Formation of probing radiation for investigating a uniaxial x-cut crystal with the help of an aperiodic diffractive axicon V.D. Paranin1, S.V. Karpeev1,2 1 Samara National Research University, 34 Moskovskoe Shosse, 443086, Samara, Russia 2 Image Processing Systems Institute – Branch of the Federal Scientific Research Centre "Crystallography and Photonics" of Russian Academy of Sciences, 151 Molodogvardeyskaya st., Samara 443001, Russia Abstract The paper presents an experimental study of transformation of a laser beam formed by an aperiodic diffractive axicon (fracxicon) in a lithium niobate x-cut. The beam is shown to undergo astigmatic rhomboidal transformation induced by the crystal birefringence. The output beam intensity distribution is measured at various distances from the crystal. The effects analyzed make it possible to extend the range of measuring thickness or birefringence of solid, liquid or gaseous media with uniaxial optical anisotropy. Keywords: fracxicon; uniaxial crystal; birefringence 1. Introduction Besssel laser beams [1-4] possessing non-diffractive properties are an efficient tool in various metrological [5,6], diagnostic [7,8] and testing [9-13] applications. Beams of this kind are also useful for investigating optical anisotropy and birefringence. In [14-22] it is shown that Bessel beam propagation in birefringent crystals of various cuts is accompanied with the transformation of the beam order or kind. In [23-25] the influence of the position and parameters of certain elements of optical scheme (laser wavelength, illuminating beam wavefront curvature, crystal temperature) on the Bessel beam characteristics at the crystal output is analyzed. In [26, 27] the thicknesses of z- and x-cuts of uniaxial crystals are measured by an optical method using the effects mentioned. Similar results can be expected for media with various refractive index distributions: linear, parabolic etc. This makes Bessel beams promising means for remote control of anisotropic films, metamaterials, birefringent crystals and ceramics. As a rule, conical and diffractive axicons are used to form Besssel beams. The diameter of an axicon (laser beam) amounts to 200-300 mm, while its numerical aperture assumes specified values within a wide range in the long-wave part of the visible spectrum and shortwave infrared. Therefore, Bessel beams can be used for studying both submicron films and air routes many kilometers long. There are many other axisymmetrical optical elements that form beams with non-diffractive properties, among them a logarithmic axicon [28-30], a generalized axicon [31], an axilens [32], and an aperiodic (fractional) axicon [33]. Linear diffractive axicons [28, 29] are used to produce Bessel laser modes, whereas the analogue of a logarithmic axicon is used to form hypergeometric modes of laser radiation [34, 35] that retain their mode properties longer than Bessel beams. The tandem of a lens and an axicon – a lensacon that makes it possible to form conical axial distributions - also possesses interesting properties. The aperiodic (fractional) axicon also referred to as a fracxicon [33] presented in the paper comprises an axicon and a parabolic lens as special cases. The theoretical models developed and the experimental results obtained do not limit the use of non-diffractive beams to solids only. It is also possible to measure distributions of optical parameters of liquid and gaseous anisotropic media on their basis. For example, we can analyze the state of disturbed atmosphere, the properties of gas-plasma flows, distribution of ionic solution concentrations. The advantages of special beams including singular and vector ones for the purpose of atmospheric data transmission are described in the review [36]. We should also mention the possibility of producing tunable diffractive elements based on the electro-optic effect for the purpose of fast data transmission and three-dimensional addressing [37, 38]. A relatively small range of measuring due to periodic transformation of the beam order in a crystal [20, 27] is one of the problems of measuring thicknesses of z-cut birefringent crystals. Astigmatic beam transformation in x- and z-cut crystals leads to the splitting of the beam into separate intensity maxima [18, 19]. The angular dimension of the maxima decreases with the increase of the crystal thickness and birefringence [18, 19]. In the case of crystals of considerable thickness it leads to the problem of insufficient spatial resolution of the video camera. Both problems are solved by using a multizone axicon or a variable-period axicon (fracxicon, lensacon etc.). An element of this kind makes it possible to choose a site of diffractive microrelief the spatial period of which conforms to the optical and dimensional parameters of the tested sample. The aim of the study was to analyze the transformation of a laser beam formed by an apriodic diffractive axicon (fracxicon) in a uniaxial x-cut crystal. 2. Experimental study An optical setup was assembled to investigate astigmatic beam transformation. The scheme of the setup is presented in fig. 1. The setup includes a helium-neon laser, a spatial filter – beam expander, a polarizer, a fracxicon, a lithium niobate x-cut crystal, a CCD matrix. The spatial filter consists of a microlens 20x, a pinhole aperture with the diameter of 15 μm, a collimator lens 3rd International conference “Information Technology and Nanotechnology 2017” 34 Computer Optics and Nanophotonics / V.D. Paranin, S.V. Karpeev with the focal distance of 200 mm. The setup allowed the formation and investigation of a sufficiently extended fracxicon beam observed at a distance up to 600 mm. Fig. 1. Scheme of the experimental setup. A polished uniaxial x-cut crystal of lithium niobate with 842±2 μm thickness was used as the beam converter. The optical axis of the crystal was aligned parallel to one of its sides and its direction was marked. The axis of the polarizer and that of the crystal were parallel in the experiments. A phase diffractive variable-period axicon (fracxicon) shown in fig. 2 was used to form the beam. The fracxicon was made on a fused-silica substrate by plasma-chemical etching. The diameter of the fracxicon was 20 mm, the period of the diffraction microrelief - 7 μm in the central part of the optical element and 70 μm at the edge of the element. a) b) c) Fig. 2. Photos of the diffractive fracxicon microrelief: a) central part, b) middle part, c) edge part. The distance between the crystal and the fracxicon was 75 mm. The image of the output beam was formed directly by the CCD matrix without the use of imaging optics. The images of the beams observed for various distances L between the CCD array and the crystal are presented in fig. 3. The distance between the crystal and the fracxicon was 75 mm. The image of the output beam was formed directly by the CCD matrix without the use of imaging optics. The images of the beams observed for various distances L between the CCD array and the crystal are presented in fig. 3. a) b) c) d) e) Fig. 3. Output beams for various distances L “crystal – CCD array”: a) L=250 mm, b) L=300 mm, c) L=350 mm, d) L=400 mm, e) L=450 mm. 3rd International conference “Information Technology and Nanotechnology 2017” 35 Computer Optics and Nanophotonics / V.D. Paranin, S.V. Karpeev Increasing the distance between the crystal and the camera makes astigmatic beam transformation more complicated due to the inclusion of fracxicon regions with increased angular aperture. This makes the use of several variable-period diffractive axicons unnecessary. One variable-period diffractive element is sufficient for reliable measurement of the thickness or birefringence of a plane-parallel crystal. The results obtained in this work are in good agreement with earlier studies [18, 19]. The approach proposed has the advantage of a simpler optical measurement scheme that does not comprise an analyzer. The simplification is made possible due to parallel orientation of the polarizer and the crystal optical axis. 3. Conclusion The results obtained confirm the validity of using an aperiodic diffractive axicon with specified radial period distribution. It is possible to select the part of the microrelief conforming to the test specimen parameters and the characteristics of the optical measurement system on the basis of this element. Measurement with the use of several parts of fracxicon improves the accuracy of determining the thickness or birefringence of the crystal. Acknowledgements The work was supported by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation and the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (RFBR grants 16-07-00825, 16-29-11698-ofi_m). References [1] Bereznyi AE, Prokhorov AM, Sisakyan IN, Soifer VA. Bessel optics. DAN SSS 1984; 274(4): 802–805. [2] Bereznyi AE, Sisakyan IN. Binary elements of Bessel-optics. Computer Optics 1987; (1): 132–133. [3] Durnin, J. Exact solutions for nondiffracting beams. I. The scalar theory. J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 1987; 4(4): 651–654. [4] Durnin J, Miceli JJ, Eberly JH. Diffraction-free beams. Physical Review Letters 1987; 58: 1499–1501. [5] Kotlyar VV, Skidanov RV, Khonina SN. Contactless precision measurement of a linear displacement using DOEs forming Bessel beams. Computer Optics 2001; 21: 102–104. [6] Wang K, Zeng L, Yin Ch. Influence of the incident wave-front on intensity distribution of the nondiffracting beam used in large-scale measurement. Opt. Commun 2003; 216: 99–103. [7] Lee KS, Rolland JP. Bessel beam spectral-domain high-resolution optical coherence tomography with micro-optic axicon providing extended focusing range. Opt. Lett. 2008; 33(15): 1696–1698. [8] Cizmar T, Kollarov V, Tsampoula X, Gunn-Moore F, Sibbett W, Bouchal Z, Dholakia K. Generation of multiple Bessel beams for a biophotonics workstation. Optics Express 2008; 16(18): 14024–14035. [9] Arlt J, Dholakia K, Soneson J, Wright EM. Optical dipole traps and atomic waveguides based on Bessel light beams. Physical Review A 2001; 63: 063602- 1–063602-8. [10] Garces-Chavez V, McGloin D, Melville H, Sibbett W, Dholakia K. Simultaneous micromanipulation in multiple planes using a self-reconstructing light beam. Nature 2002; 419: 145–147. [11] Khonina SN, Skidanov RV, Kotlyar VV, Soifer VA. Rotating microobjects using a DOE-generated laser Bessel beam. Proceedings of SPIE 2004; 5456: 244–255. [12] Khonina SN, Kotlyar VV, Skidanov RV, Soifer VA, Jefimovs K, Simonen J, Turunen J. Rotation of microparticles with Bessel beams generated by diffractive elements. Journal of Modern Optics 2004; 51(14): 2167–2184. [13] Fortin M, Piché M, Borra EF. Optical tests with Bessel beam interferometry. Optics Express 2004; 12(24): 5887–5895. [14] Khonina SN, Volotovsky SG, Kharitonov SI. Features of nonparaxial propagation of Gaussian and Bessel beams along the axis of the crystal. Computer Optics 2013; 37(3): 297–306. [15] Khonina SN, Morozov AA, Karpeev SV. Effective transformation of a zero-order Bessel beam into a second-order vortex beam using a uniaxial crystal. Laser Phys 2014; 24: 056101-1–056101-5. [16] Khonina SN, Kharitonov SI. Comparative investigation of nonparaxial mode propagation along the axis of uniaxial crystal. Journal of Modern Optics 2015; 62(2): 125–134. [17] Khonina SN, Karpeev SV, Morozov AA, Paranin VD. Implementation of ordinary and extraordinary beams interference by application of diffractive optical elements. Journal of Modern Optics 2016; 63(13): 1239–1247. [18] Khonina SN, Paranin VD, Ustiniv AV, Krasnov AP. Astigmatic transformation of Bessel beams in a uniaxial crystal. Optica Applicata 2016; 46(1): 5–18. [19] Khonina S, Paranin V, Degtyarev S, Savelyev D. Transformation of Bessel beams passing through uniaxial y-cut crystal. Materials of 17th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks ICTON 2015; 1–4. [20] Khonina SN, Paranin VD, Karpeev SV, Morozov АА. Study of polarization transformations and interaction of ordinary and extraordinary beams in nonparaxial regime. Computer Optics 2014; 38(4): 598–605. [21] Paranin VD, Karpeev SV, Krasnov AP. A converter of circularly polarized laser beams into cylindrical vector beams based on anisotropic crystals. Computer Optics 2015; 39(5): 644–53. DOI: 10.18287/0134-2452-2015-39-5-644-653. [22] Khonina SN, Paranin VD. Electro-optical correction of Bessel beam conversion along axis of a barium niobate-strontium crystal. Computer Optics 2016; 40(4): 475-481. DOI: 10.18287/2412-6179-2016-40-4-475-481. [23] Paranin VD, Karpeev SV, Khonina SN. Control of the formation of vortex Bessel beams in uniaxial crystals by varying the beam divergence. Quantum Electronics 2016; 46(2): 163–168. [24] Paranin VD, Khonina SN, Karpeev SV. Control of the Optical Properties of a CaCO3 Crystal in Problems of Generating Bessel Vortex Beams by Heating. Optoelectronics, Instrumentation and Data Processing 2016; 52(2): 174–179. [25] Paranin VD, Karpeev SV, Khonina SN. Transformation of Bessel beams in c-cuts of uniaxial crystals by varying the emission source wavelength. Journal of Russian Laser Research 2016; 37(3): 250–253. [26] Gornostay AV, Odinokov SB. A method to design a diffractive laser beam splitter with color separation based on bichromated gelatine. Computer Optics 2016; 40(1): 45–50. DOI: 10.18287/2412-6179-2016-40-1-45-50. 3rd International conference “Information Technology and Nanotechnology 2017” 36 Computer Optics and Nanophotonics / V.D. Paranin, S.V. Karpeev [27] Paranin VD. Measuring the thickness of z-cut uniaxial crystals based on Bessel laser beams. Computer Optics 2016; 40(4): 594–599. DOI: 10.18287/2412- 6179-2016-40-4-594-599. [28] Jaroszewicz Z, Sochacki J, Kołodziejczyk A, Staronski LR. Apodized annular-aperture logarithmic axicon: smoothness and uniformity of the intensity distribution. Optics Letters 1993; 18: 1893–1895. [29] Golub I, Chebbi B, Shaw D, Nowacki D. Characterization of a refractive logarithmic axicon. Optics Letters 2010; 35: 2828–2830. [30] Khonina SN, Balalaev SA. The comparative analysis of the intensity distributions formed by diffractive axicon and diffractive logarithmic axicon. Computer Optics 2009; 33(2): 162–174. [31] Sochacki J, Kołodziejczyk A, Jaroszewicz Z, Bará S. Nonparaxial design of generalized axicons. Applied Optics 1992; 31: 5326–5330. [32] Davidson N, Friesem AA, Hasman E. Holographic axilens: high resolution and long focal depth. Optics Letters 1991; 16(7): 523–525. [33] Khonina SN, Volotovsky SG. Fracxicon – diffractive optical element with conical focal domain. Computer Optics 2009; 33(4): 401–411. [34] Kotlyar VV, Skidanov RV, Khonina SN, Soifer VA. Hypergeometric modes. Optics Letters 2007; 32(7): 742–744. [35] Khonina SN, Balalayev SA, Skidanov RV, Kotlyar VV, Paivanranta B, Turunen J. Encoded binary diffractive element to form hyper-geometric laser beams. Journal of Optics A: Pure and Applied Optics 2009; 11: 065702-1-065702-7. [36] Soifer VA, Korotkova О, Khonina SN, Shchepakina ЕА. Vortex beams in turbulent media: review. Computer Optics 2016; 40(5): 605–624. DOI: 10.18287/2412-6179-2016-40-5-605-624. [37] Paranin VD. Methods to control parameters of a diffraction grating on the surface of lithium niobate electro-optical crystal. Technical Physics 2014; 59(11): 1723–1727. [38] Paranin VD, Karpeev SV, Tukmakov KN, Volodkin BO. Tunable diffraction grating with transparent indium-tin oxide electrodes on a lithium niobate X- cut crystal. Computer Optics 2016; 40(5): 685–688. DOI: 10.18287/2412-6179-2016-40-5-685-688. 3rd International conference “Information Technology and Nanotechnology 2017” 37