<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Query Conservative Extensions in Horn Description Logics with Inverse Roles?</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Jean Christoph Jung</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Carsten Lutz</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Mauricio Martel</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Thomas Schneider</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Fachbereich Informatik, Universitat Bremen</institution>
          ,
          <country country="DE">Germany</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>? Accepted for IJCAI 2017. Supported by DFG project LU 1417/2 and ERC consolidator grant 647289 `CODA'.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>
        Motivated by applications in ontology-mediated querying, module extraction,
and ontology versioning, we consider two kinds of convervative extensions in
Horn Description Logics (DLs) with inverse roles. Our prime notion is as follows:
a TBox T2 T1 is a ( ; )-query conservative extension of a TBox T1, where
and are signatures, if all -queries give the same answers w.r.t. T1 and
T2, for every -ABox. If this is the case, then T1 can safely be replaced by
T2 in querying applications where the data uses only symbols from and the
query uses only symbols from . We also study ( ; )-query entailment and
( ; )-query inseparability as generalizations of conservative extensions, please
see the recent survey [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ] for details.
      </p>
      <p>
        For Horn-DLs without inverse roles, query conservative extensions can be
characterized in terms of the existence of homomorphisms between universal
models. The resulting characterizations provide an important foundation for
decision procedures, often based on tree automata [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]. In the presence of inverse
roles, however, such characterizations are only correct if we require the existence
of n-bounded homomorphisms, for any n. It is not obvious how the existence
of such in nite families of bounded homomorphisms can be veri ed using tree
automata (or related techniques) and, consequently, decidability results for query
conservative extensions in Horn-DLs with inverse roles are di cult to obtain.
      </p>
      <p>
        In this paper, we develop decision procedures for query conservative extensions
in Horn DLs with inverse roles. The main idea is to provide a characterization
that is much more re ned than the usual ones, mixing unbounded and bounded
homomorphisms and using unbounded ones only in places where this is strictly
necessary. We can then deal with the `unbounded part' using tree automata while
the `bounded part' is addressed by precomputing relevant information using
a mosaic technique. In this way, we establish decidability and a 2-ExpTime
upper bound for query conservative extensions in Horn-ALCHIF . Together with
lower bounds from [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ], we get 2-ExpTime-completeness for all fragments of
Horn-ALCHIF that contain ELI or Horn-ALC. These results also apply to
query entailment and inseparability.
      </p>
      <p>We additionally study -deductive conservative extensions between TBoxes,
that is, whether T1 and T2 entail the same concept and role inclusions as well as
functionality assertions over . Our main result is that deductive conservative
extensions in ELHIF ? are in 2-ExpTime and coNExpTime-hard in ELI.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Botoeva</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Konev</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lutz</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ryzhikov</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wolter</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zakharyaschev</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Inseparability and conservative extensions of description logic ontologies: A survey</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: Proc. RW</source>
          (
          <year>2016</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Botoeva</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lutz</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ryzhikov</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wolter</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zakharyaschev</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Query-based entailment and inseparability for ALC ontologies</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: Proc. IJCAI</source>
          . pp.
          <volume>1001</volume>
          {
          <issue>1007</issue>
          (
          <year>2016</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>