Digital Vehicle Ecosystems and New Business Models: An Overview of Digitalization Perspectives Christian Kaiser Alexander Stocker Gianluigi Viscusi Virtual Vehicle Research Center Virtual Vehicle Research Center École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne Austria Austria (EPFL) christian.kaiser@v2c2.at alexander.stocker@v2c2.at Switzerland gianluigi.viscusi@epfl.ch 1 from heart bpm value and GPS positions if a sport activity is ABSTRACT performed), which can be transferred to vehicles, too. As The ongoing digitalization of passenger vehicles entails a vehicles capture sensory data about themselves and their rearrangement of stakeholder power relations within the environment during operation and thereby reveal how they are automotive industry. A bunch of innovation-friendly IT start-ups used by a driver, they can become ‘Quantified Vehicles’ [44]. - the majority of them from outside Europe - has already put Quantified vehicles represent one key result of digitalization in energy into the development of novel quantified vehicle services the automotive industry, where incumbents have to face a key for various beneficiaries, including drivers as well as third set of competing systemic challenges spanning from innovation parties, challenging the traditional role of vehicle manufacturers. capability, focus, and governance. In particular, digitalization has They gather data on how vehicles are used and offer digital enabled digital entrepreneurship [36] providing less bounded products and services exploiting this data. Thereby new business entrepreneurial processes and outcomes and less predefinition in models have been created within the automotive industry, entrepreneurial agency, as shown also by the rising number of causing an interesting power struggle between the various start-ups focusing on quantified vehicles [24,45]. stakeholders. This paper provides a short overview on the role of Considering the development process of successful business the digitalization phenomenon in general, the impact of models based on exploiting vehicle operation data, there is digitalization in the automotive domain through quantified currently a friendly competition between the major players from vehicle start-ups and new business models, as well as a brief Information and Communication Technology (ICT) industry investigation of the position of vehicle manufacturers and their against the vehicle manufacturers on the supremacy of digital digital service strategies – all of them concluded in a comparison ecosystems. ICT start-ups have already successfully transferred of value creation for business model elements. the quantified-self [37,47] phenomenon to vehicles and have launched apps and services to generate a whole new market, CCS CONCEPTS while vehicle manufacturers are currently in the transition • Social and professional topics → Professional topics • process from vehicle manufacturers towards integrated mobility Computing and business; Automation; Economic impact and data service providers [24]. Thus, the digital ecosystem for the incumbents and start-ups, which are competing in the KEYWORDS quantified vehicles market, have to consider industry transformation in general, impacting on the overall digital Digital Vehicle, Quantified Vehicle Services, Vehicle Generated information assets available as well as on the sustainability of Data, Connected Vehicle, Business Models, Digital Business business models. Innovation This paper aims to explore different approaches on developing platform oriented and sustainable business models for the 1 Introduction occupation of digital services, probably the most lucrative Digitalization is an important driver of service and business components in the future automotive industry, between the model innovation in the vehicle domain. Digitalization incumbent vehicle manufacturers and the emerging tech start- challenges are currently often subsumed under the more popular ups. In particular, this paper aims to identify the main actors and term ‘connected vehicles’. Taking a look on digital services and roles in emerging digital ecosystems of vehicle usage data mobile applications, it emerges that connecting vehicles closer to platforms and their contribution to eventually define an their human drivers is an increasingly requested topic of information infrastructure for an automotive industry centered research. Such include e.g. the detection of behavioral patterns around ‘quantified vehicles’. from data collected during self-tracking activities (e.g. conclude After this introduction, the paper will provide a summary on digitalization as well as its implications for the automotive Platform Economy & Business Models workshop at i-KNOW ’17 October 11–12, 2017, domain ranging in Section 2, whereas Section 3 outlines the Graz, Austria Copyright © 2017 for this paper by its authors. Copying permitted for applied research approach. Section 4 discusses relevant digital private and academic purposes. challenges of vehicle manufacturers and the increased i-KNOW’17, October 2017, Graz, Austria C. Kaiser et al. competition on the way to digital services including recent are currently in the transition process from vehicle activities within the startup ecosystem. Section 5 concludes with manufacturers towards integrated mobility and data service an outlook and a classification of value drivers and business providers [24,45]. Yet, the digital ecosystem for the incumbents model elements for each stakeholder investigated in this paper. and start-ups competing in the quantified vehicles market have to consider another industry transformation, impacting on the 2 Background and Motivations on Digitalization overall digital information asset available as well as the sustainability of business models. Digitalization is a sociotechnical process that leverages the At the state of the art, the need to build on an appropriate ICT technical process of the encoding of analog information in a infrastructure, the open system integration of the energy digital format (digitizing) applied to broader social and landscape led to its definition as “Internet of Energy” [5,27]. As a institutional contexts, transforming their sociotechnical consequence of the “Internet” metaphor, the energy related structures, thus rendering digital technologies infrastructural challenges and concerns have been alternatively interpreted as a [48,58]. Furthermore, digitalization depends and results in digital consequence of lack of information “to enable and motivate artefacts characterized by attributes such as editability, economic and behaviorally driven solutions” [55]. Consequently, interactivity, reprogrammability / openness, distributedness [25], “energy informatics” (EI) has emerged as a new field within also implying a shift in product design moving from modularity information systems (IS) research to analyze, design, and to generativity [29,56,57]. implement systems increasing the efficiency of energy demand Quantified vehicles represent one of the key results of and supply infrastructure [55]. According to Dedrick [16] digitalization in the automotive industry, where incumbents researchers have framed the impacts of IT on the environment as have to face a key set of competing concerns systematically first, second, and third-order effects: interrelated as shown by Svahn et al. [46] through the case of Volvo: innovation capability (existing versus requisite),  First-order effects: direct impacts from IT hardware innovation focus (product versus process), innovation during the product lifecycle, including production, use collaboration (internal versus external), and innovation and disposal of computer equipment. governance (control versus flexibility). In particular, it is worth  Second-order effects: impacts of ICTs on other processes noting that from a strategy perspective, the digitalization such as transportation or industrial production, enforces internetworking to be considered as “those business influencing their environmental impact. processes/activities conducted or mediated online by and  Third-order effects: are longer term and more dynamic between employees, customers, suppliers and partners of firms, impacts, occurring when widespread use of ICTs leads using internet-based technologies accessed through internet- to changes in lifestyles and economic structures. based infrastructures.” [15:224]. Besides incumbent’s digitalization enabled by digital entrepreneurship providing less Third order effects are relevant when considering the increased bounded entrepreneurial processes and outcomes and less use of social media transformative potential for green IS on the predefinition in entrepreneurial agency [36], as shown also in demand side, encouraging better practices reducing the burden the case of the specific industry, we consider a rising number of on the environment such as, e.g., the emerging carpooling and start-ups focusing on quantified vehicles. ridesharing applications impact on transportation coupled with Taking these issues into account, the role of information and its the Internet of things [30]. According to Malhotra et al. [30] this value are a central challenge in the competitive scenarios two- way, sensor-driven communication is blurring the emerging from digitalization as well. Consequently a key issue is boundaries between the production side and the demand side. related to evaluation of the digital information asset of a Furthermore, EI and IS and interdisciplinary strategies for company as well as its information capacity defined as the quantified vehicles may provide models to assess the value of current stock of understandings informed by a given installed information, in particular the social value of related open data, base [51]. The key questions are: What data do I have? How is the adopting classification frameworks such as the one proposed by quality of data? Can I exploit it in their full potential? What can I Viscusi et al. [53]. infer from it given my current systems? According to Viscusi & Over the last twenty years, actually after the massive access to Batini [51] information capacity represents the potential of a the Internet and the World Wide Web, the interest in the digital information asset defined and evaluated independently strategy concept of business model has grown, thus becoming a from its usage, determining not only its economic value, but also key element for competing in markets characterized by extensive the enabling capabilities. use of ICTs and currently transformed by digitalization. In Considering the development process of successful business general terms a business model describes the rationale of how an models based on exploiting vehicle data, there is a competition organization creates, delivers, and captures value [39:14]. between the major players from ICT industry against the vehicle However business model is a multifaceted concept, still raising manufacturers on the supremacy of digital ecosystems. ICT debate in academia as to its definition, Massa et al. [32] provided start-ups have already started to apply the quantified-self a systematic view on the different perspectives pointing out that phenomenon to vehicles and have and launched apps and business models can be considered as i) attributes of real firms services to generate a new market, while vehicle manufacturers (how firms do business), ii) cognitive/linguistic schema (how the way firms do business is interpreted by organizational members) 2 Digital Vehicle Ecosystems and New Business Models: i-KNOW’17, October 2017, Graz, Austria An Overview of Digitalization Perspectives and iii) formal conceptual representations/descriptions of the understanding the different ways the various actors can follow former two issues. As for formal/ conceptual to innovate their business models; in particular, as pointed out representations/descriptions, Al-Debei & Avison [2] identified by Massa & Tucci [31:424], business model design in newly four key dimensions of a business model: value proposition, value formed organizations, which refers to their “entrepreneurial architecture, value network, value finance. Whereas as for activity of creating, implementing and validating a business business models as attributes of real firms it is worth model”, and business model reconfiguration in incumbent firms, mentioning, especially for the case we consider of automotive encompassing the reconfiguration and eventual acquisition of industry and quantified vehicles, the definition by Zott & Amit organizational resources to change an existing business model. [59], who conceptualize a business model as “a system of interdependent activities that transcends the focal firm and spans 3 Research Approach its boundaries. The activity system enables the firm, in concert with This paper is aimed to provide an overview of innovative ICT its partners, to create value and also to appropriate a share of that start-ups towards establishing new services and sustainable value”[59:216]. This definition is particularly useful for business models. Besides that, selected digitalization initiatives understanding business models of companies interested in of German and Italian vehicle manufactures are analyzed. The quantified vehicles when linked to the above concept of authors conducted a lightweight online market research internetworking and current pervasiveness and strategic approach analyzing information available on the Web. They relevance of digital platforms [17,18,40,57]. used a combination of the terms car, vehicle, connected, As argued by Nambisan [35:217], IT can act as either an operand quantified, start-up and vehicle in search engines to capture the resource “(often tangible and static) that an actor acts on to current developments in the start-up domain. obtain support for executing a task”, or as an operant resource After having identified major quantified vehicle start-ups, two “(often intangible and dynamic) that act on other resources to authors studied the start-up websites in detail to find out more produce effects”. Accordingly, in a case a digital platform can be about their visions and goals as well as about their business considered an enabler of innovation processes and outcomes; models, products and services. Two out of the three authors whereas, in the other case, it acts as a trigger, informing rather reviewed the websites of all start-ups and discussed their than being informed by the users. Considering the automotive knowledge with the third author afterwards to come to a sectors and especially quantified vehicles, despite the “analysing” common understanding. The information was then validated in stance of the main market players, a set of traditional and new 2 discussions within the AEGIS project consortium as well. business models can be applied [44], in particular the Furthermore the authors used crunchbase.com to capture infomediary one [1,41] can be adopted under a utility additional meta-information on business and funding, where the perspective [42] and extended from data collection for, e.g., authors revealed interesting facts on investments into tech start- marketing purpose to data useful for social value, as capability ups as well as of strategic partnerships. and functionings they enable [52,53], and finally for As for the manufacturers for the countries considered, the sustainability issues. Besides environmental and societal issues, authors carried out a market research on the websites of business sustainability refers to “business models and managerial industry organizations, press news, and magazines, apart from decisions that create value over the short, medium, and long policy documents from European Union organizations. They terms, based on mutually beneficial interactions between the especially paid attention to review the current digital services of company’s value chain and the social and environmental vehicle manufacturers by taking into account the content on the systems on which it depends” [28:18]. Furthermore, according to various product websites, which is expected to be up to date. Boons & Lüdeke-Freund [14:14] a business model perspective may contribute to a sustainable innovation agenda to overcome internal and external barriers. Also, Schaltegger et al. [43:6] 4 Results: Digitalization in the Automotive Industry points out that a business model for sustainability “helps 4.1 Overview describing, analyzing, managing, and communicating (i) a company’s sustainable value proposition to its customers, and all Digitally-enhanced driving is an emerging topic, which can be other stakeholders, (ii) how it creates and delivers this value, (iii) counted to the heavily used umbrella terms ‘connected and how it captures economic value while maintaining or cars’/’connected vehicles’ or ‘connected driving’. According to a regenerating natural, social, and economic capital beyond its definition from PWC [49] in their 2016 connected car report, organizational boundaries.” Thus, considering the automotive connected vehicles are defined as vehicles that have access to the industry and the potential transformation enforced by digital Internet and a variety of sensors, and that are thus able to send innovation and quantified vehicles, business model innovation and receive signals, sense the physical environment around can open different horizons and path impacting the them, and interact with other vehicles or entities. According to sustainability of companies, although how they can innovate this report, revenues in the automotive industry (will) shift from their business models toward greater sustainability still need to hardware to software, from products to services, and from old to be significantly addressed in research and practice [21:221]. Still, business model innovation in automotive industry asks for 2 https://www.aegis-bigdata.eu/ last accessed 25.08.2017 3 i-KNOW’17, October 2017, Graz, Austria C. Kaiser et al. new economy. The report highlights four trends changing the  Vehicle manufacturers explore ways to exploit the automotive competition: connected vehicle into the provisioning of a software  radically new technology at low price (increase in vehicle to operating system to serve as a platform for a potential app infrastructure connectivity (e.g. through 5G), increase in store, as well as into the development of specific apps and computing speed to operate artificial intelligence for self- services. driving, evolution of low cost sensors to make a vehicle  Automotive suppliers want to establish direct relationships aware of its surroundings), with the end customers of vehicles produced by vehicle  shorter innovation cycles by new high-tech entrants (non- manufacturers who they supply. traditional tech companies to offer new services as add-ons  Digital players adapt their smartphone platforms to vehicle- to automobiles and disrupt traditional vehicle value chain, specific customer needs and to integrate their infotainment Apple to invest $10 billion into an iCar, Google’s self- into vehicle systems. driving vehicles to drive more than 1,5 million miles, data- centric business models depend on revenues from ongoing  Telecom players see new opportunities in terms of services and the sale of information), infrastructures, while SIM cards are installed in vehicles.  new mobility concepts and increasingly urban customers  Insurers expect new opportunities while e.g. offering (urban residents to lose interest in owning vehicles, telematics-based coverage options. millennials in cities to face affordability issues, movements towards vehicle sharing and ride sharing, expectations of We can expect a huge power struggle between all players – highly sophisticated levels of connectivity and services), including vehicle manufacturers – on who will reap most value and from the connected vehicle market. According to the problem 3  evolving regulatory and policy constraints (policy and statement of the AutoMat project coordinated by Volkswagen regulations to lack behind the technological process, expect Research, the automotive industry has not yet been able to regulators to respond with laws ensuring the safety of successfully establish an ecosystem for smart driving driverless vehicles, cities to discourage the use of non- applications equivalent to that of smartphone manufacturers electric private vehicles). [24]. In its prior problem statement, the AutoMat project mentions three reasons why vehicle manufacturers are currently The PWC report further differentiates three main categories for struggling: (i) Brand-specific business approaches dominate, and technologies and services for connected vehicles: as a consequence there is a lack of brand-independent vehicle  Consumer services such as internet and cloud based digital lifecycle data, (ii) current proprietary vehicle services focus on services that add to driving experiences, the individual customer, which results in privacy concerns, and  Connected vehicle packages with feature to improve or help few ideas exist how anonymized vehicle data can be used to managing the vehicle’s operation, and establish other services, and (iii) the implied or required collaboration between vehicle manufacturers on vehicle data and  Supply-side technologies as underlying systems connecting the vehicle to the wider world. services is considered risky in terms of competition. 4.2 The Business Models of US Start-ups Another report from McKinsey [22] on the connected vehicle trend estimates a global market size of 170 billion EUR to 180 The IT industry of the USA has already lined up a series of tech billion EUR for vehicle connectivity in 2020. This report foresees start-ups backed by risk capital, reaching more than 20 million connectivity to trigger a redistribution of automotive revenue USD in some cases, demonstrating how high investors perceive pools except vehicle operations – based on a survey of 2000 the market value of an ecosystem built on exploiting vehicle data vehicle buyers. McKinsey perceives human-machine-interface [24]. The majority of start-ups including automatic.com, (larger screens, multiple screens, innovative UIs, Augmented automile.com, dash.by, moj.io, vin.li, zubie.com to name a few Reality), vehicle condition data (for offering maintenance and capture vehicle operation data through the On-board diagnostics insurance services), and dynamic real-time geo-information (OBD) interface of the vehicle which is originally intended to (oligopoly of TomTom, Here, and Google) to become key control provide a repair technician access to the status of the various points in this redistribution. This report has identified five vehicle subsystems and diagnostic information. different groups of vehicle buyers: maxed-out vehicle These connected vehicle start-ups have specialized in capturing, enthusiasts, integration and entertainment lovers, safe and storing, and analyzing large quantities of vehicle operation data secure navigators, purists/minimalists and price conscious and offering digital services in smartphone applications to traditionalists, each group with own preferences and attitudes motivate the driver for sharing valuable driving data. The towards connectivity-related features. Along with the majority of start-ups are currently capable of automatically preliminary market analysis a 1st competition analysis is extracting interesting driving events using computational provided.According to the McKinsey report, the connected intelligence including e.g. hard brakes, hard accelerations or vehicle ecosystem of the future will be highly influenced by speeding to name a few. These events are hidden in the gathered additional players including digital players, telecom players and vehicle operation data (time series data) and have to be revealed insurers. 3 http://automat-project.eu last accessed 17.08.2017 4 Digital Vehicle Ecosystems and New Business Models: i-KNOW’17, October 2017, Graz, Austria An Overview of Digitalization Perspectives through applying big data analytics. Mobile applications running case of a detected accident, roadside assistance, or allowing on the driver’s smartphone then pull the results from the start- (stolen) vehicle location via mobile apps to name a few. up’s datacenter and then visualize them on the driver’s Their offer surely is expected to increase, taking also into smartphone or tablet. The majority of these start-ups provide account new strategic partnerships as well as investments into mobile apps connected to the OBD interface of the vehicle via connected vehicle start-ups. For instance BMW i Ventures[10] Bluetooth with very similar functionality to the driver: These heavily invests into tech start-ups aiming to facilitate safer include for instance means to drive smarter by unlocking driving including e.g. Zendrive.com (providing smartphone- diagnostics and real-time data and greener by using the app for powered driving analytics including statistics and gamification), gaining an overview on how driving habits influence fuel or Nauto.com (multi-sensor device to monitor the driving consumptions (dash.by), make the vehicle smarter by revealing behavior including statistics especially for safety relevant events. insights of vehicle data and providing driving stats Moreover BMW [11] has recently teamed up with IBM in its (automatic.com), or delivering real time location, trip history, activity to deploy the vehicle data platform and to enhance it maintenance alerts, engine diagnostics and driving insights with analytics features [23]. (zubie.com). The following subsections summarize information on USP and the different services captured from the various product websites of German vehicle manufacturers and published studies like Karlsson et al. [26]: 4.3.1 AUDI “Innovative services and functions that connect drivers with their Audi and the world: that is Audi connect. myAudi and the Audi connect services make driving even more relaxing and safer.” Source: [8] “The term “Audi connect” covers all applications and developments that connect Audi vehicles to their drivers, the internet, transportation infrastructure and other vehicles. Audi is continually building up its lineup of products and services in this technical area – with new solutions such as the Audi connect SIM and the traffic light information service for the US market.” [9] 4.3.2 BMW “BMW Connected is a personal mobility assistant which facilitates everyday mobility and assists drivers in reaching their destinations relaxed and on time. Mobility-relevant information such as recommendations for optimal departure times are available Figure 1: Exemplary snapshots of dasb.by’s mobile app. remotely via smartphone or smartwatch and can be seamlessly transferred into the vehicle.” Another interesting tech-startup recently receiving amongst BMW ConnectedDrive [12]: others a huge investment from BMW i Ventures is Zendrive.com [13]. Zendrive is taking advantage of the sensors built into  Remote Services: Locking and unlocking the vehicle, modern smartphones to capture smartphone sensor data while indicate the vehicle’s location by honking the horn or driving, and provide cloud-enabled driving analytics aiming at flashing the lights, or on a map in the app. Activate the safer drivers as well as on safer roads by using gamification vehicle's climate control immediately or on schedule. features. According to the business information platform  Concierge Services: Select travel destinations and get crunchbase.com a bulk of investors of these start-ups stems from information, connect with call-center agents to look for the insurance industry, too. nearest services or to book services, addresses sent directly to navigation system. 4.3 Digital Services of Vehicle Manufacturers  Real Time Traffic Information: Information about the German vehicle manufacturers including AUDI, BMW, current traffic situation, calculate expected delays and DAIMLER, and VOLKSWAGEN currently offer some recommend detours, on street parking information. digital/connected services. These services allow for instance  Intelligent Emergency Call: If an airbag is deployed, the accessing some vehicle functions through the drivers’ BMW Call Centre is contacted via an accident-proof smartphone via mobile apps (e.g. lock/unlock the vehicle), telephone unit permanently installed in the vehicle, precise vehicles conducting (semi-) automatic calls for emergencies in position of vehicle is communicated including relevant accidental data. 5 i-KNOW’17, October 2017, Graz, Austria C. Kaiser et al.  Digital Services: With BMW CarData a vehicle owner can Automotive industry expertise helping dealers in digital view the key vehicle data and share them with third parties marketing and sales. This connection to the brand websites is if required. aimed not only to increase marketing and selling activities, but also to improve integration with FCA in terms of timely updates 4.3.3 DAIMLER of assets, campaigns, pricing and inventory. However, this “Mercedes me is your package of innovative services, products and integration, each Dealer Digital Website site, can be customized lifestyle offers from Mercedes-Benz, Daimler and our cooperation according to the value proposition of the dealer brand [20]. partners – including access to your vehicle via smartphone, of The FCA effort in digitization of customers’ experience and course.” dealers services represents the basis for moving from connected Mercedes me' connect services [33,34]: to self-driving vehicles as shown by the partnership with Google  Vehicle Setup: Remote Retrieval of Vehicle Status, Remote and the announcement in the spring of 2016, that they would Door Locking and Unlocking, Programming of Charge build 100 self- driving Chrysler Pacifica hybrids minivans, Settings and Pre-Entry Climate Control, Personalization. formerly tested in Arizona, California and Michigan.  Vehicle Monitoring: Geofencing, Vehicle Tracker, Parked Furthermore, Google's self-driving vehicle project, Waymo, has Vehicle Locator, Route Planning for plug-in hybrid vehicles. announced in April 2017 a program on larger scale in Phoenix  Parking using a smartphone app: Geofencing, Vehicle program using the FCA 500 Pacifica minivans, allowing Tracker, Parked Vehicle Locator, Route Planning for plug-in hundreds of people in Phoenix applying on Waymo's website to hybrid vehicles. ride in the vehicles in order to get feedback on the experience. [7] 4.3.4 VOLKSWAGEN “VW Car-Net® makes your Volkswagen more like a friend. It gives advice, helps you along the way, entertains you, and watches out 5 Conclusion for you. It connects you to the world outside all from the comfort of Digitalization is an unstoppable trend in the automotive industry your driver’s seat. VW Car-Net is your partner in drive.” in general and increasingly observable by the driver. In modern VW Car-Net [54]: passenger vehicles, drivers can connect to the cloud, where  Via app-connected drivers can access select smartphone services to drivers and other stakeholders are provided. Thereby apps right from their dash. three approaches have been discovered:  Guide & Inform Services via SiriusXM® Traffic subscription  Brand dependent assistance services, which provide access and SiriusXM® Travel Link to vehicle functions and services via smartphone. Users thereby get access to vehicle functions via apps. 4.3.5 Fiat Chrysler Automobiles (FCA)  Brand-independent apps and services, often as components In order to not exclusively look at German vehicle of data ecosystems with several stakeholders, which provide manufacturers, at the glance some of the main initiatives by the transparency on driving data to be used e.g. in driving Italian-controlled multinational corporation Fiat Chrysler behavior analytics. Automobiles (FCA), oriented towards consumers and dealers are  Strategic alliances of vehicle manufacturers with ICT firms discussed in the following. As for consumers, it is worth (e.g. BMW teams up with IBM) to establish services & mentioning the Uconnect® navigation, entertainment (with business models on how to make value out of vehicle data. CarPlay [6] to use iPhone while driving by putting his applications and functions on the vehicle’s built-in display) and As pointed out by Zott & Amit [60] digitalization is strictly communication system that allows drivers to being connected connected to product innovation and its acting both at business while driving and paying attention to the road and related events and customers/users side asks for new ideas and business models [19]. Moreover, apart from CarPlay and iPhone, FCA is design in the case of start-ups and/or reconfiguration for vehicle collaborating with Google to integrate the Android open-source manufacturer [31]. Following the perspective by Amit and Zott platform with the Uconnect 8.4-inch connected system [8]. [3,4,59] of business model as an activity system that defines the Considering now dealers, The FCA Dealer Digital Programme is way a company does business, whose elements are content (the a collection of tools, process, and support channels aiming at ‘What?’), structure (the ‘How?’), and governance (the ‘Who?’) and coordinating the action by the different partners and acting in its value drivers are novelty, lock-in, complementarities, and the digital space in order to enable the engagement of local in- efficiency, market shoppers to increase selling [20]. Furthermore, the FCA Dealer Digital Websites are the only sites having traffic directly Table 1 identifies business model’s elements and value drivers from the brand website’s dealer locator, thus increasing through for start-ups and vehicle manufacturers (termed OEM for this connection their visibility in search results on the main Original Equipment Manufacturers, in gray) discussed in search engines such as e.g. Google also through the support of previous Sections. Vehicle manufacturers seem more oriented FCA Dealer Digital Advertising (DDA) Programme [20], a one- towards governance and the exploitation of complementarities stop shop for digital advertising campaigns connecting dealers to as value drivers (thus confirming a platform orientation as Certified Providers with national coverage and extensive digital business model [40]), with Volkswagen targeting novelty for 6 Digital Vehicle Ecosystems and New Business Models: i-KNOW’17, October 2017, Graz, Austria An Overview of Digitalization Perspectives customers through business model innovation at content level [6] Apple. 2017. CarPlay. Retrieved from https://www.apple.com/ios/carplay/available-models/ and FCA using it for efficiency and lock-in at dealers level. As to [7] Associated Press. Fiat Chrysler, Google Begin Offering Rides in Self- this issue, the resulting ecosystems show a relevance of digital driving Cars. VOA. Retrieved August 15, 2017 from (entrants) players as partners and a focus of FCA on the https://www.voanews.com/a/fiat-chrysler-self-driving- inclusion of dealers as a key part of its value constellation [38] cars/3824581.html [8] Audi. 2017. Audi Connect. Retrieved August 14, 2017 from rather than value chain, through internetworking. As for the http://www.audi.com/en/innovation/connect.html start-ups, the ones considered appears to focus on ‘structure’ as [9] Audi. 2017. Audi connect and infotainment. Retrieved August 14, 2017 business model element by mostly targeting (quite surprisingly) from https://audi-illustrated.com/en/CES-2016/Audi-connect-und- Infotainment efficiency as value driver instead of novelty, thus having an [10] BMW. 2017. BMW i Ventures. Retrieved August 14, 2017 from execution orientation rather than a differentiation one to digital www.bmwiventures.com/portfolio business [50]. [11] BMW. 2017. BMW Cardata. [12] BMW. 2017. BMW Connected Drive. Retrieved August 14, 2017 from https://www.bmw.com/en/topics/fascination-bmw/connected- Table 1. Business model elements and source of value creation drive/overview.html for vehicle manufacturers and start-ups in automotive [13] BMW Group. 2014. BMW i Ventures announces strategic investment in Zendrive. Retrieved August 14, 2017 from Type Value drivers Business model https://www.press.bmwgroup.com/usa/article/detail/T0196902EN_US/b element mw-i-ventures-announces-strategic-investment-in- Company/Initiative zendrive?language=en_US [14] Frank Boons and Florian Lüdeke-Freund. 2013. Business models for Audi/Audi connect OEM Complementarities Governance sustainable innovation: state-of-the-art and steps towards a research Automatic Start-up Efficiency Structure agenda. Journal of Cleaner Production 45: 9–19. Automile Start-up Efficiency Governance https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.007 BMW / BMW OEM Complementarities Governance [15] Peter J Brews and Christopher L Tucci. 2007. The structural and Connected performance effects of internetworking. Long Range Planning 40, 2: 223– Dash Start-up Efficiency Structure 243. FCA/Uconnect OEM Complementarities Governance [16] Jason Dedrick. 2010. Green IS: Concepts and issues for information FCA/ Dealer Digital OEM Efficiency/Lock-in Content systems research. Communications of the Association for Information Programme/ Digital Systems 27: 173–184. Websites/Dealer [17] Thomas Eisenmann, Geoffrey Parker, and Marshall Van Alstyne. 2011. Digital Advertising Platform envelopment. Strategic Management Journal 32, 12: 1270–1285. Mercedes Benz- OEM Complementarities/No Governance https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.935 Daimler/ Mercedes velty [18] Thomas R Eisenmann, Geoffrey Parker, and Marshall W. Van Alstyne. 2006. Strategies for Two-Sided Markets. Harvard Business Review Me October: 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-006-0114-6 Metromile Start-up Efficiency Structure [19] FCA. 2017. u-connect. Retrieved August 15, 2017 from Mojio Start-up Complementarities Structure https://www.driveuconnect.eu/en/features/controls Vinli Start-up Complementarities Structure [20] FCA. 2017. FCA Dealer Digital Programme. Retrieved August 15, 2017 Volkswagen/VW OEM Novelty Content from http://www.fcadealerdigital.com/ Car-Net [21] Nicolai J Foss and Tina Saebi. 2016. Fifteen Years of Research on Zendrive Start-up Efficiency Content Business Model Innovation. Journal of Management 43, 1: 200–227. Zubie Start-up Efficiency/Complemen Structure https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316675927 tarities [22] Andreas Habeck, John Newman, Michele Bertoncello, Matthias Kässer, Florian Weig, Martin Hehensteiger, Julian Hölz, Ralf Plattfaut, Chad Wegner, Michal Guminski, and Zexiong Yan. 2014. Connected Car, Acknowledgement automotive value chain unbound. [23] IBM. 2017. IBM Integrates with BMW CarData to Enable New and The AEGIS project has received funding from the European Innovative Services for Drivers. News Releases. Retrieved August 14, Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under 2017 from www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/52595.wss grant agreement No 732189. The document reflects only the [24] C Kaiser, A Stocker, Gianluigi Viscusi, A Festl, P Mörtl, and M Glitzner. 2017. Quantified Cars: An exploration of the position of ICT start-ups author’s views and the Commission is not responsible for any vs. car manufacturers towards digital car services and sustainable use that may be made of information contained therein. business models. In 2nd International Conference on New Business Models (NBM2017). [25] Jannis Kallinikos, Aleksi Aaltonen, and Attila Marton. 2013. The References ambivalent ontology of digital artifacts. MISQuarterly 37, 2: 357–370. [1] A. Afuah and C. Tucci. 2000. Internet Business Models and Strategies. [26] Per-Henrik Karlsson, Hong Kyu Ahn, and Byeongmin Choi. 2016. McGraw-Hill College, Boston. Connected CAr. Retrieved from [2] Mutaz M Al-Debei and David Avison. 2010. Developing a unified https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/2016-06/022.1-connected-car- framework of the business model concept. European Journal of a-new-ecosystem.pdf Information Systems 19: 359–376. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2010.21 [27] Stamatis Karnouskos and Orestis Terzidis. 2007. Towards an [3] Raphael Amit and Christoph Zott. 2012. Creating value through information infrastructure for the future Internet of energy. In business model innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review 53, 3. Communication in Distributed Systems (KiVS), 2007 ITG-GI Conference, 1– [4] Raphael Amit and Christopher Zott. 2001. Value creation in E-business. 6. Strategic Management Journal 22, 6–7: 493–520. [28] Florian Lüdeke-Freund, Lorenzo Massa, Nancy Bocken, Alan Brent, and [5] Hans-Jürgen Appelrath, Orestis Terzidis, and Christof Weinhardt. 2012. Josephine Musango. 2016. Business models for shared value: Main Report. Internet of Energy - ICT as a Key Technology for the Energy System of Network for Business Sustainability South Africa. the Future. Business & Information Systems Engineering 4, 1: 1–2. [29] Kalle Lyytinen, Youngjin Yoo, and Richard J Boland Jr. 2016. Digital 7 i-KNOW’17, October 2017, Graz, Austria C. Kaiser et al. product innovation within four classes of innovation networks. [54] Volkswagen. 2017. Volkswagen car-net. Retrieved August 14, 2017 from Information Systems Journal 26, 1: 47–75. http://www.vwcarnetconnect.com/ https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12093 [55] Richard T. Watson, Marie-Claude Boudreau, and Adela J. Chen. 2010. [30] Arvind Malhotra, Nigel P Melville, and Richard T Watson. 2013. Information systems and environmentally sustainable development: Spurring Impactful Research on Information Systems for Environmental energy informatics and new directions for the is community. MIS Sustainability. MIS Quarterly 37, 4: 1265–1274. Quarterly 34, 1: 23–38. https://doi.org/Article [31] Lorenzo Massa and Christopher L. Tucci. 2014. Business Model [56] Youngjin Yoo. 2013. The Tables Have Turned: How Can the Information Innovation. In The Oxford Handbook of Innovation Management. Systems Field Contribute to Technology and Innovation Management https://doi.org/0.1093/oxfordhb/9780199694945.013.002 Research?. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 14: 227– [32] Lorenzo Massa, Christopher L. Tucci, and Allan Afuah. 2017. A Critical 236. Assessment of Business Model Research. Academy of Management [57] Youngjin Yoo, Richard J Boland, Kalle Lyytinen, and Ann Majchrzak. Annals 11, 1: 73–104. 2012. Organizing for Innovation in the Digitized World. Organization https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2014.0072 Science 23, 5: 1398–1408. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0771 [33] Mercedes. 2017. Mercedes Me. Retrieved August 14, 2017 from [58] Youngjin Yoo, Kalle J. Lyytinen, Richard J. Boland, and Nicholas https://www.mercedes-benz.com/en/mercedes-me/ Berente. 2010. The Next Wave of Digital Innovation: Opportunities and [34] Mercedes. 2017. Mercedes Me Connect. Retrieved August 14, 2017 from Challenges: A Report on the Research Workshop “Digital Challenges in https://www.mercedes-benz.com/en/mercedes-me/connectivity/ Innovation Research” (June 8, 2010). SSRN. Retrieved May 12, 2017 from [35] Satish Nambisan. 2013. Information Technology and Product / Service https://ssrn.com/abstract=1622170 or Innovation : A Brief Assessment and Some Suggestions for Future http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1622170 Research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 14: 215–226. [59] Christoph Zott and Raphael Amit. 2010. Business model design: an [36] Satish Nambisan. 2016. Digital Entrepreneurship: Toward a Digital activity system perspective. Long range planning 43, 2–3: 216–226. Technology Perspective of Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.004 and Practice: n/a-n/a. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12254 [60] Christoph Zott and Raphael Amit. 2017. Business Model Innovation: [37] Gina Neff and Dawn Nafus. 2016. Self-Tracking. How to Create Value in a Digital World. GfK Marketing Intelligence [38] R Normann and R Ramìrez. 1994. Designing interactive strategy: from Review 9, 1: 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1515/gfkmir-2017-0003 value chain to value constellation. Wiley,Chichester. [39] Alexander Osterwalder and Yves Pigneur. 2010. Business Model Generation. John Wiley & Sons. [40] Geoffrey G Parker, Marshall W Van Alstyne, and Sangeet Paul Choudary. 2016. Platform revolution: How networked markets are transforming the economy-and how to make them work for you. WW Norton & Company. [41] M. Rappa. 2001. Business models on the web: Managing the digital enterprise. Retrieved from digitalenterprise.org/models/models.html [42] M. A. Rappa. 2004. The utility business model and the future of computing services. IBM Systems Journal 43, 1: 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1147/sj.431.0032 [43] Stefan Schaltegger, Florian Lüdeke-Freund, and Erik G Hansen. 2016. Business Models for Sustainability. Organization & Environment 29, 3: 264–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026616633272 [44] Andrew Shipilov. 2016. Why Aren’t Automakers Embracing Digital Business Models? Harvard Business Review, December 30. [45] Alexander Stocker, Christian Kaiser, and Michael Fellmann. 2017. Quantified Vehicles. Business & Information Systems Engineering 59, 2: 125–130. [46] Fredrik Svahn, Lars Mathiassen, and Rikard Lindgren. 2017. Embracing digital innovation in incumbent firms: How Volvo cars managed competing concerns. MIS Quarterly 41, 1: 239–253. [47] Melanie Swan. 2013. The quantified self: Fundamental disruption in big data science and biological discovery. Big Data 1, 2: 85–99. [48] David Tilson, Kalle Lyytinen, and Carsten Sørensen. 2010. Digital Infrastructures: The Missing IS Research Agenda. Information Systems Research 21, 4: 748–759. [49] Richard Viereckl, Dietmar Ahlemann, Alex Koster, Evan Hirsh, Felix Kuhnert, Joachim Mohs, Marco Fischer, Walter Gerling, Kaushik Gnanasekaran, Julia Kusber, Juliane Stephan, David Crusius, Henning Kerstan, Trent Warnke, Manuel Schulte, Jonas Seyfferth, and Edward H. Baker. 2016. Connected car report 2016: Opportunities, risk, and turmoil on the road to autonomous vehicles. Retrieved from http://www.strategyand.pwc.com/reports/connected-car-2016-study [50] G. Viscusi. 2015. Digital business innovation: roadmaps and attitudes from a FutureEnterprise perspective. Génie Logiciel 115: 36–41. [51] G. Viscusi and C. Batini. 2014. Digital Information Asset Evaluation: Characteristics and Dimensions. In Smart Organizations and Smart Artifacts SE - 9 (Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07040-7_9 [52] G. Viscusi and C. Batini. 2016. Information Production and Social Value for Public Policy: A Conceptual Modeling Perspective. Policy & Internet 8, 3: 334–353. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.121 [53] G. Viscusi, M. Castelli, and C. Batini. 2014. Assessing social value in open data initiatives: a framework. Future Internet 6, 3: 498–517. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi6030498 8