=Paper= {{Paper |id=Vol-1726/paper-07 |storemode=property |title=Econometric Modelling of the Parameters Actuarial Model of Net Rates for Life Insurance of the Population of Region |pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1726/paper-07.pdf |volume=Vol-1726 |authors=Vladimir S. Mkhitarian,Svetlana S. Mikhaylova }} ==Econometric Modelling of the Parameters Actuarial Model of Net Rates for Life Insurance of the Population of Region== https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1726/paper-07.pdf
   Econometric Modelling of the Parameters
Actuarial Model of Net Rates for Life Insurance
          of the Population of Region

             Vladimir S. Mkhitarian1 and Svetlana S. Mikhaylova2
        1
         National Research University Higher School of Economics, Russia
                               http://www.hse.ru
      2
        East Siberia State University of Technology and Management, Russia
                              http://www.esstu.ru
                          Buryat State University, Russia
                               http://www.bsu.ru



      Abstract. The article analysed and solved the problems of constructing
      mortality tables and determining the amount of payment for the foresee-
      able future, which are relevant in connection with the development of the
      classical life insurance in Russia and the growing role of methodological
      developments aimed at determining the cost of insurance coverage. The
      algorithm calculation is implemented on the example data of a region of
      the Russian Federation. The practical significance of the proposed algo-
      rithm is that it can be used by insurance companies when calculating
      the tariff of life insurance in the region.

      Keywords: actuarial calculations, life insurance, prediction of mortal-
      ity, insurance rate


1   Introduction

Life insurance is one of the most effective ways to solve the problem of shortage
of regional financial resources through the mobilization and transformation of
available funds of the population into investments. The development of life insur-
ance industry, on the one hand, serves as a source of investment funds bearing a
principally long-term character, on the other hand, acts as a guarantor of social
security of the population, protecting the interests of policyholders [12].
     In the life insurance implementation in the region it is necessary to consider
its features, as the subjects of the Russian Federation are characterized by differ-
ent levels of socio-economic development, the diversity of national composition
of the population, sharp differences of climatic conditions, which directly leads to
the demographic situation, determines the level of mortality in the region [10].
Thus, the reduction of providing insurance protection cost to the population,
inadequate assessment of the insurance capacity of the region may lead to finan-
cial instability of the insurance company, not profitable insurance operations,
and overstatement of tariffs will hinder the development of life insurance, will
lead to non-competitiveness of the individual insurer. A reasonable life insurance
tariff size from the economic point of view, for the population of the region will
provide the required reliability and stability of the insurer. At the same time the
insurance companies in the development of regional tariff policy face with the
problem of the lack of reliable statistics, a single insurance information base, and
methods of calculating insurance rates for the region. Determining the size of the
overall life insurance net rates on the basis of regional statistics, as well as the
prediction of rate changes caused by socio-economic status, the demographic sit-
uation in the future, it is essential for the organization of long-term life insurance
in the region [15]. Because insurers are relying on forward-looking information,
can adjust the size of the current tariff, as in the upward and downward, which
will provide, in the first case, the insurer’s stability in the future, in the second
case, mass insurance in the current period, which is the main condition for the
reliability of the insurance operations [7].


2    The calculation algorithm
1. In the first step of life insurance payment modelling it is necessary to solve the
problem of building a regional mortality tables. The table construction includes
several stages:
 – Calculation of baseline values for all ages on the basis of the mortality statis-
   tics (distribution of deaths by age);
 – If necessary, processing of this range of values to remove distortion caused
   by age accumulation;
 – Interpolation of row of values to eliminate possible gaps or extrapolation to
   calculate the values for the older age groups;
 – Calculation of the remaining life table functions;
    The main methodological problem of constructing mortality tables is asso-
ciated with the transition from the actual age-specific mortality rates to table
probabilities of dying at a given age. Age-specific mortality rates (mx) are cal-
culated separately for men and women as the ratio of the number of deaths in a
particular age by the average annual number of men or women in this age group:
                                      n Dx
                               mx =           × 1000%,
                                      n P̃x

where n Dx – the number of deaths in the age range (x+n); n P̃x – average annual
population (men or women) in the age interval (x + n).
   To go from the actual levels of age-specific mortality rates mx to tabular
probabilities qx we can use the analytical laws of mortality. These theoretical
models allow us to identify the main patterns of interest to researchers, even a
simplified study of reality. At the same time, some real mortality processes are
well enough approximated by the considered analytical laws [14].
   The most used “law of mortality” is a model Heligmen-Pollard, proposed by
the authors in 1980, which describes the change in the mortality rate, represented
by the ratio of (qx/(1 − qx)) the probability of dying at age x to the probability
of surviving to age (x + 1) year of age x [2].
    In the basis of the following law known as the law of Gompertz-Mackhame,
lies the assumption that the intensity of mortality increases with age, at a ge-
ometric rate, i. e. µx = A + Bcx , where A is the parameter responsible for the
deaths that are not associated with health status and age, B is the coefficient
of proportionality linking the mortality rate with the weakening of the vitality
of the person, C – a parameter characterizing the rate of decrease of a person’s
ability to resist various health disorders. The law of Gompertz-Mackhame satis-
fyingly describes mortality only for the older age intervals. This can be explained
by the reduced rate of death at an early age.
    In 1939, Weibull as a simple approximation of the force of mortality suggested
a power function µx = kxn , which will determine the survival function
                            Z x                               
                                      n                k     n+1
                    s (x) = −      ku du = exp −           x
                                0                    n+1

and the curve of deaths
                                                             
                             0            n          k
                  f (x) = −s         x = kx exp −       xn+1        .
                                                    n+1

    Erlang’s model is a function of the form µx = x/(a (x + a)). For Erlang’s
model, 2nd order mortality curve is described by the formula f (x) = x/a2 ×
e−x/a , x ≥ 0, the survival function s (x) = (x + a)/a × e−x/a [1].
    Also to describe mortality at different age intervals you can use the following
nonlinear functions: logarithmic, exponential, power, hyperbolic, polynomials of
various degrees.
    The advantage of the theoretical models is that for them the probability
characteristics of demographic indicators can be calculated on a small number
of parameters. This fact is particularly important at the limited statistics.

2. To facilitate the calculations of the risk rates in the next step the table of
switching functions is built. Standard switching functions are divided into two
groups. The basis of the first the number of survivors to a certain age is put, the
second – the number of dying. The main in the first group are the functions Dx
and Nx :
                                                 Xω
                          Dx = lx × ν x , Nx =       Dj ,
                                                    j=x

where ν – discounting factor in the compound interest rate i, and is determined
by the formula ν = 1/(1 + i).
    A-priory Nx = Nx+1 + Dx and Nω = Dω (ω – the age limit adopted in the
mortality table).
    Function Dx is used for insurance on survival. Dx is the expected present
value of the amount of insurance premiums for insurance on survival initial set of
l0 with the condition of payment of a single sum insured upon reaching the age
of x, switching function Nx is used to simplify the calculations of rent insurance.
The meaning of this function is the following. At birth, a group of children
numbering l0 is an insurance contract with a condition of payment of a lifelong
annuity in size per unit at the beginning of each year, starting at age x, then
Nx represents the present value of insurance payments or the total amount of
one-time premium. The switching number of the second group is used to simplify
calculations in life insurance in case of death:
                                                        ω
                                                        X
                                       x+1
                         Cx = dx × ν         ,   Mx =         Cj .
                                                        j=x

    Each insurance company develops its own table of switching functions based
on its rates of return, the specifics of the insurance field and existing insurance
statistics [3].

3. There is the calculation of the net net-rate on life insurance contracts. When
life insurance insured risk is the duration of human life, i. e. the risk is not death
itself, but the time of death. Death at a young age causes the need to promote
the well-being of the family of the deceased, and survival to deep old age requires
obtaining regular income without continuing employment [9].
     In accordance with the above-mentioned there are the following types of life
insurance:
 – insurance in case of death (distinguish between life and term insurance);
 – endowment insurance;
 – mixed life insurance.
    Insurance in case of death. Risk covered by this insurance is the death of
the insured person during the period of insurance. The insurer when the insured
event guarantees the payment of the insured sum to the beneficiary. Contracts
of this type are not associated with the provision of the property interests of the
insured but, as a rule, his heirs and creditors.
    At endowment insurance the risk of survival of the insured is insured before
the end of the insurance period. It allows to raise the level of welfare of the
insured person by creating savings. endowment insurance is insurance of a certain
amount of money for a certain period. In the event of death of the policyholder
during the period of validity of the contract the insurance sum is not paid and
fees are not refundable.
    Mixed insurance covers the risks of survival until the end of the period of
insurance, death in action.

4. The size of the relative risk premium is determined. The risk premium is
introduced for life insurance in case of death, the life insurance contract; en-
dowment allowance is not entered as the insurance company pays the insurance
indemnity only in case if the client survives until the end of the contract, i. e., the
size and term of payment is known in advance to the insurer. And the insurance
company provided by the correct choice of mortality tables and economically
reasonable interest rate compounding means has no risk of exceeding the insur-
ance premiums collected over the net premiums of life insurance on survival. In
the contract of the mixed insurance two components are taken into account: life
insurance and life insurance on survival for the same period. As the risk premium
is calculated only on the first component, the total net rate on the contract of
the mixed insurance the risk premium will have little impact.
    To determine the size of risk premiums the expectation EX, the variance
D(ξi ), or standard deviation σ(ξi ), indicating the variation from the mean are
used. Total net premium P in this case can be calculated as P = EX + αEX,
P = EX + βσ(ξi ) or P = EX + γD(ξi ), where X is the total amount of claims,
EX – its expected value, α, β, γ – ratios, reflecting the sustainability of the
portfolio and scatter payouts relative to the average value. You can also enter the
risk premium of a mixed type, which when receiving a new risk takes into account
its dependence with the already existing portfolio, but also directly determines
the degree of accumulation of risks as P = EX + αEX + βσ(ξi ) + γD(ξi ) [4].
    In the case of homogeneity of insurance portfolio, all three approaches will
give the same results, and the relative increase risky for life insurance in the case
of life at age x will be:
                                         r
                                            px 1
                               Θx = tγ ·       ·√ ,
                                            qx     n

where tγ – the reliability coefficient, qx – the probability of death at age x, px –
the probability of survival at age x, n – the volume of the insurance portfolio.
     It should be noted that the share of risk premiums in the insurance rate
with increasing age of the insured is reduced due to the fact that with increasing
age the probability of death, respectively, reduces the probability of survival
[5]. The increase in the portfolio of the insurer tends to reduce the overall level
of risk premium, because the more homogeneous the risks in the portfolio, the
smaller the realized total risk is different from the expected. This explains the
advantage of large insurance companies. Because of their size they can set lower
rates, as a large portfolio allows them to provide a sufficient level of reliability
at a lower risk premium than the insurance company, whose portfolio contains
fewer contracts.
     The insurance company in order to establish competitive rates, while growing
the insurance portfolio, may establish a lower risk premium than it allows the
portfolio. In this case, a significant factor is the insurance potential of the region,
i. e. the number of able-bodied population, living standards, incomes, prospects
of socio-economic development of the region, the level of insurance culture, the
presence of competitors, etc.


5. The last step is to define the tariff rate life insurance as the sum of the main
net rates, risk premiums and load. The load and the brave extra charge are
determined by each insurance company on its own, depending on the portfolio,
of doing business expenses, profit margins, etc.
3    Results
Let’s determine on the basis of regional statistics data the size of net-net rates for
life insurance classes for male and female population, promising annual number
of concluded life insurance contracts on the territory of the Republic of Buryatia
in the period until 2018.
     To determine the main net rates types of life insurance for the future period
it is necessary to forecast age-specific mortality rates of male and female popu-
lation of the region. As a method of forecasting age-specific mortality researcher
selected the method of “law of mortality” that allows to confine the data of re-
gional statistics and meet the requirements of short-term population projection.
Extrapolation method, being less time consuming, does not provide a qualitative
forward-looking information, due to the unstable, spasmodic development in the
retrospective period [8].
     To select analytical functions describing the best way the process of extinction
of the region’s population ages, the author in the environment of MS Excel has
calculated the parameters of analytical models of age specific mortality rates [1].
The main criterion of quality was the coefficient of determination. The study
revealed that the distribution of age-specific mortality rates of the population
of the Republic of Buryatia corresponds to the Weibull distribution. So a model
based on the Weibull distribution and the exponential function, which is a special
case of Weibull distribution, allows to describe at least 90.0% of the changes in
age-specific mortality of male and female population of the Republic of Buryatia
at different age intervals, between 1990 and 2015.
     Analytical record for the following models [6]:
 – µx = kxn – a power (Weibull model);
 – µx = aebx – exponential.
    The mortality rate among men aged 18–35 is described by the Weibull model
and in the older age group of 36–70 the variation of mortality depending on the
age and the other is described by an exponential function. The discrepancy
of the mortality patterns of young and older ages is due to differences in the
increment of the force of mortality at different age intervals, there has been a
relatively strong surge in the death rate in the transition from the age of 35
to 36. Mortality among women all over the considered interval is described by
an exponential law, but the construction of a model for a single group of 18–70
leads to a deterioration of the quality criterion modelling characteristics, so it
seems appropriate to partition the interval 18–70 years, in two age groups: 18–35
and 36–70 years. Table 1 presents the results of modelling age-specific mortality
rates for men, similar calculations were performed for the female population of
the Republic of Buryatia for the period 1990–2015.
    The absolute increasing in mortality by age in the male population of the
Republic of Buryatia at the age of 18–35 with increasing age decreases. For
example, the mortality rate in 2015 during the transition from the age of 20 to
21 increased by 0.00024h, from the age of 30 to 31 – 0.00019h, i. e. in the age
group of 20–35, the speed of increment of intensity of mortality is reduced. On
the contrary, in the age group of 36–70 years, with increasing age, the rate of
increment of the mortality rate increases, averaging 41 years old 0.0049h, and
in 61 years old – 0.0138h, i. e. at the age of 41 out of 1000 people die at 4.9
man more than at the age of 40, and at the age of 61 there are 13.8 more than
at the age of 60.
    Changing the age of the female population of the Republic of Buryatia mor-
tality intensity is described by an exponential function and in 2015 at the age of
35 years is equal to the increment of the mortality forces 0.0011h, in 60 years –
0.0063h.


Table 1. The results of age-specific mortality levels modeling of the male population
of the Republic of Buryatia for 1990–2015

                                            Age groups
                    18–35 years                                 36–70 years
 Year       Model #1          The coefficient of         Model #2         The coefficient of
                               determination                               determination
 1990   µ̂E = 0.0005x0.7066        0.9792          µ̂E = 0.0005e0.0684x        0.9771
  ···           ···                  ···                   ···                   ···
 2000   µ̂E = 0.0003x0.9931        0.9343          µ̂E = 0.0013e0.0578x        0.9925
  ···           ···                  ···                   ···                   ···
 2010   µ̂E = 0.0003x1.0127        0.9341          µ̂E = 0.0014e0.0554x        0.9914
  ···           ···                  ···                   ···                   ···
 2014   µ̂E = 0.0001x1.7222        0.9549          µ̂E = 0.0020e0.0515x        0.9973
 2015   µ̂E = 0.0001x1.3799        0.9845          µ̂E = 0.0019e0.0523x        0.9961




    Let’s examine graphically changes in age-specific mortality rates of male and
female population of the Republic of Buryatia for the period of 2009–2015. Dur-
ing this period, values of age-specific mortality rates do not reveal directional
changes in time (Fig. 1 for females and Fig. 2 for males).
    Let’s analyse the changing values of age specific mortality rates, net rates
types of life insurance depending on the fluctuations of the parameters of the
models of mortality in the value of its standard deviation. Changing model k
parameter µx = kxn level of age-specific mortality of the male population aged
18–35 years, the value of the standard deviation of the standard of the average
kaverage leads to a change in the appropriate direction by an average of 2.38%
of your age-specific mortality in this group, which in turn implies to increase or
decrease the net rate of life insurance in case of death by an average of 2.2%, on
survival – by −0.06%, mixed – 0.06%. if the parameter naverage , is changed to
the value of the standard deviation of the average n average, that the mortality
rate at each age is also changed by an average 8%, respectively the net rate of
death is changed by 7.87%, endowment – by −0.24%, mixed – 0.24%.
  0.05
 0.045
  0.04
                                                                               2009
 0.035                                                                         2010
  0.03                                                                         2011
                                                                               2012
 0.025
                                                                               2013
  0.02                                                                         2014
 0.015                                                                         2015
  0.01
 0.005
     0

                                     age


Fig. 1. The curves of mortality of the female population of the Republic of Buryatia
for 2009–2015


   0.09

   0.08

   0.07
                                                                              2009
   0.06                                                                       2010
                                                                              2011
   0.05
                                                                              2012
   0.04                                                                       2013
                                                                              2014
   0.03
                                                                              2015
   0.02

   0.01

     0

                                     age


Fig. 2. The curves of mortality of the male population of the Republic of Buryatia for
2009–2015



   In the older age group, fluctuations of the model parameters µx = aebx also
not have a significant impact on the net rates. Fluctuations a and b lead to
changes in mortality rates at the age of 36–70, an average of 11.8% and 4.6%,
respectively, net rates in case of death by 10.9% and 4.33%, – endowment at
−1.34% and −0.69%, on the mixed – 0.06% and 0.03%.
   For the female population of the Republic of Buryatia age group of 18–35,
the deviation of the parameters a and b models µx = aebx from the mean to
the of the standard deviation leads to a change in age-specific mortality rates
at 7.14 and 0.6%, respectively, changing the net interest rates on the types of
life insurance are as follows: in the event of death, 6.7 and 0.6%, endowment –
−0.05 and −0.01%.
     In the group of 36–70 deviation a and b leads to changes in mortality rates,
average age of 13.5% and 7.55%, respectively, of the net rates on life insurance in
case of death by 12.9% and 7.37%, endowment – −0.59%–0.45%, on the mixed
– 0.03% and 0.02%.
     The changes in the development of demographic processes are long-term,
therefore, it’s fair to assume that in the absence of crisis in the economy in the
short term age-specific mortality rate of the population has the same distribution
and is described by a single model. In this case, we can assume that in the
short term demographic indicators will be close to a certain constant value,
although the study of them in the long run they will definitely show the trend of
development. In the absence of trends in mortality at age x the model parameters
are also constant.
     To define the parameters of prognostic models describing the probability
of death at age x of male and female population of the Republic of Buryatia
in the planning period of 2016–2018, we will use model of ordinary regression.
The application of this model requires the following assumptions: parameters
of the incoherent models tend to some constant value; the regression errors are
normally distributed.
     Thus, it can be assumed that the parameters of the models in the period
of 2009–2015 form a sequence of changes in the average expected level which
does not depend on the flow of time. To examine the hypothesis let’s test the
time series of indicators for the presence of trends in their development (Table
2). The most common in the practice of test series for the presence of trends is
the use of statistical testing of hypotheses about the immutability of trends in
a number, i. e. it is necessary to check the number on the accident distribution.
For this purpose T-cumulative criterion method of comparing average levels of
time series, Abbe criterion (criterion of consecutive squares of the differences)
are most often used [13].
     Testing confirmed the hypothesis about the absence of trends in parameters
of models of male mortality (Table 2) and female mortality population over the
period of 2009–2015, which form a stationary series.
     To build predictive models of age-specific mortality of men aged 18–35 data
were used from 17 age groups for 7 years (119 cases) and at the age of 35–70,
data of 35 age groups for 7 years (245 cases).
     The level models of age-specific mortality of the male population of the Re-
public of Buryatia have the form:

             µ̂E = 0.00003 x1.7441 , R2 = 0.929,     at the age of 18–35,      (1)
       tcalc       (34.15)
             µ̂E = 0.00194 e0.0523x , R2 = 0.959,     at the age of 35–70.     (2)
       tcalc       (46.76)

   Building predictive models for age-specific mortality of women were carried
out similarly as for men.
    Table 2. Statistical verification of the hypothesis of no trend in the number

                                               The calculated statistics values
                The table statistics
  Criterion                             Model #1      Model #2       Model #3       Model #4
                      value
                                         k    n        a      b       a         b    a           b
Cumulative     ttab (α = 0.05; n = 6) 0.369 1.911 1.582 2.233 0.833 0.591 1.763 2.445
T-test                 = 2.45
Comparison Ttab (α = 0.05; n = 5)        0   0.892 0.604 0.875 0.756 0.583 0.806 1.206
of the               = 2.57
average levels F (k1 = 2; k2 = 2)       13   16.8     2.6   16.8     13     7.4     1.3        1.9
                      = 19
                   min(7)
Abbe             γ0.05      = 0.468     1.55 0.63 0.53 0.49 1.125 1.259 0.746 0.556



    Model level of age-specific mortality of the female population of the Republic
of Buryatia have the form:

             µ̂E = 0.00031 e0.0734x ,     R2 = 0.962,        at the age of 18–35,              (3)
       tcalc       (37.23)
             µ̂E = 0.00037 e0.0658x ,     R2 = 0.977,        at the age of 35–70.              (4)
       tcalc       (54.93)

   Quality criteria of the models are shown in Table 3.


                  Table 3. Characteristics of the models adequacy

                                                             Model number
        Statistical characteristics
                                                  1           2             3              4
The level of significance (α)                  0.05           0.05          0.05       0.05
The coefficient of determination (R2 )        0.929          0.959         0.962      0.977
Average approximation error (δ̄), %           1.626          2.657         1.680      1.768
The observed value of F – Fisher             1631.4         5645.5        1118.6     10305.0
criterion (Fcalc )
The tabular value of F – Fisher criterion      3.84          3.84          3.84           3.84
(Ftab (1; ∞))



    Descriptive quality models that characterize the age-specific mortality of the
female population of the Republic of Buryatia, are higher than the models that
characterize the age-specific mortality of the male population. Men’s mortal-
ity is more subject to fluctuations depending on the influence of social factors,
economic, than female mortality.
4    Discussions

A key indicator of the prospects for the development of life insurance in the re-
gion is determining the potential number of concluded life insurance contracts.
The number of life insurance contracts is directly proportional to the collected
insurance premiums, the ratio is the average insurance premium. Under the in-
fluence of various factors, such as inflation, growth of welfare of the population,
changing the average term of the life insurance contract, etc., the average insur-
ance premium may be also changed.


5    Conclusions

On the basis of predictive models of age-specific mortality levels the lump-sum
net-rates for male and female population of the Republic of Buryatia were built
for the future period 2016–2018.
    The demographic situation in the region has stabilized and while maintaining
the favorable trends of social and economic development, at least not deteriorate.
Therefore, insurers, who lead insurance activities on the territory of the Republic
of Buryatia, have some possibility to implement one of the basic principles of
determining insurance rates in the main part of the net rate – rate stability
dimensions. Also the age-specific mortality prediction will help to determine the
parameters of the actuarial model of the relative risk premium [11].


References
 1. Arató, M., Bozsó, D., Elek, P., Zempléni, A.: Forecasting and simulating mortality
    tables. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 49, 805–813 (2009)
 2. Benjamin, B., Pollard, J.H.: The Analyses of Mortality and Other Actuarial Statis-
    tics. Butterworth-Heineman Ltd., Oxford (1980)
 3. Booth, H.: Demographic forecasting: 1980 to 2005 in review. International Journal
    of Forecasting 22, 547–581 (2006)
 4. Bowers, N.L., Gerber, H.U., Hickman, C., J., Jones, D.A.: Actuarial Mathematics.
    The Society of Actuaries. Itasea, Illinois (1986)
 5. Graf, S., Kling, A., Ru, J.: Risk analysis and valuation of life insurance contracts:
    Combining actuarial and financial approaches. Insurance: Mathematics and Eco-
    nomics 49, 115–125 (2011)
 6. Kornilov, I.A.: Mortality tables and models of survival. Publishing house of Moscow
    State University of Economics and Statistics, Moscow (2011)
 7. Kurkina, I.V.: Actuarial calculations of pension and health insurance. Publishing
    house of Nizhny Novgorod State Technical University, Nizhny Novgorod (2005)
 8. Lewis, K.D.: Methods of forecasting of economic indicators. Finance and statistics,
    Moscow (1986)
 9. Mkhitaryan, V.S., Kuchmaeva, O.V.: Demographic statistics as a tool for socio-
    economic policy. Demoscope Weekly (385–386) (2009)
10. Nifantova, R.V.: Methodological bases and modern methods of population projec-
    tions. Journal of economy of region 2(34), 185–192 (2013)
11. Patrick, B.: Modern actuarial risk theory. Journal of Risk and Insurance 70(2)
    (2003)
12. Rappaport, A.: Demography and Retirement: The Twenty-First Century. Praeger
    Publishers, Westport (2002)
13. Sadovnikova, N.A., Shmoilova, R.A.: Fundamentals of statistical modeling. Pub-
    lishing house of Moscow State University of Economics and Statistics, Moscow
    (2002)
14. Shaw, C., Blakely, T., Tobias, M.: Mortality among the working age population
    receiving incapacity benefits in new zealand, 1981–2004. Social Science & Medicine
    73, 568–575 (2011)
15. Wilson, T.: Quantifying the uncertainty of regional demographic forecasts. Applied
    Geography 42, 108–115 (2013)