<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2007</year>
      </pub-date>
      <fpage>16</fpage>
      <lpage>21</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>The CIDOC CRM ontology is an international standard currently widely accepted and adopted by di erent research communities and digital infrastructures to manage heterogeneous documentation (ARIADNE, PARTHENOS, 3D COFORM, 3D ICONS, iMARINE, to cite a few)1. It fosters interoperability among di erent data structures by providing the semantic de nitions needed to transform di erent and con ned information sources into a coherent and global resource, and o ering a exible system that does not impose the use of a unique standard. The CRM is used to describe the documentation process and to express the implicit and explicit concepts and relationships typically assumed in the cultural heritage documentation. By providing a common and extensible semantic framework, to which any cultural heritage information can be mapped, it prevents semantic information loss, a phenomenon that usually occurs when integrating heterogeneous resources.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>nizers are fully involved, providing relevant inputs and contributing in making
recommendations.</p>
      <p>During the workshop participants shared their approaches describing and
showcasing systems using the CRM, exchanging experience about its practical
uses and describing di culties in its application.</p>
      <p>This proceeding includes six selected papers presented at the workshop
\Extending, Mapping, and Focusing the CRM". Every paper received two reviews,
provided by the program committee members. Most of the submitted works
discussed about practical applications of the CIDOC CRM global ontology for the
implementation of case studies directly connected with the ARIADNE project
activities.</p>
      <p>The reason stays in that the CIDOC CRM ontology has been chosen by the
ARIADNE project as the global ontology to which the archaeological datasets
and collections, made available by the partner institutions, were mapped. This
activity allowed the identi cation of common concepts and relations, which were
fundamental for the implementation of the archaeological extension of the
ontology, the CRMarchaeo. These mapping activities were performed using the
3M tool developed by FORTH, which provides users with a powerful graphical
interface that overcomes the complexity of the global model and allows using
the CRM extensions. It also acts as guide to advice users in the mapping
process. The X3ML data exchange framework tool is presented in the paper \X3ML
Framework: An e ective suite for supporting data mappings", authored by Nikos
Minadakis, Yannis Marketakis, Haridimos Kondylakis, Giorgos Flouris, Maria
Theodoridou, Martin Doerr, and Gerald de Jong.</p>
      <p>Furthermore, CIDOC CRM has been chosen as the backbone ontology for
the integration of heterogeneous datasets at the level of single records.
A description of this activity is reported in the paper \Integrating heterogeneous
coin datasets in the context of archaeological research" (by Achille Felicetti,
Philipp Gerth, Carlo Meghini, and Maria Theodoridou), which demonstrates
the item-level integration process of archaeological archives through the use of
semantic technologies.</p>
      <p>For the implementation of this case study, a sub set of ancient coin records,
provided by several European archaeological institutions, was selected. The subset
thus created, was analysed to identify similar concepts and common metadata
elements to enable their integration. CIDOC CRM was chosen as the conceptual
model for encoding the identi ed entities, while some important numismatic
vocabularies have been employed to improve standardisation.</p>
      <p>Another ARIADNE-related work, \Integrating terminological tools and
semantic archaeological information: the ICCD RA Schema and Thesaurus" (by
Achille Felicetti, Ilenia Galluccio, Cinzia Luddi, Maria Letizia Mancinelli, Tiziana
Scarselli, and Antonio Davide Madonna), describes the process of mapping,
translation and publication in SKOS format of the RA Thesaurus. The RA
Thesaurus, developed by the Italian Ministry of Cultural Heritage (MiBACT),
provides a uni ed and meaningful terminology for the description of
archaeological objects according to the MiBACT o cial cataloguing standards. A detailed
description of the thesaurus, is provided within the paper, together with the
technologies used for the publication of the thesaurus on the web.</p>
      <p>The paper \Dati.CulturaItalia: a use case of publishing Linked Open Data
based on CIDOC-CRM" (by Sara Di Giorgio, Achille Felicetti, Patrizia Martini
and Emilia Masci) describes the pilot project dati.culturaitalia.it, aimed at
building a Linked Open Data (LOD) Service that would make open datasets from the
web-portal CulturaItalia, available. The CIDOC CRM ontology was used in this
case study, to transform and represent cultural heritage data. The RDF triples
mapped to the CRM Erlangen were enriched with links to URIs identifying
instances of internationally established RDF resources for geographic names, and
instances of authority les for personal and corporate names.</p>
      <p>The work by Achille Felicetti, Francesca Murano, Paola Ronzino, and Franco
Niccolucci, \CIDOC CRM and Epigraphy: a hermeneutic challenge", proposes
an extension of the CIDOC CRM to encode epigraphic concepts and to model
the scienti c process of investigation in this domain. After identifying the main
concepts involved in the study of epigraphy, and analysing the existing CIDOC
CRM entities, together with those provided by the CRMsci and CRMarchaeo
extensions, the authors propose to introduce the CRMepi extension. With the
new classes and properties developed ad hoc, CRMepi aims at contributing to
the speci c needs of epigraphic documentation.</p>
      <p>A methodological contribution to temporal knowledge is provided by the
paper \Temporal Primitives, an Alternative to Allen Operators" (by Manos
Papadakis, and Martin Doerr). The paper discusses the limits of the Allen Interval
Algebra set of operators, which fails in observation-driven elds like
stratigraphy. In such cases, incomplete temporal information yields a disjunctive set of
Allen operators, which a ects RDF reasoning since it leads to expensive queries
containing unions. To address this de ciency, the authors introduce a set of basic
temporal primitives which are employed in an extension of CIDOC CRM. The
exible representation proposed by the authors can describe any Allen
operator as well as scenarios with further temporal generalization using conjunctions
of primitives. An extension to the basic set of primitives is also proposed,
introducing fuzzy primitives that can model temporal topologies with imprecise
boundaries that generalize over precise boundary models.</p>
      <p>Paola Ronzino</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list />
  </back>
</article>