</title>
      <p>Over the next several months, my focus will be on identifying the
personalization and persuasive strategies that work best together in
both e-commerce and social networks. I will do this by conducting
several user-studies where users will be asked to answer questions
based on their experience of using different e-commerce and social
network platforms. In one of the studies, users will be presented with
image and text product descriptions and will be asked to identify
which ones they find more persuasive and why.</p>
      <p>Since persuasion profiles are an integral part of providing
personalized content to customers, I will work on designing and
implementing dynamically generated persuasion profiles for users
with the aim of answering the following research questions.
1. How can one apply the data-driven user model and the
persuasion profile to generate a personalized persuasive
product display? In other words, can a system dynamically
apply a user’s persuasion profile when presenting information
about a selected product?
2. How can one evaluate the effectiveness of the user’s
personalization experience?
Answering these questions will involve reading vast literature on the
subject of persuasion profiles. In addition, it will involve carrying
out user-studies to validate the effectiveness of existing
implementations of persuasion profiles.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-8">
      <title>6. CONCLUSION</title>
      <p>Simply selling products online can no longer guarantee profits for
e-businesses especially for new comers to the e-commerce industry.
Since e-commerce is now a mainstream activity, the competition
among companies is more intense. Consequently, e-businesses have
to adopt strategies that can enhance the shopping experience of their
customers that will subsequently translate to profits for the
ebusiness. My research aims at improving e-commerce users’
experience using data-driven personalized persuasion and social
network analysis.</p>
      <p>I propose to use a framework that combines persuasive technology
and social network analysis to provide an e-commerce platform that
will deliver the right content to a user at the right time and in the
right way. The persuasive technology module will implement
personalization and persuasive strategies based on the PSD
framework. The social media module will incorporate a social
network on the proposed e-business platform that will allow for
communication between customers.</p>
      <p>The contributions of this research are novel and relevant because
they will introduce an innovative approach for generating content
for users in e-commerce that is data-driven and personalized. When
implemented, my proposed solution will lead to an improved user
experience in an e-commerce platform.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-9">
      <title>7. REFERENCES</title>
      <p>M. Kaptein and P. Petri, "Dynamically Adapting Sales
Influence tactics in E-Commerce," Marketing Dynamism &amp;
Sustainability: Things Change, Things Stay the Same, pp.
445-454, 2015.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Kaptein</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Markopoulos</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B. d. R. Emile</given-names>
            <surname>Aarts</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>"Personalizing persuasive technologies: Explicit and implicit personalization using persuasion profiles,"</article-title>
          <source>International Journal of Human-Computer Studies</source>
          , vol.
          <volume>77</volume>
          , pp.
          <fpage>38</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>51</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2015</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Berkovsky</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Freyne</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Oinas-Kukkonen</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>"Influencing Individually:Fusing Personalization and Persuasion,"</article-title>
          <source>in Proceedings of 24th Int'l Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence</source>
          ,
          <year>2015</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Fogg</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Eckles</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>"Mobile Persuasion: 20 Perspectives on the Future of behavior Change,"</article-title>
          <source>Stanford Captology Media</source>
          ,
          <year>2007</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          <article-title>[7] "How to Win Online: Advanced Personalization in Ecommerce,"</article-title>
          <source>ATG Web Commerce, An Oracle White Paper</source>
          ,
          <year>2011</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Oinas-Kukkonen</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Marja</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>"A systematic framework for designing and evaluat-ing persuasive systems,"</article-title>
          <source>in Proceedings of the 3rd Int'l Conference on Persuasive Technology, Oulu, Finland</source>
          ,
          <year>2008</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Fogg</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Persuasive Technology:
          <article-title>Using Computers To Change What We Think and Do</article-title>
          , Morgan Kaufmann Publishers,
          <year>2003</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          10]
          <string-name>
            <surname>R. B. Cialdini</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Influence: Science and Practice., Boston: Pearson Education,
          <year>2009</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [11]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Kaptein</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Parvinen</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>"Advancing E-commerce Personalization: Process Framework and Case Study,"</article-title>
          <source>International Journal of Electronic Commerce</source>
          , vol.
          <volume>19</volume>
          , no.
          <issue>3</issue>
          , pp.
          <fpage>7</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>33</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2015</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [12]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Kaptein</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>"Adaptive persuasive messages in an ecommerce setting: the use of persuasion profiles,"</article-title>
          <source>Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Information Systems</source>
          ,
          <year>2011</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [13]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Kaptein</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Eckles</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Davis</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>"Envisioning persuasion profiles: challenges for public policy and ethical practice,"</article-title>
          <source>ACM Interactions</source>
          , vol.
          <volume>18</volume>
          , no.
          <issue>5</issue>
          , pp.
          <fpage>66</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>69</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2011</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          [14]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Kaptein</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Markopoulos</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B. d.</given-names>
            <surname>Ruyter</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
            <surname>Aarts</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>"Can you be persuaded? Individual differences in susceptibility to persuasion," Human-computer interaction</article-title>
          -INTERACT, pp.
          <fpage>115</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>118</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2009</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          [15]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
            <surname>Adaji</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Vassileva</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>"Persuasive Patterns in Q&amp;A Social Networks,"</article-title>
          <source>in Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Persuasive Technology, Salzsburg, Austria</source>
          ,
          <year>2016</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          [16]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
            <surname>Adaji</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Vassileva</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>"Evaluating personalization and Persuasion in E-Commerce," in Extended proceedings of the 11th international conference on persuasive technology</article-title>
          .,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Salzsburg</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Austria,
          <year>2016</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          [17]
          <string-name>
            <surname>C.-T.</surname>
            Kao and M.-
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>"The right level of complexity in a banner ad: Roles of construal level and fluency," Human Interface and the Management of Information</article-title>
          .
          <source>Information and Interaction Design</source>
          , pp.
          <fpage>604</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>613</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2013</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          [18]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Wu</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Z.</given-names>
            <surname>Noorian</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Vassileva</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>I. Adaji</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>"How buyers perceive the credibility of advisors in online marketplace: review balance, review count and misattribution,"</article-title>
          <source>Journal of Trust Management</source>
          , vol.
          <volume>2</volume>
          , no.
          <issue>1</issue>
          , pp.
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>18</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2015</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          [19]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
            <surname>Adaji</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Vassileva</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>"Predicting Churn of Expert Respondents in Social Networks: A Case Study of Stack overflow,"</article-title>
          <source>in IEEE 14th International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications (ICMLA)</source>
          , Miami, Florida,
          <year>2015</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>
          [20]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
            <surname>Qualman</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Socialnomics:
          <article-title>How social media transforms the way we live and do business</article-title>
          , John Wiley &amp; Sons,
          <year>2010</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>