<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Social Media Data Analytics for Tourism</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>A Preliminary Study</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Arkka Dhiratara</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Jie Yang, Alessandro Bozzon, Geert-Jan Houben</addr-line>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Delft University of Technology</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Mekelweg 4, 2628CD, Delft</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="NL">The Netherlands</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>J.Yang-3, A.Bozzon</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>G.J.P.M.Houben</addr-line>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>Social media data are increasingly used as the source of research in a variety of domains. A typical example is urban analytics, which aims at solving urban problems by analyzing data from di erent sources including social media. The potential value of social media data in tourism studies, which is one of the key topics in urban research, however has been much less investigated. This paper seeks to understand the relationship between social media dynamics and the visiting patterns of visitors to touristic locations in real-world cases. By conducting a comparative study, we demonstrate how social media characterizes touristic locations di erently from other data sources. Our study further shows that social media data can provide real-time insights of tourists' visiting patterns in big events, thus contributing to the understanding of social media data utility in tourism studies.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>
        Today, our society is increasingly hyper-connected with the unprecedented rise
of social media; currently, social media has 2.206 Billion active users with 30%
global penetration1. Social media activities are therefore an important class of
daily activities performed by people worldwide to ful ll their social needs. These
social media activities have generated a wealth of social data, which can provide
meaningful and even possibly, real-time insights to a variety of studies. Social
media has thus been leveraged as part of marketing strategy for industries, through
\passive marketing" (as sources of market intelligence to gain insights of the
users) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ]. As Mangold and Faulds (2009) recommend, social media should be
regarded as an integral part of an organization's marketing strategy and should
not be taken lightly [14].
      </p>
      <p>
        Among di erent domains, urban science has been shown as an important
domain where social media data can contribute [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5 ref8">8, 5</xref>
        ]. A wide range of urban
problems have been studied with social media data, including event detection
[13], urban area characterization [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ], to mention a few. The potential of social
media data, however, has been much less investigated in the study of tourism,
despite the fact that tourism plays a key role in economic and social development
1 http://wearesocial.com/uk/special-reports/global-statshot-august-2015
of many cities. Social media data are intrinsically di erent compared with other
data sources used for tourism studies [18][
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
        ], such as visitor survey,
transportation statistics, or online reviews. They either require a considerable amount of
laborious e ort for data acquirement { thus are infrequently updated, or require
a large amount of volunteer input from online users, thus are highly sparse.
Different from them, social media data are easily accessible in big size; moreover,
they are topically, and spatially and temporally tagged, thus providing a distinct
opportunity for tourism studies.
      </p>
      <p>On the other hand, the high availability of social media data raises some
challenges. In order to retrieve relevant social data, one should take into account
e ective parameters for data ltering, such as hashtags, keywords or geographic
boundaries/coordinates. When it comes to tourism studies, the selection of
parameters is crucial and needs to be carefully designed, to avoid biasing the
interpretation of the results. For example, to capture the popularity of Ei el Tower in
Paris w.r.t. the number of visitors, we should avoid only using keywords or
hashtags (e.g. #Ei elTower, #TourEi el, or #Ei el) to lter the data, as we cannot
assume whether people posting tweets with these hashtags are indeed currently
visiting that location. In this case, geographic coordinates become necessarily to
be used as an additional parameter for ltering social media data.</p>
      <p>By carefully selecting the parameters for ltering social media data, we
created a dataset to explore the potential of social media data for tourism studies.
Speci cally, we focus on Instagram, which has been shown to be highly
popular among tourists [22] as it features creating and sharing visual content (i.e.
images) by users. We then seek to answer the following research questions:</p>
      <p>RQ1. How does social media data characterize touristic location di erently
from other data sources?</p>
      <p>RQ2. Can social media data provide real-time insights about visiting patterns
of tourists to di erent tourist locations in big events?</p>
      <p>We tackle these questions by quantitatively and qualitatively analyzing the
social media data we collected from Instagram. By comparing the social data
results with o cial tourism statistics and online review data, we nd that
social media characterizes touristic locations di erently, featuring more landmark
locations. Our study further shows that, during big events, social media data
can characterize the visiting patterns of tourists at di erent locations with high
temporal resolution, thus contributing to the understanding of how social media
data can be used for obtaining real-time insights for touristic locations.</p>
      <p>
        Our study provides preliminary however useful results that support social
media as a useful data source for tourism studies. In 2014, World Travel Tourism
Council (WTTC) stated that tourism industry has contributed US$7.6 trillion
and also support 276 million jobs across the globe [21]. Because of the high
economical and societal relevance, governments and the tourism industry are
devoted to attracting more tourists to visit their cities' touristic locations [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
        ].
The results of this work can be of fundamental interests for tourism marketing
and decision making using social media data.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Related Works</title>
      <p>
        Social media data analytics. The unprecedented popularity of social media
has o ered opportunities for a variety of domains. An important application is
user modeling, for which social media data has been shown to be useful for
modeling user attributes, including personal traits and personality [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ], their interests
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ], and etc.. In addition, social media data have also been shown to be e ective
for detecting social trends, including hot topics [15], cultural fashion trends [12] ,
and even epidemic burst [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ]. Di erent from existing studies, we focus on tourism
analytics using social media data in this work.
      </p>
      <p>
        Social media data in urban analytics. While little work can be found in
tourism studies, social data has enabled a wealth of research works in urban
analytics. These include using social data for event-detection [13], venue
recommendation for city-scale events [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ], characterizing mobility patterns [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ] in cities,
and etc.. These works aim to show the e ectiveness of social data for
characterizing urban environment and human behaviour in cities. Falling in this line of
research, the potential of social media in tourism studies, however, remains to
be investigated.
      </p>
      <p>
        Data sources for tourism studies. United Nations and European Union have
provided guidelines and recommendation regarding the comprehensive
methodological framework for collection and compiling of tourism statistics [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">18, 11</xref>
        ].
Among di erent data sources for tourism study, visitor survey and
transportation statistics are the ones used the most. In addition to this, some tourism
studies focus on data from online review websites, e.g. TripAdvisor [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">17, 16, 3</xref>
        ].
While being relevant, data from these review websites are highly sparse [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ], due
to the nature that they require volunteer input from online users. Recent studies
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ] have shown a limited value of these data in tourism research.
3
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Methods</title>
      <p>In 2015, France was one of the top touristic destinations over the world [20],
with more than 83 million tourist arrivals. In addition, the city of Paris itself
also ranked as the most visited city in the world [19]. Therefore, this paper will
scope the sample of touristic locations within the city of Paris (France). This
section introduces our method in creating the dataset for answering our research
questions, including the o cial tourism statistics, TripAdvisor statistics, and
Instagram data.
3.1</p>
      <p>O</p>
      <p>
        cial Tourism Statistics and TripAdvisor
We are interested in understanding the characteristics of data from social media,
compared with those from other data sources. To this end, we rst determined
the touristic locations considered in our study. We chose the top-5 touristic
locations based on their popularity in Paris' annual visitor statistic [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ] and in
TripAdvisor. Table 1 reports the descriptive statistics of these locations, including
the annual visitors according to the o cial report, and the number of reviewers
in TripAdvisor.
      </p>
      <p>Comparing the popularity of touristic locations in the o cial report and
in TripAdvisor, we can nd that touristic locations have di erent popularity
between the one reported by o cial statistics and the one observed through
TripAdvisor. In particular, while there are more visitors in Cathedral than
Eiffel Tower according to the o cial report, Ei el Tower appears to be the one
reviewed more often on TripAdvisor. In addition, di erent museums also show
di erent popularity: Musee du Louvre is more popular than Musee d'Orsay in
terms of visitors. However, people tend to review Musee d'Orsay more often on
TripAdvisor. These observations clearly show a di erence between the reality
(o cial statistics) and statistics from the online review platform (TripAdvisor).
# Touristic Locations O cial Statistic TripAdvisor</p>
      <p>Visitors Reviews
1 Notre Dame Cathedral
2 Musee du Louvre
3 Eiffel Tower
4 Musee d'Orsay
5 Arc de Triomphe
3.2 Instagram Data
This work requires data acquisition from Instagram as the main object of study.
Currently, Instagram has provided access to their API Endpoints2 through which
developers are able to interact with its data. Unfortunately, due to the change of
Instagram's platform policy starting on 17 November 2015, every newly created
app won't have full access of the API Endpoint (Sandbox Mode)3. Developers are
required to submit their applications through a review process to be granted will
full API access, which requires a long period of time. Therefore, we developed
an alternative method here to track real-time posts available on Instagram, that
was, using its search function.</p>
      <p>Instagram's search function enables us to nd photos based on keyword.
Moreover, Instagram website provides \explore" feature that enables a user to
explore trending and recent posts on a speci ed location based on the
Location2 https://www.instagram.com/developer/
3 http://developers.instagram.com/post/133424514006/
instagram-platform-update
Id4. An example of the Location page is shown in Figure 1. By using
webscrapping techniques we were able to retrieve photos and auxiliary information
required for this study, including Timestamp, User-Id and Location-Id.
Determine Relevant Location-Id. Instagram allows users to tag location
information to photos. In doing this, users get automatically location tag
recommendations based on their locations or photos' coordinates. We leveraged such
location tags to lter relevant posts for this study. Particularly, we noticed that
a single location can have multiple Location-Ids. For example, if we want to nd
Instagram's posts located at The Ei el Tower we could nd it on Location-Id
216052603, as well as Location-Id 2593354, which is the French version of the
name Tour Ei el. To cope with this problem, we proposed to merge multiple
Location-Ids for individual touristic locations, in order to gain more data and to
avoid biasing the interpretation of the results: including either only the English
and the French version of the Location-Id of The Ei el Tower, the results will
be biased to speci c type of people speaking English or French.</p>
      <p>The discovery of available Location-Ids was performed as follows. First, we
queried Instagram's posts based on keyword and/or hash-tags. Second, based on
the retrieved posts we were able to identify a list of frequently used Location-Ids
4 E.g., The
218177821/.</p>
      <p>Ei el Tower: https://www.instagram.com/explore/locations/
(&gt; 100 posts) for speci c touristic locations. As a result, we were able to nd
relevant Instagram's Location-Ids for each tourist destination considered in our
study.</p>
      <p>Tapping on Instagram's Recent Media Stream. After identifying the
Location-Ids of every touristic location in our study, we built a crawler to scrap
Instagram's explore page5 using Location-Ids as the parameters. As a result,
we were able to retrieve 898,339 Instagram posts. However, when analyzing the
retrieved data based on post's timestamp, we found that the number of photos
older than one month decreases dramatically. This pattern could happen either
because of Instagram's own policy that not revealing all old photos or because
of the feature itself only just available since June 20156.</p>
      <p>140000
120000
100000
s
t
so 80000
P
#
60000
40000
20000Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Okt Nov Dec</p>
      <p>Month</p>
      <p>As a result of this nding, we used only recent retrieved posts that were
not older than 14 days (from 25 December 2015 to 7 January 2016) to ensure
reliability. We leave it to future work, to scrap the website for a longer period of
time. The resulting data set contains 82,381 posts7.
5 https://www.instagram.com/explore/locations/&lt;location-id&gt;
6 http://blog.instagram.com/post/122260662827/150623-search-and-explore
7 The dataset has been made available to the community at: https://github.com/
arkka/tourism-analytics</p>
      <p>Arc de Triomphe</p>
      <p>Musee d'Orsay
Musee du Louvre</p>
      <p>22.8%
Notre Dame de Paris
In order to answer RQ1, we rst construct a ranking list of the considered
touristic locations according to their popularity in Instagram. Speci cally for
each touristic location, we count the number of related posts, to be used as a
measure of its popularity in social media. Next, we compare this ranking list
with the one in o cial tourism report and that in TripAdvisor.</p>
      <p>Comparing Metrics. To quantitatively compare the ranking list of touristic
locations from di erent data sources, we used a well-accepted measure of
nonparametric rank correlations, namely Kendall's rank correlation, which is based
on pair-wise agreements between touristic locations. The result shows that there
is no correlation (&lt; 0:1, with p-value &gt; 0:1) between the ranking list of o cial
report and that of social media. Comparing with the ranking from TripAdvisor,
we nd a moderate correlation between social media and TripAdvisor (= 0:59,
p-value = 0:14). We next qualitatively analyze the similarity and dissimilarity
among data from di erent sources, as we will see later.</p>
      <p>Social Media vs. O cial Statistic. It is interesting to see how the relative
ranking positions of di erent tourist locations di er in social media list and the
o cial list of tourism statistics. In particular, o cial tourism statistics reveals
that Notre Dame Cathedral and Muse du Louvre have more visitors than The
Ei el Tower, however in social media the most popular one is The Ei el Tower
for both Instagram and Tripadvisor. A possible reason for this would be that
tourists are more opt to take a photo on landmark touristic locations without
entering the attraction such as museums or monuments. Following this kind
of scenario, we are able to leverage social media data to complement existing
o cial statistics. Social media is able to identify trends independently without
the needs of conventional visitor counting methods, such as using ticket sales
or gate counters. Moreover, social media also able to provide high temporal
resolution data that we can leverage to enhance our analysis which we explore
in the later section.</p>
      <p>Instagram vs. TripAdvisor. Comparing the popularity of touristic locations
between TripAdvisor's user reviews and Instagram's posts, we nd that there are
certain amount of similarities between these statistic . Both of these statistics
rank The Ei el Tower as the most popular touristic locations, followed by Musee
du Louvre and Notre Dame Cathedral respectively. The di erence can be found
for Musee d'Orsay and Arc de Triomphe, which respectively rank at the fourth
and fth in TripAdvisor, but it is the other way around on Instagram. Overall,
it is interesting knowing the fact that these two di erent data sources can relate
with each other. The similarity between TripAdvisor and Instagram data could
be because that both are user-generated. In the following, we will analyze in
detail the utility of social media data in providing ne-grained temporal insights
for tourism studies.
4.2</p>
      <p>
        Evolution of Touristic Location Popularity During New Year's
Eve
Social media has been shown to be e ective as sensors for detecting collective
trends of societal events [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7 ref9">7, 9</xref>
        ]. However, the potential for real-time event sensing
is less investigated. We now study RQ2, that is, how social media can re ect
realtime dynamics of the popularity of touristic locations in big events. Speci cally,
we focus on the social media activities around di erent touristic locations in
New Year's Eve and investigate how their popularity change over time.
      </p>
      <p>Figure 4 shows the dynamics of the popularity of the top touristic locations
in Paris within two weeks from Dec. 25th, 2015 to Jan. 7th, 2016 on a daily base.
We can observe di erent visiting patterns of these considered touristic locations,
according to the evolution of popularity before, during, and after New Year's Eve.
In particular, the popularity of The Ei el Tower and Arc de Triomphe drastically
increases during New Year's Eve in terms of the number of Instagram posts. In
contrast, the popularity of Musee du Louvre deceases during New Year's Eve.
Therefore with social data we could draw the conclusion that The Ei el Tower
and Arc de Triomphe are the ones attract more social activities from visitors
during the big event, while Musee du Louvre loses social attention during the
same period of time. A possible reason could be that people are more likely</p>
      <p>Arc de Triomphe
Musee d'Orsay
Musee du Louvre
Notre Dame de Paris</p>
      <p>Tour Eiffel</p>
      <p>Fig. 4: Daily number of visitor trends on 2016 New Years Eve.
445000 AMMruucssdeeeee Tddr'uOioLrmsoaupyvhree
350 TNooutrreEDiffaemle de Paris
300 New Year's Eve
ts250
s
o
P#200
150
100
50
208/12/2015 29/12/2015 30/12/2015 31/12/2015Hour 1/1/16 2/1/16 3/1/16 4/1/16
(a) Dec. 25th, 2015 { Jan. 7th, 2016
450
400
350
300
ts250
s
o
P#200
150
100
50
000:00 04:00 08:00 12:00 16:00 20:00 0H0:o00ur 04:00 08:00 12:00 16:00 20:00</p>
      <p>Arc de Triomphe
Musee d'Orsay
Musee du Louvre
Notre Dame de Paris
Tour Eiffel</p>
      <p>New Year's Eve
(b) 2016 New Year's Eve.
to celebrate big events in landmark attractions (e.g. The Ei el Tower and Arc
de Triomphe) than museums. We leave it to the future work to nd out more
characteristics of touristic locations according to their corresponding visiting
patterns during big events.</p>
      <p>Daily Visiting Patterns of Tourist Locations during New Year's
Day
Social media data allow us to analyze ne-grained patterns of user activities
with high temporal resolution. We now analyze the visiting patterns of people
to touristic locations on hourly base.</p>
      <p>Daily Visiting Pattern. Figure 5a shows the visiting frequency of people to
touristic locations during the week centred at New Year's Day, observed through
Instagram. we could observe that in normal days (excluding New Year's Eve)
number of Instagram's posts peaked at 9-10PM on each day. In contrast, we
have found a drastic change of daily visiting pattern on New Year's Eve, which
is moved earlier to 6PM on 31 December 2015 and followed by another peak
on the next day at 1AM with a huge number of posts compared to the rest of
other peaks. After the New Year's Eve (1 January 2016) we could observe that
the daily visiting pattern comes back normal as usual in the evening, which is
peaked at 9PM. These observations indicate a distinct visiting pattern of people
to touristic locations on New Year's Day, di ering from other days before and
after. Moreover, this gure also shows the distribution of each post by touristic
locations. Overall, The Ei el Tower consistently has the highest number of posts
compared others, which followed by Musee du Louvre and Notre Dame Cathedral
respectively.</p>
      <p>Using high temporal data that we have retrieved from social media, we are
able to relate the number of posts on speci c touristic locations with their
opening hours. For example, the opening time of Musee du Louvre is from 9am to
6pm every day except on January 1, May 1 and December 258. Based on the
hourly visitor trends depicted on gure 5b, we could see that the number of
posts increases dramatically on 9am until reaching it's peak on 6pm and then
decreases dramatically when reaching the closing hour on 6pm. We could
interpret that as during New Year's eve, people tend to visit a touristic location that
has no restrictive opening hours, which usually is an outdoor touristic location,
such as The Ei el Tower and Arc de Triomphe, instead of museums in Paris
such as Musee du Louvre that are closed on the 1st January 2016. Therefore,
it is clear that social data is able to provide additional data and insights that
complement the existing o cial statistics.</p>
      <p>Visiting Patterns of Di erent Touristic Locations on New Year's Eve.
Based on the previous analysis, we have noticed that there is a di erence visiting
pattern on New Year's Eve and normal days. On gure 5b, we focused our
analysis from 31 December 2015 to 1 January 2016 to identify the trend. Consistent
with previous results, this gure shows that on New Year's Eve people are more
likely to celebrate at The Ei el Tower and Arc de Triomphe. Moreover, Arc
de Triomphe become the second-most popular touristic location for celebrating
New Year's Eve. In contrast, Musee du Louvre which is usually the second-most
popular touristic location on a normal day becomes less popular on New Year's
Eve. These observations indicate that people tend to be selective in celebrating
the big event, favouring more at landmark locations than museums.
5</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Threat to Validity</title>
      <p>This study aims to explore the potential of social media data in tourism studies.
The main limitation (and a threat to validity) is the size of the data we collect.
8 http://www.louvre.fr/en/hours-admission/admission
This relates to several important factors, including the length of the time period
of the data, the number of city and touristic locations we consider in the data.
It would be highly interesting to compare the touristic locations in di erent
cities, which we leave for the future work. Second, due to Instagram's Public
API limitation, we couldn't explore the full potential of Instagram data using
the API. In this paper, we stress our e ort in creating the trustable data crawler,
and testing the reliability of the data.
6</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>While social media has open many research opportunities in urban analytic,
the value in the tourism studies has been much less explored and remains an
open question. This paper takes a rst step towards understanding the utility
of social media data in urban tourism studies. We show that social media can
provide di erent re ections of the tourism from other data sources, including
o cial tourism report and online review platforms (e.g. TripAdvisor); moreover,
we nd that social media data can provide real-time insights of tourists' visiting
patterns during big events. In conclusion, our study provides a set of preliminary
results that support social media as a useful data source for touristic marketing
and decision making.
12. G. C. J. Park and E. Ferrara. Sytle in the age of instagram: Predicting success
within the fashion industry using social media. 2015.
13. R. Lee and K. Sumiya. Measuring geographical regularities of crowd behaviors for
twitter-based geo-social event detection. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM
SIGSPATIAL international workshop on location based social networks, pages 1{10. ACM,
2010.
14. W. Mangold and D. Faulds. Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion
mix. 2009.
15. M. Mathioudakis and N. Koudas. Twittermonitor: trend detection over the twitter
stream. In Proceedings of the 2010 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on
Management of data, pages 1155{1158. ACM, 2010.
16. J. Miguens, R. Baggio, and C. Costa. Social media and tourism destinations:</p>
      <p>Tripadvisor case study. Advances in Tourism Research, 26(28):26{28, 2008.
17. P. O'Connor. User-generated content and travel: A case study on tripadvisor. com.</p>
      <p>Information and communication technologies in tourism 2008, pages 47{58, 2008.
18. United Nations. International Recommendations for Tourism Statistics, 2008.
19. UNWTO. UNWTO Tourism Highlights: 2015 Edition. 2015.
20. UNWTO. Unwto world tourism barometer. 14, May 2016.
21. WTTC. Travel &amp; Tourism: Economic Impact 2015. 2015.
22. J. Yang, C. Hau , G.-J. Houben, and C. T. Bolivar. Diversity in urban social
media analytics. In Web Engineering, pages 335{353. Springer, 2016.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Frequentation</given-names>
            <surname>Des Sites Culturels</surname>
          </string-name>
          Pariens
          <year>2015</year>
          .
          <year>2016</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Abel</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Q.</given-names>
            <surname>Gao</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.-J.</given-names>
            <surname>Houben</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Tao</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Semantic enrichment of twitter posts for user pro le construction on the social web</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Extended Semantic Web Conference</source>
          , pages
          <volume>375</volume>
          {
          <fpage>389</fpage>
          . Springer,
          <year>2011</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J. K.</given-names>
            <surname>Ayeh</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Au</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Law</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>do we believe in tripadvisor? examining credibility perceptions and online travelers attitude toward using user-generated content</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Travel Research</source>
          , page
          <volume>0047287512475217</volume>
          ,
          <year>2013</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Bachrach</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Personality and patterns of facebook usage</article-title>
          .
          <year>2012</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Balduini</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Bozzon</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E. Della</given-names>
            <surname>Valle</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Huang</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.-J.</given-names>
            <surname>Houben</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Recommending venues using continuous predictive social media analytics</article-title>
          .
          <source>IEEE Internet Computing</source>
          ,
          <volume>18</volume>
          (
          <issue>5</issue>
          ):
          <volume>28</volume>
          {
          <fpage>35</fpage>
          ,
          <year>2014</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6. Z. Cheng, J. Caverlee,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            <surname>Lee</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D. Z.</given-names>
            <surname>Sui</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Exploring millions of footprints in location sharing services</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of the 5th AAAI conference on web and social media</source>
          , volume
          <volume>2011</volume>
          , pages
          <fpage>81</fpage>
          {
          <fpage>88</fpage>
          ,
          <year>2011</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
            <surname>Constantinides</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Social media / web 2.0 as marketing parameter: An introduction</article-title>
          .
          <year>2009</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          8.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Cranshaw</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Schwartz</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J. I.</given-names>
            <surname>Hong</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
            <surname>Sadeh</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>The livehoods project: Utilizing social media to understand the dynamics of a city</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of the 6th AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, page 58</source>
          ,
          <year>2012</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          9.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
            <surname>Diaz-Avilez</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Stewart</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Tracking twitter for epidemic intelligence</article-title>
          .
          <source>case study: Ehec/hus outbreak in germany</source>
          .
          <year>2011</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          10.
          <string-name>
            <surname>M. S</surname>
          </string-name>
          . et al.
          <article-title>Tourist satisfaction as the key to destination survival in pahang</article-title>
          .
          <year>2013</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          11.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Eurostat</surname>
          </string-name>
          . Methodological manual for tourism statistics,
          <year>2014</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>