<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Case Representation and Similarity Assessment in the selfBACK Decision Support System</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Kerstin Bach</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Tomasz Szczepanski</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Agnar Aamodt</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Odd Erik Gundersen</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Paul Jarle Mork</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Department of Computer and Information Science</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Department of Public Health and General Practice Norwegian University of Science and Technology</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Trondheim</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="NO">Norway</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>In this paper3 we will introduce selfBACK , a decision support system that facilitates, improves and reinforces self-management of non-speci c low back pain. 3 This paper is a resubmission from the 24th International Conference on Case Based Reasoning. Full paper: http://www.idi.ntnu.no/ kerstinb/paper/2016-ICCBR-Bachetal.pdf</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Case-Based Reasoning</kwd>
        <kwd>Case Representations</kwd>
        <kwd>Data Streams</kwd>
        <kwd>Similarity Assessment</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>
        Introduction
Low back pain is one of the most common reasons for activity limitation, sick
leave, and disability. It is the fourth most common diagnosis (after upper
respiratory infection, hypertension, and coughing) seen in primary care [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>Self-management in the form of physical activity and strength/stretching
exercises constitute the core component in the management of non-speci c low
back pain; however, adherence to self-management programs is poor because it
is di cult to make lifestyle modi cations with little or no additional support. In
the selfBACK project we will develop and document an easy-to-use decision
support system to be used by the patient him/herself in order to facilitate,
improve and reinforce self-management of non-speci c low back pain. The decision
support system will be conveyed to the patient via a smart-phone app in the
form of advice for self-management.</p>
      <p>The selfBACK system will constitute a data-driven, predictive decision
support system that uses the Case-Based Reasoning (CBR) methodology to
capture and reuse patient cases in order to suggest the most suitable activity
goals and plans for an individual patient. This will be based on data from two
sources. One is a questionnaire, presented to the patient at suitable intervals, in
order to capture general information (e.g. age) and subjective symptoms (e.g. the
current degree of pain). Initially, patient information from the patient's clinician
or general practitioner will also be added. The other is a stream of activity data
collected using a wristband. The incoming data will be analyzed to classify the
patients current state and recent activities, and matched against past cases in
order to derive follow-up advices to the patient. Two main challenges are to
detect the activity pattern represented at a suitable level of abstraction, and
to match that structure against existing patient descriptions in the case base.
Combined with patient pro le data from the questionnaire, and the current goal
setting, this should enable the system to suggest the best next activity goal and
plan for the patient.</p>
      <p>
        Strati ed care for patients with low back pain, based on initial pain intensity,
disability related to low back pain, and fear-avoidance beliefs have been shown
to improve patient outcomes as well as being cost-e ective [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]. The selfBACK
system aims at further improving the strati ed care approach by including data
on the patients health and coping behaviour (i.e., the adherence to basic
selfmanagement principles) in order to support and prompt appropriate actions
thereby empowering the patient to improve the self-management of their own
low back pain. The selfBACK system targets the self-management of
nonspeci c low back pain by incorporating existing knowledge in the selfBACK
system to recommend advice that is personalised to the information input by
the patient.
      </p>
      <p>The overall selfBACK hypothesis is that CBR can be applied to the
general condition and activity pattern streams of patients with non-speci c low
back pain in order to e ectively improve their rehabilitation processes. Based
on this hypothesis, we are currently studying two core research issues: The case
representation, i.e. what exactly should be in a case and how should this be
expressed, and the corresponding similarity assessment method that operate on
that structure. The primary focus of this paper is on case representation, with
similarity assessment discussed in relation to the representation.</p>
      <p>In the presentation we describe the case representation and case content as
well as we introduce the applied similarity assessment. For both, case
representation and similarity assessment, we conducted experiments using already existing
data set from the domain and discuss these in the course of this work as well.
Acknowledgement The selfBACK project has received funding from the
European Unions Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant
agreement No 689043.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hill</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Whitehurst</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.G.T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lewis</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bryan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dunn</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Foster</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Konstantinou</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Main</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mason</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Somerville</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sowden</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Vohora</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hay</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Comparison of strati ed primary care management for low back pain with current best practice (STarT Back): a randomised controlled trial</article-title>
          .
          <source>The Lancet</source>
          <volume>378</volume>
          (
          <issue>9802</issue>
          ),
          <volume>1560</volume>
          {1571 (Oct
          <year>2011</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2. Wandell, P.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Carlsson</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wettermark</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lord</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Cars</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ljunggren</surname>
          </string-name>
          , G.:
          <article-title>Most common diseases diagnosed in primary care in stockholm, sweden</article-title>
          , in
          <year>2011</year>
          .
          <source>Family Practice</source>
          <volume>30</volume>
          (
          <issue>5</issue>
          ),
          <volume>506</volume>
          {
          <fpage>513</fpage>
          (
          <year>2013</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>