<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Overview of the European Strategy in Research Infrastructures</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Dimitrios Tzovaras Information Technologies Institute, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Thessaloniki 57001</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="GR">Greece</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Proceedings of the XVIII International Conference «Data Analytics and Management in Data Intensive Domains» (DAMDID/RCDL'2016)</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Ershovo</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="RU">Russia</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <fpage>187</fpage>
      <lpage>194</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>The European Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures (ESFRI) was established in 2002, with a mandate from the EU Council to support a coherent and strategy-led approach to policy-making on research infrastructures in Europe, and to facilitate multilateral initiatives leading to the better use and development of Research Infrastructures (RI), at EU and international level. ESFRI has recently presented its updated 2016 Roadmap which demonstrates the dynamism of the European scientific community and the commitment of Member States to develop new research infrastructures at the European level. This work is focused on the identification of the new features and conclusions of the ESFRI Roadmap 2016 in terms of the methods and procedures that led to the call, the evaluation and selection of the new ESFRI Projects and the definition and assessment of the ESFRI Landmarks. An analysis of the impact of research infrastructures on structuring the European Research Area as well as the global research scene, and of the overall contribution to European competitiveness are also discussed focusing on data intensive RI and eInfrastructures projects.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1 Introduction</title>
      <p>ESFRI has recently fulfilled the commitment made by
Member States and the European Commission in the
Innovation Union flagship initiative and has
implemented 60% of ESFRI projects by the end of 2015.
The new ESFRI 2016 Roadmap demonstrates the
dynamism of the European scientific community and the
commitment of Member States to develop new research
infrastructures at the European level. The networks of
research infrastructures across Europe strengthen its
human capital base by providing world-class training for
a new generation of researchers and engineers and
promoting interdisciplinary collaboration.</p>
      <p>The objective of Horizon 2020 is to ensure the
implementation and operation of the ESFRI and other
worldclass research infrastructures, including the
development of regional partner facilities; integration of
and access to national research infrastructures; and the
development, deployment and operation of
einfrastructures. The major changes in Horizon 2020 with
regard to the previous framework programme (FP7)
include the emphasis on innovation and the development
of human resources, addressing industry as an
einfrastructure supplier and user, more resolve towards
service orientation and service integration, and more
emphasis on data infrastructure development. In Horizon
2020 the e-infrastructure activities are part of the
European Research Infrastructures, including
einfrastructures programme. The indicative budget for
einfrastructures from 2014 to 2020 is 890 million euros.</p>
      <p>This work starts with an overview of the European
strategy for RI, with a special emphasis in
eInfrastructures, as defined in the ESFRI Strategy report
published in March 2016 and will then show that
implementations of some of the facilities stipulated by
the Strategy have already started under the H2020
support. Focus is given on the identification of the new
features and conclusions of the ESFRI Roadmap 2016 in
terms of the methods and procedures that led to the call,
the evaluation and selection of the new ESFRI Projects
and the definition and assessment of the ESFRI
Landmarks. An analysis of the impact of research
infrastructures on structuring the European Research
Area as well as the global research scene, and of the
overall contribution to European competitiveness will
also follow. A further analysis of the ESFRI Projects and
ESFRI Landmarks will also be provided focusing on RI
and e-Infrastructure projects that are data-intensive. A
Landscape Analysis will also be presented that provides
the current context, in each domain, of the operational
national and international research infrastructures open
to European scientists and technology developers
through peer-review of competitive science proposals.
The e-infrastructures landscape, transversal to all
domains, will be also elaborated as approached by the
eInfrastructure Reflection Group (e-IRG).</p>
      <p>The work also focuses on recent initiatives and
activities supporting the e-infrastructure activities in
Horizon 2020 in order to achieve by 2020 a single and
open European space for on-line research where
researchers will enjoy leading-edge, ubiquitous and
reliable services for networking and computing, and
seamless and open access to e-Science environments and
global data resources, such as:
between the research communities and the concerned
governments from the very beginning of the RI project
•
•
•</p>
      <sec id="sec-1-1">
        <title>The European Open Science Cloud initiative</title>
        <p>activities, towards facilitating integration in the
area of European e-Infrastructures and
connected services between the member states,
at the European level, and internationally.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-1-2">
        <title>Activities of the e-Infrastructure Reflection</title>
        <p>Group (e-IRG), focusing on presenting the
eIRG Roadmap 2016 to be published this
Summer 2016, which will give guidance and
recommendations for policy and technical
discussions on the main European Open Science
Cloud topics.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-1-3">
        <title>Activities involving EU - Russian Federation</title>
        <p>cooperation in the area of RI in FP7 and H2020.</p>
        <p>Ultimately, the guidelines for providing access to RIs
are given, and the impact of RIs to European Union and
internationally are discussed.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2 European strategy for Research</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Infrastructures</title>
      <p>Since 2006, ESFRI focuses on the identification of RIs
in Europe across all scientific areas and periodically
updates its roadmaps for providing a strategic vision for
ensuring the access of RIs to researchers. Generally, the
main objectives of ESFRI, as described in [5], are:
• to support a coherent and strategy-led approach
to policy making on research infrastructures in
Europe
• to facilitate multilateral initiatives leading to a
better use and development of research
infrastructures acting as an incubator for
panEuropean and global research infrastructures
• to establish a European Roadmap for research
infrastructures (new and major upgrades,
panEuropean interest) for the coming 10-20 years,
stimulate the implementation of these facilities,
and update the Roadmap as the need arises
• to ensure the follow-up of implementation of
already ongoing ESFRI projects after a
comprehensive assessment, as well as the
prioritization of the infrastructure projects listed
in the ESFRI Roadmap</p>
      <p>With the last roadmap, published in 2016, ESFRI has
widened its horizon and scope by adopting a more
focused, strategic approach and identifying a limited
number of RIs with high added value for European
research. The target is to fund a limited number of mature
projects that will enhance European research and
innovation competitiveness. Thus, as stated in [5], ESFRI
added as an important eligibility condition that a proposal
required a funding commitment from the submitting
Member State or Associated Country along with a
political commitment from at least two others. This
requirement strengthened the transparency of the
submission process and forced a dialogue and crosscheck
[5]. This is also ensured by performing a landscape
analysis of RIs for identifying their strengths, potential
and weaknesses in all fields of research.</p>
      <sec id="sec-3-1">
        <title>2.1 Landscape Analysis and ESFRI Landmarks</title>
        <p>The purpose of landscape analysis is to identify the
operating open access RIs from national, regional and
international infrastructures, as well as groups that
provide integrated solutions with open access to the
stateof-the-art resources. The impact of the landscape analysis
by the ESFRI infrastructures is emphasised by the list of
ESFRI Landmarks, that are implemented ESFRI projects
(or started implementation under the roadmap) with great
success on providing scientific services and
competitiveness of the European Research Area.</p>
        <p>The key elements of the new ESFRI process, as stated
in [5], are:
• definition of clear rules, communication and
explanation of the procedure at the start;
• delineation of a window of opportunity: new
projects will remain on ESFRI Roadmap for a
maximum of ten years;
• evaluation of scientific relevance and project
maturity in parallel but separately;
• engagement of international experts and peer
reviewers in the evaluation process;
• adoption of a lifecycle approach to the analysis
of infrastructures, with Projects and Landmarks
clearly identified and indication of emerging
opportunities;
• assessment of the implementation of the
inherited projects from Roadmap 2008 and
2010 for monitoring their progress and
identifying areas where support is needed;
• recognition and analysis of the overall
“Landscape” of the European research
infrastructure system and of the
complementarity of projects;
• identification of the role of the successful
ESFRI infrastructures and definition of the
“Landmark list”;
• monitoring of Projects and periodic review of</p>
        <p>Landmarks, and update of the Roadmap.</p>
        <p>Emphasis on new ESFRI projects is always given on
excellence, impact, sustainability and continuous report.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-2">
        <title>2.2 The ESFRI Roadmap 2016 projects and</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-3">
        <title>Landmarks</title>
        <p>The new ESFRI roadmap contains 21 ESFRI projects, 9
from the 2008 roadmap, 6 from the 2010 roadmap and
five new project (plus one reoriented project). The
evaluation process for selecting the new projects was a)
the Strategy Working Groups with respect to their
scientific excellence, pan-European relevance and
socioeconomic impact and b) their degree of maturity as
benchmarked by the ESFRI Implementation Group.</p>
        <p>Regarding the ESFRI Landmarks, 29 are listed
containing already implemented projects and two new
projects that were evaluated and are under construction.
The list of the ESFRI projects (Table 1) and the ESFRI
Landmarks (Table 2) are presented in [5], and are
categorized in the following application categories:
• Energy (4 projects)
• Environment (5 projects)
• Health &amp; Food (8 projects)
• Physical Sciences &amp; Engineering (3 projects)
• Social &amp; Cultural Innovation (1 project).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-4">
        <title>2.3 Big Data in Research Infrastructures</title>
        <p>Data occurring from RIs by experimentation,
measurements, observations, data analysis, modelling
and simulations are usually large or complex that
traditional data processing applications are insufficient to
process. Moreover, the analysis of such data is crucial to
scientific research and usually require high performance
computing or cloud computing capabilities in order to
process them.</p>
        <p>For this reason, the Research Data Alliance (RDA)
addresses a global data policy with direct connections
with e-IRG, with specific actions on standardization
strategies, like PanData for analytic facilities [7].
Usually, such data occur from physics experiments,
astronomical research, biomedical interests or large scale
simulations of complex systems. The distributed nature
of RIs in the domains listed before, enhances the need for
effective data access and analysis. Thus, the ESFRI is
expected to play a significant role in this general
development, by formulating a new generation of big
data practitioners and big data engineers.
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
2006
2008
The evaluation process of new projects from ESFRI
adopted a transparent approach together with national
research authorities and research communities of the new
roadmap process. This process is illustrated in Figure 1,
and consists of five distinct steps, as presented in [5]:
• Review of projects from previous ESFRI
roadmaps. The RIs that were implemented and
produced high quality services to the
community led to the identification of the
ESFRI Landmarks. The lifecycle analysis
performed for the identification of scientific key
services is now adopted and key issues can now
be resolved for the remaining projects.
• Submission and eligibility of proposals.</p>
        <p>Members or Associated countries can submit
proposals to the ESFRI Roadmap 2016. New
ESFRI Projects have to be competitive and
mature, while the ability to be implemented
within ten years is crucial. They need to
demonstrate government level financial
commitment of the proponent Member State or
Associated Country plus at least two additional
political commitments. This increases the
likelihood of success for the projects and
enables a more robust and reliable selection
process by ESFRI.
• Evaluation of proposals. Eligible proposals
were assessed through two parallel and
independent evaluation processes. The Strategy
Working Groups (SWGs) evaluated the
scientific case, i.e. scientific merit, relevance
and impact, European added value,
socioeconomic benefit and the needs of interfacing or
integrating external e-infrastructure. The SWG
identified assigns a minimum of three
independent international peer-reviewers who
contribute their evaluation on the science
aspects of the project. In parallel, the
Implementation Group (IG) assessed the
maturity, i.e. stakeholder commitment, user
strategy and access policy, preparatory work,
planning, governance and management, human
resources policy, finances, feasibility and risks.
The IG similarly assigns international expert
evaluators to assess the relevant “maturity”
aspects of each project. Based on their own
analysis and on the reports from the referees, the
SWG and IG identified critical questions and
issues to be addressed by each of the eligible
proposals. The SWG and IG subsequently
reached their conclusions with a joint
recommendation per project, and an overall
harmonization to align the results from the
different areas and formulate a ranking of the
projects and recommendations.
• Decision making. The executive board proposes
a final recommendation on the list of projects
and Landmarks that should be included for a
final decision.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4 e-infrastructure activities in Horizon 2020</title>
      <p>During the last decades, scientific applications require
challenging demands of interoperable data,
computational power and collaborations between
different scientific fields and researchers. The developed
large scale information systems called e-infrastructures
and are supported by many initiatives in Europe and
worldwide.</p>
      <p>The European Commission (EC) is interested on
investing through its Framework Programmes in
eInfrastructures since they are considered as key enablers
of the European Research Area (ERA). The collaboration
among scientific communities of researchers that work
together on complex multi-disciplinary problems whose
solutions are highly beneficial for the society and the
progress at large are then of high importance, [1].</p>
      <p>The corresponding H2020 call for e-infrastructures
(H2020-EINFRA-2016-2017) focuses on the open
research data, data and computing intensive science,
research and education networking, high performance
computing and big data innovation. The following
principles are key elements for the project
implementations:
• Service orientation: The funded projects will
contribute to the formulation of a high quality
catalogue of services describing the services
that they will provide during the lifetime of the
projects. A service oriented European
einfrastructure landscape will be supported by
adopting new knowledge and innovative ICT
solutions by global and multidisciplinary
research.
• Maximizing and assessing the impact of the
einfrastructures: Projects should have a clear
plan for active participation in international fora
and research groups/initiatives to promote data
and computing infrastructure interoperability.
• Co-Design: A balanced set of partners with
complementary competences and roles should
form the consortium of projects that will be
funded by this call.
• Open Research Data: In order to make research
data discoverable, accessible, intelligible,
useable and interoperable, this call focuses on
open data taking into account the above criteria.
• H2020 as a catalyst of the European plan for
growth and jobs: This call will promote the use
of other funding sources as instrument to
support initiatives of European interest to foster
growth and jobs.</p>
      <p>The call has two themes: “Integration and
consolidation of e-infrastructure platforms supporting
European policies and research and education
communities” and “Support to the next implementation
phase of Pan-European High Performance Computing
infrastructure and services (PRACE)” with several
topics. More details and the specific topics can be found
in [2].</p>
      <p>Recent initiatives and activities for supporting the
einfrastructure activities in Horizon 2020 have been
formulated. In order to achieve by 2020 a single and open
European space for on-line research where researchers
will enjoy leading-edge, ubiquitous and reliable services
for networking and computing, and seamless and open
access to e-Science environments and global data
resources, several research groups and cooperation have
been instantiated. The distribution of Research
Infrastructures in Europe is illustrated in Figure 2.</p>
      <sec id="sec-4-1">
        <title>4.1 European Open Science Cloud</title>
        <p>Recently, the Commission High Level Expert Group on
the European Open Science Cloud (HLEG EOSC) has
drafted a first report on the realization of the European
Open Science Cloud that will be published after summer
2016. With this initiative, EOSC aims to introduce,
accelerate and support the Open Science and Open
Innovation in the Digital Single Market, thus enabling
reuse of geographically distributed scientific data.</p>
        <p>EOSC is a European infrastructure, worldwide
accessible and interoperable, including all the required
human expertise, resources, standards, best practices and
the underlying technical infrastructures. Special
emphasis is given on the support of the Finding, Access,
Interoperation and the re-use of open and sensitive
secured data. It supports also data related elements, i.e.
software, standards, protocols and workflows, that allow
the data driven knowledge discovery and innovation.
1 http://ec.europa.eu/research/infrastructures/index_en.cfm?pg=mapri</p>
        <p>Figure 2 Research Infrastructures funded by the
European Commission1.</p>
        <p>Due to the fact that about 50% of the research data
are not reproducible, EOSC aims to realize the ambition
of collaboration across research infrastructures through
re-use of scientific data across Europe.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-2">
        <title>4.2 e-Infrastructure Reflection Group (e-IRG)</title>
        <p>The e-Infrastructure Reflection Group (e-IRG), founded
in 2003), is a European independent body with mission
to form a general purpose European e-Infrastructure by
providing guidance on the development of a European
eInfrastructure for science and research. Some examples
of already established e-Infrastructures across Europe are
GEANT (networking - http://www.geant.org/), EGI
(cloud computing - https://www.egi.eu/), PRACE
(supercomputing - http://www.prace-ri.eu/), EUDAT
(big data - https://www.eudat.eu/), IDGF (crowd
computing - http://idgf-sp.eu/), Open Aire (repository for
scientific articles - https://www.openaire.eu/).</p>
        <p>e-IRG initiative purpose is to support strategic
European e-Infrastructure policymaking and the
development of convergent and sustainable
eInfrastructure services. As stated in the revised Mission
and Vision statement of e-IRG, [6], the two main
objectives are “Sustain e-IRG as the leading European
advisory body on e-Infrastructures” and “Maintain and
further develop e-IRG in its role as the facilitator and
stimulator of European e-infrastructure collaboration”.</p>
        <p>To reach these goals, e-IRG acts as advisory body by
producing strategic and policy reports, analyses and
recommendations. e-IRG has also the ambition to
influence regional and European policy makers and to
promote scientific excellence approach in
eInfrastructure policy making. After the publication of the
ESFRI Roadmap 2016, the e-IRG group is intended to
publish the e-IRG Roadmap 2016 during the summer of
2016, which will provide guidance and recommendations
for policy and technical discussions on the main
European Open Science Cloud topics.
is established by the Ministry of Education and Science
of the Russian Federation. Dedicated calls offer
cofunding support for Russian Horizon 2020 participants in
accordance with the Russian Federal Programme (FTP)
“R&amp;D in Priority Areas of Development of the Russian
S&amp;T Complex 2014-2020” managed by the Russian
Ministry of Education &amp; Science (MES).</p>
        <p>In 2014, the European Commission published the
Roadmap for international cooperation document, [4],
including the Russian Federation, as report on the
implementation of the strategy for international
cooperation in research and innovation. Specific
opportunities of collaboration offered 13 thematic
working groups: aeronautics, energy, environment and
climate change, food, agriculture, biotechnology, health,
ICT research, e-infrastructures, mobility,
nanotechnology/materials, research infrastructures, and
space.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>5 Access to Research Infrastructures</title>
      <p>European Commission, in close cooperation with the
ESFRI, the e-IRG group and other EU organizations
developed the Charter for Access to Research
Infrastructures, for promoting the harmonisation of
access procedures and enhanced transparency of access
policies in order to enable the remote access of users to
the RIs. This document was published in March 2016,
[2], and it is accompanied with reference documentation
containing complementary material regarding the
definition of an access policy for any RI.</p>
      <p>The charter promotes access to RIs and interaction
with a wide range of social and economic activities,
including business, industry and public services, in order
to maximise the return on investment in RIs and to drive
innovation, competitiveness and efficiency, [2]. The
Charter for Access to RIs proposes the following
guidelines that each RI have to specify, [2]:
• Access policy: The Access Policy should define
the access in terms of Access Units, the state of
the specific Access mode, clarify the conditions
for Access, describe the processes and
interactions involved in the Access and
elaborate on the support measures facilitating
the Access.
• Access modes: Three different Access modes
have been defined, i.e. excellence-driven,
market-driven and wide. Thus, each access to a
RI may be regulated according to one Access
mode or any combination of them.
• Access restrictions: Definition of possible
restrictions by means of quota or pre-defined
user groups.
• Access processes and interactions: The
following processes and interactions are defined
in the Access to RIs: application, negotiation,
evaluation, feedback, selection, admission,
approval, feasibility check, setting-up, use,
2https://ec.europa.eu/research/infrastructures/index_en.cfm?pg=charte
r_access_ri</p>
      <p>monitoring and dismantling.
• Support measures facilitating Access: RIs are
encouraged to offer support measures such as
guidance through user manuals, provision of
user support, provision of accommodation and
guidance with immigration procedures.
• Education and training: RIs are encouraged to
offer education and training, as well as to
collaborate with other institutions and
organizations that benefit from using RIs for
their education and training purposes.
• Regulatory framework: A regulatory framework
should be defined when providing access to a
RI, that should cover Access, intellectual
property rights, data protection, confidentiality,
liability and possible fees.
• Transparency: Each RI should provide
transparent information on the RI itself,
including its services, access policy, data
management policy and the terms and
conditions.
• Research data management plan: RIs and users
should have an agreement on a data
management plan outlining how the research
data will be handled.
• Health, safety, security and environment: RIs
should take the necessary actions to ensure the
health, security and safety of any user accessing
the RI itself, as well as to minimize the impact
on the environment.
• Quality assurance: RIs are encouraged to set up
mechanisms in order to evaluate the quality of
the provided access to users.
• Limitations: Access to RIs may by limited by
the following: national security and defence;
privacy and confidentiality; commercial
sensitivity and intellectual property rights;
ethical considerations in accordance with
applicable laws and regulations.</p>
      <p>Therefore, all the established RIs have published2 in
accordance with the charter, their individual access
policies to foster collaboration among researchers across
Europe. International cooperation and access to RIs is
strongly encouraged from the European Commission,
thus RIs should also define how non-EU members can
grand access to their infrastructures.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>6 Impact of Research Infrastructures</title>
      <p>The relationship between academia and RIs contributes
to an effective European educational and scientific
ecosystem that attracts and supports industry. The
optimal distribution of the RIs across Europe (Figure 2),
is of great importance since it contributes in promoting
European cohesion, [5]. The knowledge-based economy
is effectively stimulated by strengthening the links
between RIs, higher education and research institutions
with economic players like industry, services and
utilities, [5].</p>
      <p>The ESFRI Working Group on Innovation (WG
INNO) promoted the industrial capabilities of the RIs on
the ESFRI Roadmap in order to push the cooperation of
pan-European RIs with industry. This implies promoting
partnerships on R&amp;D projects for realizing ecosystems
of integrated competences, services and technologies
facilitating industrial innovation. Generally, linking the
RIs among themselves and allowing the broader social,
technological and economical players to acquire
information from multiple resources in an effective,
efficient and sustainable way, [5].</p>
      <p>The success of many RIs lead the G8+5 Group of
Senior Officials (GSO) to define a strategy for Global
Research Infrastructures (GRI). A well-known example
of a GRI is CERN for high-energy physics that is now
considered as a globalized infrastructure. The Global
Science Forum is responsible for identifying GRI needs
and opportunities, including the organizational and long
term sustainability aspects. ESFRI acts as a reliable
partner at the global level in the practical development of
scientific and political initiatives aimed at
internationalization of new or existing infrastructures
that appear ready to move to a global operation involving
access, data policy, and lifecycle management and to
consider international governance, [5].</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>7 Conclusions</title>
      <p>European Commission and the ESFRI group have
provided the resources and competence for supporting a
strong research and innovation profile for their members,
by sharing expensive scientific equipment and
einfrastructures, capitalising on cross-border
collaboration and human potential across Europe. The
main principles for the European strategy for Research
Infrastructures rely on the adoption of a coherent
participation model in European and global RI initiatives,
utilization of a continuous collaboration among academia
and industry, and on the harmonization of investment in
e-infrastructures, as key enablers of a knowledge
intensive economy, for and of eScience. A coordinated
policy framework of e-Infrastructures, including fast
networking, storage, high performance computing, data
access and management structures and services has been
progressing during the last years.</p>
      <p>ESFRI, over the past decade, has improved the
efficiency and impact of the European RIs, that are
moving towards a sustainable investment for overall
competitiveness. With the new published ESFRI
Roadmap 2016, new methods and procedures have been
adopted, as well as new procedures for the evaluation and
selection of new projects and definition and assessment
of the ESFRI Landmarks. Enhancing and optimising RIs
and their access by scientists and researchers is a key
element of competitiveness as well as a necessary basis
for dealing with societal challenges.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Giuseppe</given-names>
            <surname>Andronico</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Valeria Ardizzone, Roberto Barbera, Bruce Becker, Riccardo Bruno, Antonio Calanducci, Diego Carvalho, Leandro Ciuffo, Marco Fargetta, Emidio Giorgio, Giuseppe La Rocca, Alberto Masoni, Marco Paganoni, Federico Ruggieri and Diego Scardaci.
          <article-title>e-Infrastructures for e-Science: A Global View</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Grid Computing</source>
          ,
          <volume>9</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ), p
          <fpage>155</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>184</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2011</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          https://ec.europa.eu/research/infrastructures/pdf/ 2016_
          <article-title>charterforaccessto-ris.pdf European Commission</article-title>
          . HORIZON 2020
          <string-name>
            <surname>-Work Programme</surname>
          </string-name>
          2016
          <article-title>-2017</article-title>
          .
          <article-title>European Research Infrastructures (including e-Infrastrucures)</article-title>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref /h2020/wp/2016_2017/main/h2020-wp1617
          <article-title>- infrastructures_en.pdf European Commission</article-title>
          .
          <article-title>Roadmaps for international cooperation</article-title>
          , Brussels,
          <year>2014</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          http://ec.europa.eu/research/iscp/pdf/policy/ann ex_roadmaps_
          <fpage>sep</fpage>
          -2014
          <source>.pdf European Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures. Strategy Report on Research Infrastructures</source>
          ,
          <year>Roadmap 2016</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>http://www.esfri.eu/roadmap-2016 e-Infrastructure Reflection Group (e-IRG).</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          http://e-irg.
          <article-title>eu/ Photon and Neutron data infrastructure initiative (PaNdata)</article-title>
          . http://pan-data.eu/ Ralph Schroeder. e-Research Infrastructures and Open Science:
          <article-title>Towards a New System of Knowledge Production?</article-title>
          .
          <source>Prometheus</source>
          ,
          <volume>25</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ), p.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>