<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Reasoning at a Distance by Way of Conceptual Metaphors and Blends</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Marco Schorlemmer</string-name>
          <email>marco@iiia.csic.es</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Arti cial Intelligence Research Institute (IIIA-CSIC) Barcelona</institution>
          ,
          <country country="ES">Spain</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>In: A.M. Olteteanu, Z. Falomir (eds.): Proceedings of ProSocrates 2017: Symposium on Problem-solving, Creativity and Spatial Reasoning in Cognitive Systems, at Delmenhorst, Germany, July 2017, published at http://ceur-ws.org</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>Cognitive scientists of the embodied cognition tradition have been
providing evidence that a large part of our creative reasoning and
problemsolving processes are carried out by means of conceptual metaphor and
blending, grounded on our bodily experience with the world. In this
talk I shall aim at eshing out a mathematical model that has been
proposed in the last decades for expressing and exploring conceptual
metaphor and blending with greater precision than has previously been
done. In particular, I shall focus on the notion of aptness of a metaphor
or blend and on the validity of metaphorical entailment. Towards this
end, I shall use a generalisation of the category-theoretic notion of
colimit for modelling conceptual metaphor and blending in combination
with the idea of reasoning at a distance as modelled in the
BarwiseSeligman theory of information ow. I shall illustrate the adequacy of
the proposed model with an example of creative reasoning about space
and time for solving a classical brain-teaser. Furthermore, I shall argue
for the potential applicability of such mathematical model for ontology
engineering, computational creativity, and problem-solving in general.
Copyright c by the paper's authors. Copying permitted for private and academic purposes.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list />
  </back>
</article>