<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>A Recommender System for Personalized Exploration of Majors, Minors, and Concentrations*</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Young Park</string-name>
          <email>young@bradley.edu</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Department of Computer Science &amp; Information Systems Bradley University U.</institution>
          <country>S.A</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2017</year>
      </pub-date>
      <abstract>
        <p>Many students change their majors during college. Choosing the right academic majors, minors, and concentrations within a major in higher education is challenging but crucial in assuring students' overall academic and career success. Personalized prediction of student success in majors, minors, and concentrations will help students better find the right majors, minors, and concentrations for them, so as to timely achieve their academic goals. In this paper, we present a new recommender application for the academic major/minor/concentration selection problem in the educational domain. The proposed major/minor/concentration recommender system is a collaborative filtering-based recommender based on student grade prediction, and provides a variety of personalized predictions and recommendations on majors, minors, and concentrations. It is a useful tool to guide students, advisors, and administrators during the personalized major/minor/concentration exploration (declare/change) process.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>INTRODUCTION</title>
      <p>Selecting the right academic major, minor, and/or concentration
within a major in higher education is challenging for many
students. However, such selection can be crucial in assuring
students’ overall academic success and later career satisfaction and
success. Many students change their majors over the course of their
college career. Students who pick the right major, minor, and/or
concentration tend to do better in the requisite courses and thus get
better grades. Those students are also less likely to change their
chosen major, minor, and/or concentration or drop out, and thus are
more likely to graduate on time.</p>
      <p>
        Students typically choose their major, minor, and/or
concentration based on various factors such as their interests,
personality, and other considerations [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]. However, we believe that
it is also very important to consider how students will perform in
their selected major, minor, and/or concentration. Providing
students with personalized prediction of success in majors, minors,
and concentrations during the exploration process will greatly help
individual students better find their ideal majors, minors, and
concentrations and eventually achieve their academic goals.
      </p>
      <p>
        Recommender systems provide personalized recommendations
of items, such as goods, services, or information, that are most
likely to be relevant and interesting to users to help them find the
items most useful to them [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2 ref3">2,3</xref>
        ]. Recommender technologies have
been applied in a variety of application domains including the
traditional e-commerce domain as well as emerging domains such
as education and engineering. A number of recommender systems
have been developed and deployed in the educational domain for
learning, teaching, and academic advising [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4 ref5">4,5</xref>
        ]. In the educational
setting, the typical users are students, teachers, or academic
advisors, and the typical recommendable items are educational
goods, services, or information such as courses, learning materials,
topics, student performance, and grades.
      </p>
      <p>In this paper, we describe a new educational recommender
application in order to help guide the college
major/minor/concentration exploration and selection process. The
proposed recommender can be used as a tool for students in the
major/minor/concentration exploration (declare/change) process
by providing personalized predictions of success in majors, minors,
and concentrations, along with recommendations for individual
students. The proposed tool can also be used by administrators and
advisors to guide decision-making and improve the academic
experience for students at their educational institutions.
2</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>PERSONALIZED EXPLORATION OF</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>MAJORS/MINORS/CONCENTRATIONS 2.1</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Our Approach</title>
      <p>Our goal is to predict how well a student will perform in majors,
minors, and/or concentrations, i.e.
• Given a student and a major, minor, and/or concentration, how will
the student perform?
• Given a student, in what majors, minors, and/or concentrations will
that student perform well?</p>
      <p>
        An academic major, minor, or concentration typically includes
course requirements consisting of core courses and elective
courses. A close approximation of a student’s performance can be
derived from the grades earned in his or her courses. Thus, we
represent a student’s performance in a major, minor, or
concentration as the grades earned in both core and elective courses
required in the major, minor, or concentration. Collaborative
filtering recommendation techniques were applied to predict
student grades in courses [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6 ref7">6,7</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Our approach to major/minor/concentration recommendation is
based on personalized student-course grade prediction. From our
previous work, we developed a collaborative-filtering-based
recommender system called pGPA that predicts personalized
student grades [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ]. Given a student, a course and a semester/term,
pGPA provides the student’s predicted grade in the course and the
grade prediction proved accurate enough to support high-level
decision making through experimentation on actual student grade
data. pGPA uses user-to-user collaborative filtering, item-to-item
collaborative filtering, and matrix factorization for personalized
course grade predictions. To the best of our knowledge, our
personalized major/minor/concentration recommender is the first
application of collaborative filtering to the
major/minor/concentration exploration problem.
2.2
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>A Major/Minor/Concentration</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Recommender</title>
      <p>
        The proposed major/minor/concentration recommender system
called myMMCheck is a collaborative filtering-based recommender
system using the personalized grade prediction system pGPA [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ].
Y. Park
student at that time and (2) compute the grade point average of the
(m+n) courses in the sets in each pair in CMMC × EMMC.
• Given only a target student S, (1) identify the sets CMMC and EMMC
for each potential major, minor, or concentration MMC, (2) predict
the personalized grades for courses in the sets in each pair in CMMC
x EMMC that have not taken by the student at that time, and (3)
compute the grade point average of the (m+n) courses in the sets in
each pair in CMMC × EMMC.
      </p>
      <p>myMMCheck can provide a variety of personalized predictions
and recommendations on majors, minors, and concentrations:
• For a student with a specific major, minor, or concentration selected
by the student, myMMCheck predicts how well the student will
perform in that major, minor, or concentration by predicting the best
overall grade point average along with the list of predicted grades in
m core courses and n elective courses. The student will have a better
perspective on the chosen major, minor, or concentration, and thus
can better prepare and perform.
• For a student, myMMCheck recommends a list of majors, minors, or
concentrations along with the set of m core courses and n elective
courses in which the student will do well based on the overall grade
point average predicted. The student can further explore the
recommended majors, minors, or concentrations.
3</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORK</title>
      <p>We have presented a novel recommender application to the
personalized major/minor/concentration exploration and selection
problem. The proposed educational recommender system is based
on a collaborative filtering-based personalized grade prediction
system. The proposed recommender can provide a variety of
personalized tips on majors, minors, and concentrations and be
useful as a guiding tool during the personalized
major/minor/concentration exploration (declare/change) process.</p>
      <p>As future work, we plan to build a real-world dataset and
perform comprehensive testing across curriculums in a higher
educational institution. We also plan to incorporate other important
factors besides students’ performance, including their interests,
personalities, and career goals.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          [1]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Harris-Bowlsbey</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J. 2014. White</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Paper-Career</surname>
            <given-names>Guidance</given-names>
          </string-name>
          &amp;
          <article-title>Its Implementation in the U</article-title>
          .S., Kuder at https://www.kuder.com/research/whitepapers/
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          [2]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ricci</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rokach</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Shapira</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <year>2015</year>
          .
          <article-title>Recommender Systems: Introduction and Challenges</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Recommender Systems Handbook</source>
          (pp.
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>34</lpage>
          ). Springer US.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          [3]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Felfernig</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Jeran</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ninaus</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Reinfrank</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Reiterer</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <year>2013</year>
          .
          <article-title>Toward the next generation of recommender systems: applications and research challenges</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Multimedia Services in Intelligent Environments</source>
          (pp.
          <fpage>81</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>98</lpage>
          ). Springer International Publishing.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [4]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Manouselis</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Drachsler</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Verbert</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Duval</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E</given-names>
          </string-name>
          . (Ed.).
          <year>2013</year>
          .
          <article-title>Recommender Systems for Learning. (Springer Briefs in Electrical</article-title>
          and Computer Engineering) Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          [5]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Manouselis</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Drachsler</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Verbert</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Santos</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>O. C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (Eds.).
          <source>2014. Recommender Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning: Research Trends and Applications</source>
          . Springer Science &amp; Business Media
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          [6]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sheehan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Park</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <year>2012</year>
          .
          <article-title>pGPA: a personalized grade prediction tool to aid student success</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of the sixth ACM conference on Recommender systems</source>
          (pp.
          <fpage>309</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>310</lpage>
          ). ACM
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [7]
          <string-name>
            <surname>Elbadrawy</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Polyzou</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ren</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Z.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sweeney</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Karypis</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rangwala</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <year>2016</year>
          .
          <article-title>Predicting Student Performance Using Personalized Analytics</article-title>
          . Computer,
          <volume>49</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>61</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>69</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>