<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>EMMSAD 2017 RADAR</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Modeling Methods for Systems Analysis</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Development</string-name>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2017</year>
      </pub-date>
      <fpage>12</fpage>
      <lpage>13</lpage>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>The eld of information and software systems development has resulted in a rich
heritage of modeling methods and notations (e.g., ER, ORM, UML, ArchiMate,
EPC, BPMN, DEMO). This canon of methods and notations continues to be
enriched with extensions, re nements, and even new languages, to deal with new
challenges. Even with some attempts to standardize, new modeling methods are
constantly being introduced, especially in order to deal with emerging trends
such as compliance and regulations, cloud computing, big data, business
analytics, the Internet of Things, etc. These ongoing changes signi cantly impact the
way information and software systems, enterprises, and business processes are
being analyzed and designed in practice.</p>
      <p>Evaluation of modeling methods contributes to the knowledge and
understanding of their strengths and weaknesses. This knowledge may guide researchers
toward the development of the next generation of modeling methods and help
practitioners select the modeling methods most appropriate to their needs. A
variety of empirical and non-empirical evaluation approaches can be found in
the literature: feature comparison, meta-modeling, metrics, paradigmatic
analyses, contingency identi cation, ontological evaluation, surveys, laboratory and
eld experiments, case studies, and action research. Yet, there is a paucity of
such research in the literature.</p>
      <p>The EMMSAD conference (Exploring Modeling Methods for Systems
Analysis and Design) focuses on evaluating, as well as exploring and enhancing,
modeling methods and techniques for the development of information and software
systems, enterprises, and business processes. The objective of the EMMSAD
conference series is to provide a forum for researchers and practitioners interested in
evaluation and modeling methods for systems development to meet and exchange
research ideas and results. It also provides the participants with an opportunity
to present their research papers and experience reports, and to take part in open
discussions. More details can be found at http://www.emmsad.org/.</p>
      <p>This year EMMSAD celebrates its 22nd edition, in Essen Germany. We
opened two new categories of short papers:
{ EMMSAD-Next: reporting on research-in-progress, preliminary ndings,
or initiatives.
{ EMMSAD-Practice: reporting on lessons learned from practice or
collaborations with industry.</p>
      <p>Four papers were accepted in those tracks and constitute EMMSAD-RADAR
proceedings:
1. Architectural Intelligence: a Framework and Application to e-Learning
2. Towards Modeling Monitoring Services for Large-Scale Distributed Systems
with Abstract State Machines
3. A Proposed Method in Agile Practices to Create Requirements
Documentation and Test Cases
4. Combining Top-down and Bottom-up Enterprise Modelling</p>
      <p>The proceedings further include the abstract of BPMDS/EMMSAD keynote,
which was given by Heinrich C. Mayr, from Alpen-Adria-Universitt Klagenfurt,
Austria. The title of the keynote was Domain Speci c Conceptual Model
Engineering.</p>
      <p>We wish to thank the EMMSAD 2017 RADAR authors for having shared
their work with us, as well as the members of the EMMSAD 2017 Program
Committee for their valuable reviews. We also thank the organizers of CAiSE
2017 for their help with the organization of the event and IFIP WG8.1 for the
support. We wish you pleasant and fruitful event.</p>
      <p>May 2017</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Iris Reinhartz-Berger</title>
      <p>Wided Guedria</p>
      <p>Palash Bera
Sergio Guerreiro</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Iris Reinhartz-Berger Wided Guedria</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Palash Bera Sergio Guerreiro</title>
      <sec id="sec-4-1">
        <title>Advisory Committee</title>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>John Krogstie</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Henderik A. Proper</title>
      <sec id="sec-6-1">
        <title>Program Committee</title>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>Palash Bera</title>
      <p>Sjaak Brinkkemper
Tony Clark
Dolors Costal
Sybren De Kinderen
Rebecca Deneckere
John Erickson
Neil Ernst
Christophe Feltus</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-8">
      <title>Peter Fettke</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-9">
      <title>Kathrin Figl</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-10">
      <title>Mohamad Gharib Je Gray Wided Guedria</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-11">
      <title>Sergio Guerreiro</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-12">
      <title>Giancarlo Guizzardi Stijn Hoppenbrouwers</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-13">
      <title>University of Haifa, Israel</title>
      <p>Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology
(LIST), Luxembourg
Saint Louis University, USA
Instituto Superior Tecnico, University of Lisbon,
Portugal
Norwegian University of Science and Technology
(NTNU), Norway
Luxembourg Institute of Science and
Technology (LIST), Luxembourg, and Radboud University
Nijmegen, The Netherlands</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-14">
      <title>Saint Louis University, USA</title>
      <p>Utrecht University, The Netherlands
She eld Hallam University, United Kingdom
Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, Spain
University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany
Centre de Recherche en Informatique, France
University of Nebraska-Omaha, USA
Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh, USA
Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology
(LIST), Luxembourg
German Research Center for Arti cial Inteilligence
(DFKI) and Saarland University, Germany
Vienna University of Economics and Business (WU),
Austria
University of Florence, Italy
University of Alabama, USA
Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology
(LIST), Luxembourg
Instituto Superior Tecnico, University of Lisbon,
Portugal
Federal University of Espirito Santo (UFES), Brazil
HAN University of Applied Sciences, the
Netherlands</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-15">
      <title>Owen Molloy</title>
      <p>Haralambos Mouratidis
John Mylopoulos
Andreas L Opdahl
Herve Panetto
Oscar Pastor Lopez
Robert Pergl
Anna Perini
Barbara Pernici
Anne Persson
Nuno Pombo
Jolita Ralyte
Iris Reinhartz-Berger
Camille Salinesi</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-16">
      <title>Alberto Silva</title>
      <p>Sase Singh
Monique Snoeck
Il-Yeol Song
Janis Stirna
Arnon Sturm
Dirk van der Linden
Steven van Kervel
Carson Woo
Michael Wufka
Marielba Zacarias
Chalmers and the University of Gothenburg, Sweden
University of Ottawa, Canada
Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya (UPC), Spain
University of Manchester, United Kingdom
Technische Universitat Munchen, Germany
University of Tartu, Estland
Vienna University of Economics and Business,
Austria
NUIG, Ireland
University of Brighton, United Kingdom
University of Toronto, Canada
University of Bergen, Norway
CRAN, University of Lorraine, CNRS, France
Universitat Politecnica de Valencia, Spain
Czech Technical University, Czech
Fondazione Bruno Kessler Trento, Italy
Politecnico di Milano, Italy
University of Skovde, Sweden
University of Beira Interior, Portugal
University of Geneva, Switzerland
University of Haifa, Israel
CRI, Universite de Paris1 Pantheon-Sorbonne,
France
INESC-ID / Instituto Superior Tecnico, Portugal
Elizabeth City State University, USA
K.U.Leuven, Belgium
Drexel University, USA
Stockholm University, Sweden
Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Israel
University of Haifa, Israel
Formetis BV, The Netherlands
University of British Columbia, Canada
Douglas College, Canada
Research Centre for Spatial and Organizational
Dynamics, Universidade do Algarve, Portugal
University of Haifa, Israel
Stockholm University, Sweden</p>
      <sec id="sec-16-1">
        <title>Additional Reviewers</title>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-17">
      <title>Martin Kleehaus</title>
      <p>Technische Universitat Munchen, Germany</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list />
  </back>
</article>