<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Keyword Extraction from the Web for Personal Metadata Annotation</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Junichiro Mori</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Yutaka Matsuo</string-name>
          <email>y.matsuo@carc.aist.go.jp</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Mitsuru Ishizuka</string-name>
          <email>ishizuka@miv.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Boi Faltings</string-name>
          <email>boi.faltings@epfl.ch</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>E ́ cole Polythechnique Fe ́de ́rale de Lausanne</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Switzerland junichiro.mori</addr-line>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology</institution>
          ,
          <country country="JP">Japan</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>University of Tokyo</institution>
          ,
          <country country="JP">Japan</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <fpage>51</fpage>
      <lpage>60</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>With the currently growing interest in the Semantic Web and Social Networking, personal metadata is coming to play an important role in the Web. This paper proposes a novel keyword extraction method to extract personal metadata from the Web. The proposed method is based on co-occurrence information of words. Our method extracts relevant keywords depending on the context of a person. Our experimental results show that extracted keywords are useful for personal metadata creation. We also discuss the annotation of personal metadata and application to the Semantic Web.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Considering personal metadata, we notice that a lot of information is contained in
the Web pages. For example, imagine a researcher: that researcher’s information can
be in an affiliation page, a conference page, an online paper, or even in a Weblog. In
fact, we can expect that these pages contain a lot of personal metadata even including
information that we would not expect to find. Therein, questions are:
– What kind of personal metadata are in the Web?
– What kind of Web page contains personal metadata?
– How are extracted metadata applied to semantic annotation?</p>
      <p>Considering these points, one of our research goals is to extract personal metadata
from the Web and apply them to semantic annotation. As a preliminary report to achieve
this goal, we propose a novel keyword extraction method to extract personal information
from the Web.</p>
      <p>The remainder of this paper is organized as follows: section 2 describes the
proposed keyword extraction method using an actual example. In section 3, we show the
extracted keywords and analyze them. In section 4, we discuss the annotation of
personal metadata. Section 5 contains related works. Finally, we address future works and
conclude this paper in section 7.
2
2.1</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Keyword Extraction</title>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>Extraction of the Initial Term Set for Keyword</title>
        <p>As an experimental attempt, we extracted the keywords of Program Committee
members of SemAnnot 2004 Workshop (There are 28 members including chair persons).
First, we need to acquire Web pages that contain information of respective committee
members and their mutual relationships. A simple way of acquiring those Web pages is
to use a search engine. It is reasonable to use a search engine because it can search many
Web pages in less than a few seconds. It also tracks the temporal variance of the Web. In
this experiment, we used Google5, which currently addresses data from 4 billion Web
pages.</p>
        <p>We first put each person’s full name to a search engine (name is quoted with
double quotation such as “Siegfried Handschuh”) and retrieve documents related to each
person. From the search result, we used the top 10 documents per person as the initial
documents that might contain personal keywords.</p>
        <p>The search result documents include not only html files but also other file types
such as .pdf, .doc, .xls, .ppt. In this experiment, we used only html files. Furthermore,
we did not use metadata indicators in an html file such as META tags and RDF. In the
future, we are planning to use other file types along with html files that already have
been attached metadata.</p>
        <p>
          The html files, at to a maximum of 10 files per person, are acquired from the initial
documents of each person. They are pre-processed with html-tag deletion and
part-ofspeech tagging (POS). Then, the term set for keyword extraction is extracted from
preprocessed html files using the term extraction tool, Termex [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>
          ]. Termex extracts terms
        </p>
        <sec id="sec-2-1-1">
          <title>5 http://www.google.com</title>
          <p>from POS data based on statistical information of conjunctions between parts of speech.
Termex6 can also extract nominal phrases that include more than two nouns such as
“Annotation tool”. After the whole procedure of extracting the term set, we extracted
about 1000 terms per person on the average. The relevant keyword of each person is
chosen from these terms. Figure 1 shows steps of the proposed keyword extraction.
Because the term set includes both relevant and irrelevant terms for personal
information, we need to evaluate the relevance of term as a personal keyword. This subsection
explains the scoring method that gives relevance as a personal keyword to the term.
Term relevance based on Co-Occurrence The simple approach to measure term
relevance as a personal keyword is to use co-occurrence. In this paper, we define
cooccurrence of two terms as term appearance in the same Web page. If two terms
cooccur in many pages, we can say that those two have a strong relation and one term is
relevant for another term. This co-occurrence information is acquired by the number of
retrieved documents of a search engine result. For example, assume we are to measure
the relevance of name N (e.g. “Siegfried Handschuh”) and term w (e.g. “Annotation”).
Here, w is the term in the term set W extracted from the initial documents of the
person named “N ” . We first put a query, “N and w”, to a search engine and obtain the
number of retrieved documents that is denoted by jN and wj. We continuously apply a
query, “N ” and “w”, and obtain the number of retrieved documents for each, jN j and
jwj. Then, the relevance between the name N and the term w, denoted by r(N; w), is</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-2-1-2">
          <title>6 Termex can be used for both Japanese and English POS data</title>
          <p>approximated by the following Jaccard coefficient.</p>
          <p>r(N; w) =</p>
          <p>jN and wj
jN j + jwj ¡ jN and wj
This Jaccard coefficient captures the degree of co-occurrence of two terms by their
mutual degree of overlap.</p>
          <p>Keyword of person As described in a previous subsection, the term set of a person is
extracted from various Web pages. Although the Web pages contain a person’s name in
the text, each page may contain personal information in different contexts. For example,
imagine that one person, named “Tom”, is both a researcher and a artist, we can expect
that his name may appear not only in academic-related pages, but also in other pages
related to his art activities. Even among his academic-related pages, there might be
different pages depending on his acquaintances, affiliations, and projects. In this way,
different Web pages reflect different contexts of a person. Here, we introduce the notion
of a context to extract the keyword that captures the context of a person.</p>
          <p>To extract the keyword in relation to a certain context, we must estimate the
relevance between the term and the context. If we replace the name N with the context C
in the relevance, r(N; w), we can obtain the relevance between context C and term w,
r(C; w), in the same manner. Then, the relevance of person N and term w in the context
C, denoted by score(N; C; w), is calculated as the following.</p>
          <p>score(N; C; w) =</p>
          <p>r(N; w)
M AX(r(N; w))
+ ®
Therein, ® denotes the relevance between the person and the context. For example, we
can use r(N; C) as ®. M AX(r(X; Y )) is the maximum value of the Jaccard coefficient
in the term set W . We define the threshold for r(N; C) to exclude terms that are not
relevant for a person, but that have strong relation to the context. threshold is decided
based on heuristic method. The term w with the higher score(N; C; w) is considered to
be a more relevant keyword for person N in context C.</p>
          <p>Regarding the “Tom” example, if we set “Art” as the context, we can get keywords
related to his art activities. Alternatively, if we include his research project name as the
context, keywords related to his project would be acquired.</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-2">
        <title>Keywords showing a relation between persons If we consider the relation between</title>
        <p>two persons in terms of their contexts, one person can be regarded as a part of the
context of another person. Hence, we can apply the previous formula to keyword extraction
of the relations among persons as follows:
score(N 1; N 2; W ) =</p>
        <p>r(N 1; w)
M AX(r(N 1; w))
+ ¯</p>
        <p>r(N 2; w)</p>
        <p>M AX(r(N 2; w))
(
r(N 1; w) r(N 2; w)</p>
        <p>;
M AX(r(N 1; w) M AX(r(N 2; w)</p>
        <p>&gt; threshold)
Therein, N 1 and N 2 denote each person’s names in the relation. ¯ is the parameter of
relevance between persons, such as r(N 1; N 2). This formula shows the relevance of
person N 1’s term w in relation to person N 2.</p>
        <p>As there are many contexts of a person, the relations among persons also have a
variety of contexts. For example, the relation of two persons in the academic field
might be coauthors, have the same affiliation, the same project; they may even be
friends. The relevance of person N 1’s term w in relation to person N 2 in the context
C, score(N 1; N 2; C; w), is given as follows:
score(N 1; N 2; C; w) = score(N 1; N 2; w) + °
Therein, ° is the parameter of relevance between the persons and the context, such as
r(N 1andN 2; C).</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Keyword Analysis for Personal Metadata</title>
      <sec id="sec-3-1">
        <title>Personal Metadata in Keywords</title>
        <p>As an example of extracted keywords, Table. 1 shows higher-ranked extracted keywords
of “Siegfried Handschuh”. Each column in the table shows higher-ranked keywords
based on Term Frequency Inverse Document Frequency (TFIDF), co-occurrence
without the context, and co-occurrence with the context, respectively, from the left column.</p>
        <p>In TFIDF-based keywords, we can find keywords that are related to the person such
as “annotation” and “semantic”. Nevertheless, there are many irrelevant words
including general words. Because TFIDF is based on the frequency of word appearances in a
text, it is difficult for a word to become higher-ranked in terms of relevance with another
word. On the other hand, in co-occurrence-based keywords, general words are excluded
and relevant words of each person appear in the rank list.</p>
        <p>As explained in the previous section, the context can be considered in the keyword
extraction. In this experiment, we used “Semantic Web” as the context. With this
context, keywords are chosen in relation to one’s activity about the Semantic Web. In the
column of “Co-Occurrence with the context”, we can find that context-related keywords
come to appear in the rank list. The order of higher-ranked keywords also changes in
relation to the context.</p>
        <p>The column at the right side shows a property label for each keyword in
“CoOccurrence with the context”. Considering a correspondence to existing personal
metadata vocabularies such as FOAF, we have defined six property labels: Name (N),
Technical term (T), Event (E), Organization (O), Project (P), URL. In order to analyze what
kind of property is included in keywords, we annotated a property label to higher-ranked
keywords of each person. Thereby, we acquired 1646 labeled keywords in total (about
60 keywords per person on average).</p>
        <p>Table. 2 shows the distribution of property labels. Nearly half of higher-ranked
keywords are occupied with names. Notwithstanding, it is noteworthy that other
properties such as organizations and projects also appear to a certain degree. In particular,
as shown on the right side column, the properties for each person are distributed in a
balanced manner. This distribution indicates that if we extract about 60 higher-ranked
keywords of one person, on average we can obtain about 30 names of his acquaintance,
2 or 3 related organizations, and 1 or 2 projects. These numbers nearly match our
research activity and show the possibility of using keywords for personal metadata. In
this analysis, we took many keywords together as “technical terms”. If we classify each
keyword more precisely, we could discover other personal metadata in keywords.
To further explore the possibility of personal metadata extraction from the Web, we
analyzed which Web pages include a higher-ranked keyword. First, we classified all
280 Web pages (10 per person) that were used to extract the initial term set. Thereby,
we prepared the 11 categories shown in Table. 3. “Personal page” includes personal
Web pages of the affiliation or one’s own domain. “Other page” includes uncategorized
pages and non-html pages such as .pdf and .ppt files. “Event page” includes conference,
workshop, and meeting pages. ML log is the email exchanged in a mailing list. DBLP 7
is the online bibliography of Computer Science papers. As seen in the table, “Personal
page” is the most dominant type of Web page. Because a person’s name was used as a
query, it is natural that we obtain a personal page in a search result.</p>
        <sec id="sec-3-1-1">
          <title>7 http://www.informatik.uni-trier.de/˜ley/db/</title>
          <p>Property</p>
          <p>Number</p>
          <p>Per person</p>
          <p>Although name entities can be acquired most from “Personal page”, DBLP is also
a good information resource to extract a name entity. DBLP contains coauthor
information of a paper. Therefore, the extracted name is related to one’s acquaintance in a
research activity. “Event page”, such as conference, workshop, is a information resource
of various personal information. However, because the Event page is not specified to a
certain person, “Personal page” gives more accurate information about each person.</p>
          <p>Overall, “Personal page” is a good information source for personal metadata such
as names, organizations, and projects. Event page and DBLP provide metadata that are
related to personal research activities such as coauthors, projects, and events including
conferences and workshops.
4</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Annotation of Personal Metadata</title>
      <p>Our keyword extraction method can be applied to semantic annotation in following
ways.</p>
      <p>
        – Annotation for Web page : As our analysis showed, our personal keyword
extraction method offers strong potential for personal metadata extraction from the Web.
Extracted personal metadata can be applied to partially annotate the Web pages
using metadata description framework such as the RDF[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>
        ]. Because metadata are
given the relevancy in relation to a person, annotated Web pages can be used in
many applications such as Information retrieval and Information integration. For
example, using annotated Web pages, the search engine that supports the Semantic
Web could answer to following question:
² Who knows this person?
² Who is involved in this project?
² Who knows this research topic well?
² Which pages include this person’s information?
– Annotation for Personal Metadata File : Extracted personal metadata is used not
only for annotating a Web page, but also for annotating a personal metadata file. As
one emerging personal metadata standard, “Friend of a Friend”, FOAF[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ], defines
an RDF vocabulary for expressing metadata about people, the relation among them,
and the things they create and do. FOAF provides a way to create machine-readable
personal documents on the Web, and to process them easily through merging and
aggregating them. Because extracted metadata are easily incorporated in FOAF, we
can facilitate the creation of FOAF documents.
      </p>
      <p>
        This paper presents discussion of the importance of a person’s context in keyword
extraction. The context often defines the properties. Currently, there is no FOAF
vocabulary to define a context. In addition to FOAF, there are many vocabularies and
framework for personal metadata such as Topicmaps [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ], RDF-vCard [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>
        ], Person class of
DAML+OIL [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>
        ]. However, none of them address the notion of a personal context.
One way to introduce a personal context to those metadata frameworks is to prepare
schema that corresponds to respective contexts. Regarding the expression of personal
metadata, we need further consideration to make the metadata expressive and usable.
5
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Related works</title>
      <p>
        Aiming at extracting and annotating personal metadta, our method is regarded as one
of Information Extraction(IE) methods supporting a semantic annotation. Up to now,
many IE methods rely on predefined templates and linguistic rules or machine learning
techniques to identify certain entities in text documents[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
        ]. Furthermore, they usually
define properties, domains, or ontology beforehand. However, because we try to extract
various information from different Web pages, we don’t use predefined restrictions in
the extraction.
      </p>
      <p>
        Some previous IE researches have addressed the extraction and annotation of
personal metadata. In [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ], they proposes the method to extract a artist information, such
as name and date of birth, from documents and automatically generate his or her
biography. They attempt to identify entity relationships, metadata triples
(subject-relationobject), using ontology-relation declarations and lexical information. However, Web
pages often include free texts and unstructured data. Thereby, capturing entity
relationships becomes infeasible because of lacking regular sentences. Rather than focusing on
the entity relationship, we find the entity in the Web pages based on the relevance in
relation to a person.
      </p>
      <p>
        In [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ], they address the extraction of personal information such as name, project,
publication in a specific department using unsupervised information extraction. It learns
to automatically annotate domain-specific information from large repositories such as
the Web with minimum user intervention. Although they extract various personal
metadata, they don’t consider the relevance of extracted metadata. Because extracted
metadata in our method have the relevance, they can be used as reliable initial seeds for
bootstrap learning for automatic annotation in their method.
      </p>
      <p>
        Although the aim is not extracting personal metadata, in [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
        ], they proposes the
method to extract a domain terminology from available documents such as the Web
pages. This method is similar to our one in terms of that terminology are extracted
based on the scoring measure. However, their measure is based not on the co-occurrence
but on the frequency. Furthermore, they focus on the domain-specific terms rather than
personal metadata and the method is domain dependent. In our method, we can capture
the various aspects of personal metadata even from different domain resources using
the notion of a context.
6
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Future works and Conclusion</title>
      <p>To apply our keyword extraction methods to personal metadata annotation, we must
consider and solve following points in the future.</p>
      <p>
        – Evaluation of personal metadata : One problem is that we are not sure that the
extracted metadata are true. Although two terms co-occur in many Web pages, they
might not have any relation. Therefore, someone should evaluate the propriety of
a keyword as actual metadata. One approach to solve this problem would be an
interactive annotation system[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ]. Reusing and modifying a keyword as a candidate
of personal metadata, a user can easily annotate personal metadata.
– Entity recognition of keywords : Another critical problem is to decide a certain
keyword property. In our experiment, the property label was given manually to
each keyword. However, it is not efficient to put a property to numerous extracted
keywords. One approach to automatically decide the property of a keyword is to
use techniques in the entity recognition research[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ].
– Privacy problem of information extraction from the Web : A person sometimes
does not know that his or her information is extracted from the Web only by name.
Therefore, we should take care not to intrude on a user’s privacy even in information
extracted from the Web. We must clarify the use of the information only for useful
services for a user.
      </p>
      <p>The Web holds much personal information that can be used as personal metadata.
This paper proposes a novel keyword extraction method to extract personal information
from the Web. Our result showed the important possibility of using extracted keywords
as personal metadata. Importantly, our method can capture the personal information in
different contexts. This allows us to obtain various personal metadata.</p>
      <p>Because the Web is such a large information resource, its information runs the
gamut from useful to trivial. It presents the limitation that it must be publicly
available on the Web. For further improvement of the proposed method, we must analyze
“what” information of “who” in the Web, and its reliability.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Alani</surname>
          </string-name>
          et al.
          <article-title>Automatic Extraction of Knowledge from Web Documents</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Workshop of Human Language Technology for the Semantic Web and Web Services</source>
          , 2nd International Semantic Web Conference, Sanibel Island, Florida, USA,
          <year>2003</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Berners-Lee</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Hender</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>O. Lassila.</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>The Semantic Web</article-title>
          .
          <source>Scientic American</source>
          ,
          <year>2001</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Ciravegna</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Dingli</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Petrelli</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Wilks</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>User-system cooperation in document annotation based on information extraction</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, EKAW02</source>
          , Springer Verlag,
          <year>2002</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Cunningham</surname>
          </string-name>
          et al.
          <article-title>GATE:A Framework and Graphical Development Environment for Robust NLP Tools and Application</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of the 40th Anniversary Meeting Assoc. for Computational Linguistics(ACL2002)</source>
          , East Stroudsburg, Pa.,
          <year>2002</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Dan</given-names>
            <surname>Brickley</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Libby</given-names>
            <surname>Miller</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>FOAF: the 'friend of a friend' vocabulary</article-title>
          . http://xmlns. com/foaf/0.1/,
          <year>2004</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Dingli</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            <surname>Ciravegna</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Guthrie</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Wilks</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Mining Web Sites Using Unsupervised Adaptive Information Extraction</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of the 10th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics</source>
          , Budapest, Hungary,
          <year>2003</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Garton</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Haythornthwaite</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            <surname>Wellman</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Studying online social networks</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Doing Internet Research</source>
          , S. Jones, Ed. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp.
          <fpage>75</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>105</lpage>
          ,
          <year>1999</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          8.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Kahan</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. R.</given-names>
            <surname>Koivunen</surname>
          </string-name>
          . Annotea:
          <article-title>An open rdf infrastructure for shared web annotations</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of the 10th International WWW Conference</source>
          , pp.
          <fpage>623</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>632</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2001</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          9.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Lars</given-names>
            <surname>Marius</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Garshol</article-title>
          .
          <article-title>Living with topic maps and RDF</article-title>
          . http://www.ontopia.net/topicmaps/materials/tmrdf.html,
          <year>2003</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          10.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Staab</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Maedche</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Handschuh</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>An Annotation Framework for the Semantic Web</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of 1st International Workshop MultiMedia Annotation</source>
          ,
          <year>2001</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          11.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Velardi</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Missikoff</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Basili</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Identification of relevant terms to support the construction of Domain Ontologies</article-title>
          .
          <source>In ACL-EACL Workshop on Human Language Technologies</source>
          , Toulouse, France,
          <year>2001</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          12.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Yangarber</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Grishman</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <source>Machine Learning of Extraction Patterns from Unanotated Corpora: Position Statement. Workshop Machine Learning for Information Extraction</source>
          , IOS Press, Amsterdam, pp.
          <fpage>76</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>83</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2000</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          13.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Resource Description</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Framework(RDF) Schema Specification</article-title>
          .
          <source>In W3C Recommendation</source>
          ,
          <year>2000</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>14. http://gensen.dl.itc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/win.html</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          15.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>DAML</given-names>
            <surname>Ontology</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Library</article-title>
          . http://www.daml.org/ontologies/
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          16.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Representing</surname>
          </string-name>
          vCard Objects in RDF/XML. http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/NOTE-vcard-rdf20010222/
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>