<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Habits of Highly Successful Professional Learners and the Corresponding Online Curriculum</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Rob Rubin</string-name>
          <email>rorubin@microsoft.com</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Alicia Redmond</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Gregory Weber</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Gulrez Khan</string-name>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
      <fpage>112</fpage>
      <lpage>121</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>Microsoft introduced the Microsoft Professional Program (MPP) in Data Science on edX -- a fourteen course online offering of which passing nine is necessary for successful completion, including a mandatory capstone project, to address the growing gap between the number of technology jobs available and the number of candidates qualified to fill those roles. In this paper, we take a first look at the descriptive analytics of a highly-motivated cohort who demonstrated success in this program to understand 1) the components to create an engaging course and curriculum, as measured by high levels of completion and learned content, and 2) the attributes contributing to learner success in completing a course and the entire curriculum.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Online learning</kwd>
        <kwd>MOOC</kwd>
        <kwd>professional learning</kwd>
        <kwd>effective habits of learning</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>
        A significant challenge in industry and academia that can be addressed by MOOC’s is
training employees and to take on new roles in the workforce. Per the McKinsey Global
Institute’s research [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ] by 2018 the United States will experience a shortage of 190,000
skilled data scientists, and 1.5 million managers and analysts capable of actionable
insights. In 2016, Microsoft introduced the Microsoft Professional Program (MPP) in
Data Science. The Microsoft Professional Program offers learners an
employer-endorsed credential who have completed a rigorous curriculum that focuses on both
conceptual knowledge, product capabilities, and application of their newly acquired skills
to real world labs and problems. These curricula are designed to be delivered online
with a 4-8 hour per week commitment, over 40 weeks, where videos are provided by
working professionals and experts alike [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ]. Each course includes videos, online
assessments and labs with a discussion forum to seek help from fellow classmates and
teaching assistants, including both formative and summative assessments [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ]. A
capstone project is included as part of the curriculum that provides a real-world exercise
for the learner to demonstrate the skills they’ve learned through the program.
      </p>
      <p>
        Our research agenda is focused on examining a multi-course offering to solve an
indemand industrial need. By contrast there has been a large focus on individual
MOOC’s [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ]. We think multi-course offerings are an area ripe for investigation. While
our research is early in development, we share descriptive analytics on the self-selecting
cohort of successful learners who elected to participate in the MPP and hope this
stimulates research into multi-course offerings such as the edX X-Series or online programs
and Micro-degrees. We begin our study with a focus on the visualization of the
program and course structure [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ] to understand the impact of both program and course
organization and design on learner performance [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ], and we look at the behavior of the
successful learners.
      </p>
      <p>Our target demographics for the MPP were informed by a focus on the growing
millennial workforce, working professionals in existing job roles, and early analysis of the
gateway courses to Data Science. The demographics we established are:
1. Employed technology professionals seeking to change roles, solve more meaningful
problems, and/or stay current on technology.
2. Millennials in STEM seeking entry into a technology field.
3. Women professionals in role seeking to transition into STEM roles</p>
      <p>The first cohort was a pilot that consisted of full time employees. The curriculum
was launched in May 2016 and participants were instructed to complete the curriculum
by either September 2016 or January 2017. In admitting learners to the two cohort
tracks, we did not control for level of experience or skills. Participation in the pilot
cohorts was voluntary and free, but support from their manager was encouraged.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Pilot Curriculum Performance vs MOOC Performance</title>
      <p>
        One critical measure for the pilot was course completions because learners were
required to complete 9 of 14 courses in a curriculum to qualify for a credential. Course
completion is measured as a learner earning a passing grade on the course, which is
70% on average for all courses. Figure 2 contains an outline of the first curriculum
published in Data Science. Completion rates are calculated by dividing the number of
learners who earn a passing grade on the course divided by the number of learners who
started the course by accessing the course content. While most MOOC platforms cite
completion rates between 2-7%, the publicly-offered courses included in the MPP Data
Science curriculum on edX are experiencing an average completion rate of 14% with a
range of 4-31% [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        The learners are required to complete the entire curriculum to be eligible for the
degree. Given that edX cites a 20% attrition rate course over course in its X-series
courses, which commonly contain 3-4 courses in a series, we were concerned about the
attrition rate through a curriculum that required completion of 9 courses from 14
available [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ]. To date, the pilot has experienced an average of 12% attrition rate between
courses offered in the curriculum. The engagement level of the courses comprising the
curriculum is critical to drive the performance of these key measures. Therefore, the
analysis in progress includes identifying attributes of courses with high completion
rates and determine the areas within a course in which intervention is required to
support the learner to persevere to completion.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Methodology</title>
      <p>
        For this analysis, we are leveraging a total data set of 782 learners who agreed to
participate in a pilot run of a Data Science curriculum in the Microsoft Professional
Program, which we intend to make available as an anonymized data set, as researchers
elsewhere have benefitted enormously [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ]. The participants resided in 45 different
countries - 15% were female, 75% were male and 10% did not disclose their gender.
The age distribution is 41% under 35 years old and 59% are 35 years old and over. The
educational background of the participants was 5% held a PhD or doctorate, 43% held
a Master’s degree, 45% held a Bachelor’s degree, and 7% held other education.
      </p>
      <p>Within the pilot period between July 2016 and January 2017, a subset of learners
completed the curriculum of 9 courses, who we refer to as “Highly Successful
Learners”, while another subset completed between 4-8 courses, who we refer to as
“Successful Learners”. Our initial analysis focused on these two subsets of learners to better
understand what behaviours they exhibited to be successful in the MPP Data Science
online curriculum. These two groups are compared against each other to determine
whether there are behaviours exhibited by learners who completed the curriculum
within 6 months of the pilot launch that made them highly successful in the program
compared to those that made it partially through the curriculum.
• 208 Highly Successful Learners who completed the 9-course curriculum
• 135 Successful Learners who completed between 4-8 courses in
the curriculum.
• 439 Learners are considered in progress as of February 2017 and are not included in
the following analysis on leaner behaviours and strategies
2</p>
      <sec id="sec-3-1">
        <title>Analysis Areas</title>
        <p>The following areas describe the analysis in progress to evaluate the learner behaviour
through the MPP curriculum for highly successful learners who complete the
curriculum compared to the learners who only complete a subset of the curriculum. Additional
analysis areas will be evaluated and included as the research continues.
3</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-2">
        <title>Impact of Course Design on Learner Performance</title>
        <p>To better understand the impact of course design on performance, we developed a
visualization of the course structure. Figure 2 shows that the two highest performing
courses had completion rates of 21% and 25% respectively. These two courses shared
essentially the same course structure. This structure consisted of brief video’s, textual
challenge descriptions, and programming problems. Only the introductory course had
a higher completion rate than these two courses.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-3">
        <title>Session Time</title>
        <p>
          The time spent in a learning session is based upon the difference in logged event times
continuing until there is at least 30 minutes of no logged activity [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
          ]. Note that the total
lab time may not be accurately reflected since labs were performed outside of the
learning platform. The analysis compares the session time between Highly Successful
Learners who completed all 9 courses in the MPP curriculum and Successful Learners who
completed between 4-8 courses in the curriculum.
        </p>
        <p>There was less time spent per course for Highly Successful Learners (7.1 hours
median per course) compared to Successful Learners (7.6 hours median per course). There
was not a substantial amount of course forum time by either group.</p>
        <p>The total time spent in a learning session was analysed across courses completed by
the pilot participants across 14 courses in the MPP Data Science curriculum across the
dimensions of Highly Successful vs Successful Learners, age, and gender.
Programming in Python stands out as having much more time spent in all categories for Highly
Successful Learners as compared to Successful Learners. Forum posts indicated that
this course was exceptionally challenging to complete.</p>
        <p>
          When looking at the time spent per day in the learning session, the Highly Successful
Learners tended to be more active early in the pilot program [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
          ]. Successful Learners
showed daily activity that was consistent throughout the pilot program. The hours spent
in learning session per day ranged from under 30 minutes to over 10 hours. This broad
distribution demonstrates the wide range of learning styles used in the course
curriculum [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
          ].
5
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-4">
        <title>Video Length and Time on Task</title>
        <p>
          We have augmented the Course DNA with time on task data for video and length of
video. The result shows a high correlation between length of the video and percentage
of video watched, as shown in Figure 3 below. The correlation amplifies some of the
basic published research around video length and engagement [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
          ], with a much higher
percentage of videos viewed when there is a lower median length; We see this effect
quite dramatically for the entire MPP curriculum.
Several learning strategies stood out between Highly Successful Learners and
Successful Learners as learners progressed through the Data Science curriculum. The courses
are intended to become more challenging as the learner is expected to learn more to
build on their previous knowledge as they progress through the curriculum. Highly
Successful Learners displayed “grit” or persistence [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
          ], measured by learners who
have taken every problem they possibly can, and every attempt needed to get the best
possible score. Both groups of learners attempt similar numbers of problems
throughout the first half of the curriculum. As courses became more difficult, Highly Successful
Learners attempted more problems to achieve a passing score in the course.
        </p>
        <p>
          The Capstone Project based course was where the forums were utilized mostly by
Highly Successful Learners, was one of the most rewarding for learners, and heavily
clustered student attempts [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>
          ]. The notable exception was the Programming Python
course. By analyzing the forum posts, we determined the Programming Python
increased forum usage was due to lab challenges. By contrast, the Project forum content
was used for student collaboration.
        </p>
        <p>Another way to measure “grit” or persistence is whether a learner decides to try a
course again after they have failed it the first time. The courses in the MPP Data Science
curriculum were offered multiple times during the pilot program, so learners had the
opportunity to take a course again if they initially failed. In a comparison of one course,
Data Science Orientation, where we see learners who earned a grade under 70% during
the first run of the course either earned a passing grade during the next run of the course
or they abandoned the program.</p>
        <p>
          Learners can view the score and progress through the course to see if they have
earned a passing grade. They can also view the remaining problems/assignments to
complete [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>
          ]. Highly successful learners are seen to be looking more to the progress
page especially as courses become more difficult during the second half of the
curriculum.
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-5">
        <title>Conclusion</title>
        <p>Our study of an employer-created professional program offered online in a bounded
time frame offers a starting point into understanding the learning behavior of
professional learners. Highly Successful learners demonstrate “Grit” in multiple ways: They
both attempt more assessments and 15% of them explore and complete more than the
necessary courses to complete the program. They appear to both minimize the time on
task by watching fewer minutes of video, as well as maximizing the number of
assessments they attempt. They manage their session times with a heavier upfront
commitment, and maintain that commitment consistently through the program. Highly
Successful learners appear motivated to explore and learn as much as possible of the
learning pathways and check their progress regularly. The capstone project based course
was where the forums were utilized the most heavily, and post-completion interviews
revealed that this course was one of the most rewarding for learners.</p>
        <p>
          There are significant learning behaviors and analytics yet to be explored. The DNA
of the courses appears to matter in student comments, but we have not yet quantified
performance by course DNA, nor have we completed the qualitative survey analysis
[
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>
          ] or the predictive behavioral analytics [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>
          ] to understand better how we might help
committed learners become highly successful learners. Finally, we plan to explore the
learning pattern of those who fail more attempts at questions.
8
        </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lund</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Manyika</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Nyquist</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mendonca</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ramaswamy</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2013</year>
          )
          <article-title>Game changers: Five opportunities for US growth and renewal, , McKinsey Global Institute July 2013 Retrieved from http://www.mckinsey.com/global-themes/americas/us-game-changers</article-title>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Fox</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>"Viewpoint: From MOOCs to SPOCs: How MOOCs Can Strengthen Academia,"</article-title>
          <source>Communications of the ACM</source>
          , vol.
          <volume>56</volume>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dec</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2013</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bajzek</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Brooks</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Jerome</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lovett</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rinderle</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rule</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Thille</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2008</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Assessment and Instruction: Two Sides of the Same Coin</article-title>
          . In G. Richards (Ed.),
          <source>Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education</source>
          <year>2008</year>
          (pp.
          <fpage>560</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>565</lpage>
          ). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ho</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A. D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chuang</surname>
          </string-name>
          , I. Reich, J.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Coleman</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Whitehill</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Northcutt</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Williams</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hansen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lopez</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Petersen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2015</year>
          ).
          <article-title>HarvardX and MITx: Two Years of Open Online Courses Fall 2012-</article-title>
          <year>Summer 2014</year>
          . (HarvardX Working Paper No.
          <volume>10</volume>
          ). Retrieved from Social Science Research Network: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=
          <fpage>2586847</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Seaton</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2016</year>
          )
          <article-title>“Exploring Course Structure at HarvardX: A New Year's Resolution for MOOC Research”</article-title>
          . Retrieved from http://vpal.harvard.edu/blog/exploring-course
          <article-title>-structureharvardx-new-year%E2%80%99s-resolution-mooc-research</article-title>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Freeman</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Haak</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wenderoth</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M. P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2011</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Increased Course Structure Improves Performance in Introductory Biology</article-title>
          .
          <source>CBE Life Sciences Education</source>
          ,
          <volume>10</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>175</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>186</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7. Reich, J. (
          <year>2014</year>
          ).
          <article-title>MOOC completion and retention in the context of student intent</article-title>
          .
          <source>Educause Review Online</source>
          . Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/mooc-completion
          <article-title>-andretention-context-student-intent</article-title>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          8.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hansen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          * &amp; Reich, J. (
          <year>2015</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Demographics in MOOCs: Exploiting public datasets for estimates and comparisons</article-title>
          .
          <source>Proceedings of the Fifth Learning Analytics and Knowledge 2015 Conference</source>
          ,
          <volume>59</volume>
          -
          <fpage>63</fpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          9.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D. T.</given-names>
            <surname>Seaton</surname>
          </string-name>
          , G. Kortemeyer,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Bergner</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            <surname>Rayyan</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D. E.</given-names>
            <surname>Pritchard</surname>
          </string-name>
          . eText Use in Blended Introductory Physics Courses:
          <article-title>Interpreting Meaningful Interactions and the Effects of Course Structure</article-title>
          .
          <source>American Journal of Physics</source>
          ,
          <volume>82</volume>
          (
          <issue>12</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>1186</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1197</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2014</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          10.
          <string-name>
            <surname>J. Champaign</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Colvin</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Liu</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fredericks</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Seaton</surname>
            , and
            <given-names>D. E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pritchard</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Correlating skill and improvement in 2 MOOCs with a student's time on tasks</article-title>
          .
          <source>Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Learning at Scale</source>
          , Atlanta,
          <string-name>
            <surname>GA</surname>
          </string-name>
          , March 4-5 2014
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          11.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Guo</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Kim</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            <surname>Rubin</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>How video production affects student engagement: an empirical study of MOOC videos</article-title>
          .
          <source>Proceedings of the First ACM Conference on Learning at Scale</source>
          , Atlanta,
          <string-name>
            <surname>GA</surname>
          </string-name>
          , March 4-5 2014
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          12.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dweck</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C. S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1986</year>
          ).
          <article-title>"Motivational processes affecting learning"</article-title>
          .
          <source>American Psychologist</source>
          .
          <volume>41</volume>
          (
          <issue>10</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>1040</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1048</lpage>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          13.
          <string-name>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
            <surname>Yin</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Fox</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>"Clustering Student Programming Assignments to Multiply Instructor Leverage,"</article-title>
          <source>in 2nd ACM Conference on Learning at Scale</source>
          ,
          <year>2015</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          14. D. T. Seaton,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
            <surname>Bergner</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>I. Chuang</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            <surname>Mitros</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D. E.</given-names>
            <surname>Pritchard</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Who Does What in a Massive Open Online Course? Communications of the ACM</article-title>
          ,
          <volume>57</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>58</fpage>
          ,
          <year>2014</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          15.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Breslow</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L. B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pritchard</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D. E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>DeBoer</surname>
          </string-name>
          , J.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Stump</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G. S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ho</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A. D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Seaton</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D. T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2013</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Studying learning in the worldwide classroom: Research into edX's first MOOC</article-title>
          .
          <source>Research &amp; Practice in Assessment</source>
          ,
          <volume>8</volume>
          <fpage>13</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>25</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          16.
          <string-name>
            <surname>C.</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>A</article-title>
          .
          <string-name>
            <surname>Coleman</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D. T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Seaton</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>and I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chuang</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>Probabilistic Use Cases: Discovering Behavioral Patterns for Predicting Certification</article-title>
          .
          <source>Proceedings of the Second ACM Conference on Learning at Scale</source>
          , Vancouver, BC, March
          <volume>14</volume>
          -18 2015
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>