=Paper= {{Paper |id=Vol-1909/paper3 |storemode=property |title=Computational Modelling for Phase Transformation Prediction in Super-Invar Alloys: Analytical and Experimental Data |pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1909/paper3.pdf |volume=Vol-1909 |authors=Alexander S. Zhilin,Valeria R. Ramazanova,Joseph W. Newkirk,Tarak A. Amine,Deborah Alvarenga }} ==Computational Modelling for Phase Transformation Prediction in Super-Invar Alloys: Analytical and Experimental Data== https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1909/paper3.pdf
      Computational Modelling for Phase Transformation Prediction in
          Super-Invar Alloys: Analytical and Experimental Data

    Alexander S. Zhilin, Valeria R. Ramazanova     Joseph W. Newkirk, Tarak A. Amine          Deborah Alvarenga
          Materials Science Department                Materials Science Department         Centro Universitário do Sul
             Ural Federal University                 Missouri Science and Technology            de Minas UNIS
          Yekaterinburg, Russia, 620004                         University                      Virginia, Brazil
                a.s.zhilin@urfu.ru                             Rolla, USA
                                                           jnewkirk@mst.edu



                                                       Abstract
                      The possibility of using computational modelling to predict phase
                      transformation processes has been shown while examining super-invar
                      samples. Due to the complicity of phase transformation processes in these
                      alloys the correlation between modelling and experimental work has been
                      described. Modelling allows basic background of composition behavior to
                      be predicted but it doesn`t give the real structure components.



1     Introduction
Invar and super-invar alloys with cobalt are unique to design materials with low thermal expansion properties [1]. These
alloys are divided into deformable and casting according to the manufacturing technology [2]. Various technologies
enable mass diverse items to be obtained. Understanding the mechanism of structural units distribution is a key factor of
final functional properties formation [3]. The present paper demonstrates how modern methods of modeling help to select
the composition of experimental alloy. The modeled compositions are correlated with experimental compositions
obtained by various research teams and our as well [4-6]. The application of modern computer analysis methods becomes
essential due to cost-intensive production of experimental alloys with high composition of expensive alloying elements
such as nickel and cobalt. The search of tailored composition for rational alloying can be carried out by modeling the
composition and phase transformation as a result.

2     Experiment

2.1    Composition Modeling
The analyzed compositions are given in Table 1. The selection of these compositions is the consequence of practical
applications of methods to compare the properties of alloys obtained by pressure metal treatment and foundry
technologies (with carbon addition) [7]. The structure-formation of carbon alloys is of particular interest as there is no
sufficient information to describe alloys provided in literature. The models have been implemented in computer software
JMatPro at Materials Science Department, Missouri Science and Technology University, Missouri State, USA.
2.2    Experimental Compositions
All listed alloys were obtained from Ltd. First Foundry, Yekaterinburg, Ural region, Russia. Experimental alloys
obtained were further analyzed applying metallography at Excellence center of Ural Federal University. The research
was done in order to determine real composition of the experimental alloys.

                                             Table 1: Analyzed compositions

                                                                Composition
                                   Alloy
                                                Fe (%)      Ni (%)       Co (%)      C (%)
                                  Alloy 1         64          36            -          -
                                  Alloy 2         64          32            4          -
                                  Alloy 3         64          30            6          -
                                  Alloy 4        63,4         32            4         0,6
                                  Alloy 5        63,4         30            6         0,6


3     Results and Discussion
Distribution curves of corresponding phases in terms of variation in the concentration of components (nickel, cobalt,
carbon) were obtained by composition modeling (Fig. 1, 2). The ranges of solid-solution and secondary phases can be
defined on the resulting phase diagrams. It is obviously consistent with the theory [2-3]. Carbon-free alloys are excellent
for calculations (Fig. 1 a, b, c and Fig. 2 a, b). Obtained temperature boundaries of phase genuinely correlate with
literature data. In particular, it is true for liquidus and solidus curves. Moderately narrow interval of crystallization is
observed in all alloys. It is confirmed by the results of experimental melting. Separation of structural components of
carbon-free Fe-Co-Ni alloys applying metallography is complex. It seems possible to perform experiment by
diffractometry including determination of metal lattice parameters. Although, this type of experiment was not conducted
as it was not the purpose of research.
    However there are significant differences between structural components modeled by JMatPro program and obtained
by experimental melting. In particular, cementite can be found on phase diagrams of carbon-containing alloys (Fig. 1d,
2c). However, the formation of cementite in real alloys was not proved by metallography. It is suggested that cementite is
formed due to cooling of alloy, but diffusion results in decomposition of this phase. The behavior of carbide phase
largely determines final properties and applications of analyzed alloys. Taking into account the influence of such
elements as nickel and cobalt, which form unstable carbides, it can be confirmed that the formation of iron carbide is also
suppressed. In doing so, the classic theory of iron carbide formation is not denied. According to it, iron carbide is formed
in certain temperature interval during crystallization of carbon-containing alloys based on iron. This carbide phase
(cementite) was not fixed and determined by us.
    The selection of compositions with cobalt content of 4% (alloys 2, 4) and 6% (alloys 3, 5) was not random. Highest
thermal properties of experimental alloys (which were obtained by cast technologies) were observed in alloy with 4%
cobalt composition. While alloy with 6% cobalt composition has a practical interest due to the expansion of invar
interval. In superinvar alloys, the part of nickel atoms is actively substituted by cobalt. It is used for the improvement of
thermal stability in wide range of temperature. We acted in a similar way, replacing the cobalt atoms for nickel atoms.
                              a)                                                          b)




                              c)                                                          d)

   Figure 1: Calculated phase diagrams for a) classic invar alloy 64%Fe-32% (alloy 1) b) and c) 64%Fe-32%Ni-4%Co
                                  (alloy 2); d) 63,4%Fe-32%Ni-4%Co-0,6%C (alloy 4)

    It is obvious that cobalt actively forms solid solutions based on austenite which maintains final functional properties
of alloys (fig. 1b and 2a). But the appearance of cementite in the interval between 600 - 800 °C (Fig. 1d and 2c) and the
existence of this phase in structure at room temperature generate questions. Phase diagrams do not indicate the phase of
graphite. In our experimental alloys obtained by cast technologies (alloys 3, 5) graphite has always been one of the major
structural components [6]. Unfortunately none of the diagrams has shown the presence of graphite at room temperature.
On the other hand, cementite which had not been observed in experimental alloys obtained by cast technologies, was
traced in all diagrams of carbon-containing alloys (alloys 3, 5) (Fig. 1 and 2). Real liquidus and solidus lines are found
within the range of calculated lines. The data reported here have shown good agreement with results. Based on the
presented results, the following model of structure formation has been proposed. Cementite is formed at high
temperature; this phase decays into metal and graphite during the cooling of alloy. Products of decay are not shown on
phase diagrams (Fig. 1 and 2). It has been proved above that graphite is formed in carbon-containing alloys during
cooling [6]. Graphite exists in structure of alloys at room temperature. Calculated curves partly confirmed the hypothesis
of existence and following decay of non-stable metal carbides in researched alloys. But full understanding of structure
formation at room temperature is not achieved because of cementite presence and simultaneously absence of graphite on
phase diagrams.
                               a)                                                         b)




                                                             c)

     Figure 2: Calculated phase diagrams for a) and b) 64%Fe-30%Ni-6%Co (alloy 3); c) 63,4%Fe-30%Ni-6%Co-0,6%C
                                                          (alloy 5)

    Obtained model of phase equilibriums (Fig. 1 and 2) is useful for experimental alloys casting. It gives the
understanding of beginning and ending of crystallization. In consequence it allows us to set right parameters for not only
experimental but industrial castings.
    Thus it is shown that modern methods of modeling make it possible to get reasonable representing of phase
distribution of alloys components in high temperature field. On the base of simulated phase diagrams, correct parameters
of industrial casting can be chosen. However incorrect data of secondary phase (for example cementite) are observed in
calculated curves. In addition, phase of graphite common in carbon-containing alloys at room temperature is not
indicated in phase diagrams. Formation of cementite is not proved by metallography. The motivation for further
researches arises. The process responsible for disappearance of cementite phase is to be determined next.

Acknowledgment
Paper is dedicated to cherished memory of emeritus professor of UrFU S.V. Grachev.

References
1.    Park, W.S., Lee, C.S, Chun, M.S., Kim, M.H. and Lee, J.M., “Comparative study on mechanical behavior of low
      temperature application materials for ships and offshore structures: Part I – Experimental investigations,” Materials
      Science and Engineering A, vol. 528, pp. 5790-5803, 2011.
2.   Chermenskii, V.I., Konchakovskii, I.V, Grachev, S.V., Maiorov , A.V. and Kuchin, P.S., “Precision castable alloy of
     invar class for operating temperatures up to 500°C,” Metal Science and Heat Treatment, vol. 52, pp. 504-507,
     January 2011.
3.   Shcherbedinskii, G.V., Rodionov, Y.L., “Multifunctional alloys with controlled set of hard-to-combine mechanical
     and physicochemical properties,” Metally, vol. 5, pp. 132-135, 2000.
4.   Grachev, S. V., Filippov, M.A., Chermenskii, V.I., Kharchuk, M.D., Konchakovskii, I.V., Zhilin, A.S., Tokarev,
     V.V. and Nikiforova, S.M., “Thermal properties and structure of cast carbon-containing invar and superinvar alloys
     after two-stage annealing,” Metal Science and Heat Treatment, vol. 55, 124-128, July 2013.
5.   Ha, T.K. and Min, S.H. “Effect of C content on the microstructure and physical properties of Fe-36Ni invar alloy,”
     Materials Science Forum, vol. 804, pp. 293-296, 2015.
6.   A. Zhilin, S. Grachev, M. Ryzhkov, N. Popov, S. Nikiforova and V.V. Tokarev, “Influence of carbon addition on
     structure and thermal properties of cast superinvar alloys,” Procedia Materials Science, vol. 5, pp. 173-180, 2014.