<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Extended Abstract - Decision Support for Operational Excellence in Manufacturing Systems</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Andreas Felsberger</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Bernhard Oberegger</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Simon Reisinger</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Gerald Reiner</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Operations-</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Energy-</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Environmental Management</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Klagenfurt</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Austria</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="editor">
          <string-name>General Terms: Decision Support Systems, Operations Management</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Additional Key Words and Phrases: OPEX, Business Manufacturing Intelligence</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>P&amp;OM</addr-line>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>In order to remain competitive in the digital transformed economic world, the perfect match of supply and demand through supply chain and operations management is of essential importance. Flexibility, quality, costs and customer satisfaction are of major interest for companies. Programs aimed at improving these factors are often launched under the label ”Operational Excellence” (OPEX), which literally means ”excellent operational performance” [Dahm and Bru¨ckner 2014]. The pursuit of operational excellence contributes significantly to the success of companies [Issar and Navon 2016] and is intended to secure long-term survival [Dahm and Bru¨ckner 2014]. The aim of this work is to evaluate how decision support systems can help to achieve operational excellence. For this purpose, literature was analyzed to derive requirements for decision support via an OPEX framework in manufacturing systems.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>SHORT ABSTRACT</title>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2. INTRODUCTION</title>
      <p>Nowadays, companies use elements of different management
systems and concepts simultaneously. These management systems
provide fundamental insights for Operational Excellence. The main
challenge is to combine these systems to gain the ability to react
better and faster to market volatility including quick response times
to emerging customer requirements and the adaption of new
technologies. Operational Excellence (OPEX) is achieved through
continuous adaptation and optimization of processes [Gleich 2008] and
illustrates a collective concept for various management approaches
to align all business processes to customer requirements, quality
and efficiency [Dahm and Bru¨ckner 2014]. Gleich et al. [Gleich
2008] define Operational Excellence as the dynamic ability to
realize effective and efficient core processes of the value chain through
the integrative use and design of technological, cultural and
organizational factors on the basis of the strategy. In this work, the
OPEX framework is considered as an information platform that
integrates current systems used in the production environment and
summarizes the data and information from these various systems
collected in the supply chain process. Moreover, this paper
provides an overview of an OPEX framework. Thus, the OPEX
framework is assigned to the the category of Manufacturing Intelligence
SamI40 workshop at i-KNOW ’17, October 11–12, 2017, Graz, Austria
Copyright c 2017 for this paper by its authors. Copying permitted for
private and academic purposes.</p>
      <p>Systems. The aim of this work was to identify requirements for
operational excellence applications in the manufacturing industry.
A literature review was conducted to identify grounded literature
within this topic. Therefore we observed relevant topics of
”Operational Excellence”, ”Performance Measurement”,
”Manufacturing Execution Systems”, Business Intelligence” and
”Manufacturing Intelligence” within the meta-database Web of Science.
3.
The use of an OPEX decision support system can enable
production control by quickly summarizing the essential information and
conducting a wide range of analyses. A continuous analysis and
improvement of the operational performance requires continuous
monitoring of critical activities and the use of appropriate
indicators [Issar and Navon 2016]. These key performance indicators
are intended to help identify gaps between expectation and
performance and to subsequently develop appropriate actions [Wouters
and Wilderom 2008]. An example of a key performance indicator
for operational excellence is the overall equipment effectiveness,
consisting of the factors availability, performance and quality of
manufacturing processes [Kemper et al. 2004].</p>
      <p>Despite large quantities of operational data, companies face the
challenge to derive useful information from this data. Business
Intelligence systems (BIS) are expected to close this gap [Zeng et al.
2012]. BIS have the goal to improve decision-making ”quality”
through faster availability and higher data quality [Negash 2004].
The data which create the basis for BIS are gathered from various
sources, such as Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) or
Manufacturing Execution Systems (MES), which are of different quality or
exist in different formats. ERP is the integrated management of core
business processes and MES provides traceability and enables the
control of multiple elements of the production process to support
the decision making process in manufacturing. The integration of
this data is therefore a major challenge for BI systems and as the
storage of large amounts of data becomes increasingly favorable,
companies collect unstructured data in large quantities [Chaudhuri
et al. 2011]. Business intelligence systems are intended to support
the decision-making process by integrating these increasing
volumes of unstructured data from internal and external sources [Isik
et al. 2011]. Intelligent decision-making is one of the current
keywords in this research field and is interrelated to modern business
development. The potential of big data and advanced artificial
intelligence offers new insights for innovations on Decision Support
Systems (DSS) and for decision-making in the form of more
objective and evidence-based smart decisions [Abbasi et al. 2016; Zhou
et al. 2015]. The main impact and key aspect of these intelligent
systems is an improved method of data analysis. The mere
collection, storage and unregulated use of data has no direct impact on
decision-making so far [Babiceanu and Seker 2016]. DSS research
and development will benefit from progress in huge data bases,
artificial intelligence and human-machine interactions [Power 2008].
In the case of the Industry 4.0 paradigm, the massive increase of
data allows the optimization and improvement of models to
enhance error analysis and the prediction of specific situations to set
up counteractive measures [Andreadis et al. 2014]. Decisions made
to optimize efficiency and effectiveness of manufacturing systems
are reaching from the strategic level to tactical and operational
production scheduling and control. Automating these decisions by
using innovative algorithms and intelligent software applications
based on the knowledge in the field of production and operations
management, the performance of a manufacturing system can be
improved [Felsberger et al. 2016].</p>
      <p>ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research work has been performed in the EU project Power
Semiconductor and Electronics Manufacturing 4.0 (SemI40),
which is funded by the programme Electronic Component
Systems for European Leadership (ECSEL) Joint Undertaking (Grant
Agreement No. 692466) and the programme ”IKT der Zukunft”
(project number: 853343) of the Austrian Ministry for Transport,
Innovation and Technology (bmvit) between May 2016 and April
2019. More information on IKT der Zukunft can be found at
https://iktderzukunft.at/en/. Moreover, the project SemI40 is
cofunded by grants from Germany, Italy, France, and Portugal.
Ahmed Abbasi, Suprateek Sarker, and RH Chiang. 2016. Big data research
in information systems: Toward an inclusive research agenda. Journal of
the Association for Information Systems 17, 2 (2016), 3.</p>
      <p>Georgios Andreadis, Paraskevi Klazoglou, Kyriaki Niotaki, and
Konstantin-Dionysios Bouzakis. 2014. Classification and review of
multi-agents systems in the manufacturing section. Procedia
Engineering 69 (2014), 282–290.</p>
      <p>Radu F Babiceanu and Remzi Seker. 2016. Big Data and virtualization for
manufacturing cyber-physical systems: A survey of the current status and
future outlook. Computers in Industry 81 (2016), 128–137.</p>
      <p>Surajit Chaudhuri, Umeshwar Dayal, and Vivek Narasayya. 2011. An
overview of business intelligence technology. Commun. ACM 54, 8
(2011), 88–98.</p>
      <p>Markus H Dahm and Aaron D Bru¨ckner. 2014. Operational Excellence
mittels Transformation Management: Nachhaltige Vera¨nderung im
Unternehmen sicherstellen–Ein Praxisratgeber. Springer-Verlag.
Andreas Felsberger, Bernhard Oberegger, and Gerald Reiner. 2016. A
Review of Decision Support Systems for Manufacturing Systems.. In
SAMI@ iKNOW.</p>
      <p>Ronald Gleich. 2008. Operational excellence: innovative Ansa¨tze und best
practices in der produzierenden Industrie. Haufe-Lexware.</p>
      <p>Oyku Isik, Mary C Jones, and Anna Sidorova. 2011. Business intelligence
(BI) success and the role of BI capabilities. Intelligent systems in
accounting, finance and management 18, 4 (2011), 161–176.</p>
      <p>Gilad Issar and Liat Ramati Navon. 2016. Operational Excellence: A
Concise Guide to Basic Concepts and Their Application. Springer.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Solomon</given-names>
            <surname>Negash</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2004</year>
          .
          <article-title>Business intelligence</article-title>
          .
          <source>The communications of the Association for Information Systems</source>
          <volume>13</volume>
          ,
          <issue>1</issue>
          (
          <year>2004</year>
          ),
          <fpage>54</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Daniel J Power</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2008</year>
          .
          <article-title>Decision support systems: a historical overview</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Handbook on Decision Support Systems 1</source>
          . Springer,
          <fpage>121</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>140</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Marc</given-names>
            <surname>Wouters</surname>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Celeste</given-names>
            <surname>Wilderom</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2008</year>
          .
          <article-title>Developing performancemeasurement systems as enabling formalization: A longitudinal field study of a logistics department</article-title>
          .
          <source>Accounting, Organizations and Society</source>
          <volume>33</volume>
          ,
          <issue>4</issue>
          (
          <year>2008</year>
          ),
          <fpage>488</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>516</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Li</given-names>
            <surname>Zeng</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Ling</given-names>
            <surname>Li</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>and Lian</given-names>
            <surname>Duan</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2012</year>
          .
          <article-title>Business intelligence in enterprise computing environment</article-title>
          .
          <source>Information Technology and Management</source>
          <volume>13</volume>
          ,
          <issue>4</issue>
          (
          <year>2012</year>
          ),
          <fpage>297</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>310</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Hong</given-names>
            <surname>Zhou</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Christopher Noble, and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Julie</given-names>
            <surname>Cotter</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <year>2015</year>
          .
          <article-title>A Big Data Based Intelligent Decision Support System for Sustainable Regional Development</article-title>
          . In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Smart City/SocialCom/SustainCom (SmartCity). IEEE,
          <fpage>822</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>826</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>