<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Challenges of Session-Aware Recommendation in E-Commerce (Keynote)</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Dietmar Jannach TU Dortmund</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Germany dietmar.jannach@tu-dortmund.de</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Recommender systems</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Session-aware Recommendation</addr-line>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>MOTIVATION</title>
      <p>
        (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ) First, in e-commerce scenarios users oen visit an online
shop with a very specic shopping intent, and a
recommender system, to be successful, must be able to adapt
its recommendations to the particular contextual situation
and short-term preferences of the user.
(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ) Second, in some cases it might be relevant to know which
items the user inspected in his or her last session, and a
recommender could use this knowledge to remind the user
of such items.
(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ) ird, in some domains, also aside from e-commerce,
considering popularity trends in the user community could be
helpful when deciding on what to recommend to users.
(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ) Fourth, some users might be interested in certain items
only in case they are currently discounted. For such users,
recommending items that are on sale could be a promising
strategy.
      </p>
      <p>To be able to analyze research questions like these, a dierent
problem abstraction is required. Instead of a user-item rating matrix,
the input to the recommendation problem is rather a time-ordered
sequence (log) of user actions of dierent types, e.g., an item view
event, a purchase, etc. Correspondingly, other computational tasks
than rating prediction have to be considered, including the
prediction of the next user action, the identication of trends, or the
consideration of sequence constraints.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>CONTENTS OF THE TALK Dening Sequence-Aware Recommendation</title>
      <p>We will rst highlight the importance of what we call
“sequenceaware” recommender systems in practice and categorize dierent
recommendation scenarios where the main input to the problem
is a time-ordered series of logged user actions. We will consider
ComplexRec 2017, Como, Italy.
2017. Copyright for the individual papers remains with the authors. Copying permied
for private and academic purposes. is volume is published and copyrighted by its
editors. Published on CEUR-WS, Volume 1892..
dierent computational tasks in that context and then specically
focus on session-based recommendation problems (where only the
interactions of the current session are known) and session-aware
ones (where we also know previous sessions of the current user).
2.2</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>E-Commerce Case Studies</title>
      <p>In the remainder of the talk, we will focus on the specic problems
mentioned in the introduction and present insights from recent
research works. e case studies are based on a large data set
containing logged user interactions of a major European fashion
retailer.</p>
      <p>2.2.1 Considering short- and long-term interests. In the rst case
study [1], we compare the performance of dierent heuristic
approaches to adapt the system’s recommendations to the estimated
short-term interests of the user. e results show that while the
choice of the underlying long-term model is relevant, considering
short-term interests in the right way has much more impact on
recommendation accuracy.</p>
      <p>2.2.2 On the value of reminders. Since the rst study revealed
that reminding users of things they have inspected (but not
purchased) in the recent past can be an eective strategy, we then
explore more elaborate reminding techniques than just presenting
the recently viewed items in reverse chronological order [4].</p>
      <p>2.2.3 Deriving recommendation success factors from log data.
Since the available log data also contains information about which
items were recommended to users and which of these items they
actually inspected, we then re-construct in a systematic way which
factors contributed to the success of the presented
recommendations. e analysis shows that besides the consideration of the
recent interests, recommendations are particularly successful when
they are related to currently trending or to discounted items [2].</p>
      <p>2.2.4 Operationalizing the insights into algorithms. Finally, we
present a novel algorithmic approach to predict the next user
interaction that considers all of the above-mentioned factors (short-term
intents, reminders, trends and discounts) in an integrated way. We
frame the recommendation problem as a classication task and
our experiments show that a deep neural network leads to a beer
performance than when using Random Forests or when using a
weighted hybrid scoring approach.
2.3</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Outlook</title>
      <p>e talk ends with a discussion of open questions and possible
future directions in the eld.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Dietmar</given-names>
            <surname>Jannach</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Lukas Lerche, and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Michael</given-names>
            <surname>Jugovac</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2015</year>
          .
          <article-title>Adaptation and Evaluation of Recommendations for Short-term Shopping Goals</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proc. RecSys</source>
          '
          <volume>15</volume>
          .
          <fpage>211</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>218</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Dietmar</given-names>
            <surname>Jannach</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Malte</given-names>
            <surname>Ludewig</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2017</year>
          .
          <article-title>Determining Characteristics of Successful Recommendations from Log Data - A Case Study</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proc. SAC '17.</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Dietmar</given-names>
            <surname>Jannach</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Paul Resnick, Alexander Tuzhilin, and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Markus</given-names>
            <surname>Zanker</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2016</year>
          .
          <source>Recommender Systems - Beyond Matrix Completion. Commun. ACM</source>
          <volume>59</volume>
          ,
          <issue>11</issue>
          (
          <year>2016</year>
          ),
          <fpage>94</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>102</lpage>
          . DOI:hp://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2891406
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Lerche</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Jannach</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Ludewig</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2016</year>
          .
          <article-title>On the Value of Reminders within E-Commerce Recommendations</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proc. UMAP</source>
          '
          <volume>16</volume>
          .
          <fpage>27</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>25</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>