<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Bitcoin Response to Twitter Sentiments</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Neutral</string-name>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Faculty of Finance, Ternopil National Economic University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Ternopil 46006</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UA">Ukraine</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Governance Analytics, Paris Dauphine University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Paris 75016</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="FR">France</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>The paper investigates the Bitcoin exchange rate response to the daily Twitter data. Sentiment score is computed for the number of obtained tweets. The prediction accuracy for the Bitcoin exchange rate employing the sentiment score reveals the influence of the Twitter social network on the news diffusion and target exchange rate volatility. We used the historical data on the Bitcoin exchange rate and the daily sentiment score of the pertinent tweets to forecast the direction of change for the Bitcoin. The results show better performance of the developed forecasting method with both historical data on the exchange rate and the sentiment score than using only the exchange rate data as an input.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>Prediction of the exchange rates has been the topic of hot debates since decades if not
centuries. In the economic literature, different opinions exist on whether it is ever
possible to forecast exchange rates. Recently, the crypto currencies were introduced
as the possible substitute to the money issued by the central banks. The volatility
together with abnormal interest of the economic agents to the crypto money has spurred
the discussion among the economists and researchers about the underlying reasons of
the decision-making for crypto trading and its forecasting.</p>
      <p>
        The deep learning methods (subset of the artificial intelligence repertoire) have
been employed for the exchange rate prediction. Our previous finding prove that the
convolutional deep neural networks provide relatively accurate results on the
out-ofsample data for the directional prediction of the selected reserve currencies k-days
ahead [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]. However, the one-day directional forecasting for the crypto currencies
remains surprisingly challenging. Moreover, the changes in crypto currencies’
regulation may cause the market volatility which is difficult to forecast even with methods
of machine learning.
      </p>
      <p>In the study, we test our hypothesis that the exchange rate of crypto currencies (in
particular the Bitcoin rate) depends on behavioral signals rather than any fundamental
conditions and thus the forecasting technics must consider the “crowd” sentiments.
This statement conforms to the ideas of the behavioral economic mainstream. The
behavioral economics insists that the emotions may lead the market participants more
significantly than the fundamental factors. The traders’ sentiments may cause the
market corrections or shocks which cannot be explained by the efficient market
hypothesis neither by the fundamental or technical analysis. The number of crypto
currencies has been created since 2009 but the Bitcoin is one of the most popular. It
motivates us to focus on the Bitcoin exchange rate in the study.</p>
      <p>Recently the social networks have been introduced (i.e., Facebook, Twitter, etc).
Now a lion share of communication is made through the social networks and the
speed of the news diffusion increased vastly with respect to the end of 80s. Moreover,
recently Twitter became of the most conventional tools of the communication among
the politicians, country leaders, main economists and market-makers with the society.
Thus, we cannot ignore the role of the social networks, in particular Twitter, in the
evaluation of the crypto currencies market sentiments.</p>
      <p>Our research agenda foresees integrating the sentiment analysis of Twitter data
together with the historical data on the exchange rates for the prediction of the direction
for the exchange rates of Bitcoin to US Dollar. The rest of the paper is organized as
follows: Section 2 discusses the related literature, Section 3 gives the analysis of the
crypto currencies market, Section 4 reports the data, Section 5 focuses on
methodology and methods employed, section 6 presents the results, Section 7 concludes with
some further research agenda outline.
2</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Related Works</title>
      <p>
        One of the most prominent economic mainstreams with regard to the exchange rate
prediction is the efficient market hypothesis (EMH). The random walk model has
been seen as a proof of the EMH. However, the market traders together with the
academics disclose the number of cases where statistical and machine learning methods
could beat the random walk. Most of these methods, though, show only slightly better
performance at different time horizons (see [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ]). Behavioral economics poses the
main challenge to the EMH. The traders decisions are not always rational and
behavioral factors are important for the market reaction. The use of crypto currencies
anticipates the participants’ irrationality as these assets are not recognized as the money in
most of the countries.
      </p>
      <p>
        The recent opinion article of R. Shiller in New York Times (October 19, 2017) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ]
on the traders behavior during the financial crash in 1987 reveals the importance of
the market sentiments. In 1987 people did not use Internet for social networking so R.
Shiller sent around 3500 surveys to the investors with the questions underlining the
traders reasoning during October 19, 1987. The survey revealed no fundamental
factors caused the panic among investors. Even the news in the leading economic
reviews before the very day has not contributed much. However, in the morning of
October 19 the World Street Journal published the article comparing the situation
before the crises of 1929 and the market circumstances in 1987. The information and
the graph coincided to the extent that it “raised the thought that today, yes, this very
day could be the beginning of the end for the stock market” [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ]. The author also adds
‘Given the state of communications then, it is amazing how quickly the panic spread”
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ]. We believe, now the social networks help diffuse the news much faster. Twitter is
one of the main instruments for the communication. It spurs our interest in exploiting
Twitter data for our study.
      </p>
      <p>
        The economic literature still adjusts to the new instruments of interests such as
Twitter data. Despite some papers discuss the “wisdom of crowds” [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4 ref5">4,5</xref>
        ], we consider
the findings of [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ] as the most pertinent to our study. The researchers use the Twitter
data to compute the market sentiments of FOMC meetings. The authors empirically
prove the correlation between the stock market fluctuations and the sentiment score of
the target tweets. The study [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ] uses the sentiment score and the exchange rate of the
reserve currencies in their forex prediction with different methods including neural
networks. Our study is focused on the Bitcoin market and contrary to the authors we
use the convolutional neural networks. They prove their classification accuracy for
the number of implications in finance [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        The paucity of papers is still observed in the realm of the Bitcoin prediction.
Among the recently published papers the one of [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ] discusses the relationship
between the Bitcoin rate and the flow of its transactions. [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
        ] employ VAR methods in
the point forecasting of the Bitcoin rate. In our paper we focus on the directional
prediction. The paper [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
        ] discusses the trend prediction for the Bitcoin with the shallow
neural networks. Authors praise the acceptable performance of the developed method.
They point out that the additional data on the volume of transactions improve the
results only marginally. We go further in our study using the convolutional neural
network as the deep learning technic to predict the target rate change.
3
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Analysis of the market for crypto currencies</title>
      <p>Anonymous character of the turnover of the crypto currency with open crypto graphic
code and available for all interested transactional storage (blockchain) makes it
possible to avoid both bureaucratic procedures when making calculation, and legislative
acts on tax control. The crypto currency became rather attractive speculative
investment center for stock exchanges traders and for those who want to get quick returns,
reminding financial pyramid. However, using the blockchain technology for
transactions and specific form of money mining, the assumptions about financial pyramids
are questionable. At least 1076 of the crypto currencies are involved in the stock
exchanges trades and are owned by millions of people. The opportunity to pay for goods
and attendance without intermediaries and for a minimum commission fee have led to
the increasing of the crypto currency market capitalization in 2017 up to 1250% (700
billion dollars), where Bitcoin accounts for 40% of the total share. Such rapid growth
of capitalization is nothing else, but the expansion of cryptocurrency into the global
financial system, which can have both negative and positive effects on financial
system of the world countries. Fig.1. Describes the Bitcoin exchange rate over 2017.</p>
      <p>700 billion US Dollars of the cryptocurrency capitalization in the scale of the
world financial markets is not a large sum and is equal to the capitalization of the
largest companies in S&amp;P500 rating such as Microsoft Corp. ($ 671 billion),
Amazon.com ($ 605 billion), and others. But considering the fact that the crypto currency
partially fulfill and, in the future can fully fulfill the role of money, further growth of
the capitalization can carry certain risks for monetary policy of the central banks.
1000
800
D
SU600
.
n
l
b400
n
i
200
0
4900,00</p>
      <p>Exploring the capitalization of the crypto currency market in comparison with the
money supply of the developed countries, the capitalization of cryptocurrency is
higher than monetary aggregate M0 (money outside banks (cash)) or M1 (depending
on methods of calculating of monetary aggregates), and higher than aggregate money
supply of more than 100 countries of the world. Fig. 2 reflects the growth of the
cryptocurrencies market over the last 9 years.
4</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Data</title>
      <p>We gathered the data on the Bitcoin exchange rate from the website of
http://markets.businessinsider.com/currencies/btc-usd.</p>
      <p>We collected the Twitter data for the research purposes. The timespan includes the
period between January 2014 to September 2017. We use simple combination for the
key word “Bitcoin + “exchange rate”. This combination intends to capture the most
pertinent tweets usually posted by the professionals or those interested in trading. We
collected the tweets only in English to simplify further sentiment analysis. In total, we
contained almost 2.5 million tweets for more then 2,5 years. Table 1 provides the
descriptive statistics on the average number of tweets per day, standard deviation, and
the example of the scrapped tweets.</p>
      <p>
        Similarly to [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ] we created three following data sets:
set 1: the historical data on Bitcoin exchange rate to US Dollar;
set 2: the sentiment score of the pertinent tweets
set 3: the combination of the first and the second sets.
      </p>
      <p>
        These sets are divided into training and testing subsets at the ratio 90:10.
In this section we explain the developed deep learning method to predict the daily
directional change of the Bitcoin exchange rate, methods of performance evaluation,
and the methodology of the sentiment score calculation.
Among the deep learning methods convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are
discriminant models apt for classification problems. Moreover, CNNs address
dimensionality. CNNs have been successfully used for unsupervised extraction of abstract input
features for prediction problems [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]. The approach has also proved effective in
financial predictions [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8 ref9">8, 9</xref>
        ]. It motivates us to use CNNs to predict the daily directional
change of the Bitcoin exchange rate (BTC). Units in the CNNs receive inputs from
small contiguous subregions of the input space, called a receptive field, that
collectively cover the entire set of input features [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ]. We use maximum pooling for down
sampling and reducing dimensionality. We employ a dropout as regularization
technique to avoid overfitting in the training phase. The output of a convolution layer is
obtained by applying a rectified linear unit (ReLU). The softmax function is applied
at the output generation stage. We use Keras Python Library with Tensorflow
framework to run the experiments. In the first series of experiments with only time-series
data on the target exchange rate we obtain the best prediction results with the
following CNN architecture: width: 4; height: 1; depth: 1; stride: 2; padding: 0. In the
second series with inclusion of tweets we obtain the best prediction results with the
following CNN architecture: width: 5; height: 1; depth: 2; stride: 1; padding: 0.
      </p>
      <sec id="sec-4-1">
        <title>Experimental setup to evaluate our method</title>
        <p>In accordance with best evaluating practices the predictive accuracy of developed
models are compared to those of baseline models and best available existing methods
on out-of-sample data to determine if the improvement in predictive accuracy is
statistically significant. We will test the hypothesis that “the proportion of correctly
classified observations” measure resulting from our model is higher than those
obtained using alternate methods. We now expand on the candidate models we propose
to use for comparison.</p>
        <p>
          Random walk. Following standard evaluation practice in financial economics (see
[
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
          ]), we will evaluate the prediction accuracy of our model by using random walk
without a drift (RW).
        </p>
        <p>ARIMA. Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) is commonly used time series model
for foreign exchange rate forecasting. We use auto.arima () from the library “forecast”
function with default parameters to get prediction results. Then we implement the
function to calculate the proportion of correctly classified observations.</p>
        <p>Shallow neural networks. A standard multilayer perceptron (MLP) with 1 hidden
layer of neurons is used as a prediction model to compare with CNNs. The logistic
activation function is used for the neurons in the hidden layer and the output neuron.
We use standard back-propagation training algorithm with fixed training speed for
training. We conduct experiments using the Tensorflow framework. The output layer
contains 1 neuron with the forecasted value. We obtain the best prediction results with
10 neurons in the hidden layer.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-2">
        <title>Sentiment score</title>
        <p>
          As in the study of [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
          ], we usethe Pattern Package with Python programming
environment to compute the sentiment score. “Pattern” (BSD license) is a Python package
for web mining, natural language processing, machine learning and network analysis,
with a focus on ease-of-use [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>
          ]. The results are the values in the range [-1; 1]. The
most negative tweets have the score (-1) and positive incline to 1. These values are
the polarity scores for the pertinent tweets. The polarity score is negative when the
tweet content is pessimistic or aggressive. The tweets with polarity score close to 1
reflect the positive expectations about Bitcoin and may be treated as the incitation for
the bullish strategy of the user if he/she participates in the cryptocurrency trading.
Table 2 includes the descriptive statistics on the sentiment score findings. Fig. 3
depicts the distribution of the tweets with different ‘mood’: [-1; -0.1) – negative, [-0.1;
0.1] – neutral, (0.1; 1] – positive. The downside of the method is that it uses the
polarity score of the adjectives to assess the tweet ‘mood’. The tweets without the
adjectives are then recognized as neutral.
        </p>
        <sec id="sec-4-2-1">
          <title>Negative</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-4-2-2">
          <title>Positive 39% 36% 25%</title>
          <p>The results (Table 3) prove the empirical evidence for the CNN superior performance
in forecasting the Bitcoin direction of change in comparison with the other methods
using the set 1. However, the findings indicate that even the best available methods do
not yield the accurate results with the crypto currencies’ historical data. Recall that we
assess the classification accuracy of the point estimate forecasting technics to evaluate
the developed model. The results with ARIMA, one-layer neural network and the
convolutional neural network provide only marginally better forecasts than the simple
random walk. The possible explanation is in the high volatility of the Bitcoin
exchange rate in 2017 with the moderate interest to the crypto currency before. The
results obtained with sentiment score as the input data improved the accuracy of the
method drastically. Fig. 4 displays the training accuracy of the CNN with the set 3.
The accuracy rate reaches around 95 % on the training data and 68.6% with the test
inputs. Fig. 5 depicts the training loss decrease during the CNN training visualized
with Tensorboard. In the experiments, we do not anticipate the lag between the
Bitcoin rate change and the tweet news following the idea that with the daily window
the news influence is absorbed by the market participants within an ongoing day.
The Bitcoin is among the most popular crypto currencies. However, it does not
represent the legal tender. There is no evidence about the underlying conditions that lead
the Bitcoin market participants. We made the hypothesis about that the behavioral
signals make the most significant contribution to the Bitcoin fluctuations. The
hypothesis is tested with the developed model together with the traditional methods. Our
findings prove the significant influence of the Twitter signals on the Bitcoin
fluctuations. The sentiment score included as an input data much improved the prediction
accuracy for the Bitcoin directional changes. Thus the tweet sentiment data may be
further exploited in the developing of the trading strategies. Further research studies
will devote special attention to the periods when some regulations concerning Bitcoin
legitimacy are adopted.</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Galeshchuk</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mukherjee</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Deep networks for predicting direction of change in foreign exchange rates</article-title>
          .
          <source>Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management</source>
          <volume>24</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>100</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>110</lpage>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rossi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Exchange rate predictability</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of economic literature 51(4)</source>
          ,
          <fpage>1063</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1119</lpage>
          (
          <year>2013</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Shiller</surname>
            , R.:
            <given-names>A Stock</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Market Panic Like 1987 Could Happen</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Again</article-title>
          . The New York Times,
          <year>2017</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gurkaynak</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R. S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sack</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B. P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Swanson</surname>
          </string-name>
          , E. T.:
          <article-title>Do actions speak louder than words? The response of asset prices to monetary policy actions</article-title>
          and statements,
          <year>2004</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Papaioannou</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Russo</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Papaioannou</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Siettos</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C. I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Can social microblogging be used to forecast intraday exchange rates?</article-title>
          <source>Netnomics: Economic Research and Electronic Networking</source>
          <volume>14</volume>
          (
          <issue>1-2</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>47</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>68</lpage>
          (
          <year>2013</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Azar</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lo</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A. W.:</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>The wisdom of Twitter crowds: Predicting stock market reactions to FOMC meetings via Twitter feeds (</article-title>
          <year>2016</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Plakandaras</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Papadimitriou</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gogas</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , &amp;
          <string-name>
            <surname>Diamantaras</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Market sentiment and exchange rate directional forecasting</article-title>
          .
          <source>Algorithmic Finance</source>
          <volume>4</volume>
          (
          <issue>1-2</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>69</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>79</lpage>
          (
          <year>2015</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          8.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Busseti</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Osband</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wong</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Deep learning for time series modeling</article-title>
          .
          <source>Technical report</source>
          , Stanford University (
          <year>2012</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          9.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Yeh</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S. H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C. J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tsai</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M. F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Corporate Default Prediction via Deep Learning (</article-title>
          <year>2014</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          10.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Yang</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S. Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kim</surname>
          </string-name>
          , J.:
          <article-title>Bitcoin Market Return and Volatility Forecasting Using Transaction Network Flow Properties</article-title>
          . In Computational Intelligence, IEEE Symposium Series on (pp.
          <fpage>1778</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>1785</lpage>
          ). IEEE (
          <year>2015</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          11.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Catania</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Grassi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ravazzolo</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Forecasting Cryptocurrencies Financial Time Series</article-title>
          . Working Paper (
          <year>2018</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          12.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Almeida</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Tata</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Moser</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Smit</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Bitcoin prediciton using ANN</article-title>
          . Working Paper (
          <year>2018</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          13.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Smedt</surname>
          </string-name>
          , T. D.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Daelemans</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Pattern for python</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Machine Learning Research 13</source>
          ,
          <fpage>2063</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>2067</lpage>
          (
          <year>2012</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>