<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Proceedings of the Workshop on Second-Order Quanti er Elimination and Related Topics, Dresden, Germany, December 6{8, 2017</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2017</year>
      </pub-date>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>Editors
Patrick Koopmann
Technische Universitat Dresden
Dresden
Germany</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Renate A. Schmidt The University of Manchester Manchester UK</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Sebastian Rudolph Technische Universitat Dresden Dresden Germany</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Christoph Wernhard Technische Universitat Dresden Dresden Germany</title>
      <p>Copyright c 2017 for the individual papers by the papers' authors. This volume
is published and copyrighted by its editors.
Second-order quanti er elimination (SOQE) is the problem of computing from a
given logic formula involving quanti ers upon second-order objects such as
predicates an equivalent rst-order formula, or, in other words, an equivalent formula
in which these quanti ed second-order objects do no longer occur. The problem
can be studied for various logics, including classical propositional and rst-order
logic as well as modal and description logics. In slight variations SOQE is also
known as forgetting, projection, predicate elimination and uniform interpolation.</p>
      <p>SOQE bears strong relationships to Craig interpolation, de nability and
computation of de nientia, the notion of conservative theory extension, abduction
and notions of weakest su cient and strongest necessary condition, to
correspondence theory relationships, as well as to generalizations of Boolean uni cation
to predicate logic.</p>
      <p>Various important research subjects of current interest are based on SOQE
and these related notions, as is re ected in the topics addressed in workshop
program: In the area of knowledge representation they include forgetting,
uniform interpolation and abduction in description logics, modularization, reuse,
versioning and summarization of ontologies, forgetting in variants of logic
programming that are relevant for ontology reasoning, and query reformulation on
the basis of interpolation. The uni ed correspondence research program, which
recently emerged from the study of algorithmic correspondence and canonicity,
now by itself reaches into further areas such as proof theory. SOQE has
applications in the veri cation of distributed systems. The investigation of SOQE with
respect to speci c fragments of rst-order logic is { much less researched than
decidability { an area with open challenges, where, however, ways of progress
can be indicated. For Boolean uni cation on the basis of predicate logic, like
SOQE an operation with formulas as output, various relationships to SOQE can
be shown. In the Algebra of Logic program of the 19th century SOQE was
identi ed as an important operation, which makes the study of historical aspects
and the passage of SOQE to modern logic particularly interesting. Special forms
of SOQE are essential components of state-of-the-art SAT-solvers. SOQE
provides an exemplary framework for studying the dichotomy of expressivity versus
complexity.</p>
      <p>The rst Workshop on Second-order Quanti er Elimination and Related
Topics (SOQE 2017) was held in the International Center for Computational Logic
(ICCL) at Technische Universitat Dresden in Dresden, Germany, during 6-8
December 2017. The workshop aimed at bringing together researchers working on
SOQE and related topics in a dedicated event. Its program includes nine invited
talks, two tutorials and nine research talks, acquired with an open call for
submissions of original research, adaptions of relevant research published elsewhere
and discussions of research in progress.</p>
      <p>We would like to thank all those involved for their enthusiasm and
highquality contributions, in particular, the invited speakers, the authors of tutorials
and research presentations, the members of the program committee, and Romy
Thieme who assisted with the local organization.</p>
      <p>The organizational framework for the workshop was provided by the ICCL at
TU Dresden, an interdisciplinary center of competence in research and teaching
in the eld of Computational Logic, with special emphasis on algebra, logic, and
formal methods in computer science, founded in 2003. The workshop was made
possible through funding by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) for the
project The Second-Order Approach and its Application to View-Based Query
Processing (grant WE 5641/1-1).</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>December 2017</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Patrick Koopmann Sebastian Rudolph Renate A. Schmidt Christoph Wernhard</title>
      <p>Organization
SOQE 2017 was organized by the International Center for Computational Logic
of Technische Universitat Dresden, Germany.</p>
      <sec id="sec-6-1">
        <title>Program Chairs</title>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>Patrick Koopmann Sebastian Rudolph Renate A. Schmidt Christoph Wernhard</title>
      <sec id="sec-7-1">
        <title>Program Commitee</title>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-8">
      <title>James Delgrande</title>
      <p>Andreas Herzig
Stefan Hetzl
Patrick Koopmann
Andreas Nonnengart
Hans Jurgen Ohlbach</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-9">
      <title>Alessandra Palmigiano</title>
      <p>Sebastian Rudolph
Renate A. Schmidt
Viorica Sofronie-Stokkermans
David Toman
Dirk Walther
Christoph Wernhard
Frank Wolter
Richard Zach</p>
      <sec id="sec-9-1">
        <title>Organization Chair</title>
        <p>Technische Universitat Dresden, Germany
Technische Universitat Dresden, Germany
The University of Manchester, UK
Technische Universitat Dresden, Germany</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-10">
      <title>Simon Fraser University, Canada</title>
      <p>IRIT, France
Technische Universitat Wien, Austria
Technische Universitat Dresden, Germany
DFKI, Germany
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat Munchen,
Germany
Technische Universiteit Delft, Netherlands
Technische Universitat Dresden, Germany
The University of Manchester, UK
Universitat Koblenz-Landau, Germany
University of Waterloo, Canada
Fraunhofer IVI, Germany
Technische Universitat Dresden, Germany
University of Liverpool, UK
University of Calgary, Canada</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-11">
      <title>Christoph Wernhard Technische Universitat Dresden, Germany</title>
      <sec id="sec-11-1">
        <title>Funding</title>
        <p>The workshop was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) with
grant WE 5641/1-1.
Interpolation for Query Reformulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .</p>
        <p>Michael Benedikt
Algorithmic Correspondence and Canonicity for Non-Classical Logics . . .</p>
        <p>Willem Conradie
Focusing on a Vocabulary: Ontology Inseparability, Uniform
Interpolation and Modularity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .</p>
        <p>Boris Konev
Conservative Extensions in Description Logics and Beyond . . . . . . . .</p>
        <p>Carsten Lutz
Elimination Techniques in Modern Propositional Logic Reasoning . . . .</p>
        <p>Norbert Manthey
Automated Forgetting and Uniform Interpolation: Three Tools . . . . . .</p>
        <p>Renate A. Schmidt
Swinging between Expressiveness and Complexity in Second-Order
Formalisms: A Case Study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .</p>
        <p>Andrzej Szalas
Forgetting for Logic Programs/Existential Rules . . . . . . . . . . . . . .</p>
        <p>Kewen Wang (collaboration with Zhe Wang)
Ackermann-Based Forgetting for Expressive Description Logics . . . . . .</p>
        <p>Yizheng Zhao
Resolution Based Uniform Interpolation and Forgetting for Expressive
Description Logics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .</p>
        <p>Patrick Koopmann
Cut Elimination and Second Order Quanti er Elimination . . . . . . . . .</p>
        <p>Alessandra Palmigiano
1
2
7
8
9
11
13
15
16
17
19</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-11-2">
        <title>Research Presentations</title>
        <p>A Preliminary Comparison of the Forgetting Solutions Computed using
SCAN, LETHE and FAME . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .</p>
        <p>Ruba Alassaf and Renate A. Schmidt
Second Order Quanti er Elimination: Towards Veri cation Applications .</p>
        <p>Silvio Ghilardi and Elena Pagani
Towards Elimination of Second-Order Quanti ers in the Separated
Fragment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .</p>
        <p>Marco Voigt
VII
21
27
36
51
67
82
99
Early Steps of Second-Order Quanti er Elimination beyond the Monadic
Case: The Correspondence between Heinrich Behmann and Wilhelm
Ackermann 1928-1934 (Abstract) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102</p>
        <p>Christoph Wernhard</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Algorithmic</given-names>
            <surname>Correspondence</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <article-title>Canonicity for Possibility Semantics (Abstract</article-title>
          <string-name>
            <surname>) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .</surname>
          </string-name>
          106 Zhiguang Zhao
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>