<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta>
      <journal-title-group>
        <journal-title>Castiglione della Pescaia, Italy, May</journal-title>
      </journal-title-group>
    </journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Feelings Detection System - a Proposal</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Arminda Guerra Lopes</string-name>
          <email>aguerralopes@gmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Ana Dias</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Joana Salgueiro</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Eurico Lopes</string-name>
          <email>eurico@ipcb.pt</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Instituto Politécnico de Castelo Branco/EST &amp; Madeira Interactive Technologies Institute</institution>
          ,
          <country country="PT">Portugal</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Instituto Politécnico de Castelo Branco/EST &amp; QRural - Qualidade de Vida no Mundo Rural</institution>
          ,
          <country country="PT">Portugal</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>Instituto Politécnico de Castelo Branco/EST</institution>
          ,
          <country country="PT">Portugal</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2018</year>
      </pub-date>
      <volume>29</volume>
      <issue>2018</issue>
      <fpage>53</fpage>
      <lpage>61</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>The feelings detection is the study of the human feelings, attitudes and opinions and their classification about a specific topic. This paper consists of carry out the feelings (rever sentido da frase) analysis of a population, expressed in written comments from online newspapers about several subjects. The motivation for this project results from the local newspaper agents who suggested the development of this application for their use. After looking into several algorithms able of doing this analysis it was decided to use the algorithm SentiStrength, which allows words classification based on the punctuations stored in its dictionary as positives or negatives. “To feed” the algorithm authors used comments from online newspapers through a web spider, storing it in a text file that will be the algorithm input. The results will be achieved through the Media reach by the SentiStrength analysis in which the positive and negative feelings are expressed and presented in the extracted comments.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>SentiStrength</kwd>
        <kwd>sentiments</kwd>
        <kwd>detection of sentiments</kwd>
        <kwd>digital inclusion</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>Technological change invades most areas of society and many different aspects of our
lives. The utilization of technologies, such as the Internet, increased across all sectors
of society. Digital devices and applications play key roles in our daily life and in a
wider range of the society. This gives us insight to develop a system, which can
contribute to the inclusion of different people in digital world.</p>
      <p>The proposed system is an example of public participation in society. Three local
newspapers suggested the incentive. The goal was to implicate public participation
through comments of newspapers’ news about the written texts in order to get more
ideas about how to address the narratives.</p>
      <p>Conversely, they wanted to get data about a subject and then, inform others about
people’s opinions.</p>
      <p>
        The main purpose of this paper is to present the analyses of the principal
techniques of feelings detection in a population, to verify the viability of the
development of a system prototype that allows to withdraw people’s opinions about
different themes. Comments are extracted from online newspapers expressing feelings
related to the news. During this work’s development some issues emerged, such as,
the way to extract newspapers comments and how it would be analyzed. As a solution
to our problems we used a Web Spider [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>
        ], which allows access to the intended
information and analysis of the extracted comments. An already existent algorithm
was used, the SentiStrength [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ]. The algorithm permits to evaluate words as
emoticons (faces that show feelings) classifying each word or emoticon.
      </p>
      <p>In summary, authors tried to focus on: the meaning of the detected feelings from a
population; the use of a common algorithm for feelings detection; the solution to
access the information from the newspaper; and the whole process from information
gathering to its analysis. These steps permitted to test the project proposal viability.
Finally, we intended to define the requirements to develop the prototype tool for the
population feelings’ analysis of a specific event and time.</p>
      <p>The final output has several components, expressed in text form, related to a
subject. This work will ensure that the users opinion about certain news, expressed on
online platforms newspapers, will be understood as well as their feelings about the
expressed comments.
2</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Related Work</title>
      <p>This section presents the background information about sentiments analysis studies
and the algorithms, generally, used for this subject.
2.1</p>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>Sentiment Analysis</title>
        <p>
          Sentiment analysis deals with the computational treatment of opinion, sentiment and
subjectivity in text. Throughout the use of technologies people’s opinions can
influence in shaping the opinions of others. There are hundreds of papers published
on the subject: [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
          ], [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
          ], [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
          ], [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
          ], [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>
          ]. The factors behind this include: the rise of
machine learning methods in natural language processing and information retrieval
and the availability of datasets for machine learning algorithms, among others.
2.2
        </p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-2-2">
        <title>Tools for Sentiment Classification</title>
        <p>
          The feelings analysis as referred in [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
          ] is the classification of human feelings,
attitudes and opinions about a topic expressed in text or speech.
        </p>
        <p>
          Despite not being a very discussed topic, there are some tools that can help in the
sentiments classification expressed in texts or words. In this research some algorithms
examples are presented:
• Emoticons: as referred in [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
          ] is a tool that analysis emoticons and allows to
withdraw the feelings itself. Concerning its efficiency, it is more efficient when
used with another algorithm because it only refers to the feeling expressed and not
the value.
• LIWC: this program searches words belonging to the text we want to analyze and
verifies if these words exist in its dictionary. If these words exist, they will be
stored in the right category. The words are analyzed separated by categories, for
instance, articles, personal pronouns, positive and negative feelings [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
          ].
• SentiWordNet: according to the Princeton University [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>
          ] this algorithm is based
on a wordnet dictionary that is compounded by a wide range of nouns, verbs,
adjectives and adverbs, which are grouped in sets of synonyms called synsets to
express a different concept. The results from this method are divided into three
categories as positivity, negativity and objectivity. Each one is related with a
color.
• SenticNet: this algorithm exploits the analysis of feelings concept, which means it
carries out the polarity detection (Binary classification of the text. It can be
positive or negative and varies between 1 and -1) and it realizes the
acknowledgement of emotions through semantic Web. The main goal is to give
meaning to the contents published in the internet, in order, to be understood by
both human and machine [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
          ].
• PANAS: Is a method for analysing feelings, which has two mood scales. One
measures the positive affection and the other the negative affection. This
algorithm does not work online as the previous ones, but it does work using a
questionnaire filled by the users [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
          ].
• SentiStrength: according to [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
          ] this algorithm has several lists of negative and
positive words and also an emoticons list with the respective punctuations. The
SentiStrength analyses such a whole text as word by word and the punctuation is
from 1 to 5 if it is positive and from -1 to -5 if it is negative. For example, the
word “like” have a value of 2 and “love” is value higher, which means, a 3. So, we
can conclude that “love” has a stronger sentiment than “like”. It contains a
dictionary in almost every language and is available in Windows program and
Java code.
        </p>
        <p>To be possible to verify which one of the algorithms would be more suitable to our
work, we hold a scale to compare each one according to several parameters (Figure
1), as if it contained or did not contained Portuguese language; if it was or if it was
not available free of charge, in order to have a more accessible use; if it evaluated
short or long texts; if it placed the words in categories, which means, if it divided
them in positive and negative feelings and finally, if it evaluated emoticons.</p>
        <p>Through the scale and the research conducted, the SentiStrength algorithm was
chosen to carry out the feelings analysis in this project. Professor Mike Thelwall
created this algorithm and it is considered to be the best feelings classifier. It has
already been used in several important events, such as, The Olympic Games in
London, in 2012, and Super Bowl in 2014.</p>
        <p>SentiStrength was the one that we choose, as it analyses emoticons which is quite
important because, nowadays many people use them to express feelings. It is
available free of charge which leads to detect feelings easier since any user can
benefit from its services. It analyses short texts but this may be adapted to analyse
long texts as we will see in the next topic. Finally, it also separates the words into
categories, from positive to negative feelings. The tests carried out were only done in
the SentiStrength because the other algorithms are not available for its use.
A person’s feeling is expressed through a written comment about what they feel
concerning a particular subject. The sentiment analysis is the analysis of each
comment. The goal is to obtain people’s opinion produced by their feelings about a
subject. They presente those feelings through the words they use when they make
comments on written form. Then, the newspaper ‘owner’ will analyze it and draws
some conclusions about the user satisfaction or dissatisfaction about a newspaper
narrative. From those results, the user (newspaper) can improve or change the way
future narratives will be written or can collect the data to inform others about the
acceptance levels that news produced on the reader. As stated before levels are
represented in a quantitative order and each work is quoted according positive and
negative values.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>4 Application Description</title>
      <p>To continue this project and be able to get an input in order to be analyzed by
SentiStrength, several components had to be drawn up as a Web Spider and a filter.
Both components were performed using the Python scripting language considering
that it is easier to implement, and it has a library called BeautifulSoup, which has
functions that allow to extract archive data HTML.
4.1</p>
      <sec id="sec-3-1">
        <title>Web Spider</title>
        <p>
          A Web Spider [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>
          ] is a computer program that browses by the World Wide Web in a
methodical and automated way. For the development applications of the web spider
several frameworks can be used and one of them is the Scrapy [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
          ]. It is an open
source framework implemented in Python which provides components for the
selection and extraction of data from sources as HTML and XML.
        </p>
        <p>This component was developed to withdraw specific informations of the HTML’s
components of a particular site, in that case, online newspapers sites. The comments
are extracted depending on the date and topic entered by users in order to simplify the
research and therefore the information to extract. In such a way to remove the
comments according to the conditions imposed by the user, the web spider will
compare the introduced dates with every news date; if it is within the range it shall be
checked in the title of itself, if it finds the topic introduced by the user. In case all
these requirements occur, the comments will be removed and stored in a text file.</p>
        <p>The web spider removes the comments through the HTML tags presented in each
site and, each of them has different tags. The negative point is that it needs to make
different web spiders for different newspapers. In some newspapers the comment
section is a Facebook plug-in, this make the withdrawal of the comments harder
because the plug-in redirects to another HTML page. So, in this project we do not
remove the comments from the newspapers that have this section. In the future we
will sort this problem.
4.2</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-2">
        <title>Filter</title>
        <p>
          There is a large amount of repeated information and the SentiStrength [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
          ] only
evaluates texts written in one line. It was decided to carry out a filter where all the
repeated information’s, line breaks and enters are eliminated to get an evaluation
more concise of the matter.
        </p>
        <p>Keeping the file initial order resulting from the web spider, the filter begins by
withdrawing the repeated comments and then removes the characters “\n” and “\r” so
the comments are all kept in just one line and be considered by the SentiStrength as
one only text.
4.3</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-3">
        <title>SentiStrength</title>
        <p>As referred in section 2 the algorithm SentiStrength was used to analyze feelings
resulting from comments removed from the online newspapers. The input for the
algorithm was the file resulting from the filter, since this is already without repeated
comments and with it in just one line to turn the analysis easier. After the file analysis
by SentiStrength the output was also a text file with the general classification of the
positive and negative feelings and with the individual classification of each word.
Through the general average presented in the document it is possible to determine
which feelings predominates in the extracted comments.
4.4
After the comments extracted using the web spider and filter we can initiate the
comments analysis by algorithms. The algorithms we found available to perform the
tests were the SentiStrength and the LIWC. Though the LIWC full version is paid, we
can find it online with a limited characters version (5000). Therefore, we shaved the
sample to allow the analysis using the two algorithms.</p>
        <p>SentiStrength: Coursing through a set of comments, a meaning according to these
is withdrawn through the words, which composed it. It was verified that if each one of
these words were in the dictionary they were classified according to their value,
negative or positive. Finally, values of each presented word in each comment were
summed up, which reflected an average of the positive and negative values of the
comment.</p>
        <p>Through these values it was possible to say if the comment contained a positive or
negative emotion.</p>
        <p>LIWC: In the version that is available on LIWC site only English language texts
are analyzed. We can also verify that LIWC has several options to classify the texts
that we wish to analyze, such as personal writing, social network, scientific writing
among others. LIWC analyze the texts as follows:</p>
        <p>
          The module for the examination compares each text word with the dictionary
defined by the user. The dictionary identifies the words, which are associated with
important psychologically classes. After all, the words in the text are counted. LIWC
calculates the total percentage of words that correspond to each dictionary class. For
instances, if the LIWC analyses a 2000 words text we can determine that, in these
words there are 150 pronouns and 84 words with positive emotions. It converts these
numbers to percentages and the outcome will be 7,5% pronouns and 4,2% words
containing positive emotions [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
          ].
        </p>
        <p>LIWC carries out a more detailed analysis in what feelings and words classification
concerns. In its free version it has a huge limitation: the number of characters. So, we
choose the SentiStrength because its analysis is simpler, and it is available without
limitation.
4.5</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-4">
        <title>Interface</title>
        <p>The user can take advantage of the components mentioned earlier through a
developed web application. Some of the application’s storyboards are in next figures.</p>
        <p>The user chooses the comments that they want to extract from newspapers. Figure
2 shows the choices that the user can make. To have a personalized search, they can
only choose one newspaper or choose several.</p>
        <p>After choosing the newspapers, the user chooses the time interval from which
comments will be taken.</p>
        <p>The search can be more detailed if the user searches directly the event they want.
In this case, comments are extracted depending on the topic that the user introduced.</p>
        <p>Since the application takes some time to extract the comments from the
newspapers, the user can select the time that he wants to wait or even that, the total
time for the application to finish the search.</p>
        <p>Figure 3 shows the results obtained through the analysis of comments by the
algorithm SentiStrength. The user can see how many comments were analyzed, so
they know if the analysis is based on one or many comments. The average of positive
and negative feelings in the comments will be displayed as an image, as well as the
values that represent those feelings. In the end, it will be possible to verify if the
comments expressed more negative or positive feelings.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Results</title>
      <p>For the results presented below, we searched for news between February 6 and 7,
2018 under the topic "PSI-20". In Figure 4 it is possible to verify the obtained results.</p>
      <p>To feed the SentiStrength algorithm, comments were taken from a Portuguese
newspaper, the Jornal de Negócios. Since Portuguese is our native language, we
elaborated web spiders for newspapers on this language. The newspaper analysed
deals with topics such as economics, finance, and companies, among others.</p>
      <p>The PSI-20 is the main reference index of the Portuguese capital market. This
subject concerns economy and the opinions are given depending on the state of this
index. During the analysis we find that feelings related to this theme are mostly
negative. The results are obtainable as an average of the feelings presented in all
comments.
6</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Conclusions and Future Work</title>
      <p>This paper presents the work in progress concerning a systems development for
feelings analysis. Authors showed some of the existent algorithms and their
characteristics. From those several feelings detectors an algorithm, SentiStrength was
considered the most suitable for our project. It analyses short and long texts once
adapted to do it; Divides words in categories meaning positive and negative feelings
and it also can analyze emoticons. In a manner to feed the algorithm we developed a
Web Spider and a filter that allow us to withdraw the comments and filter them
withdrawing the repeated ones to ease its analysis.</p>
      <p>This project helps users to know what others feel about a particular topic. It may be
useful to know what a population's opinion is about, for example, a hospital or hotel
and thereby influence other users in making decisions.</p>
      <p>Given the fact that the dictionary for our motherly language, Portuguese is
incomplete we intend to improve it and as a result contribute to a better functioning.
In our future work, we are still developing the application with the already developed
components. Web spider and the filter are included in order to permit a more effective
application ‘use. The prototype is in the user texts’ phase. This work can contribute
for the inclusion of different people in digital world.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Araújo</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gonçalves</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Benevenuto</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          : Métodos para Análise de Sentimentos no Twitter.
          <source>Salvador, Brasil. Retrieved March</source>
          <volume>15</volume>
          ,
          <year>2018</year>
          , from http://homepages.dcc.ufmg.br/~fabricio/download/webmedia13.pdf (
          <year>2013</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Cardie</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wiebe</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Wilson,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Litman</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>D.</surname>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Combining low-level and summary representations of opinions for multi-perspective question answering</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of the AAAI Spring Symposium on New Directions in Question Answering</source>
          ,
          <fpage>20</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>27</lpage>
          (
          <year>2003</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Conglomerates</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <source>LIWC. Retrieved March</source>
          <volume>15</volume>
          ,
          <year>2018</year>
          , from LIWC: http://liwc.wpengine.com/ (
          <year>2015</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Conglomerates</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          : LIWC.
          <source>Retrieved April 04</source>
          ,
          <year>2018</year>
          , from LIWC: http://liwc.wpengine.com/how-it-works (
          <year>2015</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Crawford</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J. R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Henry</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J. D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): Construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large</article-title>
          .
          <source>British Journal of Clinical Psychology</source>
          ,
          <volume>43</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>245</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>265</lpage>
          (
          <year>2004</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6. CyberEmotions.
          <source>SentiStrength. Retrieved March</source>
          <volume>15</volume>
          ,
          <year>2018</year>
          , from SentiStrength: http://sentistrength.wlv.ac.uk/ (
          <year>2013</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dini</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mazzini</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Opinion classification through information extraction</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of the Conference on Data Mining Methods and Databases for Engineering, Finance and Other Fields (Data Mining)</source>
          ,
          <fpage>299</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>310</lpage>
          (
          <year>2002</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          8.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kushal</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lawrence</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pennock</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>M.: Mining the peanut gallery: Opinion extraction and semantic classification of product reviews</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of WWW</source>
          ,
          <fpage>519</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>528</lpage>
          (
          <year>2003</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          9.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Das</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Yahoo! for Amazon: Extracting market sentiment from stock message boards</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of the Asia Pacific Finance Association Annual Conference (APFA)</source>
          (
          <year>2001</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          10.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Scrapinghub</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <source>Scrapy. Retrieved March</source>
          <volume>15</volume>
          ,
          <year>2018</year>
          , from Scrapy: https://scrapy.org/
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          11. SenticNet.
          <source>Retrieved March</source>
          <volume>15</volume>
          ,
          <year>2018</year>
          , from SenticNet: http://sentic.net/ (
          <year>2009</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          12.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Thakur</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gera</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Singh</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2015</year>
          ).
          <article-title>The Senti Strength Calculator: Engineering the Sentiment from the Opinionated Text</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings 2015 Fifth International Conference on Communication Systems and Network Technologies</source>
          , Gwalior,
          <fpage>1103</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1108</lpage>
          (
          <year>2015</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          13. University, P.: The Trustees of Princeton University. Retrieved March 15,
          <year>2018</year>
          , from WordNet: https://wordnet.princeton.edu/ (
          <year>2018</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          14.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wolfe</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Definition of Spidering and Web Crawlers</article-title>
          .
          <source>Retrieved March</source>
          <volume>15</volume>
          ,
          <year>2018</year>
          , from the balance: https://www.thebalance.
          <article-title>com/what-is-spidering-or-</article-title>
          <string-name>
            <surname>web-</surname>
          </string-name>
          crawling-
          <volume>3515704</volume>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          15.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zhang</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Liu</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Deep Learning for Sentiment Analysis: A Survey</article-title>
          . eprint arXiv:
          <year>1801</year>
          .
          <volume>07883</volume>
          (
          <year>2018</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>