<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>October</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Digital Vehicle Ecosystems and New Business Models: An Overview of Digitalization Perspectives</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Christian Kaiser</string-name>
          <email>christian.kaiser@v2c2.at</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Alexander Stocker</string-name>
          <email>alexander.stocker@v2c2.at</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Gianluigi Viscusi</string-name>
          <email>gianluigi.viscusi@epfl.ch</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Digital Vehicle, Quantified Vehicle Services, Vehicle Generated</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Data</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Connected Vehicle, Business Models, Digital Business, Innovation</addr-line>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Virtual Vehicle Research Center</institution>
          ,
          <country country="AT">Austria</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>Ecole Polytechnique Fédréale, (EPFL)</institution>
          ,
          <country country="CH">Switzerland</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2017</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>1</volume>
      <fpage>1</fpage>
      <lpage>12</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>1 The ongoing digitalization of passenger vehicles entails a rearrangement of stakeholder power relations within the automotive industry. A bunch of innovation-friendly IT start-ups - the majority of them from outside Europe - has already put energy into the development of novel quantified vehicle services for various beneficiaries, including drivers as well as third parties, challenging the traditional role of vehicle manufacturers. They gather data on how vehicles are used and offer digital products and services exploiting this data. Thereby new business models have been created within the automotive industry, causing an interesting power struggle between the various stakeholders. This paper provides a short overview on the role of the digitalization phenomenon in general, the impact of digitalization in the automotive domain through quantified vehicle start-ups and new business models, as well as a brief investigation of the position of vehicle manufacturers and their digital service strategies - all of them concluded in a comparison of value creation for business model elements.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>CCS CONCEPTS</title>
      <p>• Social and professional topics → Professional topics •
Computing and business; Automation; Economic impact</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>1 Introduction</title>
      <p>Digitalization is an important driver of service and business
model innovation in the vehicle domain. Digitalization
challenges are currently often subsumed under the more popular
term ‘connected vehicles’. Taking a look on digital services and
mobile applications, it emerges that connecting vehicles closer to
their human drivers is an increasingly requested topic of
research. Such include e.g. the detection of behavioral patterns
from data collected during self-tracking activities (e.g. conclude
from heart bpm value and GPS positions if a sport activity is
performed), which can be transferred to vehicles, too. As
vehicles capture sensory data about themselves and their
environment during operation and thereby reveal how they are
used by a driver, they can become ‘Quantified Vehicles’ [44].
Quantified vehicles represent one key result of digitalization in
the automotive industry, where incumbents have to face a key
set of competing systemic challenges spanning from innovation
capability, focus, and governance. In particular, digitalization has
enabled digital entrepreneurship [36] providing less bounded
entrepreneurial processes and outcomes and less predefinition in
entrepreneurial agency, as shown also by the rising number of
start-ups focusing on quantified vehicles [24,45].</p>
      <p>Considering the development process of successful business
models based on exploiting vehicle operation data, there is
currently a friendly competition between the major players from
Information and Communication Technology (ICT) industry
against the vehicle manufacturers on the supremacy of digital
ecosystems. ICT start-ups have already successfully transferred
the quantified-self [37,47] phenomenon to vehicles and have
launched apps and services to generate a whole new market,
while vehicle manufacturers are currently in the transition
process from vehicle manufacturers towards integrated mobility
and data service providers [24]. Thus, the digital ecosystem for
the incumbents and start-ups, which are competing in the
quantified vehicles market, have to consider industry
transformation in general, impacting on the overall digital
information assets available as well as on the sustainability of
business models.</p>
      <p>This paper aims to explore different approaches on developing
platform oriented and sustainable business models for the
occupation of digital services, probably the most lucrative
components in the future automotive industry, between the
incumbent vehicle manufacturers and the emerging tech
startups. In particular, this paper aims to identify the main actors and
roles in emerging digital ecosystems of vehicle usage data
platforms and their contribution to eventually define an
information infrastructure for an automotive industry centered
around ‘quantified vehicles’.</p>
      <p>After this introduction, the paper will provide a summary on
digitalization as well as its implications for the automotive
domain ranging in Section 2, whereas Section 3 outlines the
applied research approach. Section 4 discusses relevant digital
challenges of vehicle manufacturers and the increased
competition on the way to digital services including recent
activities within the startup ecosystem. Section 5 concludes with
an outlook and a classification of value drivers and business
model elements for each stakeholder investigated in this paper.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>2 Background and Motivations on Digitalization</title>
      <p>Digitalization is a sociotechnical process that leverages the
technical process of the encoding of analog information in a
digital format (digitizing) applied to broader social and
institutional contexts, transforming their sociotechnical
structures, thus rendering digital technologies infrastructural
[48,58]. Furthermore, digitalization depends and results in digital
artefacts characterized by attributes such as editability,
interactivity, reprogrammability / openness, distributedness [25],
also implying a shift in product design moving from modularity
to generativity [29,56,57].</p>
      <p>Quantified vehicles represent one of the key results of
digitalization in the automotive industry, where incumbents
have to face a key set of competing concerns systematically
interrelated as shown by Svahn et al. [46] through the case of
Volvo: innovation capability (existing versus requisite),
innovation focus (product versus process), innovation
collaboration (internal versus external), and innovation
governance (control versus flexibility). In particular, it is worth
noting that from a strategy perspective, the digitalization
enforces internetworking to be considered as “those business
processes/activities conducted or mediated online by and
between employees, customers, suppliers and partners of firms,
using internet-based technologies accessed through
internetbased infrastructures.” [15:224]. Besides incumbent’s
digitalization enabled by digital entrepreneurship providing less
bounded entrepreneurial processes and outcomes and less
predefinition in entrepreneurial agency [36], as shown also in
the case of the specific industry, we consider a rising number of
start-ups focusing on quantified vehicles.</p>
      <p>Taking these issues into account, the role of information and its
value are a central challenge in the competitive scenarios
emerging from digitalization as well. Consequently a key issue is
related to evaluation of the digital information asset of a
company as well as its information capacity defined as the
current stock of understandings informed by a given installed
base [51]. The key questions are: What data do I have? How is the
quality of data? Can I exploit it in their full potential? What can I
infer from it given my current systems? According to Viscusi &amp;
Batini [51] information capacity represents the potential of a
digital information asset defined and evaluated independently
from its usage, determining not only its economic value, but also
the enabling capabilities.</p>
      <p>Considering the development process of successful business
models based on exploiting vehicle data, there is a competition
between the major players from ICT industry against the vehicle
manufacturers on the supremacy of digital ecosystems. ICT
start-ups have already started to apply the quantified-self
phenomenon to vehicles and have and launched apps and
services to generate a new market, while vehicle manufacturers
are currently in the transition process from vehicle
manufacturers towards integrated mobility and data service
providers [24,45]. Yet, the digital ecosystem for the incumbents
and start-ups competing in the quantified vehicles market have
to consider another industry transformation, impacting on the
overall digital information asset available as well as the
sustainability of business models.</p>
      <p>At the state of the art, the need to build on an appropriate ICT
infrastructure, the open system integration of the energy
landscape led to its definition as “Internet of Energy” [5,27]. As a
consequence of the “Internet” metaphor, the energy related
challenges and concerns have been alternatively interpreted as a
consequence of lack of information “to enable and motivate
economic and behaviorally driven solutions” [55]. Consequently,
“energy informatics” (EI) has emerged as a new field within
information systems (IS) research to analyze, design, and
implement systems increasing the efficiency of energy demand
and supply infrastructure [55]. According to Dedrick [16]
researchers have framed the impacts of IT on the environment as
first, second, and third-order effects:
 First-order effects: direct impacts from IT hardware
during the product lifecycle, including production, use
and disposal of computer equipment.
 Second-order effects: impacts of ICTs on other processes
such as transportation or industrial production,
influencing their environmental impact.
 Third-order effects: are longer term and more dynamic
impacts, occurring when widespread use of ICTs leads
to changes in lifestyles and economic structures.</p>
      <p>Third order effects are relevant when considering the increased
use of social media transformative potential for green IS on the
demand side, encouraging better practices reducing the burden
on the environment such as, e.g., the emerging carpooling and
ridesharing applications impact on transportation coupled with
the Internet of things [30]. According to Malhotra et al. [30] this
two- way, sensor-driven communication is blurring the
boundaries between the production side and the demand side.
Furthermore, EI and IS and interdisciplinary strategies for
quantified vehicles may provide models to assess the value of
information, in particular the social value of related open data,
adopting classification frameworks such as the one proposed by
Viscusi et al. [53].</p>
      <p>Over the last twenty years, actually after the massive access to
the Internet and the World Wide Web, the interest in the
strategy concept of business model has grown, thus becoming a
key element for competing in markets characterized by extensive
use of ICTs and currently transformed by digitalization. In
general terms a business model describes the rationale of how an
organization creates, delivers, and captures value [39:14].
However business model is a multifaceted concept, still raising
debate in academia as to its definition, Massa et al. [32] provided
a systematic view on the different perspectives pointing out that
business models can be considered as i) attributes of real firms
(how firms do business), ii) cognitive/linguistic schema (how the
way firms do business is interpreted by organizational members)
and iii) formal conceptual representations/descriptions of the
former two issues. As for formal/ conceptual
representations/descriptions, Al-Debei &amp; Avison [2] identified
four key dimensions of a business model: value proposition, value
architecture, value network, value finance. Whereas as for
business models as attributes of real firms it is worth
mentioning, especially for the case we consider of automotive
industry and quantified vehicles, the definition by Zott &amp; Amit
[59], who conceptualize a business model as “a system of
interdependent activities that transcends the focal firm and spans
its boundaries. The activity system enables the firm, in concert with
its partners, to create value and also to appropriate a share of that
value”[59:216]. This definition is particularly useful for
understanding business models of companies interested in
quantified vehicles when linked to the above concept of
internetworking and current pervasiveness and strategic
relevance of digital platforms [17,18,40,57].</p>
      <p>As argued by Nambisan [35:217], IT can act as either an operand
resource “(often tangible and static) that an actor acts on to
obtain support for executing a task”, or as an operant resource
“(often intangible and dynamic) that act on other resources to
produce effects”. Accordingly, in a case a digital platform can be
considered an enabler of innovation processes and outcomes;
whereas, in the other case, it acts as a trigger, informing rather
than being informed by the users. Considering the automotive
sectors and especially quantified vehicles, despite the “analysing”
stance of the main market players, a set of traditional and new
business models can be applied [44], in particular the
infomediary one [1,41] can be adopted under a utility
perspective [42] and extended from data collection for, e.g.,
marketing purpose to data useful for social value, as capability
and functionings they enable [52,53], and finally for
sustainability issues. Besides environmental and societal issues,
business sustainability refers to “business models and managerial
decisions that create value over the short, medium, and long
terms, based on mutually beneficial interactions between the
company’s value chain and the social and environmental
systems on which it depends” [28:18]. Furthermore, according to
Boons &amp; Ldüeke -Freund [14:14] a business model perspective
may contribute to a sustainable innovation agenda to overcome
internal and external barriers. Also, Schaltegger et al. [43:6]
points out that a business model for sustainability “helps
describing, analyzing, managing, and communicating (i) a
company’s sustainable value proposition to its customers, and all
other stakeholders, (ii) how it creates and delivers this value, (iii)
and how it captures economic value while maintaining or
regenerating natural, social, and economic capital beyond its
organizational boundaries.” Thus, considering the automotive
industry and the potential transformation enforced by digital
innovation and quantified vehicles, business model innovation
can open different horizons and path impacting the
sustainability of companies, although how they can innovate
their business models toward greater sustainability still need to
be significantly addressed in research and practice [21:221]. Still,
business model innovation in automotive industry asks for
understanding the different ways the various actors can follow
to innovate their business models; in particular, as pointed out
by Massa &amp; Tucci [31:424], business model design in newly
formed organizations, which refers to their “entrepreneurial
activity of creating, implementing and validating a business
model”, and business model reconfiguration in incumbent firms,
encompassing the reconfiguration and eventual acquisition of
organizational resources to change an existing business model.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>3 Research Approach</title>
      <p>This paper is aimed to provide an overview of innovative ICT
start-ups towards establishing new services and sustainable
business models. Besides that, selected digitalization initiatives
of German and Italian vehicle manufactures are analyzed. The
authors conducted a lightweight online market research
approach analyzing information available on the Web. They
used a combination of the terms car, vehicle, connected,
quantified, start-up and vehicle in search engines to capture the
current developments in the start-up domain.</p>
      <p>After having identified major quantified vehicle start-ups, two
authors studied the start-up websites in detail to find out more
about their visions and goals as well as about their business
models, products and services. Two out of the three authors
reviewed the websites of all start-ups and discussed their
knowledge with the third author afterwards to come to a
common understanding. The information was then validated in
discussions within the AEGIS project2 consortium as well.
Furthermore the authors used crunchbase.com to capture
additional meta-information on business and funding, where the
authors revealed interesting facts on investments into tech
startups as well as of strategic partnerships.</p>
      <p>As for the manufacturers for the countries considered, the
authors carried out a market research on the websites of
industry organizations, press news, and magazines, apart from
policy documents from European Union organizations. They
especially paid attention to review the current digital services of
vehicle manufacturers by taking into account the content on the
various product websites, which is expected to be up to date.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>4 Results: Digitalization in the Automotive Industry</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>4.1 Overview</title>
      <p>Digitally-enhanced driving is an emerging topic, which can be
counted to the heavily used umbrella terms ‘connected
cars’/’connected vehicles’ or ‘connected driving’. According to a
definition from PWC [49] in their 2016 connected car report,
connected vehicles are defined as vehicles that have access to the
Internet and a variety of sensors, and that are thus able to send
and receive signals, sense the physical environment around
them, and interact with other vehicles or entities. According to
this report, revenues in the automotive industry (will) shift from
hardware to software, from products to services, and from old to
2 https://www.aegis-bigdata.eu/ last accessed 25.08.2017
new economy. The report highlights four trends changing the
automotive competition:
 radically new technology at low price (increase in vehicle to
infrastructure connectivity (e.g. through 5G), increase in
computing speed to operate artificial intelligence for
selfdriving, evolution of low cost sensors to make a vehicle
aware of its surroundings),
 shorter innovation cycles by new high-tech entrants
(nontraditional tech companies to offer new services as add-ons
to automobiles and disrupt traditional vehicle value chain,
Apple to invest $10 billion into an iCar, Google’s
selfdriving vehicles to drive more than 1,5 million miles,
datacentric business models depend on revenues from ongoing
services and the sale of information),
 new mobility concepts and increasingly urban customers
(urban residents to lose interest in owning vehicles,
millennials in cities to face affordability issues, movements
towards vehicle sharing and ride sharing, expectations of
highly sophisticated levels of connectivity and services),
and
evolving regulatory and policy constraints (policy and
regulations to lack behind the technological process, expect
regulators to respond with laws ensuring the safety of
driverless vehicles, cities to discourage the use of
nonelectric private vehicles).</p>
      <p>The PWC report further differentiates three main categories for
technologies and services for connected vehicles:
 Consumer services such as internet and cloud based digital
services that add to driving experiences,
 Connected vehicle packages with feature to improve or help
managing the vehicle’s operation, and
Supply-side technologies as underlying systems connecting
the vehicle to the wider world.</p>
      <p>
        Another report from McKinsey [22] on the connected vehicle
trend estimates a global market size of 170 billion EUR to 180
billion EUR for vehicle connectivity in 2020. This report foresees
connectivity to trigger a redistribution of automotive revenue
pools except vehicle oper
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">ations – based on a survey of 2000</xref>
        vehicle buyers. McKinsey perceives human-machine-interface
(larger screens, multiple screens, innovative UIs, Augmented
Reality), vehicle condition data (for offering maintenance and
insurance services), and dynamic real-time geo-information
(oligopoly of TomTom, Here, and Google) to become key control
points in this redistribution. This report has identified five
different groups of vehicle buyers: maxed-out vehicle
enthusiasts, integration and entertainment lovers, safe and
secure navigators, purists/minimalists and price conscious
traditionalists, each group with own preferences and attitudes
towards connectivity-related features. Along with the
preliminary market analysis a 1st competition analysis is
provided.According to the McKinsey report, the connected
vehicle ecosystem of the future will be highly influenced by
additional players including digital players, telecom players and
insurers.





      </p>
      <p>Vehicle manufacturers explore ways to exploit the
connected vehicle into the provisioning of a software
operating system to serve as a platform for a potential app
store, as well as into the development of specific apps and
services.</p>
      <p>Automotive suppliers want to establish direct relationships
with the end customers of vehicles produced by vehicle
manufacturers who they supply.</p>
      <p>Digital players adapt their smartphone platforms to
vehiclespecific customer needs and to integrate their infotainment
into vehicle systems.</p>
      <p>Telecom players see new opportunities in terms of
infrastructures, while SIM cards are installed in vehicles.
Insurers expect new opportunities while e.g. offering
telematics-based coverage options.</p>
      <p>We can expect a huge power struggle between all players –
including vehicle manufacturers – on who will reap most value
from the connected vehicle market. According to the problem
statement of the AutoMat project3 coordinated by Volkswagen
Research, the automotive industry has not yet been able to
successfully establish an ecosystem for smart driving
applications equivalent to that of smartphone manufacturers
[24]. In its prior problem statement, the AutoMat project
mentions three reasons why vehicle manufacturers are currently
struggling: (i) Brand-specific business approaches dominate, and
as a consequence there is a lack of brand-independent vehicle
lifecycle data, (ii) current proprietary vehicle services focus on
the individual customer, which results in privacy concerns, and
few ideas exist how anonymized vehicle data can be used to
establish other services, and (iii) the implied or required
collaboration between vehicle manufacturers on vehicle data and
services is considered risky in terms of competition.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>4.2 The Business Models of US Start-ups</title>
      <p>The IT industry of the USA has already lined up a series of tech
start-ups backed by risk capital, reaching more than 20 million
USD in some cases, demonstrating how high investors perceive
the market value of an ecosystem built on exploiting vehicle data
[24]. The majority of start-ups including automatic.com,
automile.com, dash.by, moj.io, vin.li, zubie.com to name a few
capture vehicle operation data through the On-board diagnostics
(OBD) interface of the vehicle which is originally intended to
provide a repair technician access to the status of the various
vehicle subsystems and diagnostic information.</p>
      <p>These connected vehicle start-ups have specialized in capturing,
storing, and analyzing large quantities of vehicle operation data
and offering digital services in smartphone applications to
motivate the driver for sharing valuable driving data. The
majority of start-ups are currently capable of automatically
extracting interesting driving events using computational
intelligence including e.g. hard brakes, hard accelerations or
speeding to name a few. These events are hidden in the gathered
vehicle operation data (time series data) and have to be revealed
3 http://automat-project.eu last accessed 17.08.2017
through applying big data analytics. Mobile applications running
on the driver’s smartphone then pull the results from the
startup’s datacenter and then visualize them on the driver’s
smartphone or tablet. The majority of these start-ups provide
mobile apps connected to the OBD interface of the vehicle via
Bluetooth with very similar functionality to the driver: These
include for instance means to drive smarter by unlocking
diagnostics and real-time data and greener by using the app for
gaining an overview on how driving habits influence fuel
consumptions (dash.by), make the vehicle smarter by revealing
insights of vehicle data and providing driving stats
(automatic.com), or delivering real time location, trip history,
maintenance alerts, engine diagnostics and driving insights
(zubie.com).
Another interesting tech-startup recently receiving amongst
others a huge investment from BMW i Ventures is Zendrive.com
[13]. Zendrive is taking advantage of the sensors built into
modern smartphones to capture smartphone sensor data while
driving, and provide cloud-enabled driving analytics aiming at
safer drivers as well as on safer roads by using gamification
features. According to the business information platform
crunchbase.com a bulk of investors of these start-ups stems from
the insurance industry, too.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-8">
      <title>4.3 Digital Services of Vehicle Manufacturers</title>
      <p>German vehicle manufacturers including AUDI, BMW,
DAIMLER, and VOLKSWAGEN currently offer some
digital/connected services. These services allow for instance
accessing some vehicle functions through the drivers’
smartphone via mobile apps (e.g. lock/unlock the vehicle),
vehicles conducting (semi-) automatic calls for emergencies in
case of a detected accident, roadside assistance, or allowing
(stolen) vehicle location via mobile apps to name a few.
Their offer surely is expected to increase, taking also into
account new strategic partnerships as well as investments into
connected vehicle start-ups. For instance BMW i Ventures[10]
heavily invests into tech start-ups aiming to facilitate safer
driving including e.g. Zendrive.com (providing
smartphonepowered driving analytics including statistics and gamification),
or Nauto.com (multi-sensor device to monitor the driving
behavior including statistics especially for safety relevant events.
Moreover BMW [11] has recently teamed up with IBM in its
activity to deploy the vehicle data platform and to enhance it
with analytics features [23].</p>
      <p>The following subsections summarize information on USP and
the different services captured from the various product websites
of German vehicle manufacturers and published studies like
Karlsson et al. [26]:
4.3.1 AUDI
“Innovative services and functions that connect drivers with their
Audi and the world: that is Audi connect. myAudi and the Audi
connect services make driving even more relaxing and safer.”
Source: [8]
“The term “Audi connect” covers all applications and
developments that connect Audi vehicles to their drivers, the
internet, transportation infrastructure and other vehicles. Audi is
continually building up its lineup of products and services in this
technical area – with new solutions such as the Audi connect
SIM and the traffic light information service for the US market.”
[9]
4.3.2 BMW
“BMW Connected is a personal mobility assistant which facilitates
everyday mobility and assists drivers in reaching their destinations
relaxed and on time. Mobility-relevant information such as
recommendations for optimal departure times are available
remotely via smartphone or smartwatch and can be seamlessly
transferred into the vehicle.”
BMW ConnectedDrive [12]:
 Remote Services: Locking and unlocking the vehicle,
indicate the vehicle’s location by honking the horn or
flashing the lights, or on a map in the app. Activate the
vehicle's climate control immediately or on schedule.
 Concierge Services: Select travel destinations and get
information, connect with call-center agents to look for
nearest services or to book services, addresses sent directly
to navigation system.
 Real Time Traffic Information: Information about the
current traffic situation, calculate expected delays and
recommend detours, on street parking information.
 Intelligent Emergency Call: If an airbag is deployed, the
BMW Call Centre is contacted via an accident-proof
telephone unit permanently installed in the vehicle, precise
position of vehicle is communicated including relevant
accidental data.
</p>
      <p>Digital Services: With BMW CarData a vehicle owner can
view the key vehicle data and share them with third parties
if required.</p>
      <sec id="sec-8-1">
        <title>4.3.4 VOLKSWAGEN</title>
        <p>“VW Car-Net® makes your Volkswagen more like a friend. It gives
advice, helps you along the way, entertains you, and watches out
for you. It connects you to the world outside all from the comfort of
your driver’s seat. VW Car-Net is your partner in drive.”
VW Car-Net [54]:
 Via app-connected drivers can access select smartphone
apps right from their dash.
 Guide &amp; Inform Services via SiriusXM® Traffic subscription
and SiriusXM® Travel Link</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-8-2">
        <title>4.3.5 Fiat Chrysler Automobiles (FCA)</title>
        <p>In order to not exclusively look at German vehicle
manufacturers, at the glance some of the main initiatives by the
Italian-controlled multinational corporation Fiat Chrysler
Automobiles (FCA), oriented towards consumers and dealers are
discussed in the following. As for consumers, it is worth
mentioning the Uconnect® navigation, entertainment (with
CarPlay [6] to use iPhone while driving by putting his
applications and functions on the vehicle’s built-in display) and
communication system that allows drivers to being connected
while driving and paying attention to the road and related events
[19]. Moreover, apart from CarPlay and iPhone, FCA is
collaborating with Google to integrate the Android open-source
platform with the Uconnect 8.4-inch connected system [8].
Considering now dealers, The FCA Dealer Digital Programme is
a collection of tools, process, and support channels aiming at
coordinating the action by the different partners and acting in
the digital space in order to enable the engagement of local
inmarket shoppers to increase selling [20]. Furthermore, the FCA
Dealer Digital Websites are the only sites having traffic directly
from the brand website’s dealer locator, thus increasing through
this connection their visibility in search results on the main
search engines such as e.g. Google also through the support of
FCA Dealer Digital Advertising (DDA) Programme [20], a
onestop shop for digital advertising campaigns connecting dealers to
Certified Providers with national coverage and extensive digital</p>
        <p>
          Automotive industry expertise helping dealers in digital
marketing and sales. This connection to the brand websites is
aimed not only to increase marketing and selling activities, but
also to improve integration with FCA in terms of timely updates
of assets, campaigns, pricing and inventory. However, this
integration, each Dealer Digital Website site, can be customized
according to the value proposition of the dealer brand [20].
The FCA effort in digitization of customers’ experience and
dealers services represents the basis for moving from connected
to self-driving vehicles as shown by the partnership with Google
and the announcement in the sprin
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref42">g of 2016</xref>
          , that they would
build 100 self- driving Chrysler Pacifica hybrids minivans,
formerly tested in Arizona, California and Michigan.
Furthermore, Google's self-driving vehicle project, Waymo, has
announced in April 2017 a program on larger scale in Phoenix
program using the FCA 500 Pacifica minivans, allowing
hundreds of people in Phoenix applying on Waymo's website to
ride in the vehicles in order to get feedback on the experience.
[7]
        </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-9">
      <title>5 Conclusion</title>
      <p>Digitalization is an unstoppable trend in the automotive industry
in general and increasingly observable by the driver. In modern
passenger vehicles, drivers can connect to the cloud, where
services to drivers and other stakeholders are provided. Thereby
three approaches have been discovered:
 Brand dependent assistance services, which provide access
to vehicle functions and services via smartphone. Users
thereby get access to vehicle functions via apps.
 Brand-independent apps and services, often as components
of data ecosystems with several stakeholders, which provide
transparency on driving data to be used e.g. in driving
behavior analytics.
 Strategic alliances of vehicle manufacturers with ICT firms
(e.g. BMW teams up with IBM) to establish services &amp;
business models on how to make value out of vehicle data.
As pointed out by Zott &amp; Amit [60] digitalization is strictly
connected to product innovation and its acting both at business
and customers/users side asks for new ideas and business models
design in the case of start-ups and/or reconfiguration for vehicle
manufacturer [31]. Following the perspective by Amit and Zott
[3,4,59] of business model as an activity system that defines the
way a company does business, whose elements are content (the
‘What?’), structure (the ‘How?’), and governance (the ‘Who?’) and
its value drivers are novelty, lock-in, complementarities, and
efficiency,
Table 1 identifies business model’s elements and value drivers
for start-ups and vehicle manufacturers (termed OEM for
Original Equipment Manufacturers, in gray) discussed in
previous Sections. Vehicle manufacturers seem more oriented
towards governance and the exploitation of complementarities
as value drivers (thus confirming a platform orientation as
business model [40]), with Volkswagen targeting novelty for
customers through business model innovation at content level
and FCA using it for efficiency and lock-in at dealers level. As to
this issue, the resulting ecosystems show a relevance of digital
(entrants) players as partners and a focus of FCA on the
inclusion of dealers as a key part of its value constellation [38]
rather than value chain, through internetworking. As for the
start-ups, the ones considered appears to focus on ‘structure’ as
business model element by mostly targeting (quite surprisingly)
efficiency as value driver instead of novelty, thus having an
execution orientation rather than a differentiation one to digital
business [50].</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-10">
      <title>Acknowledgement</title>
      <p>The AEGIS project has received funding from the European
Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under
grant agreement No 732189. The document reflects only the
author’s views and the Commission is not responsible for any
use that may be made of information contained therein.
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
[16]
[17]
[18]
[19]
[20]
[21]
[22]
[23]
[24]
[25]
[26]
[27]
[28]
[29]</p>
      <p>Volkswagen. 2017. Volkswagen car-net. Retrieved August 14, 2017 from
http://www.vwcarnetconnect.com/
Richard T. Watson, Marie-Claude Boudreau, and Adela J. Chen. 2010.
Information systems and environmentally sustainable development:
energy informatics and new directions for the is community. MIS
Quarterly 34, 1: 23–38. https://doi.org/Article
Youngjin Yoo. 2013. The Tables Have Turned: How Can the Information
Systems Field Contribute to Technology and Innovation Management
Research?. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 14: 227–
236.</p>
      <p>Youngjin Yoo, Richard J Boland, Kalle Lyytinen, and Ann Majchrzak.
2012. Organizing for Innovation in the Digitized World. Organization
Science 23, 5: 1398–1408. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0771
Youngjin Yoo, Kalle J. Lyytinen, Richard J. Boland, and Nicholas
Berente. 2010. The Next Wave of Digital Innovation: Opportunities and
Challenges: A Report on the Research Workshop “Digital Challenges in
Innovation Research” (June 8, 2010). SSRN. Retrieved May 12, 2017 from
https://ssrn.com/abstract=1622170 or
http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1622170
Christoph Zott and Raphael Amit. 2010. Business model design: an
activity system perspective. Long range planning 43, 2–3: 216–226.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.004
Christoph Zott and Raphael Amit. 2017. Business Model Innovation:
How to Create Value in a Digital World. GfK Marketing Intelligence
Review 9, 1: 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1515/gfkmir-2017-0003</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Afuah</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Tucci</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2000</year>
          .
          <article-title>Internet Business Models and Strategies</article-title>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mutaz M Al-Debei</surname>
            and
            <given-names>David</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Avison</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2010</year>
          .
          <article-title>Developing a unified framework of the business model concept</article-title>
          .
          <source>European Journal of Information Systems</source>
          <volume>19</volume>
          :
          <fpage>359</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>376</lpage>
          . https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.
          <year>2010</year>
          .21
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Raphael</given-names>
            <surname>Amit</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Christoph</given-names>
            <surname>Zott</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2012</year>
          .
          <article-title>Creating value through business model innovation</article-title>
          .
          <source>MIT Sloan Management Review</source>
          <volume>53</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>3</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Raphael</given-names>
            <surname>Amit</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Christopher</given-names>
            <surname>Zott</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2001</year>
          .
          <article-title>Value creation in E-business.</article-title>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          <source>Strategic Management Journal</source>
          <volume>22</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>6</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>7</lpage>
          :
          <fpage>493</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>520</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hans-Jürgen</surname>
            <given-names>Appelrath</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Orestis Terzidis, and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Christof</given-names>
            <surname>Weinhardt</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2012</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          <article-title>Internet of Energy - ICT as a Key Technology for the Energy System of the Future</article-title>
          .
          <source>Business &amp; Information Systems Engineering</source>
          <volume>4</volume>
          ,
          <issue>1</issue>
          :
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>2</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Apple</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2017</year>
          . CarPlay. Retrieved from https://www.apple.com/ios/carplay/available-models/ Associated Press. Fiat Chrysler,
          <article-title>Google Begin Offering Rides in Selfdriving Cars</article-title>
          .
          <source>VOA. Retrieved August 15</source>
          ,
          <year>2017</year>
          from https://www.voanews.com/a/fiat-chrysler
          <string-name>
            <surname>-</surname>
          </string-name>
          self-drivingcars/3824581.html Audi.
          <year>2017</year>
          .
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Audi</given-names>
            <surname>Connect</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <source>Retrieved August 14</source>
          ,
          <year>2017</year>
          from http://www.audi.com/en/innovation/connect.html Audi.
          <year>2017</year>
          .
          <article-title>Audi connect and infotainment</article-title>
          .
          <source>Retrieved August 14</source>
          ,
          <year>2017</year>
          from https://audi-illustrated.com/en/CES-2016/
          <article-title>Audi-connect-undInfotainment BMW</article-title>
          .
          <year>2017</year>
          .
          <article-title>BMW i Ventures</article-title>
          .
          <source>Retrieved August 14</source>
          ,
          <year>2017</year>
          from www.
          <source>bmwiventures.com/portfolio BMW</source>
          .
          <year>2017</year>
          . BMW Cardata.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>BMW.</surname>
          </string-name>
          <year>2017</year>
          .
          <article-title>BMW Connected Drive</article-title>
          .
          <source>Retrieved August 14</source>
          ,
          <year>2017</year>
          from https://www.bmw.com/en/topics/fascination-bmw/connecteddrive/overview.html BMW Group.
          <year>2014</year>
          .
          <article-title>BMW i Ventures announces strategic investment in Zendrive</article-title>
          .
          <source>Retrieved August 14</source>
          ,
          <year>2017</year>
          from https://www.press.bmwgroup.com/usa/article/detail/T0196902EN_US/
          <article-title>b mw-i-ventures-announces-strategic-investment-inzendrive?language=en_US Frank Boons</article-title>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Florian</given-names>
            <surname>Lüdeke-Freund</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2013</year>
          .
          <article-title>Business models for sustainable innovation: state-of-the-art and steps towards a research agenda</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Cleaner Production</source>
          <volume>45</volume>
          :
          <fpage>9</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>19</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.
          <year>2012</year>
          .
          <volume>07</volume>
          .007
          <string-name>
            <surname>Peter J Brews and Christopher L Tucci</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2007</year>
          .
          <article-title>The structural and performance effects of internetworking</article-title>
          .
          <source>Long Range Planning</source>
          <volume>40</volume>
          ,
          <issue>2</issue>
          :
          <fpage>223</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>243</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Jason</given-names>
            <surname>Dedrick</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2010</year>
          .
          <string-name>
            <surname>Green</surname>
            <given-names>IS</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Concepts and issues for information systems research</article-title>
          .
          <source>Communications of the Association for Information Systems</source>
          <volume>27</volume>
          :
          <fpage>173</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>184</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Thomas</given-names>
            <surname>Eisenmann</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Geoffrey Parker, and Marshall Van Alstyne.
          <year>2011</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          <article-title>Platform envelopment</article-title>
          .
          <source>Strategic Management Journal</source>
          <volume>32</volume>
          ,
          <volume>12</volume>
          :
          <fpage>1270</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1285</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.935 Thomas R Eisenmann, Geoffrey Parker, and Marshall W. Van Alstyne.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          2006.
          <article-title>Strategies for Two-Sided Markets</article-title>
          . Harvard Business Review October:
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>12</lpage>
          . https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-006
          <source>-0114-6 FCA</source>
          .
          <year>2017</year>
          .
          <article-title>u-connect</article-title>
          .
          <source>Retrieved August 15</source>
          ,
          <year>2017</year>
          from https://www.driveuconnect.eu/en/features/controls FCA.
          <year>2017</year>
          .
          <article-title>FCA Dealer Digital Programme</article-title>
          .
          <source>Retrieved August 15</source>
          ,
          <year>2017</year>
          from http://www.fcadealerdigital.com/ Nicolai J Foss and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Tina</given-names>
            <surname>Saebi</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2016</year>
          .
          <article-title>Fifteen Years of Research on Business Model Innovation</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Management</source>
          <volume>43</volume>
          ,
          <issue>1</issue>
          :
          <fpage>200</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>227</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316675927 Andreas Habeck, John Newman, Michele Bertoncello, Matthias Kässer, Florian Weig, Martin Hehensteiger, Julian Hlöz, Ralf Plattfaut, Chad Wegner, Michal Guminski, and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Zexiong</given-names>
            <surname>Yan</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2014</year>
          .
          <article-title>Connected Car, automotive value chain unbound</article-title>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>IBM.</surname>
          </string-name>
          <year>2017</year>
          .
          <article-title>IBM Integrates with BMW CarData to Enable New and Innovative Services for Drivers</article-title>
          .
          <source>News Releases. Retrieved August 14</source>
          ,
          <year>2017</year>
          from www-
          <volume>03</volume>
          .ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/52595.wss
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C</given-names>
            <surname>Kaiser</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>A Stocker</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Gianluigi</given-names>
            <surname>Viscusi</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A</given-names>
            <surname>Festl</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <article-title>P Mrötl, and M Glitz ner</article-title>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>
          2017.
          <article-title>Quantified Cars: An exploration of the position of ICT start-ups vs. car manufacturers towards digital car services and sustainable business models</article-title>
          .
          <source>In 2nd International Conference on New Business Models (NBM2017).</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Jannis</given-names>
            <surname>Kallinikos</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Aleksi Aaltonen, and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Attila</given-names>
            <surname>Marton</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2013</year>
          .
          <article-title>The ambivalent ontology of digital artifacts</article-title>
          .
          <source>MISQuarterly 37</source>
          ,
          <issue>2</issue>
          :
          <fpage>357</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>370</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref19">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Per-Henrik</surname>
            <given-names>Karlsson</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Hong Kyu Ahn, and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Byeongmin</given-names>
            <surname>Choi</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2016</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref20">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Connected</given-names>
            <surname>CAr</surname>
          </string-name>
          . Retrieved from https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/2016-06/022.1
          <article-title>-connected-cara-new-ecosystem.pdf Stamatis Karnouskos</article-title>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Orestis</given-names>
            <surname>Terzidis</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2007</year>
          .
          <article-title>Towards an information infrastructure for the future Internet of energy</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Communication in Distributed Systems (KiVS)</source>
          ,
          <source>2007 ITG-GI Conference</source>
          ,
          <volume>1</volume>
          -
          <fpage>6</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref21">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Florian</given-names>
            <surname>Ldu</surname>
          </string-name>
          ̈
          <fpage>eke</fpage>
          -Freund, Lorenzo Massa, Nancy Bocken, Alan Brent, and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Josephine</given-names>
            <surname>Musango</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2016</year>
          .
          <article-title>Business models for shared value: Main Report</article-title>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref22">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Kalle</given-names>
            <surname>Lyytinen</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Youngjin Yoo, and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Richard J Boland</given-names>
            <surname>Jr</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2016</year>
          .
          <article-title>Digital product innovation within four classes of innovation networks</article-title>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref23">
        <mixed-citation>
          <source>Information Systems Journal</source>
          <volume>26</volume>
          ,
          <issue>1</issue>
          :
          <fpage>47</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>75</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref24">
        <mixed-citation>
          https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12093 Arvind Malhotra, Nigel P Melville, and Richard T Watson.
          <year>2013</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref25">
        <mixed-citation>
          <source>Spurring Impactful Research on Information Systems for Environmental Sustainability. MIS Quarterly 37</source>
          ,
          <issue>4</issue>
          :
          <fpage>1265</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1274</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref26">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Lorenzo</given-names>
            <surname>Massa and Christopher L. Tucci</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2014</year>
          .
          <article-title>Business Model Innovation</article-title>
          .
          <source>In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation Management.</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref27">
        <mixed-citation>
          https://doi.org/0.1093/oxfordhb/9780199694945.013.002
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Lorenzo</given-names>
            <surname>Massa</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Christopher L.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tucci</surname>
            , and
            <given-names>Allan</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Afuah</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2017</year>
          .
          <article-title>A Critical Assessment of Business Model Research</article-title>
          .
          <source>Academy of Management Annals</source>
          <volume>11</volume>
          ,
          <issue>1</issue>
          :
          <fpage>73</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>104</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref28">
        <mixed-citation>
          https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.
          <year>2014</year>
          .0072 Mercedes.
          <year>2017</year>
          .
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Mercedes</given-names>
            <surname>Me</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <source>Retrieved August 14</source>
          ,
          <year>2017</year>
          from https://www.mercedes-benz.com/en/mercedes-me/ Mercedes.
          <year>2017</year>
          .
          <article-title>Mercedes Me Connect</article-title>
          .
          <source>Retrieved August 14</source>
          ,
          <year>2017</year>
          from https://www.mercedes-benz.com/en/mercedes-me/connectivity/ Satish Nambisan.
          <year>2013</year>
          . Information Technology and Product / Service Innovation 
          <article-title>: A Brief Assessment and Some Suggestions for Future Research</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of the Association for Information Systems</source>
          <volume>14</volume>
          :
          <fpage>215</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>226</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref29">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Satish</given-names>
            <surname>Nambisan</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2016</year>
          .
          <article-title>Digital Entrepreneurship: Toward a Digital Technology Perspective of Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice: n/a-n/a</article-title>
          . https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12254
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Gina</given-names>
            <surname>Neff</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Dawn</given-names>
            <surname>Nafus</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2016</year>
          .
          <article-title>Self-Tracking.</article-title>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref30">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R</given-names>
            <surname>Normann and R Ramìrez</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>1994</year>
          .
          <article-title>Designing interactive strategy: from value chain to value constellation</article-title>
          . Wiley,Chichester.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref31">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Alexander</given-names>
            <surname>Osterwalder</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Yves</given-names>
            <surname>Pigneur</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2010</year>
          .
          <article-title>Business Model Generation</article-title>
          . John Wiley &amp; Sons.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref32">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Geoffrey G Parker</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Marshall W Van Alstyne</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , and Sangeet Paul Choudary.
          <year>2016</year>
          .
          <article-title>Platform revolution: How networked markets are transforming the economy-and how to make them work for you</article-title>
          .
          <source>WW Norton &amp; Company.</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref33">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Rappa</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2001</year>
          .
          <article-title>Business models on the web: Managing the digital enterprise. Retrieved from digitalenterprise</article-title>
          .org/models/models.html
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M. A.</given-names>
            <surname>Rappa</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2004</year>
          .
          <article-title>The utility business model and the future of computing services</article-title>
          .
          <source>IBM Systems Journal</source>
          <volume>43</volume>
          ,
          <issue>1</issue>
          :
          <fpage>32</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>42</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref34">
        <mixed-citation>
          https://doi.org/10.1147/sj.431.0032
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Stefan</given-names>
            <surname>Schaltegger</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Florian Lüdeke-Freund, and Erik G Hansen.
          <year>2016</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref35">
        <mixed-citation>
          <article-title>Business Models for Sustainability</article-title>
          .
          <source>Organization &amp; Environment</source>
          <volume>29</volume>
          ,
          <issue>3</issue>
          :
          <fpage>264</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>289</lpage>
          . https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026616633272
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Andrew</given-names>
            <surname>Shipilov</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2016</year>
          .
          <article-title>Why Aren't Automakers Embracing Digital Business Models? Harvard Business Review</article-title>
          ,
          <source>December</source>
          <volume>30</volume>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref36">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Alexander</given-names>
            <surname>Stocker</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Christian</given-names>
            <surname>Kaiser</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Michael</given-names>
            <surname>Fellmann</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2017</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref37">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Quantified</given-names>
            <surname>Vehicles</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <source>Business &amp; Information Systems Engineering</source>
          <volume>59</volume>
          ,
          <issue>2</issue>
          :
          <fpage>125</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>130</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref38">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Fredrik</given-names>
            <surname>Svahn</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Lars Mathiassen, and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Rikard</given-names>
            <surname>Lindgren</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2017</year>
          .
          <article-title>Embracing digital innovation in incumbent firms: How Volvo cars managed competing concerns</article-title>
          .
          <source>MIS Quarterly 41</source>
          ,
          <issue>1</issue>
          :
          <fpage>239</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>253</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref39">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Melanie</given-names>
            <surname>Swan</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2013</year>
          .
          <article-title>The quantified self: Fundamental disruption in big data science and biological discovery</article-title>
          .
          <source>Big Data</source>
          <volume>1</volume>
          ,
          <issue>2</issue>
          :
          <fpage>85</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>99</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref40">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>David</given-names>
            <surname>Tilson</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Kalle</given-names>
            <surname>Lyytinen</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Carsten</given-names>
            <surname>Sørensen</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2010</year>
          .
          <article-title>Digital Infrastructures: The Missing IS Research Agenda</article-title>
          .
          <source>Information Systems Research</source>
          <volume>21</volume>
          ,
          <issue>4</issue>
          :
          <fpage>748</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>759</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref41">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Baker</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2016</year>
          .
          <article-title>Connected car report 2016: Opportunities, risk, and turmoil on the road to autonomous vehicles</article-title>
          . Retrieved from http://www.strategyand.pwc.com/reports/connected-car-2016
          <string-name>
            <surname>-study</surname>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Viscusi</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2015</year>
          .
          <article-title>Digital business innovation: roadmaps and attitudes from a FutureEnterprise perspective</article-title>
          .
          <source>Génie Logiciel</source>
          <volume>115</volume>
          :
          <fpage>36</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>41</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref42">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>Viscusi</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Batini</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2014</year>
          .
          <article-title>Digital Information Asset Evaluation: Characteristics and Dimensions</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Smart Organizations and Smart Artifacts SE - 9 (Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation)</source>
          ,
          <fpage>77</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>86</lpage>
          . https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-
          <fpage>319</fpage>
          -07040-
          <issue>7</issue>
          _9
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>Viscusi</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Batini</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2016</year>
          .
          <article-title>Information Production and Social Value for Public Policy: A Conceptual Modeling Perspective</article-title>
          .
          <source>Policy &amp; Internet</source>
          <volume>8</volume>
          ,
          <issue>3</issue>
          :
          <fpage>334</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>353</lpage>
          . https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.121
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>Viscusi</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            <surname>Castelli</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Batini</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2014</year>
          .
          <article-title>Assessing social value in open data initiatives: a framework</article-title>
          .
          <source>Future Internet</source>
          <volume>6</volume>
          ,
          <issue>3</issue>
          :
          <fpage>498</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>517</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref43">
        <mixed-citation>https://doi.org/10.3390/fi6030498 [55] [57] [59]</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>