<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Applications of Regularly Varying Functions in Study of Cosmological Parameters</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Zˇarko Mijajlovi´c</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Faculty of Mathematics, University of Belgrade Studentski trg 16, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia State University of Novi Pazar Vuka Karadˇzi ́ca bb</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>36300 Novi Pazar</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="RS">Serbia</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2016</year>
      </pub-date>
      <fpage>372</fpage>
      <lpage>379</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>Most of the cosmological parameters, such as the scale factor  ( ), the energy density  ( ) and the pressure of the material in the universe  ( ) under usual circumstances satisfy asymptotically the power law. On the other hand the quantities that satisfy the power law are best modeled by regularly varying functions. The aim of this paper is to apply the theory of regularly varying functions to study Friedmann equations and their solutions which are in fact mentioned cosmological parameters. In particular we shall consider possible formulas for cosmological parameters of the dual universe.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>regular variation</kwd>
        <kwd>cosmological parameter</kwd>
        <kwd>Friedmann equations</kwd>
        <kwd>dual universe</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Mari´c [16], which gives necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence of
such solutions. From the theory of regular variation it follows that the solutions
under usual assumptions include a multiplicative term which is a slowly varying
function. We also present a set of formulas that can be assigned to
cosmological parameters of the dual universe. These formulas correspond to the second
fundamental solution of the acceleration equation.</p>
      <p>We shall shortly review definitions and properties of regularly varying
functions. In particular we shall use some theorems on regularly varying solutions of
the second order differential equation
¨ +  ( ) = 0,  ( ) is continuous on [,
∞].</p>
      <p>
        The notion of regular variation is related to the power law distribution
represented by the following relationship between some quantities 
and  :
 ( ) =   ( +  (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        )), , 
∈ R.
      </p>
      <p>This definition of power law is in a close relation to the notion of a slowly
varying function. A real positive continuous function1  ( ) defined for  &gt;  0
which satisfies
 ( )
 ( )
→ 1
as  → ∞, for each real  &gt;
0.
is called a slowly varying (SV) function.</p>
      <p>Definition 1.</p>
      <p>
        A function F(t) is said to satisfy a generalized power law if
(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        )
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
 ( ) =    ( )
where  ( ) is a slowly varying function and  is a real constant.
      </p>
      <p>Logarithmic function ln( ) and iterated logarithmic functions ln(. . . ln( ) . . .)
are examples of slowly varying functions. More complicated examples are
provided in [2], [22] and [16].</p>
      <p>A positive continuous function</p>
      <p>defined for  &gt;  0, is a regularly varying
(RV) function of an index  , if and only if it satisfies
 ( )
 ( )
→ 

as  → ∞, for each  &gt;
0.</p>
      <p>It immediately follows that a regularly varying function  ( ) has the form (4).
Therefore  ( ) is regularly varying if and only if it satisfies the generalized
the class of zero functions at ∞, i.e.  ∈  0 if and only if lim
power law. By ℛ  we denote the class of regularly varying functions of an index
 . Hence ℛ 0 is the class of all slowly varying functions. By  0 we shall denote
 ( ) = 0. The
following theorem [13] describes the fundamental property of these functions.
 →+∞
1 Continuing the works of G.H. Hardy, J.L. Littlewood and E. Landau, Karamata [13]
originally defined and studied this notion for continuous functions. Later this theory
was extended to measurable functions. Due to physical constraints, we are dealing
here only with continuous functions.
Theorem 1. (Representation theorem) 
able functions ℎ ( ),  ∈  0 and  ∈ R so that
∈ ℛ 0 if and only if there are
measur ( ) = ℎ ( ) 
︀∫   ( )  ,  ≥ ,

and ℎ ( ) → ℎ 0 as  → ∞, ℎ 0 is a positive constant.
will be useful for our later discussion. If</p>
      <sec id="sec-1-1">
        <title>If ℎ ( ) is a constant function, then  ( ) is called normalized. Let</title>
        <p>denote
the class of normalized slowly varying functions. The next fact on  -functions
and there is  ¨, then  in (6) has
the first order derivative  ˙. This follows from the identity  ( ) =   ˙ ( )/ ( ).
∈</p>
        <p>
          For our study of Friedmann equations we need the next result [9], [16] on
solutions of equation (
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
          ). This theorem gives necessary and sufficient conditions
for equation ¨ +  ( ) = 0 to have regularly varying solutions.
of the equation
Theorem 2. (Howard-Mari´c) Let −∞ &lt;  &lt;
1/4, and let  1 &lt;  2 be two roots
Further let   , i=1,2 denote two normalized slowly varying functions. Then there
are two linearly independent regularly varying solutions of ¨ +  ( ) = 0 of the
form
if and only if lim 
implies lim 
 →∞
 ( )
        </p>
        <p>=  , we see that
︁∫ ∞

 ( )
=  . Moreover,  2( ) ∼ (1 − 2 1) 1( )
.</p>
        <p>The limit integral in the theorem is not easy to compute. As lim  2 ( ) = 
 2</p>
        <p>−  +  = 0.
  ( ) =      ( ),  = 1, 2,
 →∞
lim  2 ( ) = 
1
 →∞
(6)
(7)
(8)</p>
        <p>⊔⊓
(9)
 →∞
︁∫ ∞


︂(  ˙ )︂ 2
¨

= −
 ˙ + 3
=
4
8
3
︂(
3
 +

 ˙ (︁</p>
        <p>2
 −  2
3 )︂
 2
= 0,
 +
 )︁
 2
,
,</p>
        <sec id="sec-1-1-1">
          <title>Friedmann equation,</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-1-1-2">
          <title>Acceleration equation,</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-1-1-3">
          <title>Fluid equation.</title>
          <p>gives a useful sufficient condition for the existence of regular solutions of the
equation ¨ +  ( ) = 0 as described in the previous theorem.
2</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Cosmological parameters</title>
      <p>Cosmological parameters are usually defined as some general physical quantities
related to the Universe. Such approach for Lambda cold dark matter model of
Universe ( CDM model) is presented in the standard literature, for example in
[12], [10] and [21]. Here our approach is somewhat formalistic. For cosmological
parameters we take primarily solutions of Fiedmann equations [7]:
and any functions derived from these solutions. Therefore, the scale factor  ( ),
the energy density  ( ) and the pressure of the material in the universe  ( ) are
basic cosmological parameters. We remind that Friedmann equations are derived
from the Einstein field equations. These three equations are not independent.
For example, the fluid equation can be inferred from the other two equations.
Therefore, for solving of these system which consists essentially of two equations
and three unknowns some additional condition is needed. Usually equation of</p>
      <p>Suppose ¯( ),  ¯( ) and ¯( ) are some definite solutions of Friedmann
equastate  =</p>
      <p>2 is assumed.
tions. Taking
we see that then ¯( ) is a solution of the second order linear differential equation:
We note that the opposite of (13) does not hold, see [18], [19]. There RV
solutions of Friedmann equations are found (theorems 3.2 and 3.3) and appropriate
cosmological parameters for non-oscillatory universe are determined. Assuming
that the integral limit M( ) is convergent, say M( ) =  , there is proved:
- If  &lt;</p>
      <p>1/4 then the universe is non-oscillatory.
- The converse is almost true, namely, if the universe is non-oscillatory then</p>
      <p>≤ 1/4.
- If  &lt;</p>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>1/4 and in some special cases for  = 1/4, the scale factor  ( ), a solution of Friedmann equations, is an RV function.</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-2">
        <title>In view of these properties it is justified to call the constant  a threshold</title>
        <p>constant. Assume that  is a root of the polynomial  2
−  +  . Then
It is easy to check that in fact any solution  ( ) of (11) jointly with ¯( ) and
¯( ) is a solution of all three Friedmann equations. Therefore, in search for RV
solutions of the acceleration equation and so of the Friedmann equations, we can
use the Howard-Mari´c theorem 2. We just did this in our previous work [18]. We
review some results from there we need in our further discussion.</p>
        <p>First observe that the integral limit in the Howard-Mari´c theorem for the
equation (11) is given by:</p>
        <p>M( ) = lim 
 →∞</p>
        <p>︁∫ ∞ ( )
 2 .
we have
The functions for which this integral limit converges define so called Mari´c class
of functions ℳ . Then M is a real functional defined on ℳ . Also, in view of (9)
If
 →∞
lim  ( ) = 
then</p>
        <p>M( ) = .
 ( ) =
4
3</p>
        <p>︂(

2  ¯( ) +
3¯( ) )︂</p>
        <p>,
¨ +
 2  = 0.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-3">
        <title>In this case cosmological parameters are represented as follows:</title>
        <p>( ) is a regularly varying function of an index  .</p>
        <p>Scale factor  ( ):  ( ) =    ( ),  ̸= 0 and  is an RV function. In other words,
Hubble parameter  ( ) =  ˙ ( )/ ( ):
 ( ) =
+</p>
        <p>,  ∈  0.


  ˙
2
3
≡   =</p>
        <p>As the Friedmann equations are invariant under translation transformation,
the above formulas also hold for the expanding universe with the cosmological
constant  .</p>
        <p>=</p>
        <p>3(1 +  )
 ( ) ∼ 3(1 +  )
 ( ) =  0 3(1+ )  ( )</p>
        <p>2
M( ) =
1 + 3
2
Formulas for the exponent  and the Hubble parameter  ( ) are widely found
in the literature. Formulas for  ( ) and  ( ) are also reduced to the standard
form if  ( ) and  ( ) are constant at infinity, or if the equation of state  = 
2
is assumed, or lim →∞</p>
        <p>˙( ) = 0. We did not assumed in derivation of (18) any
of these assumptions. In fact, we found asymptotics for solutions of Friedmann
equations only assuming M( ) =  &lt;</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-4">
        <title>1/4, and in certain cases for  = 1/4.</title>
        <p>As far as we know, it is implicitly widely assumed that the limit lim →∞
exists and is finite, what is much stronger assumption than that the integral
Then the cosmological parameters can be put in the following form:
 ( ) =
state parameter. Assuming  ( ) =    ( ),  ∈ 
and  ̸= 0, we define  by
There are functions ,</p>
        <sec id="sec-2-4-1">
          <title>Therefore, if   ˙</title>
          <p>∈  0 such that  =  ˆ
2, where  ˆ( ) =  −   ˙ +  .
standard equation of state and classical asymptotics for cosmological parameters.</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-5">
        <title>In [18] is also found</title>
        <p>→ 0 as  →</p>
        <p>∞, then  ˆ( ) ≈  , what leads to  = 
M( ) =  =
2</p>
        <p>1 + 3
9 · (1 +  )2
.
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
2, the
(19)
3</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Cosmological parameters for dual universe</title>
      <p>In the previous section we have seen that  ( ) and  ( ) may vary, depending on
the limit of the hidden parameter   ˙( ) as  → ∞. As indicated in [19] one can
speculate that this variation is an effect of the existence of the dual universe. We
remind that one of the concepts of string theory and hence M-theory is that the
big bang was a collision between two membranes. The outcome was the creation
of two universes, one in the surface of each membrane. Using the Large Hadron
Collider (LHC) located in CERN, some data are collected that might lead to
the conclusion that the parallel universe exist. Specifically, if the LHC detects
the presence of miniature black holes at certain energy levels, then it is believed
[6] that these would be the fingerprints of multiple universes. Collected data are
still analyzed.</p>
      <p>We will not enter here into a full discussion on the existence of the multiverse.
But if the existence the parallel universe is assumed, we can explicitly find a set
of formulas that might represent cosmological parameters of the dual universe.
We obtain them using the second fundamental solution  2( ) in Howard - Mari´c
theorem applied to the acceleration equation. To find the second fundamental
solution and therefore the dual set of these formulas we take the second root
 = 1 −  of the quadratic equation  2 −  +  = 0 appearing in this theorem.
To avoid singularities, we assume ,  ̸= 0. Now we use  instead of  for the
index of RV solution  ( ) - scale factor and for determination of other constants
and cosmological parameters. As in (17) we introduce   = 32 − 1. Then we
have the following symmetric identity for the equation of state parameters:
  +   + 3    = 1
(20)
For our universe we have  =   , while for the dual universe the corresponding
equation of state parameter is   . Then the dual formulas are obtained by
replacing  with  and   with   in (15), (16) and (18). If one wants to give
any physical meaning to the so obtained dual set of functions, it is rather natural
to interpret them as the cosmological parameters of the dual universe.</p>
      <p>As we shall see these two universes are isomorphic in the sense that there is
an isomorphism which maps cosmological parameters into their dual forms. In
this derivation we shall use some elements of the Galois theory. For the basics
of this theory the reader may consult for example [11].</p>
      <p>Our assumption that  &lt; 14 and that the solutions  and  of the equation
(7) differ, say  &lt;  , introduces the following kind of symmetry. Let  = R(,  )
be the extension algebraic field where R is the field of real numbers and  and 
are letters (variables). It is easy to see that for such  the polynomial  2 −  + 
is irreducible over the field  . Hence, the Galois group G of the equation (7)
is of the order 2 and has a nontrivial automorphism  . Let  and  be the
roots of the polynomial  2 −  +  . Then  ( ) =  and  ( ) =  . Further,
let  = 29 · (11++3 )2 where  is a parameter. Then we can take  = 3(1+2 ) and
 = 31(1++3 ) . Let   ≡  and   ≡ 11+−3  . Then  (  ) =   since   and  
are rational expressions respectively in  and  . Further, the time  and the
constant</p>
      <p>are invariant under  i.e.  ( ) =  and  ( ) =  since  and  are
the elements of the ground field  . The cosmological parameters (15), (16) and
(18) are rational expressions of  so if   is the corresponding parameter to the
solution  , then  (  ) =   . For example, for the Hubble parameters we have
 (  ) =   . Hence, not only solutions (isomorphic via  ) come into the pairs
but the sets of all cosmological parameters come as well. At this point one may
speculate about two dual universes having the same time  and the constant 
and the conjugated parameters   and   connected by the relation (20).</p>
      <p>Of course, there is a question what are the values of the constants appearing
in cosmological parameters, for example of 
=   . Most results in the
literature see e.g. [25], are consistent with the w = -1 cosmological constant case.
Results from experimental cosmology, such as the Baryon Oscillation
Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) of Luminous Red Galaxies (LRGs) in the Sloan Digital
Sky Survey (SDSS) are consistent with w = -1, the dark energy equation of
is no corresponding</p>
      <p>neither  . Equation of state is 
state, [1]. However, the value 
= −1 yields singularity in (18). For such  there
= −
 2 and then by
fluid equation we have  ˙ = 0, i.e  is a constant. This case corresponds to the

= 8
cosmological constant, so 
=  
. In the absences of 
and  for dual
 
of 
=  
we may take (20) for defining relation . Putting  
= −1 in
cosmological constant and its expansion is governed with the dark energy.
this identity we obtain</p>
      <p>= −1. Hence, dual universe is also equipped with a
The other values of 
are also considered. For example if 
= 1/3 then

= 
= 1/2,</p>
      <p>= 1/4 and in this case Howard-Mari´c theorem cannot be
applied since functions  1( ) and  2( ) from this theorem are not fundamental
solutions. But there is a variant of this theorem appropriate for this case [16],
and applying it one can show that  ( ) is regularly varying of index 12 if and
only if 
∼ 31 as  →
∞, i.e.</p>
      <p>1
∼ 3
classic cosmological solution. For more details one can consult [18].</p>
      <p>2 holds asymptotically. This is the second
4</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Conclusion</title>
      <p>A detailed analysis of Friedmann equations and cosmological parameters from
the point of view of regular variation is presented. The central role in this analysis
has the acceleration equation since it can be considered as a linear second order
differential equation and that the theory of regularly varying solutions of such
equations is well developed [16]. We introduced in a formal way certain constants
such as the threshold constant</p>
      <p>and the equation of state parameter  . Both
constants have the fundamental role in describing asymptotics of cosmological
parameters and evolution of the Universe. We also inferred formulas that might
represent the cosmological parameters of the dual universe.
Spectroscopic Survey: baryon acoustic oscillations in the Data Releases 10 and 11
Galaxy samples. MNRAS 441, 24-62, (2014)
2. Bingham, N.H., Goldie, C.M., Teugels, J.L.: Regular variation. Cambridge Univ.</p>
      <p>Press, Cambridge (1987)
3. Barrow, J. D.: Varieties of expanding universe. Class. Quantum Grav., vol. 13, no.</p>
      <p>11, (1996)
4. Barrow, J. D. and Shaw, D. J.: Some late-time asymptotics of general scalartensor
cosmologies. Class. Quantum Grav., vol. 25, no. 08 (2008)
5. Coles, P. &amp; Lucchin, F., Cosmology: the Origin and Evolution of Cosmic Structure
(2nd ed.). Wiley, Chichester(2002)
6. Farag A. A., Faizal, M., Khalil, M. M.: Absence of black holes at LHC due to
gravity’s rainbow. Physics Letters B, 295-300, (2015)
7. Friedmann, A.: U¨ber die Mo¨glichkeit einer Welt mit konstanter negativer</p>
      <p>
        Kru¨mmung des Raumes. Z. Phys., 21 (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ): 326 (1924).
8. Hille, E.: Non-oscillation theorems. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 64, 234 (1948)
9. Howard, H.C., Maric, V.: Regularity and nonoscillation of solutions of second order
linear diferential equations. Bull. T. CXIV de Acad. Serbe Sci et Arts, Classe Sci.
mat. nat, 22. 85-98, (1997)
10. Islam, J.N.: An introduction to mathematical cosmology. Cambridge Univ. Press,
      </p>
      <p>Cambridge (2004)
11. Lang, S.: Algebra. Springer, (2002)
12. Liddle, A.R., Lyth, L.H.: Cosmological Inflation and Large-Scale Structure.
Cambridge Univ. Press (2000)
13. Karamata, J., Sur une mode de croissance r´eguliere fonctions. Math. (Cluj) (1930)
14. Kusano, T., Mari´c, V.: Regularly varying solutions of perturbed Euler diferential
equations and related functional diferential equation. Publ. Inst. Math., 1, 88(102),
(2010)
15. Mari´c, V., Tomi´c, M.: A classification of solutions of second order linear diferential
equations by means of regularly varying functions. Publ. Inst. Math. (Belgrade),
58(72), 199 (1990)
16. Mari´c, V., Regular Variation and Diferential Equations. Springer, Berlin (2000).
17. Mijajlovi´c, Zˇ., Pejovi´c, N. &amp; Ninkovi´c, S.: Nonstandard Representations of
Processes in Dynamical Systems. AIP Conf. Proc. 934, 151 (2007)
18. Mijajlovi´c, Zˇ., Pejovi´c, N., Sˇegan, S., Damljanovi´c, G., On asymptotic solutions of</p>
      <p>Friedmann equations. Appl. Math and Computation, 219, 12731286, (2012).
19. Mijajlovi´c, Zˇ., Pejovi´c, N., Mari´c, V.: On the  cosmological parameter. Serb.</p>
      <p>Astron. J. 190, 25 - 31, (2015)
20. Molchanov S.A., Surgailis D., Woyczynski, W.A.: The large-scale structure of the
universe and quasi-Voronoi tessalation of schock fronts in forced Burgers turbulence
in   . Ann. Appl. Probability, vol. 7, No. 1., 200 (1997)
21. Narlikar, J.V., An Introduction to Cosmology. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge
(2002).
22. Seneta, E.: Regularly varying functions. Springer, Berlin (1976)
23. Stern, I.: On Fractal Modeling in Astrophysics: The Efect of Lacunarity on the
Convergence of Algorithms for Scaling Exponents. A.S.P. Conf. Ser., vol. 125, 222
(1997)
24. Stroyan, K.D., Luxemburg, W.A.J.: Introduction to the theory of infinitesimals,</p>
      <p>Academic Press, NY (1976)
25. Particle Data Group: http://pdg.lbl.gov</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1. L.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Anderson</surname>
          </string-name>
          et al.:
          <article-title>The clustering of galaxies in the SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation</article-title>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>