Willows in Czech lowlands: variability of density and shrinkage Vladimír Gryc1, Kyriaki Giagli1, Marek Fajstavr1, Hanuš Vavrčík1 1 Department of Wood Science, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Czech Republic, e-mail: gryc@mendelu.cz Abstract. The objective of the present study was to determine the variability of tree-ring width, wood density and shrinkage of white willow (Salix alba L.) growing in the lowland forest of South Moravia, Czech Republic. Six young trees were selected from three plots (18 trees in total). Sample logs were taken at breast height (1.3 m from the ground). All examined parameters i.e., average tree-ring width, wood density and shrinkage were influenced by the locality. Moreover, the results revealed much higher variability among trees per plot than mean values among plots. Average green and dry wood density of white willow was 753.0 kg·m-3 and 390.8 kg·m-3, respectively. Average radial shrinkage was 3.59 % and the average tangential shrinkage 8.26 %. Keywords: Salix alba, tree-ring width, radial shrinkage, tangential shrinkage, variability of wood properties. 1 Introduction Genus Salix represents about 450 species worldwide distributed mostly in the North hemisphere (Argus 1997). White willow (Salix alba L.) is native to Europe and Asia (western and central). Nowadays, white willow has expanded beyond its original area, e.g. to North America and Australia. In the Czech Republic, the species grows in the floodplain forests in warmer regions (Úradníček et al. 2001). Willows and willow clones are fast growing species preferred for many reasons i.e., environmental restoration work, biomass production for energy purposes as well as timber for wood industry (Kuzovkina and Quigley 2005, Leclerq 1997). Wood is an exceptional raw material owing to the fact that it is renewable, very strong and elastic despite the low density, easily shaped, ecologically recyclable etc. Nevertheless, wood is not homogenous and it is a highly hygroscopic material. Wood density is a fundamental property featuring the rest of wood properties. Wood density and shrinkage depend on the genus, the locality type, wood defects and mainly on position in the stem. Moreover shrinkage manifests the anisotropic character of wood through different values in the individual directions (Vavrčík and Gryc 2012, Gryc and Horáček 2007). Our study aimed at (I) analyzing the variability of density and shrinkage of white willow (Salix alba L.) among different plots and (II) describing the variability of density and shrinkage among trees in each plot. 554 2 Materials and methods The sampling material was taken from white willows growing in three plots in South Moravia, Czech Republic. All selected plots were located floodplain forest near Židlochovice (180 m a. s. l.). The plots 1, 2 and 3 were classified as Ulmeto- Quercetum alluviale (Brachypodium sylvaticum), Saliceto-Alnetum and Ulmeto- Quercetum alluviale (Aegopodium podagraria), respectively. Six healthy trees were randomly chosen per plot (mean height 23–25 m, diameter 26–32 cm). Logs (1 m) were cut at breast height (1.3 m from the ground) from each tree. Tree-ring widths were measured on transversal section by using Leica S6D stereomicroscope and the VIAS TimeTable (Vienna Institute for Archaeological Science, Vienna, Austria) measuring system (with accuracy of 0.01 mm). Samples for density and shrinkage (20 × 20 × 30 mm) were prepared uniformly from the entire log. The wood density was analyzed as (I) immediately after cutting (green density) and (II) at moisture content 0 %, when samples were measured after oven drying at temperature 103 ± 2 ºC (dry density). The wood density was calculated as: ! ρ= [kg·m-3] (1) ! where ρ stands for green and/or dry wood density, m stands for weight of sample (kg), and V stands for the volume of sample (m-3). The total linear shrinkage in the individual anatomic directions was calculated as: ! !!!"!# 𝛼 = !"#$ [%] (2) !!"#$ where limax stands for size of the tested sample (mm) in the particular anatomic direction at moisture content higher than the hygroscopicity level, limin stands for size of the sample (mm) in the particular anatomic direction at moisture content 0 %. 3 Results and discussion 2.1 Variability of tree-ring width The selected trees showed a very similar amount of tree rings, between 17 and 19 at breast height. The tree rings were wider (10–12 mm) during the first years, followed by a gradual decreasing of tree-ring width (2–6 mm) along the stem radius from pith to bark (Fig. 1). The average tree-ring width calculated from all three plots was 7.51 mm, ranging between 6.62 and 8.03 mm (Table 1). Our results on tree-ring widths were in accordance with Sacré (1974), who reported similar values (6.6–8.6 mm) depending on the logs. 555 Table 1. Descriptive statistics of tree-ring width measured in all three plots. Plot 1 2 3 1–3 Average (mm) 6.62 8.03 7.71 7.51 Median (mm) 6.40 7.76 7.62 7.38 Standard deviation (mm) 3.43 3.34 3.21 3.39 Minimum (mm) 1.17 2.46 0.91 0.91 Maximum (mm) 14.70 17.04 14.84 17.04 Coefficient of variation (%) 51.69 41.64 41.58 45.05 Fig. 1. Variability of tree-ring width along stem radius calculated per plot. All curves represent the mean values of six trees. 2.1 Variability of properties – density and shrinkage We found significant differences in both average green density and average dry density among plots (Table 2). The differences in case of green wood density among plots were higher (81.46 kg·m-3) than in case in dry wood density (20 kg·m-3). The average dry wood density from all three plots was 390.8 kg·m-3 ranging from 278.6 to 631.6 kg·m-3. Kollmann and Côté (1968) reported similar average dry wood density 365 kg·m-3 ranging between 320 and 420 kg·m-3. Nevertheless, Wagenführ (2000) stated lower dry wood density 270–330–380 kg·m-3 (minimum–average–maximum), while Wani et al. (2014) stated that basic density in Salix alba growing in Pakistan is influenced by locality. In our study, we noticed higher variability of dry wood density among individual trees in each plot than in average dry wood density among the plots (Fig. 2). 556 Table 2. Green and dry density of white willow wood. Plots 1 2 3 1–3 Average 695.0 750.1 776.5 753.0 Median 682.7 741.6 763.0 749.3 Green density (kg·m-3) Standard deviation 132.1 92.1 119.3 122.7 Minimum 412.0 499.7 424.2 412.0 Maximum 1044.6 1044.9 1563.0 1563.0 Coeff. of variation (%) 19.0 12.3 15.4 16.3 Average 380.3 400.3 387.7 390.8 Median 384.4 399.7 389.3 392.4 Dry density (kg·m-3) Standard deviation 41.3 31.4 30.7 34.3 Minimum 278.6 315.7 306.9 278.6 Maximum 631.6 513.8 461.9 631.6 Coeff. of variation (%) 10.9 7.9 7.9 8.8 Average shrinkage in the radial and tangential direction was 3.59 % and 8.26 %, respectively, which coincided with black willow radial and tangential shrinkage i.e., 3.3 % and 8.7 % respectively (Bowyer et al. 2007) (Fig. 2, Table 3). 557 Table 3. Radial and tangential shrinkage of white willow wood. Plots 1 2 3 1–3 Average 3.41 3.86 3.51 3.59 Radial shrinkage Median 2.99 3.67 3.24 3.31 Standard deviation 1.45 1.59 1.35 1.47 (%) Minimum 1.03 1.17 1.11 1.03 Maximum 7.22 9.03 10.61 10.61 Coeff. of variation (%) 42.62 41.04 38.52 40.78 Average 7.46 8.45 8.41 8.26 Tangential shrinkage Median 7.52 8.54 8.58 8.40 Standard deviation 1.70 1.62 1.58 1.69 (%) Minimum 2.20 3.36 1.03 2.20 Maximum 13.68 13.82 13.17 15.42 Coeff. of variation (%) 22.77 19.20 18.73 20.43 558 460460 Density, MC = 0 % (kg·m-3) 440440 420420 400400 380380 360360 340340 Lokalita 320320 1 Lokalita 2 300300 Lokalita 1 2 3 4 5 6 1010 3 Tangencial schrinkage (%) 99 88 77 66 Lokalita 1 Lokalita 2 55 1 2 3 4 5 6 Lokalita 66 3 55 Radial schrinkage (%) 44 33 Plot 1 Lokalita 1 Plot 2 Lokalita 2 22 Plot 3 Lokalita 1 2 3 4 5 6 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 Tree No. Fig. 2. Variability of wood density and shrinkage among trees. On the contrary, Wagenführ (2000) reported again lower values for radial and tangential shrinkage (radial: 2.4 %, tangential: 6.3 %) in comparison with our study. Higher variability of shrinkage was observed among individual trees within the plots. 559 4 Conclusions Our results indicated that white willow trees growing in the Czech lowlands produce wood of higher average density in relation with the literature, while the radial and tangential wood shrinkage were found to be in line with previous studies. We noticed significant differences among the plots. Nevertheless the variability of the examined properties was high among trees growing in the same plot. Acknowledgments. We would like to thank to Forests of the Czech Republic, state – owned company for providing experiment materials and also to all students for their help during laboratory work. References 1. Argus, G. W. (1997) Infrageneric classification of Salix (Salicaceae) in the New World. Syst. Bot. Monogr. 52, 121. 2. Bowyer, J. L., Shmulsky, R., Haygreen, J. G. (2007) Forest Products and Wood Science: An Introduction 5th edition. Ames: Blackwell Publishing, p. 558. 3. Gryc, V., Horáček, P. (2007) Variability in density of spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) wood with the presence of reaction wood. Journal of Forest Science, 53, p. 129-137. 4. Kollmann, F. P., Côté, W. A. (1968) Principles of wood science and technology. vol. I: Solid Wood. Berlin: Springer Verlag, p.592. 5. Kuzovkina, Y. A., Quigley, M. F. (2005) Willows beyond wetlands: Uses of Salix L. species for environmental projects. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 162, p. 183-204. 6. Leclerq, A. (1997) Wood Quality of White Willow. Biotechnology, Agronomy and Society and Environment, 1, p. 59-64. 7. Sacré, E. (1974) Contribution à l’étude du bois de saule blanc. Bulletin de la Société royale de botanique de Belgique, 81, p. 485-501. 8. Tsoumis, G. T. (1991). Science and technology of wood: Structure, properties, utilization. New York: Chapman & Hall, p. 494. 9. Úradníček, L., Maděra, P., Kolibáčová, S., Koblížek, J. and Šefl, J. Dřeviny České republiky (Species of the Czech Republic) (2001). Písek: Matice Lesnická, p. 333. 10. Vavrčík, H., Gryc, V. (2012) Analysis of the annual ring structure and wood density relations in English oak and sessile oak. Wood research, 57, p. 573-580. 11. Wani, B. A., Bodha, R. H., Khan, A. (2014) Wood specific gravity variation among five important hardwood species of Kashmir Himalaya. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 17, p. 395-401. 12. Wagenführ, R. (2000) Holzatlas. 5th edition. München: Fachbuchverlag Leipzig im Carl Hanser Verlag, p. 707. 560