<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>'Betwixt and Between' Action Research and the Duality between Project and Research Results</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Andreas D. Landmark</string-name>
          <email>andreas.landmark@sintef.no</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Tobias Buschmann Iversen</string-name>
          <email>tobias.buschmann.iversen@helse-vest-ikt.no</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Helse-Vest IKT Innovation and Architecture</institution>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>SINTEF Technology and Society</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2017</year>
      </pub-date>
      <abstract>
        <p>Health-care managers everywhere are pursuing the application of ICT as a 'means to an end', be it efficiency, effectiveness or quality. ICT may radically alter the delivery of health care and outcomes. The socio-technical nature of IT systems sets them apart from other engineering disciplines. The role of researchers as both participants as well as observers in such processes is a difficult one. While this dual role gives detailed insight into processes, procedures and data, the researcher, unlike the project professional, needs to maintain scientific rigour and demonstrate practical/societal relevance.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body />
  <back>
    <ref-list />
  </back>
</article>