<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>The Application of Methods of Semantic and Correlation Analysis Through Studies of the Annual Reports of Russian Companies According to the Principle of Integrated Reporting \Reliability and Completeness"</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Vera V. Plotnikova</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Maria S. Shilovskaya</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Anton A. Dvorak</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Saratov Socio-Economic Institute of Plekhanov Russian University of Economics</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Saratov</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="RU">Russia</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Yuri Gagarin State Technical University of Saratov</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Saratov, Russia</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="RU">Russia</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>The article contains an empirical study of the annual reports of the largest Russian companies for 2011{2015 according to the principle of integrated reporting \reliability and completeness". It is based on a computer model of the semantic analysis of the report texts and the correlation analysis of the values of nancial ratios and the opinion of the company's management about their nancial position and nancial results. As part of study, the distribution algorithm of words by semantic groups is proposed, and software that allows semantic analysis of the information of annual reports according to the principles of integrated reporting is developed. The correlation analysis was carried out using standard Microsoft Excel tools. According to the analysis of the 30 largest Russian holding entities, the conclusion is that in 70% of the reports the opinion of the management of Russian companies does not have an a liation with the actual values and the dynamics of nancial ratios as well as it does not correspond to the principle of IR \reliability and completeness". In the end it was concluded that companies need to use a standardized system of nancial indicators to generate reports that can provide an objective view of the company's current situation, and also to classify analytical interpretations of these indicators.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>integrated reporting</kwd>
        <kwd>nancial position</kwd>
        <kwd>semantic analysis</kwd>
        <kwd>correlation analysis</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>The problem of reliability and quality of the information disclosed in the
annual reports of Russian companies continues to be relevant for a long time. This
is due to the uncertainty about the predicted value of such information and
the objectivity of management's assessment of the company's nancial position.
In other words, there is a situation when management tries to manipulate the
opinion of stakeholders for its own bene t, hiding the real nancial situation
of the company. Subjective evaluations of the management of the company do
not always re ect the real picture of doing business [11]. And this is the reason
why over the last years, the attention to the quality of the descriptive
information disclosed in the annual reports has increased signi cantly. The research
is conducted on the basis of annual and integrated reports of the largest
Russian companies. Russia participates in the pilot project on the transition to the
international standards of integrated reporting (hereinafter IR) and the GRI
standards. At the present point in time, Russian business is still not ready for
open communication with all stakeholders, since often even nancial statements
fail to meet the requirements of reliability and completeness of information
disclosed. The new model of IR is oriented toward a constructive dialogue between
companies and users of its information. In this case, the requirements to the
quality of nancial and non- nancial information disclosed, as well as to the
management's objective overview of their nancial position and the prospects
for creating value for a long period, are raised. To a large extent, the form of the
company management's presentation of information about nancial situation in
the content of annual reports depends on the conditions that a ect the nancial
position of the company at the time of preparation of reporting. The way the
management reacts to these conditions and accordingly o ers its opinion about
the current position of the company and the prospects for its development is
the knowledgebase of our research, which allows us to draw a conclusion about
the maturity of Russian business and also its availability to move to a new level
of disclosed corporate information. One of the tools for analyzing the quality
of information contained in the annual reports of Russian companies and the
compliance of this information with the principles of integrated reporting is the
semantic analysis combined with the correlation analysis. Carrying out that sort
of research requires computer modeling of the process of word distribution by
semantic groups according to Loughran-McDonald Word Lists by
distinguishing positive, negative, uncertainty, and litigious, constraining, modal words that
make it possible to analyze the entire volume of text information contained in
the annual reports and through the use of correlation analysis to establish a
correlation between the management's subjective opinion and the objective values
of nancial ratios. This approach allows determining the quality of nancial and
non- nancial information for compliance with the principle of IR \reliability and
completeness".
2</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Literature Review</title>
      <p>There are many studies related to determining the relationship between the
quality of information disclosed in corporate reports of companies and their
nancial position. Some of them are dedicated to the study of the in uence of
the quality of information disclosed in annual reports of companies to the
valuation of their shares traded on the securities market [5] Tennyson B. M. and
others related the bankruptcies of some American companies to the quality of
managerial descriptive information disclosed in annual reports [13]. One study
showed a positive relation between the quality evaluation of information
disclosed of the nancial condition of Italian companies and the forecast precision
of nancial analysts [10]. In all these studies the methods of economic and
mathematical modeling were used as a methodological tool for analysis. According to
the world practice, lately the interest to evaluation and analysis of the quality
of corporate information disclosed with the use of text or semantic analysis has
increased signi cantly. Semantic analysis helps to study the linguistic structure
of the text, determine the tone and mood of corporate reports that helps to
assess their impact on the ability to identify situations when there are attempts
to avoid management from disclosing the real nancial position of the company.
Text mining analysis works as an additional tool for forecasting the bankruptcy
of the company, also by using this technique it is possible to distinguish
management's unintentional signals about the current nancial position of the company
and its further development which are hidden in the report texts [8]. As a part of
the text mining analysis of company reports, it is possible to determine whether
certain categories of words are prevalent and to what extent they are used by
management in individual cases. Some authors explicitly specify the presence of
fraudulent application in the annual reports and conduct an appropriate research
on how the linguistic structure of the reported text helps to identify indicators
of true or false statements through textual analysis of emotions [6]. In the works
of Caserio C., Panaro D., Trucco S. [2] there is a study that was conducted on a
sample of US listed nancial companies, in which, through the use of semantic
and regression analysis, a relation between the content of MD&amp;A (management's
analysis of the nancial condition and results of operations) and the nancial
position of the company was established. Also, it was revealed how much the
content of this report a ects the quality of forecasting the nancial condition of
the company in the future. Among the Russian studies, the most notable are the
works of E mova O.V., which details the relation between long-term
sustainable development of the company and the in uence of all stakeholders, and puts
forward the thesis on the importance of qualitative of non- nancial information
disclosed to improve the sustainability of the company's development [4]. In the
work of Malinovskaya N.V. (2015), a general analysis was carried out to ensure
that the corporate reporting of the largest Russian companies was consistent
with the leading principles for the preparation and presentation of integrated
reporting, and concluded that the quality and information transparency of the
reports were gradually improving [9]. It is important to pay attention to the
insu cient study of the chosen research topic in the context of the activities
of Russian companies, meaning to identify the compliance of company reports
with the principles of integrated reporting using semantic analysis tools, since
earlier such studies were conducted only on the basis of foreign companies (in
particular, Italian [10] and American [2]). This places emphasis on our research
in the context of the adaptation of the considered text analysis techniques to
the linguistic features of the Russian language.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Research methodology</title>
      <p>The basis of this study is the analysis of the quality of information disclosed by
Russian companies on the nancial position in accordance to the principle of
IR \reliability and completeness" and the review of nancial and non- nancial
information for material errors in the reported texts, as well as the inclusion of
all material information in the report (both positive and negative). Based on
this, we proposed two hypotheses of the study: I0 { the quality of information
disclosed in annual reports of Russian companies is consistent with the principle
of IR \reliability and completeness"; I1 { the quality of information disclosed in
annual reports of Russian companies does not meet the principle of IR
\reliability and completeness". Currently, the analysis of the semantic orientation of
company reports is characterized by the presence of a signi cant variety of text
analysis tools. Among them, a speci c place is hold by Fog-index, Naive Bayes
Classi er, Loughran-McDonald Word Lists, and others. At the same time, it
is important to pay special attention to the fact that any of these methods of
analysis are based on linguistic features and textual structure in the native
language of authors, then there is the English language, this fact is emphasized
by scientists. In our opinion, the most interesting is the method of carrying out
text analysis on Loughran-McDonald Word Lists, according to which there are
several semantic elds or groups that determine the tonality of a word. These
include positive, negative, uncertainty, litigious, constraining, modal strong and
modal weak words [7]. Considering the fact that the native language for the
authors of this research is the Russian language which is characterized by certain
expressiveness, instead of the group modal strong and modal weak words the
combined group of modal words is proposed. Modality in the Russian language
is expressed by special forms of inclination, intonation and lexical means. In this
group, in addition to the modal verbs expressing not the action itself, but the
relation to it, it is preferable to include modal particles and words (of course,
unfortunately, probably, etc.). This group also includes words that give a strong
emotional coloring to the events described. For example, impressively, colossal,
cardinal, etc. This category of words is rarely found in annual reports, but by
their number one can estimate the degree of expression of opinion of the authors
in relation to the events described [12]. Examples of words in accordance with
the author's classi cation of semantic groups are given in Table 1.</p>
      <p>As a rule, positive words are the most common in the texts of reports.
Depending on the context, an inversion of the value of positive and negative words
can occur. For example, when you use the word \growth" in the phrase \revenue
growth," it is treated as an unambiguously positive, and in the phrase \costs
growth" { as a negative one. The group of legal words includes legal terms and
words that mark legally binding actions. Also it includes words that do not
necessarily indicate a legal basis, but indicate an attitude toward the judicial
sphere. The word selection for the formation of the dictionary database for each
semantic group was carried out on the basis of the study of typical phrases and
word combinations found in the texts of annual reports, taking into account
the speci cs of the nancial and economic sphere regarding to the accounting,
analysis and audit. In the course of analysis it is important to establish whether
there is a relation between speci c groups of words, or rather their share in the
total number of words in the reports, and nancial indicators of companies. This
goal can be achieved through a correlation analysis which establishes not only
the dependence by itself, but determines its strength and character.
4</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Data Collection and Pre-processing</title>
      <p>As the test object, there were selected 30 companies which are included in the
nal rating of the quality of information disclosed in the integrated reporting by
Russian companies (http://transparency2015.downstream.ru/#/ru/1410),
conducted by the Russian Regional Network on integrated reporting. According
to this rating, the participating companies are divided into 5 groups by
transparency of information: I level { \Information disclosed at the level of the best
international practices"; II Level { \Information disclosed on international
requirements"; III Level { \Information disclosed in excess of Russian legislative
requirements"; IV level { \Information disclosed in accordance with Russian
legislative requirements"; V (zero) transparency level { \Non-transparent level".
The criterion for selection of companies for analysis was their rating in the
overall assessment. The priority was given to companies with the highest score,
included in the I, II, III level of transparency. Financial companies and
organizations whose accounting is developed in a foreign language and companies
that are the part of the State Atomic Energy Corporation \Rosatom" and the
holding of Rosseti PJSC have been excluded from this list. In this case it makes
economic sense to use only the reporting of the corporations themselves, since
they also participate in the rating. The texts of the nancial performance
reviews for 2011{2015 were extracted (150 texts). The limitation of the analysis
period is connected with the fact that only in 2011 Russian companies whose
securities were admitted to trading at stock exchanges and (or) other organizers
of trade on the securities market have a responsibility to provide consolidated
nancial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting
Standards (IFRS) [1]. The calculation of the total number of words in each text was
initially carried out using the text editor MS Word, in which this function is
performed automatically. But the use of this editor assumes the implementation
of the semantic analysis by the researcher manually, that is, by reading the text,
searching and distributing the necessary words by groups. In connection with
the great labour intensity of this work, we developed a special program
\Semanomics { TextAnalyser" which performs semantic analysis automatically with
the output of the number of words by groups and their frequency in the text on
the screen. Further, the company's nancial situation was determined by
calculating nancial ratios: Return on sales, ROS; Return on assets, ROA; Return on
investments, ROI; Current ratio, CR; Financial stability, FS; Turnover of
current assets, TR; Own funds ration, OFR. The reporting data from Consolidated
Statement of Financial Position and Consolidated Statement of Income of the
analyzed companies for the period 2011{2015 is used.
5</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Implementation algorithm of the analysis</title>
      <p>The basis of the algorithm for implementing semantic analysis is a combination
of several ways of content search. The purpose of the program is to determine
the number and frequency of occurrence of the words of each selected semantic
group in the analyzed text. For this, the words and phrases of each semantic
group are divided into 3 subgroups, and then 2 methods of nding matches in the
text are implemented. Words that do not carry semantic meaning (conjunctions,
prepositions, particles, etc.) are singled out. The scheme of speci c cases of
possible interactions between subgroups of words and variants of the search
inside the implementation algorithm is shown in Fig. 1.</p>
      <p>
        Words and phrases from the rst and second groups are not included in
other, longer words, so algorithm I is suitable for its search and it is simpler
to implement. Words from the third group, as well as words that do not carry
semantic meaning (\and", \but", \not") can be part of other words, therefore
a more sophisticated search algorithm II is implemented for them. The total
number of words in the text is initially determined by the number of spaces (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ):
Ni = Ni1 + Ni2 + Ni3;
(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        )
      </p>
      <p>
        Nw = Nsp + 1;
where Nw { total number of words; Nsp { the number of spaces. And then
the number of words without semantic meaning is subtracted from it, and
recalculation is carried out taking into account the word combinations which are
considered as one word (Russian Federation, Ministry of Energy RF, public
company \Company name", etc.). As a result, only the number of words bearing the
semantic meaning is obtained: Nws Nw (where Nws is the number of words
with semantic meaning, \semantic" words). The number of words and phrases
of each group Ni consists of searching by subgroups (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ):
where Ni is the number of words and phrases of each semantic group (positive,
negative, uncertainty, litigious, constraining, modal);Ni1 { the number of words
included in 1 subgroup (a base without a word ending);Ni2 { the number of words
in the 2 subgroup (all forms of the word);Ni3 { the number of words included
in the 3 subgroup (Combinations of words with all forms without spaces). Their
frequencies fi are de ned as the ratio of the found quantity to the total number
of \semantic" words (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ):
Then, the program displays the results of calculating the word number and
frequency of each semantic group in the analyzed text. The nal stage of the
analysis is the calculation of pair correlation coe cient (Pearson) between the
nancial ratios and the frequency of words of each semantic group in the report
for each company separately by formula (
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ):
(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        )
(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        )
(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        )
where x { the independent variable which characterizes nancial ratios (ROA,
ROS, ROI, CR, FS, TR, OFR);y { the dependent variable which characterizes
the frequency of words of each semantic group (positive, negative, uncertainty,
constraining, litigious, modal); x { standard error of the mean of the
independent variable x; x { standard error of the mean of the dependent variable y [3].
This coe cient makes it possible to estimate the strength of the connection
between the two analyzed parameters. Its value varies from -1 to 1, where 1 means
the exact direct relation, and -1 { the exact inverse relation. Accordingly, if the
ratio value is 0, then there is no relation between the parameters [3]. The
connection is considered strong if the value of the coe cient falls within the interval
(0.7;1.0) or (-1.0;-0.7). The value in the intervals (0;0.3) or (-0.3;0) indicates a
weak connection between the parameters.
      </p>
      <p>fi =</p>
      <p>Ni :</p>
      <p>Nws
rxy =
xy</p>
      <p>x y
x y
;</p>
      <p>The calculation of the pair correlation coe cient can be performed using
the statistical analysis package STATISTICA using the Correlation Matrices
function. There is another way { the \Data Analysis" package in MS Excel. We
used a simpler method { selecting the function \CORREL" from the list of the
function wizard, as shown in Fig. 2.
For example, in the selected cell C15, the result of calculating the pair
correlation coe cient between the return on assets (ROA) and the share of negative
words in the nancial survey from the integrated reports of RusHydro PJSC is
displayed.
6</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Empirical Findings</title>
      <p>A general analysis of the entire sample showed that the nancial position and
the frequency of words in di erent semantic groups are interrelated weakly or
moderately in most companies. Signi cant in uence on this result was provided
by insu cient data due to a thin volume of analysis (only 5 years). In order to
show the results of the correlation analysis visually with the calculation of the
number of companies for which a certain type of correlation was detected (direct
or reverse, strong or moderate), Table 2 is formed. Here the following notation for
the types of dependence is used: Dr.Md. { direct moderate; Dr.St. { direct strong;
Rv.Md. { reverse moderate; Rv.St. { reverse strong. The numbers indicate the
number of companies in the digest that have a dependency of the corresponding
type. In the analysis, we took into account only those types of dependence, in
which the total number of companies with a moderate and strong relation in
total exceeds the value of 8 out of 30 or 25% of the total sample.</p>
      <p>According to Table 2, it can be seen that 50% of companies in the digest have
a clear positive relation between all nancial ratios and the frequency of positive
words. This situation is considered to be natural for companies, as in the case of
improving nancial condition, it is obvious that when re ecting their opinion in
the report, management will use positive words more often. As previously
mentioned, some companies use positive words to relief negative events, which can
lead to the identi cation of feedback between these indicators. There is another
obvious correlation between nancial ratios and the frequency of negative words.
Approximately 40% of companies have a reverse and strong or moderate
relation between pro tability, their own funds ratio and the proportion of negative
words in the reports. For all other nancial ratios, a similar relation is observed
only in 30% of companies. This suggests that the better the company's nancial
position, the fewer negative words are used in the reports. This is a controversial
issue, since this dependence is not found by all companies in the digest. The
relation between the frequency of uncertain words and nancial indicators is of
particular interest. This dependence is direct strong or moderate for almost all
nancial ratios for one third of the companies, and for the other third of the
companies it is inverse. For the remaining 30% of companies this dependence is
not established or is weak. This may indicate that the leadership of the rst third
of companies is about expressing their opinion with reserve and making forecasts
using more words indicating uncertainty or uncertainty in the events described,
despite the improving nancial condition. It will also be the matter-of-course
that, if there is weakening of nancial standing of the company, the number of
insecure words will increase, and vice versa, as is the case for another third of
the companies. The relation between the nancial position and the frequency of
restrictive words is reversed and is observed in 35% of companies. This con rms
our view that the increase in the number of verbal constructions indicating the
increased pressure or the emergence of new obligations and the worsening of
the nancial situation are interrelated [12]. The frequency of modal words in
the nancial results reviews for most of the companies does not have a close
connection with the nancial position of the company. But, nevertheless, as the
data in Table 2 show, for those companies where it is found, the direction of this
connection is predominantly the reverse. That is, about 25{30% of companies
with a deteriorating nancial situation often use modal words, and vice versa.
In general, the direction of this connection is irrelevant, since both the
improvement and deterioration of the nancial situation may in uence the increase or
decrease in the number of modal words with the same degree. In this case, the
value should have only the quantity, since the more of them, the better re ected
the attitude of the management to the information provided [12]. Depending on
the semantic group, in 40{50% of the companies the pro tability ratios (ROA,
ROI, ROS), as well as OFR have a closer connection with virtually all groups
of words. This suggests that the company's nancial result is estimated by the
company's management better than the nancial position. Management pays
more attention to the description of nancial results due to the greatest
popularity of information on them from stakeholders, since often the success of the
company is primarily measured by pro tability and e ciency. The conclusions
reached allow to reject a hypothesis of the investigation of H0 and to accept
the hypothesis H1. The quality of information disclosed in the annual reports of
Russian companies does not correspond to the principle of IR \reliability and
completeness". In 70% of the reports, the opinion of the management of Russian
companies does not have a clear relation with the actual values and the
dynamics of nancial ratios. These results con rm the thesis that Russian business is
not ready for open interaction with all stakeholders.
7</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>The originality of our research is the proposed empiric treatment to the
analysis of nancial information disclosed according to the principle of integrated
reporting \reliability and completeness" in integrated or annual reports of
Russian companies, combining elements of semantic and correlation analysis. Based
on the analysis of 30 largest Russian holding entities, the conclusion is that in
70% of the reports the opinion of the management of Russian companies does
not have a signi cant relation with the actual values and the dynamics of
nancial ratios and does not comply with the principle of IR \reliability and
completeness". We found for 30% of companies strong or moderate dependence
of nancial position with all groups of words, except legal or judicial, which
justi es the conclusion that the number of words of this group is not signi cant
for the purposes of forecasting the nancial position. For 50% of companies, a
strong or moderate correlation between the number of positive words and
nancial position is direct, and the number of negative words (40% of companies) is
the reverse. Correlation with restrictive words is two-way, since it can be direct
and inverse in equal proportion for di erent companies. It was also concluded
that performance measurements are more closely related to all groups of words
than nancial indicators. This suggests that management pays more attention to
describing nancial results than describing the nancial situation. In the future,
this study will be deepened by a comparative analysis of two groups of
companies with low and high scale of bankruptcy. The method of semantic analysis
used in the research by distributing words from the texts of reports on certain
groups that characterize the tonality of the text is not new. But, the possibility
of adapting this methodology for the analysis of annual reports, which in the
end will allow us to assess their compliance with the principles of IR, determines
our contribution to the development of the prospects for open interaction of
Russian business with all interested parties. In our opinion, companies need to
use a single system of nancial indicators to generate reports that can provide
an objective view of the current situation of the company, as well as to unify the
analytical interpretations of these indicators. This will eliminate the possibility
of manipulating the opinion of stakeholders by the company management.
8. Loughran, T., Mcdonald, B.: Textual analysis in accounting and nance: A survey.</p>
      <p>
        Journal of Accounting Research 54(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ), 1187{1230 (2016)
9. Malinovskaya, N.: Analysis of corporate reporting of Russian companies for
compliance with the integrated reporting principles. Economic Analysis: Theory and
Practice 45, 36{48 (2015)
10. Pisano, S., Alvino, F.: New european union's requirements and IFRS
practicestatement management commentary: Does MD&amp;A disclosure quality a ect analysts
forecasts? Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing 11(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ), 283{301 (2015)
11. Plotnikova, V.: The importance of the report on the opinion of executives on
nancial position and nancial performance of the company for stakeholders. In:
Proc. Int. Sci. Conf. Accounting, Management and Finance: Prospects for
Development Under Economic Instability. pp. 138{142. Saratov Socio-Economic Institute
of Plekhanov Russian University of Economics (2016)
12. Plotnikova, V., Shilovskaya, M.: Analysis of information disclosure in corporate
reporting in terms of compliance with integrated reporting principle strategic focus
and future orientation. Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice 16(
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ), 919{934
(2017)
13. Tennison, B.M., Ingram, R.W., Dugan, M.T.: Assessing the information content
of narrative disclosures in explaining bankruptcy. Journal of Business Finance and
Accounting 17, 391{410 (1990)
      </p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          <article-title>1. About the consolidated nancial statements</article-title>
          .
          <source>Federal Low Russian Federation</source>
          <volume>27</volume>
          .
          <fpage>07</fpage>
          .
          <year>2010</year>
          no.
          <issue>208-OC</issue>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Caserio</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Panaro</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Trucco</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Management discussion and analysis in the US nancial companies: A data mining analysis</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: Mancini</source>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Dameri</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.P.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Bonollo</surname>
          </string-name>
          , E. (eds.)
          <source>Strengthening Information and Control Systems: The Synergy Between Information Technology and Accounting Models</source>
          , pp.
          <volume>43</volume>
          {
          <fpage>57</fpage>
          . Springer International Publishing,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Cham</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2016</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dougherty</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Introduction to Econometrics: the fourth edition</article-title>
          . Oxford, New York (
          <year>2011</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4. E mova, I.:
          <article-title>Analysis of sustainable development of the company: stakeholder approach</article-title>
          .
          <source>Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice</source>
          <volume>45</volume>
          ,
          <volume>41</volume>
          {
          <fpage>52</fpage>
          (
          <year>2013</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Frazier</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ingram</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.W.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tennyson</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.M.:</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>A methodology for the analysis of narrative accounting disclosures</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Accounting Research</source>
          <volume>22</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <volume>318</volume>
          {
          <fpage>331</fpage>
          (
          <year>1984</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Goel</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Uzuner</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Do sentiments matter in fraud detection? Estimating semantic orientation of annual reports</article-title>
          .
          <source>Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management</source>
          <volume>23</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ),
          <volume>215</volume>
          {
          <fpage>239</fpage>
          (
          <year>2016</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Loughran</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>McDonald</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>When is a liability not a liability? textual analysis, dictionaries, and 10Ks</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Finance</source>
          <volume>66</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <volume>35</volume>
          {
          <fpage>65</fpage>
          (
          <year>2011</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>