<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Workshop on Integrated Learning Analytics of MOOC Post-Course Development</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Yuan Wang</string-name>
          <email>elle.wang@columbia.edu</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Dan Davis</string-name>
          <email>md.j.davis@tudelft.nl</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Guanliang Chen</string-name>
          <email>guanliang.chen@tudelf.nl</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Luc Paquette</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Columbia University</institution>
          ,
          <country country="US">USA</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Delft University of Technology</institution>
          ,
          <country country="NL">The Netherlands</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign</institution>
          ,
          <country country="US">USA</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <fpage>95</fpage>
      <lpage>99</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>MOOC research is typically limited to evaluations of learner behavior in the context of the learning environment. However, some research has begun to recognize that the impact of MOOCs may extend beyond the confines of the course platform or conclusion of the course time limit. This workshop aims to encourage our community of learning analytics researchers to examine the relationship between performance and engagement within the course and learner behavior and development beyond the course. This workshop intends to build an awareness in the community regarding the importance of research measuring multi-platform activity and long-term success after taking a MOOC. We hope to build the community's understanding of what it takes to operationalize MOOC learner success in a novel context by employing data traces across the social web.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>MOOCs</kwd>
        <kwd>learning analytics</kwd>
        <kwd>long-term development</kwd>
        <kwd>learning outcomes</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>1.1</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>Challenges in assessing MOOC Learner Success</title>
        <p>
          MOOC learners access course content in an asynchronous and unconstrained fashion
[
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12 ref3">3, 12</xref>
          ]. This has resulted in fragmented data scattered outside of the course platform
and beyond the course-offering window, causing challenges of collecting learner data.
As a result, much research in MOOCs focuses on learner achievement and engagement
during the course itself, leaving the area of post-course student longitudinal
development relatively untouched. This lopsidedness in MOOC research reduces our
understanding of the role that MOOCs can play in 21st-century learning.
        </p>
        <p>
          It is observed that the narrative on MOOCs has shifted from overwhelmingly
optimistic from 2011 to 2014 to substantially more critical in 2015 [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
          ]. One concern is
that it is not clear how well MOOCs support student learning and career development
in response to changing societal needs [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
          ]. The development of technology and scale
of online education considerably outpace efforts to evaluate and understand how well
it is succeeding at improving outcomes. The predominant focus of studying MOOC
completion without considering learners’ longitudinal development overlooks the
possible role that MOOCs may play in the long-term professional development of many of
their users.
        </p>
        <p>
          Responding to this challenge, an emerging trend has been seen on identifying and
tracking MOOC learner development outside of the course platform and beyond the
conclusion of the course [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1 ref13">1, 13</xref>
          ], such as tracking learner activities on relevant social
web platforms, measuring learner post-course development on career advancement, and
measuring leaner participation in communities of practice related to the MOOCs they
engage with.
1.2
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-2">
        <title>Post- MOOC Development</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-3">
        <title>1.2.1 MOOCs and Continued Learning Activities</title>
        <p>Currently, the most popular approaches adopted by researchers to evaluate a MOOC's
success is to measure its learners course engagement and performance. Although this
can provide us with some insights, some researchers argue that students' post-course
learning activities should also be tracked and analyzed to gain a better understanding
of learner behavior.</p>
        <p>
          One key aspect in these post-course learning activities is to what extent learners
apply the knowledge they acquired from a MOOC in practice (i.e., learning transfer). One
example of such research comes from Chen et al. [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
          ] which targeted the learners from
a MOOC teaching functional programming in edX and analyzed the data they generated
in both edX and GitHub, a social repository for programmers to store and share code.
They found a small percentage of learners began using the taught language who had
never used it before and continued to do so after the course ended.
        </p>
        <p>
          In addition to measuring learning transfer, another interesting aspect to investigate
is whether learners continue to study the MOOC subject or related topics after the end
of the course. Just as Chen et al. [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
          ] used GitHub to measure learning transfer, Chen et
al. [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
          ] analyzed learners' data left in StackOveflow, a social platform for programmers
to ask and answer questions, and observed that some learners continued asking relevant
questions after the course finished. Moreover, some of them even changed their role
from "learner" to "teacher" by answering these questions. As learners' continued
learning activities are greatly diverse, we here identify a need for new approaches to identify
and measure such behavior.
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-4">
        <title>1.2.2 MOOCs and Career Development</title>
        <p>
          Instead of pursuing a degree in a traditional school setting, a considerable percentage
of MOOC learners are seeking career advancement through taking MOOCs [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
          ].
        </p>
        <p>
          In addition to showing interests in accumulating competency, many MOOC learners
have also expressed explicit goals of changing their careers. For instance, recent studies
on MOOC learner motivation suggest that a substantial proportion of learners register
for a MOOC with an intention of changing their job [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
          ]. Proactively seeking to change
one’s current job is correlated with higher perceived employability by employers [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
          ].
        </p>
        <p>
          More recently, Dillahunt and colleagues [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
          ] conducted a survey and found out that
enhancing employability was a key reason why many learners enroll in MOOCs. They
categorized desired career advancement for MOOC learners into four types: transition
into a new field; promotion in their current fields; obtaining new position in current
fields; and improving current job skills. However, while learners have the goal of
increasing their employability and many employers are interested in prospective
employees’ MOOC experience [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
          ], there is not yet much evidence of post-course career
improvement as a result of taking a MOOC.
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-5">
        <title>1.2.3 MOOCs and Communities of Practice</title>
        <p>
          In addition to post-course development analyzed on the individual level, development
of a community of practice complements the development of individual learners. This
can be particularly relevant for a MOOC in an emerging field since the field needs to
attract new members in order for it to grow and develop. Communities of practice refer
to groups of people who share a common interest and learn how to enrich a shared
repertoire of their practice via joint activities [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
          ]. Learning transcends personal
knowledge acquisition and becomes a dynamic, interconnected bank of knowledge
shared among community members [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
          ]. Becoming a member of a community of
practice is also considered beneficial to career advancement on the individual level [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
          ], for
example, by moving from being a novice to a full practitioner in the community. The
emergence of virtual media further extended the realm of communities of practice [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
          ].
        </p>
        <p>
          MOOCs, as a virtual learning venue, often connect to a community of practice
around the domain of the MOOC’s content. For example, a MOOC teaching methods
in the emerging field of educational data mining (EDM) is likely to attract learners who
are interested in joining the community of practice composed by the field of EDM.
MOOC learners can be perceived as aspiring practitioners in this community of
practice. With their lack of entrance restrictions, MOOCs can provide a new space to
facilitate legitimate peripheral participation. For an emerging field, fostering development
of the community of practice can be crucial, and there is initial evidence that some
MOOC participants join relevant scientific societies during or immediately after
participating in a MOOC [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>
          ]. This development does not stop at the moment when the
course concludes. Therefore, studying the development of MOOC participants as
members of the community of practice after the MOOC concludes can be a valuable lens for
understanding the impact of the MOOC.
2
        </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>WORKSHOP OBJECTIVES</title>
      <p>This workshop aimed to generate awareness in the community that considering learner
data beyond the course platform and course-offering window can uncover previously
unconsidered learning behaviors.</p>
      <p>As such, in adopting and developing this integrated learning analytics approach, the
overall goal of the present workshop was to bring together researchers and practitioners
from different disciplines and areas of expertise to herald a new MOOC research branch
on tracking and analyzing longitudinal MOOC learner development.</p>
      <p>Presentations on finished, ongoing, and proposed studies, as well as facilitated
discussion sessions are planned to develop a preliminary framework to illustrate the
current development of the field and to inspire attendees to come up with exciting new
lines of research of their own. Toward building this framework, the following guiding
questions are included:
• Data source: Where and how can learner post-development data be collected?
• Tools: What analytical tools are useful in analyzing datasets merged from multiple
sources?
• Methods: What analytical methods have been used? What other methods can be
applied?
• Generalizability: What kind of practices and findings are domain-general or not?
• Applicability: How can research findings translate into actionable insights for
various stakeholders (learners, instructors, administrators, investors, etc.)?
3</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Outcomes</title>
      <p>The Workshop on Integrated Learning Analytics of MOOC Post-Course Development
took place during the 7th International Learning Analytics &amp; Knowledge Conference,
hosted by Simon Fraser University in Vancouver, Canada. The goal of this workshop
was to foster discussions to rethink how we define success in MOOCs, going beyond
performance in MOOCs themselves and thinking about the impacts of the students’
participation in online courses in their life and career outside of the courses.</p>
      <p>More than 25 attendees from 10 institutions attended the workshop which included
presentations from 1 keynote speaker and 4 submitted papers and group discussions.
The topics ranged from how to collect learner post-development data to what
pedagogical actions can be triggered based on the existing research findings.</p>
      <p>MOOC research is typically limited to evaluations of learner behavior in the context
of the learning environment. However, some research has begun to recognize that the
impact of MOOCs may extend beyond the confines of the course platform or
conclusion of the course time limit. The papers published in these proceedings are great
examples of the most recent efforts from Learning Analytics researcher to study MOOCs
post course outcomes. This workshop encouraged our community of learning analytics
researchers to examine the relationship between performance and
engagement within the course and learner behavior and development beyond the course. It
built awareness in the community regarding the importance of research measuring
multi-platform activity and long-term success after taking a MOOC.</p>
      <p>As such, in adopting and developing this integrated learning analytics approach, this
workshop brought together researchers and practitioners from different disciplines and
areas of expertise to herald a new MOOC research branch on tracking and analyzing
longitudinal MOOC learner development. Presentations on finished, ongoing, and
proposed studies, as well as facilitated discussion sessions are included. Presentations and
discussions of the workshop helped inform a preliminary framework to illustrate the
current development of the field and inspire attendees to come up with exciting new
lines of research of their own.
4</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Davis</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hauff</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Houben</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G. J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <year>2016</year>
          .
          <article-title>Learning Transfer: Does It Take Place in MOOCs? An Investigation into the Uptake of Functional Programming in Practice</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of the Third</source>
          (
          <year>2016</year>
          ) ACM Conference on Learning@ Scale (pp.
          <fpage>409</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>418</lpage>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Davis</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lin</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hauff</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Houben</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G. J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <year>2016</year>
          .
          <article-title>Beyond the MOOC platform: gaining insights about learners from the social web</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Web Science</source>
          (pp.
          <fpage>15</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>24</lpage>
          ). ACM.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <surname>DeBoer</surname>
          </string-name>
          , J.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Stump</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G. S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Seaton</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ho</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pritchard</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D. E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Breslow</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <year>2013</year>
          ,
          <article-title>July. Bringing student backgrounds online: MOOC user demographics, site usage, and online learning</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Educational Data Mining</source>
          <year>2013</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <surname>DeFillippi</surname>
          </string-name>
          , R. J., &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Arthur</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M. B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <year>1994</year>
          .
          <article-title>The boundaryless career: A competency-based perspective</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of organizational behavior</source>
          ,
          <volume>15</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>307</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>324</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dillahunt</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T. R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ng</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fiesta</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Z.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <year>2016</year>
          .
          <article-title>Do Massive Open Online Course Platforms Support Employability</article-title>
          ?
          <source>In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work &amp; Social Computing. ACM.</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ferguson</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sharples</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Beale</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <year>2015</year>
          .
          <article-title>MOOCs 2030: a future for massive open online learning</article-title>
          . In: C. J.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bonk</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M. M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lee</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Reeves</surname>
          </string-name>
          &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>T. H. Reynolds</surname>
          </string-name>
          (Eds.), MOOCs and Open Education around the World (pp.
          <fpage>315</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>326</lpage>
          ). Abingdon: Routledge
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fugate</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kinicki</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A. J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ashforth</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B. E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2004</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Employability: A psycho-social construct, its dimensions, and applications</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Vocational behavior</source>
          ,
          <volume>65</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>14</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>38</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          8.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Johnson</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C. M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <year>2001</year>
          .
          <article-title>A survey of current research on online communities of practice</article-title>
          .
          <source>The internet and higher education</source>
          ,
          <volume>4</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>45</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>60</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          9.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kizilcec</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R. F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Schneider</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <year>2015</year>
          .
          <article-title>Motivation as a lens to understand online learners: Toward data-driven design with the OLEI scale</article-title>
          .
          <source>ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI)</source>
          ,
          <volume>22</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>6</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          10.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lave</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <year>1991</year>
          .
          <article-title>Situating learning in communities of practice</article-title>
          .
          <source>Perspectives on socially shared cognition</source>
          ,
          <volume>2</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>63</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>82</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          11.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lave</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wenger</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <year>2002</year>
          .
          <article-title>Legitimate peripheral participation in communities of practice</article-title>
          .
          <source>Supporting lifelong learning</source>
          ,
          <volume>1</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>111</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>126</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          12.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Siemens</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2015</year>
          ).
          <article-title>The role of MOOCs in the future of education. MOOCs and Open Education Around the World</article-title>
          . C. J.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bonk</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lee</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T. C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Reeves</surname>
            , &amp; T,
            <given-names>H</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Reynolds. (Eds.). New York, NY: Routledge.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          13.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Paquette</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Baker</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <year>2014</year>
          .
          <article-title>A longitudinal study on learner career advancement in MOOCs</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Learning Analytics</source>
          ,
          <volume>1</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>203</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>206</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>