<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Control of component alterations according with the target efficiency of data processing and control system</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>V.E. Gvozdev</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>M.B. Guzairov</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>D.V. Blinova</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>A.S. Davlieva</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Ufa State Aviation Technical University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Karl Marx street, 12, Ufa</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="RU">Russia</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2017</year>
      </pub-date>
      <fpage>11</fpage>
      <lpage>16</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>In this article we describe the solution to make an estimate of allowed alternations in model components parameters that make up a data processing and control system. They reflect properties of physical and information components of the aforementioned system. This solution is derived according to the limitations of possible changes in integral property that describes the system behavior in different modes of operation. The proposed solution makes it possible to solve not only the direct problem - making a conclusion whether the vulnerability of the data processing system is negligible with respect to alternations in parameters of this systems components but the inverse as well, finding tolerable levels in alterations in systems components parameters from an acceptable level of uncertainty of targeted efficiency. The proposed solution follows known demands: inner properties of the system must be so that customer demands are fulfilled.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>data processing and control system</kwd>
        <kwd>system vulnerability</kwd>
        <kwd>target system efficiency</kwd>
        <kwd>parameter alternations</kwd>
        <kwd>uncertainty in systems components</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>Data Science / V.E. Gvozdev, M.B. Guzairov, D.V. Blinova, A.S. Davlieva</p>
      <p>Alteration of systems components parameters is the inherent property of any DPCS. Statistical uncertainty as a probability of
state parameters being in tolerable intervals comprise the metric property of such alteration. On the other hand change in the
parameters is the cause of statistical uncertainty of target efficiency property:
v f  f1(Н D ) ,</p>
      <p>H Э  f 2 (Н D ) ,
Here H Э is the metric uncertainty characteristic of the target efficiency;</p>
      <p>f1() – a direct functional relationship, making a relationship v f between the metric characteristics of the uncertainty Н D
and the state parameters vector components D .</p>
      <p>f 2 () – a direct functional relationship that makes a relationship H Э between the metric characteristics of uncertainty Н D .
The character f2 () is defined by the structure of the system.</p>
      <p>
        From (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ) and (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ) it can be concluded that, from the limitations on the statistical uncertainty of the system's target efficie ncy,
there is a limitation on the value of the statistical uncertainty of the system state parameters. In other words, if the limitations on
the variability (the uncertainty characteristic) of the average target efficiency’s index are kept, then it can be argued that the
vulnerability of the system is within the permissible limits.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>3. Task statement and assumptions</title>
      <p>The initial data of the problem are:
(A) Description of the system states set Si (i  1; N ) , with each state matching the characteristics of the target efficiency Эi ;
(B) The same characteristics of the statistical uncertainty of the target efficiency for each states H i (Э ) ;
(C) A system model that characterizes the relationships ij between the states i and j (i, j  1; N , i  j) ;
(D) A rule that allows us to estimate the average proportion of the time pi (i  1; N ) the system is in the i-th state;
(E) Uncertainty characteristics of relations Нij ( ) ;
(F) The rule for estimating the average target efficiency Э as a function of Эi and pi :</p>
      <p>
        Э   (Эi , pi ) ; (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        )
(G) The rule for estimating the statistical uncertainty characteristics of the average target efficiency H Э based on
Hi (Э), Hij( ) :
      </p>
      <p>H Э  f 2 (Hi (Э), Hij ( ))</p>
      <p>
        Note that in (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ) components Hi (Э), Hij ( ) are the components of the state parameters vector (see (H)).
(H) Limitations on the variability H Э of the uncertainty characteristic of the average target efficiency  0(Э ) .
      </p>
      <p>It is required: to estimate the limits on the possible values of uncertainty characteristics Hi (Э), Hij ( ) based on the
limitation on the values H Э of the uncertainty characteristic of the average target efficiency.</p>
      <p>Assumptions:
(A) The apparatus of Markov processes is used as a basis for modeling the state of DPCS [12];
(B) Intervals Эi [Эi(l ) , Эi(u) ] ; ij [(ijl) ,(iju) ] are used as characteristics of the statistical uncertainty of the target
efficiency H i (Э ) and relationships Hij ( ) accordingly. The index "l" corresponds to the lower limit of the interval;
index "in" - the upper;
(C) Linear convolution is used as an estimate of the target efficiency</p>
      <p>
        Э  iN1 рi  Эi , (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        )
which is the average value of the target efficiency;
(D) Probability is a uncertainty characteristic of the target efficiency
      </p>
      <p>H Э  P[а(н)  Э  а(в) ] ,
where, а (l ) , а (u ) are determined by (Fig. 1):</p>
      <p>
        P[0  Э  а(н) ]  P[а(в)  Э  ]   0(Э ) / 2 .
(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        )
(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        )
(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        )
(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        )
(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        )
      </p>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>In Fig. 1 Э(0) corresponds to the basic values {Эi },{ij } .</title>
        <p>4. Solution for the task1</p>
        <p>
          The basis solution for the task is the construction of the dependence (
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
          ), which connects the statistical characteristics of the
uncertainty of the average target efficiency of the system with the statistical characteristics of the uncertainty of the components
of the system model. The basis for constructing the dependence (
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
          ) is a statistical experiment, the scheme of which is shown in
Fig.2.
        </p>
        <p>Specifying a model (graph) linking the states of the system (nodes) and transitions (edges)</p>
        <p>between states
Specifying the statistical uncertainty characteristics of nodes and edges as lower and upper</p>
        <p>limits {Эi(l ) , Эi(u) } ; {(ijl) ,(iju) } , i, j  1; N ,i  j
Generation arrays of random numbers corresponding to H ( ) (Э) , Hi(,j) ( ) ,   1; and</p>
        <p>i
calculation on their basis an array of random values of average target efficiency H Э( ) ,</p>
        <p>  1;</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-2">
        <title>On the base of the Hi( ) (Э) H i(,j) ( ) , H Э( ) was formulated the dependence</title>
        <p>H Э  f 2 (Hi (Э), Нij ( ))
Setting a limitations  (Э ) on the variability of the statistical uncertainty index the average</p>
        <p>0
target efficiency, determining the limits Э(l ) , Э(u) , the range of possible values Э
Estimation based on the dependence H Э  f2 (Hi (Э), Hij ( )) and {Э(l) , Э(u) } limitations
on the values {Эi(l ) , Эi(u) } , {(ijl) ,(iju) }</p>
        <p>In the experiment as the uncertainty characteristic of the average target efficiency H Э was the distribution density f (Э ) of
the average target efficiency Э . As the uncertainty characteristics of system components Hi (Э), Hij ( ) were interval limits of
possible values {Эi(l ) , Эi(u) } , {(ijl) ,(iju) } . These limits were determined by the rules:
Эi(l ),(u)  Эi() (1 Э ) ; (ijl),(u)  (ij) (1 ) ,
where the sign "–" corresponds to the lower limit of the interval of possible values of the graph component characteristic; the
"+" sign corresponds to the upper limit;</p>
        <p>the index "  " corresponds to the basic values of the characteristic.</p>
        <p>Note that the interval uncertainty characteristics estimates in accordance with the principle of maximization of entropy [13,
14] can be associated a law of random variable distribution.</p>
        <p>Fig. 3 shows the model (states graph) of the system [15, 16]. Table 1 shows the base values of average target efficiencies
(Эi(b) ,i  1;4) . The base values of the transitions intensities ((ijb) ,i, j  1;4,i  j) were taken to be the same and equaled ten.
During the study,  Э ,  took a different value ( Э [0;1],  [0;1]) . Fig. 4 shows estimates of the distribution densities
f (Э ) , corresponding to different  Э ,  for different uncertainty distribution by the graph components:
(A) The statistical uncertainty corresponds to the graph nodes, the nominal values of the transitions intensities correspond
to the edges;
1 In the development of the program for conducting a statistical experiment and processing the results of the experiment, the undergraduate student of the
Department of Technical Cybernetics of the Ufa State Aviation Technical University Teslenko V.V. actively participated.
3rd International conference “Information Technology and Nanotechnology 2017” 13</p>
        <p>The constructed estimates f (Э ) became the basis for constructing H Э , for various combinations of characteristics the
statistical uncertainty of the graph components. Fig. 5 shows the resulting dependencies, corresponding to different values 0(Э )</p>
        <p>The resulting dependences H Э allow us to solve a direct problem: an estimation of uncertainty characteristics of target
average efficiency H Э on the information basis on model components parameters variability; and the inverse problem: an
estimation limitations on the parameters variability of graph’s nodes and edges based on the limitations on the characteristics of
the target average efficiency.</p>
        <p>An example of solving a direct problem. Given:  (Э ) ;  Э . It is believed that the variability of transitions intensities is
0
absent. It is required to estimate the expected uncertainty H Э . The scheme for solving the problem is shown in Fig. 6.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>5. Conclusion</title>
      <p>Nowadays DPCS play more and more of a substantial role as a vital component in systems that control complex objects. This
promotes posing the problem of developing theoretical basis and development tools for managing the functional security of
DPCS. One of the key tasks in solving such a problem is analyzing vulnerabilities of DPCS. They are affected by internal</p>
      <p>Data Science / V.E. Gvozdev, M.B. Guzairov, D.V. Blinova, A.S. Davlieva
properties (construction, component properties) and by external environment in which the system is operated. The allowed level
of the vulnerability is determined by whether the deviation of the systems behavior from the base behavior is affecting the
quality of control of a complex object.</p>
      <p>In this article a solution is given to estimate the possible deviation in components parameters of the model OF DPCS (such
parameters reflect physical and information properties of the system). This solution is based of the limitations on alternation of
the integral factor that shows the behavior of the system in different modes of operation, this behavior is the target efficiency of
the system. Proposed solution follows known demands: inner properties of the system must be so that customer demands are
fulfilled (Kano’s model). The described solution makes it possible to solve not only the direct problem - making a conclusion
whether the vulnerability of the data processing system is negligible with respect to alternations in parameters of this systems
components but the inverse as well, finding tolerable levels in alterations in systems components parameters from an acceptable
level of uncertainty of targeted efficiency’s index.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Acknowledgements References</title>
      <p>This work was supported by RFBR grant No. 17-07-00351 "Methodological basics of dependability assurance of
transmission systems telemetry information with use of intelligent data analysis technologies".</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lipaev</surname>
            <given-names>VV.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Functional security of software</article-title>
          . Moscow: SYNTEG,
          <year>2004</year>
          ; 348 p.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Antamoshkin</surname>
            <given-names>AN</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Morgunova</surname>
            <given-names>ON</given-names>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Technique to study the effectiveness of complex hierarchical systems</article-title>
          .
          <source>Vestnik SibGAU</source>
          <year>2006</year>
          ;
          <volume>2</volume>
          (
          <issue>9</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>9</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>13</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Makhutov</surname>
            <given-names>NA</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Reznikov</surname>
            <given-names>DO</given-names>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Vulnerability assessment of technical systems and its place in the risk analysis procedure</article-title>
          .
          <source>Problems of risk analysis</source>
          <year>2008</year>
          ;
          <volume>5</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>72</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>85</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Mladen</given-names>
            <surname>AV. Software Reliability</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Engineering</article-title>
          .
          <source>Proceedings of the Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium</source>
          . Los Angeles, California, USA, January
          <volume>24</volume>
          -
          <issue>27</issue>
          ,
          <year>2000</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Abde</surname>
            lMoez
            <given-names>W</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Nassar</surname>
            <given-names>D</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Shereshevsky</surname>
            <given-names>M</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gradetsky</surname>
            <given-names>N</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gunnalan</surname>
            <given-names>R</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ammar</surname>
            <given-names>HYuB</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Mili M.
          <article-title>Error Propagation in Software architectures</article-title>
          .
          <source>Proceedings of the Software Metics. 10th International Symposium</source>
          , Washington, DC, USA. IEEE Computer Society,
          <year>2004</year>
          ;
          <fpage>384</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>393</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Khoshgoflaar</surname>
            <given-names>TM</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Munson</surname>
            <given-names>JC</given-names>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Predicting software development errors using complexity metrics</article-title>
          .
          <source>IEEE of Selected Areas in Communications</source>
          <year>1990</year>
          ;
          <volume>8</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>253</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>261</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bellini</surname>
            <given-names>P</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bruno</surname>
            <given-names>I</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Nesi</surname>
            <given-names>P</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rogai</surname>
            <given-names>D</given-names>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Comparing fault-proneness estimation models</article-title>
          .
          <source>Proc. of 10th IEEE International Conference on Engineering of Complex Computer Systems</source>
          ,
          <year>2005</year>
          ;
          <fpage>205</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>214</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [8]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Maevsky</surname>
            <given-names>DA</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Yaremchuk</surname>
            <given-names>SA</given-names>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Estimating the number of software defects based on the complexity metrics</article-title>
          .
          <source>Electrotechnic and computer systems: Scientific and Technical Journal</source>
          <year>2012</year>
          ;
          <volume>7</volume>
          (
          <issue>83</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>113</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>120</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [9]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Michael</surname>
            <given-names>CC</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Jones</surname>
            <given-names>RC</given-names>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>On the uniformity of error propagation in software</article-title>
          .
          <source>Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Computer Assurance</source>
          ,
          <year>1996</year>
          ;
          <fpage>68</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>76</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          [10]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Liu</surname>
            <given-names>XF.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Software quality function deployment</article-title>
          .
          <source>IEEE Potentials</source>
          <year>2000</year>
          ;
          <volume>19</volume>
          (
          <issue>5</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>14</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>16</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          [11]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Shindo</surname>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Application of QFD to Software and QFD Software Tools</article-title>
          .
          <source>Pre-Conference Workshops of the Fifth International Symposium on Quality Function Deployment and the First Brazilian Conference on Management of Product Development. Belo Horizonte</source>
          , Brazil,
          <year>1999</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          [12]
          <string-name>
            <surname>GOST</surname>
            <given-names>R</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <year>51901</year>
          .5
          <article-title>-2005 Risk management</article-title>
          .
          <article-title>Application guide of reliability analysis methods</article-title>
          . Moscow, Standartinform,
          <year>2005</year>
          ; 44 p.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          [13]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kuzin</surname>
            <given-names>LT</given-names>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Fundamentals of cybernetics</article-title>
          . Vol.
          <volume>1</volume>
          .
          <article-title>Mathematical foundations of cybernetics. Textbook for students of technical colleges</article-title>
          .
          <source>М.: Energy</source>
          ,
          <year>1973</year>
          ; 504 p.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          [14]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Jaynes</surname>
            <given-names>ET</given-names>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Information theory and statistical mechanics</article-title>
          .
          <source>The Physical Review</source>
          <year>1957</year>
          ;
          <volume>106</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>620</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>630</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          [15]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gvozdev</surname>
            <given-names>VE</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Blinova</surname>
            <given-names>DV</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Davlieva</surname>
            <given-names>AS</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Teslenko</surname>
            <given-names>VV</given-names>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Construction of basic functioning efficiency models of the hardware-software complexes</article-title>
          ,
          <source>based on the mathematical statistics methods. Software Engineering</source>
          <year>2016</year>
          ;
          <volume>7</volume>
          (
          <issue>11</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>483</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>489</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          [16]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gvozdev</surname>
            <given-names>VE</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Blinova</surname>
            <given-names>DV</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Davlieva</surname>
            <given-names>AS</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Teslenko</surname>
            <given-names>VV</given-names>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Effect assessment of the system parameters variability on the functional vulnerability'indexes of the hardware-software systems. Information Technologies for Intelligent Decision Making Support (ITIDS'</article-title>
          <year>2017</year>
          ).
          <source>Proceedings of the 5th International Conference</source>
          , Ufa, Russia, May
          <volume>16</volume>
          -19,
          <year>2017</year>
          . (in press)
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>