<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Priority Innovations for European Sheep and Goat Industry Members</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Daniel Martin-Collado</string-name>
          <email>danielmartincollado@gmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Gus Rose</string-name>
          <email>gus@gusrose.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Clara Diaz</string-name>
          <email>cdiaz@inia.es</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Kostantino Zaralis</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4">4</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>David Yañez-Ruiz</string-name>
          <email>david.yanez@eez.csic.es</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Agencia Estatal Consejo Superior De Investigaciones Científicas</institution>
          ,
          <country country="ES">Spain</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Aristotelio Panepistimio Thessalonikis</institution>
          ,
          <country country="GR">Greece</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>Centro de Investigación y Tecnología Agroalimentaria de Aragón</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Zaragoza</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="ES">Spain</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff3">
          <label>3</label>
          <institution>Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria</institution>
          ,
          <country country="ES">Spain</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff4">
          <label>4</label>
          <institution>The Organic Research Centre</institution>
          ,
          <country country="UK">United Kingdom</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <fpage>652</fpage>
      <lpage>657</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>Innovation and innovative practices can improve the sustainability of sheep and goat sector, however, they are not extensively used, tested or validated. In this context, iSAGE project aims to explore the potential of key innovations that may contribute increase the sustainability of sheep and goat production system in Europe. Key innovations were identified using a survey and 2 workshops with 18 European industry and science organizations. Industry partners then selected 35 innovations to test on farms. The main reason for industry partners to test these innovations was related to economic sustainability. However, direct and indirect social and environmental benefits of the selected innovations will also be explored using farm data, surveys and interviews. Some remarkable innovations were related to the development and implementation of genomic selection and individual recording technologies, and to the increase social sustainability of sheep farming by boosting the generational turnover and support new entrants.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>innovations</kwd>
        <kwd>sheep</kwd>
        <kwd>goats</kwd>
        <kwd>iSAGE</kwd>
        <kwd>industry</kwd>
        <kwd>sustainability</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1 Introduction</title>
      <p>
        The sheep and goat sector in Europe is very diverse with different stages of
development and diversity across and within counties and among breeds
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">(De
Rancourt et al. 2006)</xref>
        . This diversity applies to many elements such as feed resources
and feeding systems, breeds, types of farming (milk and/or meat), types of products,
production intensity, and importance of the farming to the area. In general, sheep and
goat sector is less developed than pig, poultry and cattle sectors, which are usually
less diverse. Still, innovations are being developed for intensive sheep and goat
systems; however, there is a significant proportion of farms that operate using very
similar technology and knowledge used in last decades. This lack of technical and
innovative development may be reducing the effectiveness and sustainability of
sheep and goats systems.
      </p>
      <p>
        Innovations and innovative practices that have helped farming systems evolve
include practices and technology related to feed and drugs, animal breeding, product
marketing, infrastructural and organizational operations. Recent development of
information and precision technology, data management and genetics and genomics,
have led to a whole new set of farming innovation that have been, or are planned to
be introduced into farms
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">(Caja et al., 2014)</xref>
        . In many cases these innovations are still
being developed and tested and their potential being explored for sheep and goat
industry
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3 ref4">(Dubeuf, 2014)</xref>
        . In addition, the innovations need to be tested on various
farming systems to understand their relevance, benefits, and trade-offs
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3 ref4">(Dubeuf and
Sayadi, 2014)</xref>
        . However, the testing and spread of innovations on sheep and goat
farms is challenging due to its heterogeneity.
      </p>
      <p>Other challenges for introducing innovation into sheep and goat production
systems are:
1. Relative to other agricultural sectors, sheep and particularly goat technology
has remained relatively stagnant and neglected from the mainstream
research.
2. Low sector incomes. Increasing input costs, combined with inadequate
farm-gate prices and poor monetization of by-products have made incomes
among the lowest in the agricultural industry and heavily dependent on
public support.
3. Lack of skilled workers. The sector productivity is hampered by a lack of
technical services and training. Declining rural populations creates a
shortage of skilled workers.
4. High farmer age and lack of generation transfer. Sheep and goat farmers are
older than farmers in other sectors. Elderly farmers are often reluctant to
make changes and young people are not interested in the business.</p>
      <p>Therefore, the iSAGE project aims to identify and explore the potential of key
innovations that may contribute increase the sustainability of sheep and goat
production system in Europe.
2</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Methods</title>
      <p>We identified innovations that the European sheep and goat industry think are
important to increase sustainability. These innovations were found with help from
the EU funded iSAGE project (isage.eu) consortium which includes 18 partners
representing the sheep and goat industry. These industry institutions are among the
most relevant and representative of sheep and goat farmers in the Finland, France,
Greece, Italy, Spain, Turkey, and UK.</p>
      <p>We identified and explored key innovation for sheep and goat sector using two
steps:
1) Identification of key sector innovations. Research and industry partners
identified the most relevant innovations in their countries using an online survey
and two project workshops. The online survey asked, which innovations the
partners thought would benefit and impact sustainability of the sheep and goat
sector. All 18 iSAGE industry partners answered the survey. The results of the
survey were shared with all partners and discussed with industry partners in two
project meetings in Thessaloniki in April 2016 and Zaragoza in June 2016. A list
of key innovations for European sheep and goat farming was produced as the
outcome of the workshops.
2) Test and exploration of selected innovations. Industry partners chose, from
the identified innovation, the most interesting and feasible innovations for their
needs and status of their specific industries. Innovation case studies were then
defined and protocols designed to test and explore the potential of selected
innovation. Case studies were designed to understand (i) how and why do farmers
use (or not use) innovations and innovative practices to make their farms
sustainable, and (ii) under what conditions are innovations and innovative
practices applicable.
3</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Results and Discussion</title>
      <sec id="sec-3-1">
        <title>3.1 Identification of key sector innovations</title>
        <p>The industry partners identified fifty-two innovations and innovative practices. These
innovations fit into different categories: individual recording, animal handling
equipment, pasture and forage management and improvement, drug alternatives,
health and welfare tests, reproduction, breeding and genetics, and marketing. Due to
the diversity of farming system, some innovations were only relevant or applicable in
some countries, while other had a wider relevance. We categorized these potential
innovations into dairy or meat (D/M), sheep or goat (S/G) and intensive or extensive
farm types (INT/EXT). Innovations were also rated according to their applicability
for case studies (Low, Medium and High). The innovations identified cover the
diversity of sheep and goat systems in Europe. Therefore, the benefits of the
innovations potentially apply to all European sheep and goat industries. Table 1
shows innovations which were considered highly applicable and of general interest to
European sheep and goat industries.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-2">
        <title>3.2 Test and exploration of selected innovations</title>
        <p>Industry partners selected 35 innovation case studies about reproduction (8), farm
technology; which included individual data recording (6) and handling technology
(1), breeding and genetics (6), forage and feeds (4), health and welfare (3), pastures
and grazing (2), products and marketing (2), and others (3). The main reason to
choose most of those innovation was to increase economic sustainability of farms.
Therefore, profitability appears to be the main incentive for farmers (and industry
institutions) to voluntarily introduce and assess innovations on their farms.</p>
        <p>Despite economics being the main driver of innovation selection, in many cases
there were indirect environmental (through increased efficiency) and social benefits,
which farmers were also interested in identifying and assessing. To do so, case
studies included the analysis of farm data, and farmer interviews and surveys
Electronic microchip readers and automatic milk
recording systems for individual milk production.</p>
        <p>Freeze drying for longer storage and exportation to
China
New dairy products and meat cuts</p>
        <sec id="sec-3-2-1">
          <title>Promote fresh sheep and goats products</title>
          <p>Better use of the environmental and social aspects
of sheep farming in the marketing of sheep meat.
Improve labelling and product recognition</p>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-3-2-2">
          <title>New recipe books</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-3-2-3">
          <title>Explore alternative markets (Middle East and China) D/M D/M</title>
          <p>D/M
D/M
D/M
D/M
D/M
D/M
D
D
D/M
D/M
D/M
D/M
D/M
D/M
D
D
D
D
D/M
D/M
D/M
D/M
D/M</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-3">
        <title>Dairy or</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-4">
        <title>Meat</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-5">
        <title>Sheep</title>
        <p>or Goat</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-6">
        <title>INTensive or</title>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-7">
        <title>EXTensive</title>
        <p>S/G
S/G
S/G
S/G
S/G
S/G
S/G
S/G
G
G
S/G
S/G
S/G
S/G
S/G
S/G
S/G
S/G
S/G
S/G
S/G
S/G
S/G
S/G
S/G</p>
        <p>EXT
EXT
INT
INT
INT/EXT
INT/EXT
INT/EXT
INT/EXT
INT
INT
INT/EXT
INT/EXT
INT/EXT
INT
INT/EXT
INT
INT
INT
INT/EXT
INT/EXT
INT/EXT
INT/EXT
INT/EXT
INT/EXT
INT/EXT</p>
        <p>One case study which aims to increase social sustainability is the assessment of
the UK Ambassador Program. This program aims to boost the generational turnover
and support new entrants to sheep farming. The initiative provides an opportunity for
young farmers from England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland to attend
practical training delivery sessions throughout one year on a number of sheep topics
such as farm/livestock management and business planning. The case study will
collect mostly qualitative data through interviews with present and past participants
in the Ambassador Programme. This is an important case study because lack of
generation turnover is a common problem of sheep and goat industries across
Europe. Therefore, the results of this case study will show the potential of
implementing similar programmes in other countries.</p>
        <p>There were two innovations which will be tested across countries:
a) Genomic selection. The across-country case study on genomics will explore
the potential, drivers and constraints of genomic selection in the sheep and goat
sector. The case study involves research and industry partners from France,
Greece and Spain, It has two main aims. Firstly, to evaluate the potential
contribution of genomic selection to genetic gain by simulating scenarios using
real data structures of each population involved and creating scenarios of
implementation. In addition, the case study will also use economic data to
evaluate if the potential benefits of this tool pay off the investment in genotyping.
Secondly, the case study will explore the impact of using genomic selection on
current breeding programmes implementation. This awareness will be recorded
by surveying and interviewing farmers about their awareness of genomic
selection and their perception on the economic and organizational constraints for
its implementation in breeding programmes.
b) Individual data recording technologies are at different stages of
implementation in several countries and their full potential and development of
individual recording has not been reached as compared to more developed
systems (i.e. pig, poultry and cattle). Partners from France, Greece, Spain and
Turkey have designed case studies focusing on different aspects of individual
data recording systems, from technology developments to extension activities.
Partners will work together to find a general overview of the state, needs,
potential and constraints of data recording technologies and systems for sheep
and goat industry in Europe.
4</p>
        <p>Conclusion
iSAGE innovation case studies have just started and will be completed across the
next two years. The 35 selected case studies will explore and show the potential
impact that innovations have to improve the economic, environmental and social
sustainability of sheep and goat farms. Case studies of success are expected to be
relevant to the sheep and goat industries in Europe because innovations were chosen
by industry members who are a large representation of the sector across Europe.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Caja</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Carné</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Salama, AK.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ait-Saidi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rojas-Olivares</surname>
          </string-name>
          , MA.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rovai</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Alshaikh</surname>
          </string-name>
          , MA. (
          <year>2014</year>
          )
          <article-title>State-of-the-art of electronic identification techniques and applications in goats</article-title>
          .
          <source>Small Ruminant Research</source>
          ,
          <volume>121</volume>
          , p.
          <fpage>42</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>50</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <surname>De Rancourt</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fois</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lavín</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M. P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tchakérian</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Vallerand</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2006</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Mediterranean sheep and goats production: An uncertain future</article-title>
          .
          <source>Small Ruminant Research</source>
          ,
          <volume>62</volume>
          , p.
          <fpage>167</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>179</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dubeuf</surname>
          </string-name>
          , JP. (
          <year>2014</year>
          )
          <article-title>Science, technology, innovation and governance for the goat sectors</article-title>
          .
          <source>Small Ruminant Research</source>
          ,
          <volume>121</volume>
          , p.
          <fpage>2</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>6</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dubeuf</surname>
          </string-name>
          , JP., and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sayadi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2014</year>
          )
          <article-title>Multi-functionality issues for small ruminants: What changes are needed in territorial public policies and training?: Report of two round tables on territorial issues and training for the development of goat farming</article-title>
          .
          <source>Small Ruminant Research</source>
          ,
          <volume>121</volume>
          , p.
          <fpage>136</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>145</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>