<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <contrib-group>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>LORIA / CNRS - University of Lorraine, Nancy Institute of Mathematical Sciences (IMSc)</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Chennai</addr-line>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p />
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>A well-studied phenomenon in network theory since the 1970s are
optimal schedules to distribute information by one-to-one communication
between nodes. One can take these communicative actions to be
telephone calls, and protocols to spread information this way are known as
gossip protocols or epidemic protocols. Statistical approaches to gossip
have taken a large fight since then, witness for example the survey
“Epidemic Information Dissemination in Distributed Systems” by Eugster
et al. (IEEE Computer, 2004). It is typical to assume a global
scheduler who executes a possibly non-deterministic or randomized protocol.</p>
      <p>A departure from this methodology is to investigate epistemic gossip
protocols, where an agent (node) will call another agent not because
it is so instructed by a scheduler, but based on its knowledge or
ignorance of the distribution of secrets over the network and of other
agents’ knowledge or ignorance of that. Such protocols are distributed
and do not need a central scheduler. This comes at a cost: they may
take longer to terminate than non-epistemic, globally scheduled,
protocols. A number of works have appeared over the past years (Apt et
al., Attamah et al., van Ditmarsch et al., van Eijck &amp; Gatting, Herzig
&amp; Maffre) of which we present a survey, including open problems yet
to be solved by the community.</p>
      <p>Copyright © by the paper’s authors. Copying permitted for private and academic purposes.</p>
      <p>In: T. A˚gotnes, B. Liao, Y.N. Wang (eds.): Proceedings of the first Chinese Conference on Logic and Argumentation (CLAR 2016),
Hangzhou, China, 2-3 April 2016, published at http://ceur-ws.org</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list />
  </back>
</article>