Conference Proceedings Kathryn B. Laskey 0 Ian D. Emmons 0 Paulo C. G. Costa 0 Alessandro Oltramari 0 George Mason University Fairfax, Virginia Campus , USA 2016 -

• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •

 Best practices in the engineering of ontologies Collaboration Command and Control (C2) and Situation Awareness (SA) Cyberspace: defense, exploitation, and counter-attack Decision making Economics and financial analysis Emergency response Human factors and usability issues related to semantic technologies Information sharing Infrastructure protection Intelligence collection, analysis, and dissemination Law and law enforcement Planning: representation of and reasoning over plans and processes Predictive analysis Provenance, source credibility, and evidential pedigree Resiliency, risk analysis, and vulnerability assessment Science and technology (biology, health, chemistry, engineering, etc.) Sensor systems Sociology (social networks, ethnicity, religion, culture, politics, etc.) Spatial and temporal phenomena and reasoning Uncertainty as it relates to ontologies and reasoning Ian Emmons and Kathryn Laskey STIDS 2016 Technical Chairs Paulo Costa and Alessandro Oltramari STIDS 2016 General Chairs

STIDS 2015 Committees Program Committee STIDS Steering Committee

August 7, 1961 - November 19, 2014 The Michael Dean Best Paper Award was established in 2014 in recognition of Michael Dean’s many and diverse contributions to the STIDS community. In selecting the winner, the committee sought to highlight the qualities that made Mike such an asset to this community. The criteria for selection exemplify the very best contributions to the conference and the community. To this end, the Michael Dean Best paper is the one that, in the judgment of the award committee, best satisfies the following criteria:

Conveys a clear, careful understanding of the problem or issue being addressed, and clearly states why it matters.

Conveys a thorough understanding of technical issues, and a well-grounded, pragmatic view of prior and related work.

Clearly identifies the specific semantic technologies being discussed, and their relationship to the problem. 4. Identifies specific experience or expertise on which the paper and its conclusions draw. 5. If a semantic system or application is being presented as part of a solution, clearly identifies and communicates the components of this system, including any ontologies, and how they interact, as well as their degree of actuality, availability, maturity and source. 6. Identifies whether and how such system/application/components have been evaluated and with what results.

 7. Identifies outcomes, experiences, and lessons learned.

Demonstrates prioritization of greater technical and domain understanding and problem-solving over selfpromotion, organizational promotion, partisan or programmatic scorekeeping, or other, narrower concerns. Demonstrates knowledge of prior and current art, strengthens such knowledge in the community, and promotes better understanding by sharing the rationale for choices, especially when they diverge from common practice. 10. Demonstrates and strengthens the state of the art of semantic technology via the quality of the work described. Provides promising ways forward while negotiating known trade-offs and avoiding known pitfalls. Helps more junior technologists avoid repetition of old errors, and provides more senior technologists with new insights.

 The winning paper was announced on the last day of the conference:

2016 Michael Dean Best Paper: Michael Reep, Bo Yu, Duminda Wijesekera, Paulo Costa. Sharing Data under Genetic Privacy Laws.

Runner-up: Frank Greitzer, Muhammad Imran, Justin Purl, Elise Axelrad, Yung Mei, Leong, D. E., Sunny Becker, Kathryn Laskey, Paul Sticha. Developing an Ontology for Individual and Organizational Sociotechnical Indicators of Insider Threat Risk.

 Leo Obrst (chair) Mark Underwood Ian Emmons Richard Markeloff MITRE Corporation Krypton Brothers LLC Raytheon BBN Technologies Raytheon BBN Technologies