<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>1st International EvalUMAP Workshop (EvalUMAP2016): Towards comparative evaluation in user modeling, adaptation and personalization</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Owen Conlan</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Liadh Kelly, Kevin Koidl, Séamus Lawless, Killian Levacher</addr-line>
          ,
          <institution>Athanasios Staikopoulos The ADAPT Centre Trinity College Dublin</institution>
          ,
          <country country="IE">Ireland</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Owen.Conlan</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Liadh.Kelly, Kevin.Koidl, Seamus.Lawless, Killian.Levacher</addr-line>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p />
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>The 1st International EvalUMAP Workshop brings together
researchers from every facet of the User Modelling, Adaptation
and Personalization community to explore new approaches to
comparative evaluation. This area of research is inherently
complex, not only because of its focus on the user, but also
because the domains in which it is applied tend to be highly
dynamic and diverse. To date this has presented significant
barriers to how research outcomes can be compared. This
workshop seeks to solicit input from the community to facilitate
the shared development of evaluation tasks or competitions. The
ADAPT Centre (www.adaptcentre.ie) is committed to supporting
this community-wide activity as it will, hopefully, strengthen the
research of all involved.
1. PREFACE
Research in the areas of User Modelling, Adaptation and
Personalization faces a number of significant scientific challenges.
One of the most significant of these challenges is the issue of
comparative evaluation. It has always been difficult to rigorously
compare different approaches to personalization, as the function
of the resulting systems is, by their nature, heavily influenced by
the behavior of the users involved in trialing the systems. To-date
this topic has received relatively little attention. Developing
comparative evaluations in this space would be a huge
advancement as it would enable shared comparison across
research, which to-date has been very limited.</p>
      <p>Taking inspiration from communities such as Information
Retrieval and Machine Translation, the first EvalUMAP
Workshop seeks to propose and design one or more shared tasks
to support the comparative evaluation of approaches to User
Modelling, Adaptation and Personalization. The workshop has
successfully solicited presentations from key practitioners in the
field on innovative approaches to evaluating such systems and it
provides a forum to start scoping and designing tasks for
subsequent years. The resulting shared task(s) will be
accompanied by appropriate models, content, metadata, user
behaviors, etc., and can be used to comprehensively compare how
different approaches and systems perform. In addition, a number
of metrics and observations will be outlined, that participants
would be expected to perform in order to facilitate comparison.
The following topics are addressed by this workshop.


</p>
      <p>Understanding UMAP evaluation
Defining tasks and scenarios for evaluation purposes
Identification of potential corpora for shared tasks




















</p>
      <p>Interesting target tasks and explanations of their
importance
Critiques or comparisons of existing evaluation metrics
and methods
How we can combine existing evaluation metrics and
methods
Improving on previously suggested metrics and methods
Reducing the cost of evaluation
Proposal of new evaluation metrics and methods
Technical challenges associated with design and
implementation
Privacy, Ethics and security issues</p>
      <p>Legal and ethical issues
EvalUMAP is designed to be an interactive workshop structured
to encourage group discussion and active collaboration among
attendees. The workshop will feature a keynote talk, lightning
round presentation session for position papers, multiple (parallel)
breakout sessions, and a final discussion session to wrap up the
event. The planned outcome of the EvalUMAP Workshop 2016
will be a roadmap to develop initial shared task(s) that will be
published well in advance of UMAP 2017, giving an opportunity
for participants to test and tune their systems and complete the
task in order for comparative results and associated publications
to be prepared for and presented at the EvalUMAP Workshop in
2017. We envision that EvalUMAP 2017 will be the starting point
for an annual comparative evaluation challenge at future UMAP
conferences.
2. PROGRAMME COMMITTEE
The programmee committee consists of the following members:</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list />
  </back>
</article>