<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Design and Development of MOOCs</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Zarema Seidametova</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Crimean Engineering-Pedagogical University</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Simferopol, 95015</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="UA">Ukraine</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>Massive open online courses (MOOCs) are the new additional dimension of education that allow to study online courses from different universities geographically located anywhere around the world. We consider the MOOC's classification based on pedagogical approaches and product functionalities (cMOOC, xMOOC, quasi MOOC). We present diagrams of the planning, prior preparation and the development of the MOOC. There are four stages of the process: preproduction, production, postproduction and maintenance. We present the typical roadmap of MOOC development: guidelines to develop course content, video content implementation, and development of roles. We introduce as example the video content matrix of the quasi-MOOC “Ruby on Rails Web Framework for Beginners”. We recommend the following roles for the MOOC development team: experts, curriculum designers and technical specialists. This set of roles needs for effective design of MOOC.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Massive Open Online Courses</kwd>
        <kwd>сМООС</kwd>
        <kwd>хМООС</kwd>
        <kwd>quasi МООС</kwd>
        <kwd>MOOC design</kwd>
        <kwd>Video Lectures</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>
        The educational community has begun to use since 2008 the term – massive open
online courses (MOOCs) to denote a certain format of open online courses.
According a study [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ] conducted by the MOOC Class Central by the end of 2017 the size of
the modern “MOOC movement” reached more than 800 universities, more than 81
million students; the number of MOOC courses are more than 9,400. The largest
provider of online courses Coursera (www.coursera.org) has expanded its audience to 30
million students. Duolingo (www.duolingo.com), a popular language platform, has
200 million users (they do not receive formal certification, in contrast to the
previously mentioned 81 million university students).
      </p>
      <p>
        Despite the growing number of teachers who have started to develop the MOOC
courses, the design of the MOOC is not simple. Teachers – developers of the MOOC
– should be familiar not only with pedagogical approaches, but also with logistical,
technological and financial issues. The authors of [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ] propose the conceptual
environment “MOOC Canvas” to support teachers in the description and design of the
MOOCs.
      </p>
      <p>
        The desire of educational institutions to improve the quality of education leads to
the need to increase the cost of the development and maintenance for educational
services, and, consequently, the final cost of training increases. In the economic scale,
the MOOCs model reduces the cost of learning per student. For example, if $300,000
were spent on the development of one MOOC with an audience of 100,000 students,
then we got about $3 per student [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ]. MOOC companies need to cover the start-up
costs and financing activities. For example, Coursera in November 2013 attracted $85
million of venture capital, including funding from partner universities, the World
Bank and venture capital companies. MIT and Harvard University allotted $30
million each, creating EdX (www.edx.org).
      </p>
      <p>The original concept of the MOOC assumed that MOOCs are free courses with
open access for a huge number of learners from all over the world. In recent years a
large number of researchers have discussed the development of MOOCs in terms of
social, institutional, technological, and economic issues. However, this discussion
does not pay enough attention to the issues of quality design of the MOOC both in the
technological and pedagogical perspectives.</p>
      <p>
        Prospects of MOOC learners, quality criteria in MOOC design are presented in the
article [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ] by Yousef, Chatti, Schroeder and Wosnitza.
      </p>
      <p>
        Conole [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ] presented the 7Cs (Conceptualize, Capture, Communicate, Collaborate,
Consider, Combine, Consolidate) Learning design framework, which can be used to
develop pedagogically based MOOCs. The article [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ] analyzed the state of
development of MOOC, studied Open Educational Recourses (OER), providing strategic
opportunities for improving the quality of education. The study [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ] presents a
comprehensive overview of the data management applications that are used to analyze
MOOCs. In the article [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ] Periwal and Rana presented 4 models for dropout prophecy
in MOOCs. After an empirical analysis and evaluation of these models, Periwal and
Rana concluded that for imbalance MOOC class data the model created by the naïve
Bayes technique is more appropriate. Cook, Kay, Kummerfeld in [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ], [10] suggested a
methodology for modeling the audience of learners for MOOC. Cook in his master's
thesis [10] introduced the Open Learner Model. In [11] Hew and Cheung presented a
review of the literature focusing on the MOOCs use by instructors or students. They
suggested reasons why students sign up for MOOCs: (1) the desire to learn about a
new topic, (2) to extend current knowledge, (3) for personal challenge, and (4) the
desire to collect completion certificates. The article [12] provides a large overview of
the methods and techniques for assessing students who study courses through the
MOOC platform.
      </p>
      <p>This article is a continuation of the author’s studies presented in [13], [14], in
which the technological, social, logistical and financial aspects of MOOCs were
analyzed.
2</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Classification of MOOCs</title>
      <p>
        There is an institutional classification of MOOC [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ]. For our purposes, more useful is
the classification based on the pedagogical approaches and training functions of
MOOC. Depending on the pedagogical approaches, there are following main types of
MOOCs:
      </p>
      <p>1) cMOOC (connectivist MOOCs) is associated with a socially-constructivist
pedagogical approach to learning. cMOOC uses blogs, wikis, social media for searching
knowledge. The main interactions take place in the formats “learner-learner” and
“learner-teacher”.</p>
      <p>The main focus of the cMOOC is the accumulation of knowledge, creativity and
communication of participants. The Web 2.0 platform is used. The pedagogical
approach used in the cMOOC is flexible and sensitive to the specific needs of the
participants. It helps to find like-minded people and gives an opportunity to expand the
network of contacts. Examples of platforms that use the cMOOC approach are
SoloLearn (5 million users), Duolingo (200 million users).</p>
      <p>The aim of cMOOC is to improve the quality of education through the
strengthening of horizontal links and the stimulation of joint cooperation in groups of learners.</p>
      <p>2) xMOOC (“MOOC as eXtension of something else”) uses the behavioral
principle of acquiring knowledge, by repetition and testing of knowledge. xMOOC contains
lectures, quizzes to test the mastery of theoretical material, forums for communicating
with the instructor and other students of the course. This brings together xMOOC
with the format of the traditional academic courses. Usually, students must comply
with the deadlines for submitting completed assignments.</p>
      <p>The content of the courses is focused on duplication of knowledge. The goal of
xMOOC is effective delivering of content to a wider audience.</p>
      <p>xMOOC uses its own technology platform. Three main providers Coursera, edX,
and Udacity use xMOOCs.</p>
      <p>The terms cMOOC and xMOOC were introduced by Stephen Downes, one of the
creators of the first cMOOC (2008) [15].</p>
      <p>3) Quasi MOOC uses online training, offers online courses, representing an online
resource, for example, such as open courses: Khan Academy or MIT
OpenCourseWare. Online quasi MOOCs are developed by teachers that can be not
certified.</p>
      <p>The purpose of the quasi MOOC is to provide access to collections of free learning
of the mini-lections in various disciplines and for different age groups of students.</p>
      <p>4) hMOOC is the hybrid MOOC or MOOC 3.0. This concept supports hybrid or
flipped classes, integrates and combines online and face-to-face teaching/learning.</p>
      <p>
        In addition to the listed MOOCs, there are also SPOC (small private online course)
[16], COOC (corporate open online course), BOOC (big open online course),
aMOOC (adaptive massively open online course), bMOOC (blended massive open
online course), sMOOC (semi-massive open online course) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ], etc. The terminology
in this new field is still not well established.
3
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Logistic of MOOCs deployment</title>
      <p>Based on the author’s experience acquired in the development of the MOOCs, we
present the logistics chain of MOOCs deployment on the Fig. 1, 2, 3. These
presentations allow understanding the scope of the preliminary training (planning), as well as
organization and management work.</p>
      <p>The development of the MOOCs begin with a preparatory stage, during which it is
necessary to understand the domain area, identify the target audience, determine the
development tools, and calculate the project parameters (cost, capacity, quality, and
duration). At the end of this stage, a plan-project should be prepared. Then the
organizational stage begins – designing the course, preparing the material, selecting trainers,
solving copyright problems, preparing video materials, etc. All this is displayed in the
production plan. After preparing scenarios for lessons, videos, tests, interviews, the
penultimate stage of development begins – the management stage. This stage implies
marketing, course assembly, approbation. The last stage of development is the launch
of the course.</p>
      <p>At the stage of preliminary preparation of the MOOC it is necessary:
1. Identify the narrowed, desired learning outcomes for students.</p>
      <p>2. Provide a strategy for evaluating students, verifying the mastery of knowledge in
accordance with specified learning outcomes.</p>
      <p>3. Develop a sequence of tasks and actions that will support the student's actions in
mastering the learning objectives (knowledge, skills, activity):</p>
      <p>• Availability of content that will support active learning; model of activity / skills
for students.</p>
      <p>• Duration of the course, the course building from basic knowledge to higher
order of skills, such as application, integration and analysis.</p>
      <p>4. Ensure a balance between the presence of the teacher / instructor, social and
expert cooperation, and the presence of cognitive challenges.</p>
      <p>For the pedagogical design of each week (each session) of the course, it is
necessary to allocate: planned results, content, activities, evaluation.
4</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Video content matrix by weeks of study</title>
      <p>The matrix of video content for the weeks of study should correspond to the expected
learning outcomes. It is a kind of template for displaying educational material. Table
1 presents the video content matrix of the MOOC “Ruby on Rails Web Framework
for Beginners” (RoR4B) (see also Fig. 4, 5) prepared in the framework of research
work by graduates of Applied Informatics major at the Crimean State Engineering
and Pedagogical University. The students prepared 12 videos with duration of 3-5
minutes each (the videos can be viewed on our YouTube channel CP4B,
https://goo.gl/BMLXMB). The language of these lectures and video is Russian.</p>
      <p>We can make the following recommendations on the variety of presentation forms
of the video content. These recommendations are based on the experience of the
videos production. Video content for the MOOC can be represented by following video
options:
• An introduction to the topic or subtopic with the explaining teacher on the screen:
the head or 1/3 of the upper part of body. This option usually uses to activate the
previously studied material. It contains background information (formulas,
schemes, diagrams, etc.), presents the learning objectives of the topic.
• Voice guidance of the videocast with the presentation of the educational material.</p>
      <p>We can see on the video slides of the presentation, screen cast, annotations using
the tablet or iPad, frames, programming environment, etc.
• Video taken in a specially equipped room or in a certain location – if it is
acceptable, the instructor can be placed in a different context for connection with key
concepts or with the professional community.
• Interviews – for example, it can be a short interview with a regional representative,
or an expert on a given topic.
• Summarizing – the instructor / teacher summarizes the topic and gives the
guidelines for the next topic, i.e. establishes a link between the topics.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Tools for video processing</title>
      <p>To prepare the video content, it can be used one of the video processing software:
• Edius (http://www.grassvalley.com/products/subcat-editing_software) –
proprietary video editing software for computer running Windows, the latest version is
Edius 9.10;
• Camtasia Studio / Camtasia for Mac (https://www.techsmith.com/camtasia.html) –
shareware software for capturing video from the screen, allows to record audio
from a microphone, and allows to place on the screen videos from a webcam;
• ScreenFlow (Mac) (http://www.telestream.net/screenflow/overview.htm) –
proprietary commercial software for the OS X operating system, Apple Inc. for screen
casting and video editing.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Possible roles for participants of the MOOC development team</title>
      <p>To effectively design and develop a high-quality MOOC, the development team needs
the following roles, representing domain experts, curriculum designers, and
technically skilled specialists. Based on the experience of preparing the MOOC
“Webframework Ruby on Rails for beginners” (RoR4B), these roles can be described as
follows:
• Head / expert on educational technologies – conducts consultations and gives
recommendations on MOOC planning, an educational strategies, administrative
process, resources, educational policies.
• Instructor / teacher – allocates the appropriate material for the course, designs the
main activities and evaluation, plans to the presentation of the content, the rubric
for expert evaluation.
• Copywriter – helps in choosing resources and copyright issues.
• Assistant (TA) – helps in the design of resources, the selection of materials, the
preparation of written questions, development and maintenance, for example, in
aspects that require special knowledge of content. TA monitors the discussion
forums of the MOOC and evaluation components during the activity of this course.
• Video specialist – responsible for the production of video materials, video. Video
specialist edits, mounts the original video, creates a video project, and
synchronizes the sound with the video image and uploads the video to the MOOC platform,
on YouTube.
• The course’s producer (CP) – CP edits screen capture components, organizes video
in sections (lessons) of lectures. CP adds meaningful questions to the video content
/ captured screen. CP constructs a survey, homework or evaluation components.
7</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p>Nowadays MOOCs movements are one of the most innovative initiatives within
elearning and distance education that create new learning opportunities in open and
university education. However, there are not consolidated approaches regarding the
logistic of MOOCS design and development.</p>
      <p>Students who register for MOOC pursue different goals. Designing the MOOC as
training course, it is necessary to take into account all the wishes and opportunities of
the learner’s audience. The implementation of the MOOC described in the article, is a
typical MOOC development roadmap: recommendations for content preparation,
video content, automatic evaluation, role-based specifications.</p>
      <p>The roadmap is derived from the experience of developing MOOC in the discipline
“Web-framework Ruby on Rails for beginners” (RoR4B) [17]. In the future it is
planned to develop statistical tools for this MOOC, as well as to study personalization
issues that will take into account the desires and opportunities of students.
tion. UMAP. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 9146, pp.1-12. Springer, Cham
(2015).
10. Conole, G.: MOOCs as disruptive technologies: strategies for enhancing the learner
experience and quality of MOOCs. RED. Revista de Educación a Distancia 50(2), 1–18 (2016).
11. Hew, K.F., Cheung, W.S.: Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses
(MOOCs): Motivations and challenges. Educational research review 12, pp.45-58 (2014).
12. Sandeen, C.: Assessment's place in the new MOOC world. Research &amp; Practice in
Assessment Journal 8, pp. 5-13 (2013).
13. Seidametova, Z.: MOOC course development: video content matrix and role specification
(in Russian). Information and computer technologies in economics, education and social
domain 1 (11). 5–16 (2016).
14. Moskaleva, Y., Seidametova, Z.: Logistics and business models of МООС/SPOC courses
(in Russian). Scientific notes of the Crimean Engineering-Pedagogical University 3 (57).
60–65 (2017).
15. Liyanagunawardena, T.R.: Massive Open Online Courses. Humanities 4(1). 35-41 (2015).
16. Kaplan, A.M., Haenlein, M.: Higher education and the digital revolution: About MOOCs,</p>
      <p>SPOCs, social media, and the Cookie Monster. Business Horizons 59(4), 441-450 (2016).
17. CP4B. Applied Informatics of CEPU. YouTube Playlist. http://bit.ly/1WHQtvq, last
accessed 2018/03/25.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <article-title>By the numbers: MOOCs in 2017</article-title>
          .
          <source>Class Central. January 18</source>
          .
          <year>2018</year>
          , https://www.classcentral.
          <source>com/report/mooc-stats-2017</source>
          , last accessed
          <year>2018</year>
          /03/25.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Alario-Hoyos</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pérez-Sanagustín</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Cormier</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Delgad-Kloos</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Proposal for a conceptual framework for educators to describe and design MOOCs</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of universal computer science 20 (1)</source>
          ,
          <fpage>6</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>23</lpage>
          (
          <year>2014</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Saltzman</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G. M.:</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>The Economics of MOOCs</article-title>
          .
          <source>The NEA 2014 Almanac of Higher Education</source>
          .
          <fpage>19</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>29</lpage>
          (
          <year>2014</year>
          ), https://www.nea.org/assets/docs/HE/2014_Almanac_Saltzman.pdf,
          <source>last accessed</source>
          <year>2018</year>
          /03/25.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Yousef</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.M.F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chatti</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Schroeder</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>U.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wosnitza</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>What drives a successful MOOC? An empirical examination of criteria to assure design quality of MOOCs</article-title>
          . In:
          <article-title>Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT)</article-title>
          ,
          <source>IEEE 14th International Conference</source>
          , pp.
          <fpage>44</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>48</lpage>
          . IEEE,
          <string-name>
            <surname>NY</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2014</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Daradoumis</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bassi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Xhafa</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Caballé</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.:</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>A review on massive e-learning (MOOC) design, delivery and assessment</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: P2P</source>
          , Parallel, Grid, Cloud and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Internet</given-names>
            <surname>Computing</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>3PGCIC</year>
          ), Eighth International Conference, pp.
          <fpage>208</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>213</lpage>
          . IEEE,
          <string-name>
            <surname>NY</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2013</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Romero</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ventura</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Educational data science in massive open online courses</article-title>
          .
          <source>Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery</source>
          ,
          <volume>7</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>12</lpage>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Periwal</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rana</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>An empirical comparison of models for dropout prophecy in MOOCs</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: Computing, Communication and Automation (ICCCA)</source>
          ,
          <source>2017 International Conference</source>
          , pp.
          <fpage>906</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>911</lpage>
          . IEEE,
          <string-name>
            <surname>NY</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          8.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Cook</surname>
          </string-name>
          , R.W.:
          <article-title>MOOClm: Learner Modelling for MOOCs (Master's thesis</article-title>
          , University of Sydney).
          <year>2017</year>
          ., http://hdl.handle.net/2123/17023, last accessed
          <year>2018</year>
          /03/25.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          9.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Cook</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kay</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kummerfeld</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>MOOClm: User Modelling for MOOCs</article-title>
          . In: Ricci,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Bontcheva</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Conlan</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Lawless</surname>
          </string-name>
          , S. (eds) User Modeling, Adaptation and Personaliza-
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>