<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Tracking and Analyzing the "Second Life" of TV Content: a Media and Social- driven Framework</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>L. Vignaroli</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>C. Schifanella</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>K. S. Candan</string-name>
          <email>candan@asu.edu</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>R. Pensa</string-name>
          <email>pensa@di.unito.it</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>M.L. Sapino</string-name>
          <email>mlsapino@di.unito.it</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>RAI - Centre for Research</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Technological Innovation</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Turin</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Italy</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>luca.vignaroli</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>claudio.schifanella}@rai.it</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Arizona State University</institution>
          ,
          <country country="US">USA</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Department of Compute Science, University of Turin</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>People on the Web talk about television. TV users' social activities implicitly connect the concepts referred to by videos, news, comments, and posts. The strength of such connections may change as the perception of users on the Web changes over time. With the goal of leveraging users' social activities to better understand how TV programs are perceived by the TV public and how the users' interests evolve in time, in this work, a framework that allows to manage, explore and analyze the heterogeneous and dynamic data coming from different information sources which play a role in what we call the “second life” of TV content will be exposed</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>social network analysis</kwd>
        <kwd>social TV</kwd>
        <kwd>second screen applications</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>In recent years, the way users watch television has radically
changed. With the introduction of digital television and the
growing number of generic and thematic channels the final
user tends to use new forms of navigation in the television
content space. To help users’ navigation, broadcasters
provide new enriched metadata services such as EPGs
(Electronic Program Guides) which accurately describe
scheduled programs. More in general, traditional
broadcasters are moving to become "digital media
companies" making their content available not only on the
traditional TV channels, but, in a multi-platform
perspective, the introduction of OTT (Over The Top)
services for these new companies is a must to bring its
content offering to the needs and expectation of the
audience. Also the home environment is changing since
many smart users watch television while using a notebook,
smartphone or a tablet as secondary screen more or less
related to the broadcast programmes. At the same time,
social networks allow the final user to be immersed in a
collaborative environment and to talk about television. TV
users’ social activities implicitly make connections
between concepts by means of videos, news, comments,
and posts. The strength of such connections may change as
the perception of users on the Web changes over time.
Moreover, user-generated contents (UGC) are
revolutionizing all phases of the content production value
chain, in particular it can be observed that a very large
number of UGCs include significant portions of content
already broadcast by the TV networks. In this context a
number of Social TV applications are emerging, providing
to the final user tools for social interaction while watching
television or media content related to a particular TV
program. If properly leveraged, these collaborative social
environments can be seen as rich information data sources,
indirectly returning to broadcasters and content producers
some form of implicit feedback from the final users.
In general, television content evolves in time and its life
undergoes a number of different steps. Firstly, a content is
typically produced and put on air by (e.g.) the broadcaster.
In addition, a copy of it, enriched with its description
together with a collection of related metadata is (statically)
stored in the TV archive to be reused if needed, and the
broadcaster puts the description in his EPG. Big
broadcasters also make their TV contents available in the
Internet site or as OTT service. Secondly, after the on-air
time, the broadcaster is interested in estimating to which
degree users are satisfied with the broadcasted content by
means of quantifiable data, such as TV audience
measurements, or the number of user views in the online
resource.</p>
      <p>This data collection concludes the “on-air phase” of the
content, whose life most likely spans much beyond that
point.</p>
      <p>In fact, successful TV programs will be probably
commented on Twitter and Facebook and published (either
entirely, or more often in part) online by users, for example
on YouTube. The online posting of (a fragment of) a TV
program starts a second phase for it, which can be called
“on-line phase”.</p>
      <p>During this on-line phase the content will be watched,
tagged, liked, commented and shared again and again by
users in the network. The television content turns to be a
“magnet” for users in the network attracting other users,
and it becomes a “Social Object”.
Typically, YouTube is the first place where people come to
look for a television content which they missed and despite
the copyright issues this might raise, this is a fact. Instead
of contrasting this tendency, content producers can try to
leverage it to their benefit. In fact, users that post TV
content in YouTube are implicitly disseminating,
describing and publishing it for free.</p>
      <p>As an example of the “extended” life of television content,
it can be observed that it is very easy to find in YouTube
segments of TV programs that have been uploaded long
time ago, even years ago, and are still nowadays very often
watched, commented and liked. Without video-sharing
platforms, the TV content would otherwise be just stored in
the archives of the broadcaster and it would be inaccessible
to users. As time passes and the users’ social context
changes, the way any specific television content is
perceived also evolves. For example, a content can attract
a new community of users interested in it, or it might
change its own meaning because of a new fact happened in
the world. If timely discovered these phenomena could be
leveraged by the broadcaster and some of the contents
already available in the archives could be considered for
the production of new programmes based on new interests
of the public.</p>
      <p>In this context, one of the main objectives of the project is
to capture how can the TV content evolve and detecting
which phenomena can emerge from the contents’ evolution.</p>
      <p>The second life of TV content
As a result, the Rai Research Centre has been developed a
framework for enabling the integration of heterogeneous
data coming from the knowledge sources (broadcasters’
archives, EPGs, collected audience data, social networks,
etc.) which play a role in the “second life” of TV content,
starting from its production phase, going through the on-air
phase, and continuing with the on-line phase. The system
is designed to provide powerful tools helping to highlight
the tight interactions between the Web world and the TV</p>
      <p>From a more technical point of view the framework enables
the integration of various information sources into a unique
“knowledge base”, modelled as a knowledge graph.
Integrating domain and general purpose ontologies, as well
as social interactions among users and social media, the
knowledge base can be queried and analyzed as a whole,
enabling the discovery of new and interesting cross-domain
patterns.</p>
      <p>The integration framework consists of three main layers: a
source processing layer, a knowledge graph layer and a
knowledge query and analysis layer.</p>
      <p>The “source processing layer” has the role of collecting all
the data which will be conveyed in the model. It accesses a
number of predefined web/social/media sources (e.g.,
broadcasters official web sites, social networks, TV
channels, etc) and processes them in order to extract those
information units which will be represented as nodes in the
knowledge graph, as well as information that support the
existence of relationships among them.</p>
      <p>The “knowledge layer” is the core of the system and
represents the result of public actions of users in social
environments. Furthermore, relationships are introduced
between subjects and social objects and between social
objects and concepts. Other relationships involve entities of
the same type and these are called structural dependencies.
Moreover, social objects evolve in time, hence, as a special
case of representation relationship, we consider the
temporal representation of a social object against a special
type of concept called time objects.</p>
      <p>Finally, the “knowledge query and analysis layer” consists
in a set of components for querying, browsing and
analyzing the knowledge graph. A query module extracts
sub-graphs from the knowledge layer based on user’s
requests and constraints. An analysis module provides a set
of analysis tools to obtain insights of the data.</p>
      <p>The development of the system had to face some challenges
in order to make manageable the analysis over the huge
amount of data which is being collected from the various
knowledge sources. The optimisation of algorithms and the
definition of the data model has been done in close
cooperation with the Department of Computer Science at
the University of Torino.</p>
      <p>The interactive demo (Figure 1), thanks to powerful and
flexible analysis tools (Figure 2,3) of the social network
data flow, allows to make available to Rai a number of
strategic services such as user behaviour profiling, brand
reputation, community detection and recommendation
systems for contents and advertisements.</p>
      <p>3.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Antonini</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Vignaroli</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Schifanella</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R. G.</given-names>
            <surname>Pensa</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. L.</given-names>
            <surname>Sapino</surname>
          </string-name>
          , “
          <article-title>Mesoontv: a media and social-driven ontology-based TV knowledge management system,”</article-title>
          <source>in Proceedings of ACM HT '13. ACM</source>
          ,
          <year>2013</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>208</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>213</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Antonini</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R. G.</given-names>
            <surname>Pensa</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. L.</given-names>
            <surname>Sapino</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Schifanella</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R. T.</given-names>
            <surname>Prioletti</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and L. Vignaroli, “
          <article-title>Tracking and analyzing TV content on the web through social and ontological knowledge,”</article-title>
          <source>in Proceedings of EuroITV '13. ACM</source>
          ,
          <year>2013</year>
          , pp.
          <fpage>13</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>22</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>X.</given-names>
            <surname>Han</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
            <surname>Wei</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Miao</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Mei</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Song</surname>
          </string-name>
          , “
          <article-title>Contextaware personal information retrieval from multiple social networks</article-title>
          ,
          <source>” IEEE Comp. Int. Mag.</source>
          , vol.
          <volume>9</volume>
          , no.
          <issue>2</issue>
          , pp.
          <fpage>18</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>28</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2014</year>
          . [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/
          <string-name>
            <surname>MCI</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2014</year>
          .
          <volume>2307222</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>