<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Case Study on Requirements Engineering in Information Mining Project: Metallurgical Enterprise</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Pollo-Cattaneo, M.F.</string-name>
          <email>flo.pollo@gmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Pesado, P.</string-name>
          <email>ppesado@lidi.info.</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Britos, P.</string-name>
          <email>paobritos@gmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>García-Martínez, R.</string-name>
          <email>rgarcia@unla.edu.ar</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Information Mining, Research Group. National., Lab ID + i in Visualization</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Computer Graphics and</addr-line>
          ,
          <institution>Creative Code. University, of Rio Negro at El Bolsón</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Río Negro</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="AR">Argentina.</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Information Systems, Research Group. National, University of Lanus</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Buenos Aires</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="AR">Argentina.</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>PhD Program on</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Computer Science.</addr-line>
          <institution>, Computer Science School., National University of La, Plata. Information System, Methodologies Research, Group. Technological, National University.</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Buenos Aires</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="AR">Argentina.</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3">
          <label>3</label>
          <institution>School of Computer, Science. National, University of La Plata.</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Buenos Aires</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="AR">Argentina.</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>There can be no debate that Information Mining Projects cause processing tools to arise with the sole purpose of converting available organization data into useful knowledge on account of decision-making. Considering the aforementioned, this type of projects demands due diligence in the requirement specification process, as the latter needs to be thorough and traceable throughout the entire project, and therefore, process associated with requirements engineering are not to be reused in any future projects among the like. Similarly, latest methodologies within the field of Information Mining fail to take practices associated to stakeholders and costumers' requirements management into account. With this aim in mind, a solution model to the Information Mining Project Management necessities is proposed. • Computing methodologies➝Modeling and simulation • Information systems➝Information systems applications</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>Management,</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Process,</title>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>1. INTRODUCTION</title>
        <p>
          The basis of Information Mining is centered on data processing for
nontrivial knowledge collection, an organizational task in which
analysis and synthesis tools are indispensable [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
          ]. The
aforementioned knowledge being unknown, it can be further
exploited by organizations on account of the decision-making
process [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
          ]. Information Systems specialists claim data
relationships, fluctuations and dependencies to be the core of the
process, rather than the data itself [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
          ]; whether these relationships
reflect the reality and are then regarded as valid for doing so, the
fact that they revolutionize the criteria for decision-making cannot
be dismissed [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
          ]. Taking the CRISP-DM [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
          ], P3TQ [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
          ], and
SEMMA [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
          ] standout Information Mining Methodologies as
examples, it can be seen that these all fail to take into account
aspects of those related to both project management and the
organizational context where the project is taken on, thus failing to
engineer the key concepts in business knowledge [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
          ].
        </p>
        <p>All things considered, this paper employs a proposed model which
contributes to the development of a thorough requirements
management in the context of an Information Mining project. In
order to do so, the detected problem is first described (Section 2),
and then a solution proposal is suggested (Section 3). Afterwards,
a case study in which the proposed process is implemented is then
shown (Section 4), and lastly, conclusions and future work lines are
presented (Section 5).</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-2">
        <title>2. PROBLEM DESCRIPTION</title>
        <p>
          What a proper Information Mining project needs is a due
consistent and traceable the project throughout - requirements
specification, which should, at first, allow for an orderly project
management, and also leave out any possible requirements
misunderstandings [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
          ]. Nonetheless, there is one glaring difference
between this type of projects and traditional software projects, as
an Information Mining Project demands no software product
construction, but none other than the transformation of data into
knowledge: a mere process. For this reason, it is clear that
requirements for this type of projects do not abide by any
definitions of restrictions and/or functionalities of those which the
software product does have to fulfill in the field of Software
Engineering [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
          ].
        </p>
        <p>
          At the origination of an Information Mining project, its objectives
describing customer’s general necessities - what he wants to get as
a final result of the project, generally linked to strategic and tactical
business goals [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
          ] - must be identified. This is because by
applying this field’s algorithms to available data, the latter is
transformed into knowledge in order to accomplish all sorts of
objectives. What is more, guessing out the organization’s real
expectations is key to obtaining the desired final project [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
          ].
So as to attain a clearer overview of the project, all parties taking
part in it need to manage the same vocabulary [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>
          ]. Once the
project's aims have been identified, an initial survey on available
sources of information has to be carried out. Based upon an analysis
of the project objective and information sources, the scope of the
project can be defined, thereby obtaining a group of particular
objectives. These may be achieved with the aid of Information
Mining-based algorithmic processes [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>
          ]. Thus, the business
problem - the mere motive of the entire project - can then be
solved with methodologies other than those originated in Software
Engineering, in that they overlook practical aspects of the
characteristically Information Mining requirements specification
[
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>
          ].
        </p>
        <p>
          Latest methodologies - CRISP-D, P3TQ and SEMMA - are
centered on Knowledge Discovery in Databases Process (KDD)
and emphasize available data detection, together with a simplified
overall vision of where the project develops [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>
          ], as stakeholder
and customer requirements-associated activities are left apart [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">17</xref>
          ].
The model applied in this paper elaborates on the Process Model
for Information Mining projects from [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>
          ], which is based on the
CRISP-DM methodology [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">19</xref>
          ], considering Small and Medium
Enterprises (SME) aspects. Despite this methodology including
phase-spread activities of CRISP-DM, especially "Business
Comprehension" and "Data Comprehension", COMPETISOFT
details none by only indicating what are the techniques to be
applied in any activity [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">20</xref>
          ]. Similarly, Requirements Engineering
documenting templates defined in [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>
          ] are implemented in this
paper.
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-3">
        <title>3. PROPOSED SOLUTION MODEL</title>
        <p>
          A proposed process model is split into five orderly phases: “Project
Definition”, “Business Process Engineering”, “Business Process
Data Engineering”, “Business Conceptualization” and
“Information Mining Process Specification”.
“Project Definition” phase aims to define the project scope,
stakeholders, and objectives to accomplish. The “Business Process
Engineering” phase seeks to identify and survey the most relevant
business processes in the project. The purpose of "Business Process
Engineering” is to locate data repositories where information of the
various business processes is stored and to survey their contents.
The phase of "Business Conceptualization", attempts to define
business in terms of concepts developed and vocabulary managed
in order to understand the business jargon, therefore revealing
business technical words' meanings coined in the business context.
Finally, "Information Mining Process Specification" phase intends
to identify Information Mining Processes available for use in
solving business processes problems, prior to developing the
planification of the remaining project activities. A description of
the proposed model phases and activities is displayed at [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">21</xref>
          ].
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-4">
        <title>4. CASE STUDY</title>
        <p>
          In this section, the results obtained applying the proposed process
model to a case study, are offered. Such case study uncovers
behavior patterns allowing the description of trailers used as
resources in the production area of a metallurgical enterprise. These
patterns will be taken under consideration for decision making
when planning the assembly line of units. Following, the products
obtained in the five phases of the process are shown (for clarity
generated graphics and application models of each phase they are
also represented in [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref21">21</xref>
          ]).
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-5">
        <title>4.1 Applying the First Phase of Project</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-6">
        <title>Definition</title>
        <p>The following activities are described: “Identifying Project
Objectives” (Figure 1), “Identifying Project Stakeholders” (Figure
2), and “Identifying the Project Scope” (Figure 3).</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Activity: Identifying Project Objectives.</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Input: Stakeholder meetings information.</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Process:</title>
      <p>1. Documentation analysis to detect project objectives.
2. Generation of a functional decomposition tree (figure 4).
3. Correspondence between function decomposition tree and
objective documentation templates (figure 5).</p>
      <p>Output: Project and Requirement Objectives Templates (figure 6).</p>
      <sec id="sec-5-1">
        <title>4.2 Applying the Second Phase of Business</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-5-2">
        <title>Process Engineering</title>
        <p>The following activities are described: “Identifying Business
Processes” (figure 17) and “Surveying Business Processes” (figure
18).</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Activity: Identifying Business Processes.</title>
      <p>Input: Project Scope Definition Template, Project Objective Template,
Requirement Objective Template, Project Success Criteria Template
and Project Expectations Template.</p>
      <p>Process:
1. Documentation analysis to define business activities related
to the project objectives and generation of the business
processes diagram template.
2. Generation of the column of business process, associated with
each stakeholder in the project stakeholder template (defined
in the first phase of the process).</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>Output: Business Process Diagram Template (figure 19).</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-8">
      <title>Activity: Surveying Business Processes.</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-9">
      <title>Input: Business Process Diagram Template.</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-10">
      <title>Process:</title>
      <p>1. Conduction of interviews with stakeholders to understand
each business process and to generate a business process
template per process.</p>
      <p>Output: Business Process Templates. The business processes defined
are two: “Units Production” and “Production Planning” (figure 20).</p>
      <sec id="sec-10-1">
        <title>4.3 Applying the Third Phase of Business</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-10-2">
        <title>Process Data Engineering</title>
        <p>The following activities are described: “Identifying Data
Repositories” (figure 21) and “Surveying Data Repositories”
(figure 22).</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-11">
      <title>Activity: Identifying Data Repositories.</title>
      <p>Input: Business Process Diagram Template, templates corresponding to
every business process and Stakeholders interviews information.
Process:
1. Documentation analysis to define the data repositories used
or consulted by each business process and generation of the
data repositories template.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-12">
      <title>Output: Data Repositories Template (figure 23).</title>
      <sec id="sec-12-1">
        <title>4.4 Applying the Fourth Phase of Business</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-12-2">
        <title>Conceptualization</title>
        <p>The following activities are described: “Developing a Business
Dictionary” (figure 25) and “Developing a Business Model” (figure
26).</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-13">
      <title>Activity: Developing a Business Dictionary. Input: Business Process Diagram Template, templates corresponding to every business process, Data Repositories Template and Data Structure Template.</title>
      <p>Process:
1. Documentation analysis to define the business keywords.</p>
      <p>Upon identification, words are validated by stakeholders and
thus the business dictionary is built up.
2. Wording glossary build-up, detailing keywords. By means of
example, in figure 27 two keywords of the utmost importance
to the business domain.
3. Building of the Concept-Relation and
Concept-AttributesValue chart (figures 28 and 29, respectively) upon the
wording glossary, and generation of the Concept relations
graph from the two latter charts (figure 30).
4. Correspondence establishment between wording glossary and
definitions, acronyms and abbreviations template (figure 31).
5. Correspondence establishment among
concept-attributevalue chart, wording glossary, and requirement-related
attributes template (figure 32).</p>
      <p>Output: Business Dictionary Template, Template of Abbreviations,
Acronyms, and Definitions and Template of Attributes related to
Requirements. Figure 33 shows an extract of each template.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-14">
      <title>Activity: Developing a Business Model.</title>
      <p>Input: Data Repositories Template, Data Structure Template and
Business Dictionary Template.</p>
      <p>Process:
1. Documentation analysis to establish the relationships among
business processes, data repositories and business words and
business model diagram build-up.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-15">
      <title>Output: Business Model Diagram (figure 34).</title>
      <sec id="sec-15-1">
        <title>4.5 Applying the Fifth Phase of Information</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-15-2">
        <title>Mining Process Specification</title>
        <p>The following activities are described: “Formalizing Business
Problems” (figure 35), “Identifying Information Mining Processes”
(figure 36) and “Developing a Project Plan” (figure 37).</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-16">
      <title>Activity: Standardizing Business Problems.</title>
      <p>Input: Project Scope Definition Template, Project Objective Template,
Requirement Objective Template and Business Process Diagram.
Process:
1. Analysis of the project objectives, project scope definition,
business processes and data repositories and development of
a business problems list.
2. If necessary, project objectives and requirement templates are
verified and updated in parallel to the former process.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-17">
      <title>Output: Business Problem Template (figure 38).</title>
      <sec id="sec-17-1">
        <title>5. CONCLUSIONS</title>
        <p>This paper's main contribution is to provide the community with
tools so as to enable them to carry out a thorough management of
requirements in the context of an Information Mining Project.
Consequently, this paper seeks to improve current methodologies
in which this approach has been severely overlooked, which is why
the process model proposed was applied to controversial
casestudies, covering various business issues. This being the case, both
customer requirements and requirements-related project objectives
were successfully and efficiently managed, as well as information
regarding business processes and their problems, together with the
data repositories employed, were obtained. Hence, the development
of a project master plan - guiding the project through its very stages
- was successfully developed.</p>
        <p>As future lines of work, the in-depth analysis and description of
structural procedures is heavily suggested, as it is believed that the
statement of every document process can lead to a higher rate of
automation in these processes' techniques. Moreover, it is
considered that a software tool capable of assessing the condition
of templates and minutes advised by the process - additionally
distinguishing the various versions of a single document, thereby
reporting each version's contents together with a change history - is
highly desirable project to be substantiated.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-17-2">
        <title>6. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS</title>
        <p>The research presented in this paper has been partially financed by
the 11211 EIU TIBA, research project of the National University
of Technology - UTN (for its acronym in Spanish) Buenos Aires.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Schiefer</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Jeng</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kapoor</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chowdhary</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <year>2004</year>
          .
          <article-title>Process Information Factory: A Data Management Approach for Enhancing Business Process Intelligence</article-title>
          . Proceedings 2004
          <string-name>
            <given-names>IEEE International</given-names>
            <surname>Conference on E-Commerce</surname>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Technology</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <fpage>162</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>169</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Thomsen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>BI's Promised Land</article-title>
          .
          <year>2003</year>
          . Intelligent Enterprise,
          <volume>6</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>21</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>25</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Curtis</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kellner</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Over</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <year>1992</year>
          .
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Process</given-names>
            <surname>Modelling</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <source>Communications of the ACM</source>
          ,
          <volume>35</volume>
          (
          <issue>9</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>75</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>90</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kanungo</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <year>2005</year>
          .
          <article-title>Using Process Theory to Analyze Direct and Indirect Value-Drivers of Information Systems</article-title>
          .
          <source>Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences</source>
          , pp.
          <fpage>231</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>240</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chapman</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Clinton</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kerber</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Khabaza</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Reinartz</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Shearer</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wirth</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <year>2000</year>
          .
          <article-title>CRISP-DM 1.0 Step-by-step Data Mining Guide</article-title>
          . http://tinyurl.com/crispdm (accessed
          <volume>24</volume>
          .
          <year>06</year>
          .16).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pyle</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <year>2003</year>
          .
          <article-title>Business Modeling and Business Intelligence</article-title>
          . Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <surname>SAS.</surname>
          </string-name>
          <year>2008</year>
          .
          <article-title>SAS Enterprise Miner: SEMMA</article-title>
          . http://tinyurl.com/semmaSAS (accessed
          <year>24</year>
          .
          <year>06</year>
          .16).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Vanrell</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bertone</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>García-Martínez</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <year>2010</year>
          . Modelo de Proceso de Operación para Proyectos de Explotación de Información. Anales
          <string-name>
            <surname>del XVI Congreso Argentino de Ciencias de la Computación</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <volume>674</volume>
          -
          <fpage>682</fpage>
          . ISBN 978-950-9474-49-9.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Britos</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fernandez</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>García-Martínez</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <year>2007</year>
          . Propuesta Metodológica para la Educción de Requisitos en Proyectos de Explotación de Información. IX Workshop de Investigadores en Ciencias de la Computación, pp.
          <fpage>497</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>501</lpage>
          . ISBN 978-950-763-075-0.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [10]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wiegers</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <year>2003</year>
          .
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Software</given-names>
            <surname>Requirements</surname>
          </string-name>
          . Microsoft Press.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          [11]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Cao</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Luo</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zhang</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <year>2007</year>
          .
          <article-title>Knowledge Actionability: Satisfying Technical</article-title>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Business</given-names>
            <surname>Interestingness</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <source>International Journal of Business Intelligence and Data Mining</source>
          ,
          <volume>2</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>496</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>514</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          [12]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gupta</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G. K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <year>2014</year>
          .
          <article-title>Introduction to Data Mining with Case Studies. PHI Learning Pvt</article-title>
          . Ltd.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          [13]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Britos</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dieste</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>García-Martínez</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <year>2008</year>
          .
          <article-title>Requirements Elicitation in Data Mining for Business Intelligence Projects</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Advances in Information Systems Research</source>
          , Education and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Practice. David</given-names>
            <surname>Avison</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>George M.</given-names>
            <surname>Kasper</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Barbara Pernici, Isabel Ramos, Dewald Roode Eds. (Boston: Springer),
          <source>IFIP International Federation for Information</source>
          ,
          <volume>274</volume>
          :
          <fpage>139</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>150</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          [14]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Garcia-Martinez</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Britos</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pollo-Cattaneo</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rodriguez</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pytel</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <year>2011</year>
          .
          <source>Information Mining Processes Based on Intelligent Systems. Proceedings of II International Congress on Computer Science and Informatics (INFONORCHILE</source>
          <year>2011</year>
          ),
          <fpage>87</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>94</lpage>
          . ISBN 978-956-7701-03-2.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          [15]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rose</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K. H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <year>2013</year>
          .
          <article-title>A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) - Fifth Edition</article-title>
          .
          <source>Project Management Journal</source>
          ,
          <volume>44</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>e1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>e1</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          [16]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Cao</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <year>2012</year>
          .
          <article-title>Actionable Knowledge Discovery and Delivery</article-title>
          .
          <source>Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery</source>
          ,
          <volume>2</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>149</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>163</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>
          [17]
          <string-name>
            <surname>García-Martínez</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Britos</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pesado</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bertone</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>PolloCattaneo</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rodríguez</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pytel</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Vanrell</surname>
          </string-name>
          . J.
          <year>2011</year>
          .
          <article-title>Towards an Information Mining Engineering</article-title>
          . Software Engineering, Methods, Modeling and Teaching. Editorial Universidad de Medellín,
          <volume>83</volume>
          -
          <fpage>99</fpage>
          . ISBN 978-958-8692-32-6.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation>
          [18]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Vanrell</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bertone</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>García-Martínez</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <year>2012</year>
          . Un Modelo de Procesos para Proyectos de Explotación de Información.
          <source>Proceedings Latin American Congress on Requirements Engineering and Software Testing</source>
          ,
          <fpage>46</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>52</lpage>
          . ISBN 978-958-46- 0577-1.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref19">
        <mixed-citation>
          [19]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Oktaba</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Garcia</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Piattini</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ruiz</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pino</surname>
            y F.J. y Alquicira,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <year>2007</year>
          .
          <source>Software Process Improvement: The COMPETISOFT Project Computer</source>
          ,
          <year>2007</year>
          ,
          <volume>40</volume>
          (
          <issue>10</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>21</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>28</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref20">
        <mixed-citation>
          [20]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mariscal</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Marbán, Ó.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>González</surname>
            , Á. L. y Segovia,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <year>2007</year>
          . Hacia la Ingeniería de Data Mining: Un modelo de Proceso para el Desarrollo de Proyectos. II Congreso Español de Informática,
          <volume>139</volume>
          -
          <fpage>148</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref21">
        <mixed-citation>
          [21]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pollo-Cattaneo</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pesado</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Britos</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>García-Martínez</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <year>2016</year>
          .
          <article-title>Process Model Application for Requirements Engineering in Metallurgical Enterprise Information Mining Project</article-title>
          .
          <source>Technical Report GEMIS-TD-2016-01-RT-2016-08</source>
          . http://grupogemis.com.ar/web/gemis-td-2016-01-rt-2016
          <source>-08/ (accessed 19.08</source>
          .16).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>