<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Personality profiling from text: language features tied to personality across corpora</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>William R. Wright</string-name>
          <email>wrightwr@hawaii.edu</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>David N. Chin</string-name>
          <email>chin@hawaii.edu</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>University of Hawai'i at Manoa, Dept. of Information and Computer Sciences</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>1680 East-West Road, POST 317, Honolulu, HI 96822</addr-line>
          <country country="US">USA</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>University of Hawai'i at Manoa, Dept. of Information and Computer Sciences</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>1680 East-West Road, POST 317, Honolulu, HI 96822</addr-line>
          <country country="US">USA</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. INTRODUCTION</title>
      <p>Studies that correlate personality with language features
use homogeneous data sets from a single domain, such as
Facebook posts, emails from one company, and student
essays from one university. Such single-domain correlations
may not generalize well to other domains. Therefore it is
important to study which language features are associated
with personality across multiple domains. This paper
reports preliminary results from the rst such cross-domain
study of correlations between personality and language
usage.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>PERSONALITY AND TEXT</title>
      <p>Personality traits are consistent patterns in a person's
behavior over time|particularly behavior that observers
consider when forming an opinion about how an individual's
behavior di ers signi cantly from others. A prevailing model
of human personality, the Five Factor Model, places such
behavior in ve dimensions: extraversion, agreeableness,
conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness.</p>
      <p>Language usage tends to reveal a lot about someone's
personality. The advent of computer technology, particularly
digital storage and retrieval of text allows us to examine
language usage. When relevant, such as in e-mail exchanges,
speech acts may predict personality (e.g. the disagreeable
person is apt to repeat demands without o ering a variety
of other speech acts), and punctuation and word sentiment
certainly do.</p>
      <p>Word frequency (bag-of-words counts) along with overall
stem and word counts comprise some of the most intuitive
and common features extracted from text. Since word usage
is quite context dependent, we are interested in examining
aspects of language usage that are less so. Part of speech
n-grams preserve information about how a speaker is
using language while decoupling from speci c words, which
are very context dependent. Also n-grams combining both
words and part of speech present a compromise between pure
word usage and grammatical usage.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>EXPERIMENTAL DETAILS</title>
      <p>
        We worked with two sets of participants. The rst set is
a new corpus that we collected ourselves: group of 49 web
forum users to whom we administered an personality test
consisting of 50 items from the IPIP [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ], and gathered their
forum postings. The second set that we used was a group of
2,588 university students in North America who each wrote
freely for 20 minutes in English [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]. If a writer stopped
writing, the computer would stop the clock until typing resumed.
The essays span the time period 2005 through 2008, and the
average of the essay word counts is 787. Each student also
took the Five Factor Inventory, a personality questionnaire.
To preserve anonymity, the essays and personality scores are
assigned ID numbers in place of participants' names. The
two groups di er signi cantly in the average size of
participant texts: 787 for the essays, 57,983 for the forums.
3.1
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Features extracted</title>
      <p>
        We extracted various POS n-grams, and sometimes
hybrid POS and word n-grams. Table 2 shows a few examples
of these features and the text that underlies them. The
hybrid features provide context about word usage that simple
word counts lack. To extract the features, we rst tokenized
each participant essay and then extracted the features of
interest; when possible used pre-existing tools. Although
the statistics computed were straightforward, we chose to
use standard, well-tested statistics libraries to avoid errors.
The POS tagger we used was an implementation of that
presented in [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ]; the tagger is trained on manually tagged Wall
Street Journal articles.
3.2
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Feature Selection</title>
      <p>The most populous sample (the Essays corpus) has 2588
participants. We chose a number 1/5th our sample size:
517. We took the 517 most frequent features F in the Essays
corpus (the corpus with the most participants) and ignored
the rest. Then we extracted F from the Forum texts (49
participants) as well. Of the 517 features, we show here
only the ones with p &lt; 0:1 for both corpora.
4.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>RESULTS</title>
      <p>To determine the independent relatedness of these
features to the personality dimensions, we computed the
Pearson correlations, Table 1(c, e), between feature frequencies,
normalized to document length, and scores in the given
personality dimension, Table 1(a). The p-values tell us the
probably of the null hypothesis. An encouraging aspect of
this early result is that far more features of interest are
related to Conscientiousness than any other personality
dimension. This suggests a close relationship between usage
of these language features and the speaker's personality in
the Conscientiousness dimension. It is di cult to imagine
an unrelated process that would cause such a signi cant
difference.
(c) (d)
Essays corr p-val
(e) (f)</p>
      <p>Forum corr p-val</p>
      <sec id="sec-6-1">
        <title>I have a lot if respect for you brah.</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-6-2">
        <title>I feel like I'm in summer camp.</title>
        <p>For the Essays corpus, the e ect sizes are small, whereas
for the Forum corpus they are consistently larger, Table 1(c,
e). The sparsity and variance of the Essays features may be
constraining their predictive impact; Essays features have
an average frequency of 4 whereas Forum features have an
average frequency of 248. The Forum texts are generally
much longer than the Essays, so that constraint is removed.
5.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>FUTURE WORK</title>
      <p>It may be possible to extend this work by including
coarsegrained parts of speech (e.g. noun phrases) extracted by
chunking tools. Further examination of additional corpora
may establish the generalizability of our language features
to a variety of populations. Also compelling explanations
of why particular POS n-grams are indicative of
personality would be of great interest in directing the exploration of
new text features useful for personality prediction. Finally,
the sparseness of some corpora encourages analysis of
features measured by assigning f1; 0g when fpresent; absentg,
a practice that is sometimes useful when working with sparse
features.
6.
7.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-8">
      <title>ACKNOWLEDGMENT</title>
      <p>We extend grateful thanks to James W. Pennebaker for
making this research possible by sharing the essays and
personality scores.
2.214
2.009
-2.994
-2.415
1.307
1.624
forum
forum
essay
essay
forum
essays
forum
forum
essay
open
open
open
cons
cons
extra
extra
agree
neur
see if there's the possibility to get more calories
I have the tendency to tip a minimum
not in the mood to do it also having to move out
I am trying to sleep because I came down with
I don't snack often if i'm trying to lose weight
should have started writing at a time that was easier
high end CPU is a little bit of a waste for gaming</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Argamon</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Dhawle</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Koppel</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Pennebaker</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Lexical predictors of personality type</article-title>
          .
          <source>In in 2005 Joint Annual Meeting of the Interface and the Classi cation Society of North America</source>
          ,
          <year>2005</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lewis</surname>
            <given-names>R Goldberg</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , John A Johnson, Herbert W Eber, Robert Hogan, Michael C Ashton,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C Robert</given-names>
            <surname>Cloninger</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and Harrison G Gough.
          <article-title>The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal</source>
          of Research in personality,
          <volume>40</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ):
          <volume>84</volume>
          {
          <fpage>96</fpage>
          ,
          <year>2006</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Kristina</given-names>
            <surname>Toutanova</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Dan Klein,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Christopher D Manning</surname>
            , and
            <given-names>Yoram</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Singer</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Feature-rich part-of-speech tagging with a cyclic dependency network</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of the 2003 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technology-Volume</source>
          <volume>1</volume>
          , pages
          <fpage>173</fpage>
          {
          <fpage>180</fpage>
          . Association for Computational Linguistics,
          <year>2003</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>