<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Towards a Public Multilingual Knowledge Management Infrastructure for the European Digital Single Market</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Peter Schmitz</string-name>
          <email>Peter.Schmitz@publications.europa.eu</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Enrico Francesconi</string-name>
          <email>Enrico.Francesconi@publications.europa.eu</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Najeh Hajlaoui</string-name>
          <email>Najeh.Hajlaoui@ext.publications.europa.eu</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Brahim Batouche</string-name>
          <email>Brahim.Batouche@ext.publications.europa.eu</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Publications Office of the European Union</institution>
          ,
          <country country="LU">Luxembourg</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg and ITTIG-CNR</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Florence</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="IT">Italy</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>This paper describes the first phase of the Public Multilingual Knowledge Management Infrastructure (PMKI) ISA2 project. PMKI is meant to support enterprises, in particular the language technology industry, as well as public administrations, with multilingual tools able to improve cross border accessibility of digital services. In particular it aims to create a set of tools and facilities, based on Semantic Web technologies, for establishing semantic interoperability between multilingual lexicons. A comparative study among the main data models for representing lexicons and recommendations for the PMKI service are reported. Moreover, the expected synergies with other programs of the EU institutions, as far as systems interoperability and machine translation solutions, are discussed. 1 https://ec.europa.eu/commission/priorities/digital-single-market_en E. Francesconi is author of Section 1, B. Batouche of Section 2 and 3, N. Hajloui of Section 4, P. Schmitz of Section 5</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Multilingual Language Resource Infrastructure</kwd>
        <kwd>standard representation</kwd>
        <kwd>data model</kwd>
        <kwd>interoperability</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>Linguistic and cultural diversity is one of the cornerstones that the European Union
is built upon. It represents a treasure that needs to be preserved but, at the same time,
a challenge to face considering the barriers which come along and which have to be
removed in order to guarantee a space of freedom, justice and democracy for millions
of European citizens. The EU economy is one of the main areas that can benefit from
overcoming such barriers and can exploit the globalization of the markets, which is
sped up by a rapid digital transformation of the society. In this respect the creation of
a Digital Single Market1 for the EU is one of the main priorities of the European
Commission aimed to provide better online access to digital goods and services,
guarantee an environment where digital networks and services can prosper, as well as
make “digital” as a driver for growth.</p>
      <p>The pilot project Public Multilingual Knowledge Infrastructure (PMKI), launched
within the ISA2 program, aims to represent a contribution to overcome the barriers
hampering an effective cross-border exploitation of Digital Single Market services, in
particular language and semantic barriers.</p>
      <p>The project aims to create a set of tools and facilities, based on semantic Web
technologies, aimed to support enterprises, in particular the language technology
industry, as well as public administrations with multilingual tools in order to improve
cross border accessibility of e-commerce solutions and public services, helping to
build the Connecting Europe Facility Automated Translation (CEF.AT) Platform2 - a
common building block implemented through the CEF programme.</p>
      <p>One of the main objectives of PMKI is therefore to establish semantic
interoperability between digital services, which, in practical terms, means overcoming language
and technical barriers on the Web by creating multilingual vocabularies and lexicons,
as well as establishing links between them. This will improve the ability of digital
systems to exchange data with unambiguous, shared meaning, thus supporting the
accessibility of services and goods offered through the Internet.</p>
      <p>This paper describes the first phase of the PMKI project, which consists in a
feasibility study about the implementation of mapping facilities and relations between
multilingual lexicons based on semantic Web technologies. It is organized as follows:
in Section 2 an overview of the main objectives of the project is given; in Section 3
comparative studies is illustrated about Semantic Web standards for representing
multilingual lexicons and describing their relations, as well as possible platforms for
managing lexicons; in Section 4 the PMKI relationships with the CEF (Connecting
Europe Facility) program of the European Commission are discussed. Finally in
Section 5 some conclusions are reported.
2
2.1</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>PMKI project</title>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>Presentation</title>
        <p>The objective of PMKI is to implement a proof-of-concept infrastructure to expose
and to harmonize internal (European Union institutional) and external multilingual
lexicons aligning them in order to facilitate interoperability. Additionally the project
aims to create a governance structure to extend systematically the infrastructure by
the integration of supplementary public multilingual taxonomies/terminologies.</p>
        <p>PMKI is a pilot project to check the feasibility and to prepare a road map to
convert such proof of concept into a public service.
2 https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/automated-translation
2.2</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-2">
        <title>Why such platform</title>
        <p>The need to have a public and multilingual platform that can play the role of a hub to
collect and to share language resources in standardised formats is essential to
guarantee semantic interoperability of digital services. For instance, such platform is missing
in CEF.AT, while it would provide an advantage for the development of machine
translation systems. In particular it can provide alignments of domain specific
terminologies for developing specific-domain translation systems (tender terminology,
medical terminology, etc.).</p>
        <p>A platform like PMKI may represent a one-stop-shop harmonized multilingual
lexicons repository at European level.</p>
        <p>Contrary to the European Language Resource Coordination (ELRC3) action, which
aims to identify and gather language and translation data, PMKI platform aims first to
harmonize multilingual language resources making them interoperable, then to
integrate supplementary public multilingual taxonomies/terminologies in a standardized
representation. That is why we need first to define a 1) sophisticated standard
representation that will be used with respect to a 2) defined core data model (in case with
extensions) under 3) an adequate architecture.</p>
        <p>These three requirements are respectively analyzed and detailed in three first
analysis phases of the project:


</p>
        <p>Analysis of existing relevant standards for the representation of lexicons that
will be made available on the PMKI platform;
PMKI core data model and extensions (based on the standard representation
that is recommended as result of the previous analysis);</p>
        <p>Analysis of available platforms for managing lexicons.</p>
        <p>Interoperability is one of the main features of the PMKI platform; such platform
will provide support to develop multilingual tools such as machine translation,
localization, search etc. For instance for the machine translation tool, interoperable
translation data is a factor of success to improve the quality mainly for under-resourced
languages.</p>
        <p>3 ELRC2: the European Language Resource Coordination action launched by the European
Commission as part of the CEF.AT platform activities, to identify and gather language data
across all 30 European countries participating in the CEF programme. This will be followed up
by actions concerning the setting up of a repository of language resources for CEF AT and
further data collection and awareness actions in the context of calls for tenders and calls for
proposals for which the selection procedure is still ongoing. More information can be found
here: http://www.lr-coordination.eu/</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Analysis and comparative studies</title>
      <sec id="sec-3-1">
        <title>Requirements collection</title>
        <p>
          To select the most appropriate standard for the PMKI project, we have collected our
requirements and refer them to the available standards for lexical resources and their
enrichment. In particular we analyzed SKOS
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">(Alistair &amp; all, 2005)</xref>
          , WordNet, Lemon
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">(Villegas, 2015)</xref>
          and OntoLex
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">(Bosque-Gil and all, 2015)</xref>
          . The collected requirements
are associated to the type of lexical resources which PMKI aims to deal with and to
the type of their possible lexical enrichment.
3.1.1.
        </p>
        <p>Type of lexical resources
In our analysis we have identified the PMKI requirements covered by the following
resource types: (1) controller vocabularies, (2) glossaries, (3) lexicons, (4) thesauri,
(5) taxonomies and (6) semantic networks. The types (1-3) concern mainly the
linguistic community; the types (4-5) concern mainly the librarian community and the
type (6) concerns both communities.</p>
        <p>For each type of resources, we define our requirements as a projection of the
resources type. These resources are listed in Tab. 1, where the second colon describes
the projected requirements.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-2">
        <title>Resource type Requirements</title>
        <p>Controlled vocabularies: list of terms or Description of multiword expression
sentences that contribute to the
homography and support disambiguation
Glossary: list of words with definitions Definition of terms
Thesaurus: controlled vocabulary with Description of relation between terms
definitions, properties and relations be- independently of domain/context
tween terms/concepts
Lexicon (lexical-Semantic databases): set Definition of relation between
of terms and linguistic relations between terms/concepts, depending on
dothem main/context
Taxonomy: hierarchical classification of Hierarchical classification of concepts
concepts which depends on the domain
Semantic Network: knowledge represen- Conceptualization of the term sense by
tation of nodes (objects or classes) and linking it with semantic resources
(dorelations, usually organized in a direct main ontology)
graph. It does not support formal
constraints and can even not be a shared
knowledge as the ontologies are.</p>
        <p>Table 1 List of requirements and related lexical resource types
3.1.2. Lexical enrichment</p>
        <p>No
No
Yes
Yes</p>
        <p>Yes
No
No
Yes</p>
        <p>Yes
No
No
Yes</p>
        <p>Semantic
Network
No
No
Yes
Yes
From the lexical enrichment point of view, the main requirements for the PMKI
lexical resources are: (a) hierarchical classification of concepts, (b) linguistic variation of
terms (c) sense of terms, (d) multiword expression as phrases, (e) semantics of terms.</p>
        <p>From the comparative study of the available data models, it emerged that
LemonOntoLex4 standard covers the PMKI requirements, therefore it represents the most
promising candidate to become the data model for PMKI.</p>
        <p>Ontolex is based on around the idea of separation between the lexical and the
ontological layer. Additionally it is modelled to be modular and extensible in giving a hub
for connecting lexical and terminological description elements with ontologies. In
particular the sub-ontology (modules) of OntoLex are: Ontolex core5 (illustrated in
Figure 1), syntax/semantic6, decomposition7, variation/transformation8, metadata
(Lime)9.</p>
        <p>OntoLex describes the meaning of a word by reference to the data model, a lexical
entry may be associated with a lexical concept which is sub class of skos:concept.
Lexical concept represents the semantic pole of linguistic units and is the mentally
instantiated abstraction which language users derive from conceptions. We consider
4 https://www.w3.org/2016/05/ontolex/
5 http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#
6 http://www.w3.org/ns/lemon/synsem#
7 http://www.w3.org/ns/lemon/decomp#
8 http://www.w3.org/ns/lemon/vartrans#
9 http://www.w3.org/ns/lemon/lime#
the abstraction of lexical concept as skos:concept an interesting feature because it
allows to consider a topic and its hierarchy, which is a feature not covered by
LEMON.
3.3</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-3">
        <title>Platform for managing language resources</title>
        <p>As said, the objective of PMKI project is to promote a Digital Single Market in the
EU. To this aim the alignment of multilingual lexicons dataset are essential for
crossborder accessibility of public administration services and e-commerce solutions. In
order to offer PMKI services, a knowledge management platform including
functionalities and features, such as editing of lexicons, interoperability between linguistic
models, alignments of lexical resources, import/export of dataset, and merging of
dataset, is necessary. Based on Semantic Web technologies, PMKI will exploit and
improve the existing datasets with semantic hyperlinking.</p>
        <p>
          In literature one of the most advanced platforms able to manage lexical resources is
the editor VocBench
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">(Stellato &amp; al., 2011)</xref>
          , similarly a Web application for
establishing and managing language resources and their interoperability is BabelNet.
4
        </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Possible synergies with CEF.AT</title>
      <p>The Connecting Europe Facility (CEF)10 was established by Regulation (EU)
N°1316/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013
(CEF Regulation)11. It determines the conditions, methods and procedures to provide
the European Union (EU) financial assistance to trans-European networks in order to
support trans-European networks and infrastructures in the sectors of transport,
telecommunications and energy.</p>
      <p>CEF.AT is the Automated Translation platform to be developed as part of the
Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) Programme; it is actually one of its building blocks.
The starting point of the CEF.AT is the Machine Translation at the European
Commission (MT@EC) system, which is a translation service available since 2013 to EU
Institutions, Member State administrations and a number of EC Information systems
and online services.</p>
      <p>CEF.AT is a secure and adaptable automated translation platform that plugs into
any Digital Service Infrastructure12 (DSI) such as eHealth, eProcurement, eJustice,
etc. and makes it multilingual. CEF.AT will eventually offer tools and services for the
multilingual enablement of public services. It is a key enabler for cross-border public
digital services and public administration within the Digital Single Market.
10 http://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/connecting-europe-facility
11 http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32013R1316&amp;from=EN
12https://ec.europa.eu/cefdigital/wiki/display/CEFDIGITAL/CEF+Digital+Sector+Specific+DS</p>
      <p>I
4.1</p>
      <sec id="sec-4-1">
        <title>PMKI and MT</title>
        <p>PMKI output can be integrated as a module or service to the Connecting Europe
Facility Automated Translation platform (CEF.AT).</p>
        <p>CEF.AT platform could benefit from the PMKI project to support the
implementation of the necessary multilingual tools and features (machine translation, localization
and multilingual search) offered to digital services (including the sectoral DSIs) and
public institutions at the EU and member states level, contributing to disambiguation,
domain identification, facilitation of cross-lingual search and machine translation.</p>
        <p>The PMKI strategy consists to find a sophisticated core data model based on a
standard representation for multilingual taxonomies and terminologies and its
implementation for the representation of the data in a public platform. Such standard
representation will make it possible for different stakeholders to manage the development
and evolution of their own data on an individual base, but at the same time enable
interoperability through alignment and linking can be useful both as a data/content
resource and as a tool/service.</p>
        <p>PMKI service can be used for better leveraging both the new data that are collected to
support customization and adaptation in CEF.AT, and the data currently used by
MT@EC. It can also be used to attract data providers who wish to leverage their own
data and users/DSIs who may wish to use it for their own needs (for example
visualization, search, domain identification and classification, etc.)</p>
        <p>PMKI as a digital service will play a vital role in the collection and the share of
data across borders and domains. It will help European institutions and public
administrations exchange resource data across language barriers in the European Union.
For instance, it will help the CEF.AT to make all Digital Service Infrastructures (DSI)
multilingual by playing the role of a hub that offers a common infrastructure to enable
multilingual services. In order to facilitate interoperable services as foreseen by the
Digital Agenda for Europe, PMKI aims to facilitate first interoperability between
language resources proposing a Multilingual Knowledge Infrastructure which:
 will represent a new data hub to collect and share data resources in standardized
formats;
 will be reused for CEF.AT to provide bilingual data to build/reinforce machine
translation systems, in particular on specific domain systems (tender terminology,
medical terminology, etc.);
 will be the main point of interoperable language resources coordination.
The actual CEF.AT platform produces only a very limited number of direct
translations. Direct translations are generally from English/French/German (the 3 main
working languages in the EU institutions) to all EU languages and from all EU
languages to English/French/German. The remaining combinations are indirect
translations via one of the three main languages. PMKI language resources such as EuroVoc,
which is already multilingual (24 languages), will allow the production of new
parallel corpora for such languages to train new direct MT systems.
4.2</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-2">
        <title>Support for specific domain data</title>
        <p>
          A sublanguage is a subset of the language
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">(Harris, 1970)</xref>
          identified with a
particular semantic domain (or a family of domain)
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">(Kittredge, 1978)</xref>
          ,
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">(Kittredge, 1982)</xref>
          .
        </p>
        <p>
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">(Hajlaoui &amp; Boitet, 2008)</xref>
          showed that, in case of very small sublanguages, SMT
may be sufficient quality, starting from a corpus 100 to 500 smaller than for the
general language. The corpus must obviously reach a critical size to allow reliable
statistical treatment. SMT approach works very well for restricted domains with little or
no human revision, for example the rules-based TAUM-METEO system is purposely
developed for the weather service in Canada to provide weather forecasts in French
and English. Quality offered by machine translation could be very high under certain
preconditions related to the type of domain sublanguage:
 Lexical convergence of the domain-sublanguage: the vocabulary used to prepare
the SMT system should cover the domain.
 Grammatical convergence: the training data should cover all the grammatical
variations that can be used with the domain-sublanguage.
        </p>
        <p>In this and similar domains, the quality of translations theoretically can and
practically must be gradable. The performance of a specific SMT system is proportional to the
coverage of the domain. The coverage is usually reached after a certain size of
training data. A relevant parallel corpora related to a given domain is usually difficult to
obtain. The idea is therefore to use PMKI as a filter to produce such specific domain
data. For instance users, such as specific-domain MT developers, can query a
document collection in a specific language for a specific domain. Using CEF.AT users can
translate his specific query into 23 languages. Then, by selecting a list of concepts in
the languages of his interest he will obtain the list of filtered documents in multiple
languages that concern the initial specified domain thanks to the multi-lingual and
multi-collection concepts associated to the documents.
4.3</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-3">
        <title>Support for Machine Translation (MT) and Translation Memory (TM)</title>
        <p>Actually language resources are the "raw" material for statistical machine
translation and Neural Machine Translation approaches. The EU spends lots of efforts and
money to develop and maintain lexicons for developing services to be used in the
CEF programme. PMKI platform can be an effective contribution to the MT
activities, providing a network of interoperable multilingual lexicons. The cross-lingual and
cross-collection retrieval services offered by PMKI will be able to:
 Improve the quality of MT/TM by adding new translation data.
 Improve MT/TM quality for under-resourced languages pairs.
 Facilitate the development of new direct MT systems for languages pairs where
indirect translations are actually used.</p>
        <p>PMKI can represent a “one-stop shop” for accessing lexicons, as well as providing
tools for harmonizing their technological formats, localizing them and making them
interoperable with other lexicons.</p>
        <p>PMKI can provide parallel data that can be processed for MT and TM as well in
order to maximize the probability of reuse of previous human translations.
5</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Conclusion</title>
      <p>In this paper the preliminary results obtained within the PMKI project for
implementing interoperability solution of lexical resources is presented. In particular the main
Semantic Web standards available in literature for representing lexicons have been
identified and their characteristics analyzed. For the ability of describing lexical
components in different languages using LEMON, the related concepts and their mapping
relations using SKOS, the Ontolex standard resulted as the preferred model to be
adopted as reference for the PMKI platform.</p>
      <p>The possible benefits of PMKI in the field of Machine Translation and Translation
Memory have been discussed.</p>
      <p>The next phase of the project will provide an evaluation of different mapping
algorithms and propose a technical infrastructure for the implementation and maintenance
of lexical resources and their interoperability.
6</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname> Alistair</surname>
            <given-names>Miles</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Brian Matthews, Michael Wilson, Dan Brickley, (
          <year>2005</year>
          )
          <article-title>SKOS Core: Simple knowledge organisation for the Web</article-title>
          , DCMI
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
           Stellato &amp; al., (
          <year>2011</year>
          )
          <article-title>VocBench: a Web application for Collaborative development of multilingual Thesauri, adfa</article-title>
          , p.
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bosque-Gil</surname>
          </string-name>
          &amp; al.,
          <article-title>(2015) Applying the OntoLex Model to a Multilingual Terminological Resource</article-title>
          ,
          <article-title>ESWC 2015</article-title>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname> Hajlaoui</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Boitet</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2008</year>
          ).
          <article-title>TA statistique à petits corpus pour de petits souslangages</article-title>
          .
          <source>Proc. ToTh</source>
          <year>2008</year>
          :
          <article-title>Conférence sur la Terminologie &amp; Ontologie : Théories et Applications</article-title>
          , (p.
          <fpage>15</fpage>
          ). France - Annecy.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname> Harris</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Z.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1970</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Mathematical structures of language</article-title>
          .
          <source>Mathematical Gazette</source>
          . Vol.
          <volume>54</volume>
          (
          <issue>388</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>173</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>174</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname> Kittredge</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1978</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Textual cohesion within sublanguages: implications for automatic analysis and synthesis</article-title>
          .
          <source>Proc. Coling-78</source>
          . Vol.
          <volume>1</volume>
          /1.
          <string-name>
            <surname>August</surname>
          </string-name>
          14-
          <fpage>18</fpage>
          . Bergen, Norvège.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname> Kittredge</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1982</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Variation and Homogeneity of Sublanguages. In Sublanguage -Studies of Language in Restricted Semantic Domains</article-title>
          ., (p.
          <fpage>20</fpage>
          ). Walter de Gruyter. Berlin / New York.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname> Koehn</surname>
          </string-name>
          Philipp et al. (
          <year>2007</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Moses: Open Source Toolkit for Statistical Machine Translation</article-title>
          .
          <source>In 45th Annual Meeting of the ACL, Demonstration Session</source>
          , pages
          <fpage>177</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>180</lpage>
          , Prague
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname> Villegas</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bel</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2015</year>
          ).
          <article-title>PAROLE/SIMPLE 'lemon' ontology and lexicons</article-title>
          .
          <source>Semantic Web</source>
          ,
          <volume>6</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>363</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>369</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>