<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Supporting Competence-based Learning in Blended Learning environments</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>l Vill</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Ainho</string-name>
          <email>ainhoa.alvarez@ehu.eus</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Escuela de Ingeniería de Bilbao (UPV/EHU)</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Bilbao</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="ES">Spain</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Escuela de Ingeniería de Vitoria-Gasteiz (UPV/EHU)</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Vitoria-Gasteiz</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="ES">Spain</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff2">
          <label>2</label>
          <institution>Mikel Larrañaga</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2018</year>
      </pub-date>
      <abstract>
        <p>Assessment is a very relevant part of any instructional process. Its results, when adequately provided, can improve students' learning. Assessment results could also be used to guide teachers in order to align their course design with the students' results. However, the analysis of the assessment results and the extraction of useful conclusions for both teachers and students is not an easy task and computerized tools can be very helpful to provide automation of these processes. Moreover, the information regarding assessment of students can come from many sources and in the case of blended learning environments, the number of sources increases. In this paper, a system aimed at supporting Competencebased Learning in blended learning environments (COBLE) is presented. The paper presents the system's architecture and its main elements. It is specially described how information from different sources can be gathered together into the system in order to update its models and analyze the assessment data as a whole.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Competence-based Learning</kwd>
        <kwd>Blended Learning</kwd>
        <kwd>Visual Learning analytics</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>
        Assessment is a key element of the instructional process [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ], not only for the marking
of students but also for the enhancement of teaching and learning processes. Therefore,
it is very important to align the learning design of the courses with the results of
students’ assessment [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]. For that, it is required to guide teachers to make decisions over
their course design. This can be provided through, among others, the use of
visualization techniques, an important part of learning analytics [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ]. The information provided
can also be helpful for students in order to improve their learning process. Those
techniques can also help students to self-reflect about their learning process [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2 ref3">2, 3</xref>
        ] and even
incite them to take remediation actions to improve their performance [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4 ref5">4, 5</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Current educational approaches in Higher education are focusing on the one hand on
blended learning [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ], which implies a thoughtful integration of face-to-face and online
      </p>
      <p>
        Copyright © 2018 for this paper by its authors. Copying permitted for private and academic purposes
approaches and technologies [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ]. On the other hand, they also center on the mastery of
skills or competences [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        In this kind of educational environment, the information regarding assessment in a
course can come from many sources and it should be integrated in order to analyze it
and provide adequate feedback to users [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ]. To help users in this process, this paper
presents a system that aims to support users (students and lecturers) in
competencebased blended learning environments through the use of Visual Learning Analytic
techniques called COBLE (Competence-Based Learning Environment).
      </p>
      <p>This paper describes the main components of COBLE and how its models can be
updated with information from other learning environments or tools. This paper first
presents the architecture of COBLE and then it describes its domain and learner models.
After that, the paper centers on the aspects related to the data extraction from systems
the students have interacted with, on the loading of that information into COBLE and
on how to update the learner model using that information. Next, some examples of
visualizations provided by COBLE are presented. The paper finishes with some
conclusions and future work.
2</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>COBLE</title>
      <p>COBLE, like any learning support system, represents the domain and learner models
(see Fig. 1) which structure is detailed in the following section. It has also two main
modules (see Fig. 1) that interact with the information stored regarding the domain and
the learners. These two modules interact with those models in order to support
competence-based learning environments.</p>
      <p>
        ……
In a blended learning environment, students can interact with different tools and their
marks can come from many different sources. For example, the students can use online
learning tools such as the Moodle Learning Management System (LMS) or
e-assessment systems such as AdESMuS [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
        ] and some of the students’ marks can be stored in
them. However, these students can also have part of their marks collected out of these
systems by the lecturer either in a spreadsheet or they can also be directly stored in
COBLE.
      </p>
      <p>COBLE is able to integrate all this information in its learner and domain models as
it will be described in the following section. In order to do that, COBLE incorporates a
Data Management module.</p>
      <p>Finally, a Visualization module is in charge of applying visual learning analytic
techniques in order to provide visualizations for both students and lecturers. The particular
aspects of the provided visualizations are described in the following sections.
3</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Domain and Learner Models</title>
      <p>
        The domain model of COBLE represents the course competences taking as a basis the
Competence-based knowledge space theory (CbKST) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
        ]. Therefore, they are
formally structured using prerequisite relationships (see Fig. 2).
      </p>
      <p>The competences are also related to the course topics, resources and to a set of
assessable items or exercises that will allow to determine the mastery level on each
competence. The system also includes the possibility of using evaluation rubrics for the
assessment of the assessable items.
4</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Data Extraction, Loading and Model Updating</title>
      <p>The Data Management module allows lecturers to interact with the domain and learner
models in order to load or update the information stored in them. The module has an
interface that allows lecturers to directly define or update both the domain and the
learner model. COBLE also allows lecturers to import the information related to the
interactions of the students with the domain extracted from an external system.</p>
      <p>In order to do that, the user can interact with the interface to introduce the
information individually but it can also load information provided in a text file with
commaseparated values.
4.1</p>
      <sec id="sec-4-1">
        <title>Data Extraction</title>
        <p>Several systems allow the extraction of information related to the interactions and
performance of the students related to different resources. For example, Moodle allows
lecturers to export information related to grades obtained by the students in the course’s
assignments and quizzes among other items. Fig. 3 shows the lecturer selection of items
to be exported from Moodle’s gradebook (on the left) and the generated text file with
comma-separated values loaded in a spreadsheet (on the right).
Even when lecturers do not use any management tool to evaluate the student tasks, they
usually store this information in some document, frequently in a spreadsheet.</p>
        <p>In order to be able to load into COBLE the extracted data, it must be stored in a
comma-separated values text file, which is one of the available formats in Moodle and
spreadsheets among other platforms. The only compulsory field in the file is the
student’s e-mail because it is used as the student’s identifier in COBLE. This makes it
easier to import and integrate data from different systems as it does not compel the
student to have the same user name in the different systems being used.</p>
        <p>Currently, COBLE supports the loading of comma-separated values text files where
each line represents the information of a particular student. This format was established
because it is the same structure in which Moodle data can be exported and because it
also matches the structure of the spreadsheets used by many teachers. However, it can
be easily extended to incorporate other file structures.
4.2</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-4-2">
        <title>Loading</title>
        <p>Once the information to integrate in the system has been extracted, the Data
Management module is in charge of incorporating the information into the domain and learner
models.</p>
        <p>As it can be seen in Fig. 4, the first thing the user must do is selecting the text file
(Fig. 4, a) that contains the information to be loaded into COBLE.</p>
        <p>When the file has been selected, the user is provided with a preview of the
information of the file (Fig. 4, b) to assure that the information and its structure are correct.</p>
        <p>IMPORTACIÓN DE DATOS
e
The file can have more information than the one the lecturer wants to load into the
system. For example, when exporting from the Moodle’s gradebook, the whole
information about the student is incorporated, including the system’s internal
identification for the student or the institution’s identifier. Thus, the lecturer has to select from
all the fields that appear in the file, which ones should be incorporated into COBLE
(Fig. 4, c). The user must also identify which is the field that contains the student’s
email account as that will be the identifier in COBLE (Fig. 4, d).</p>
        <p>Sometimes lecturers might have defined completely in COBLE the tasks whose
marks are going to be loaded, but sometimes it will not be the case. In this last case,
COBLE warns the user about the tasks that are not defined in the domain model and
allows the updating of the domain model defining the tasks and their relationships in
the system (Fig. 5).
The information related to the assessment of the different tasks, is stored in the
historical data part of the learner model. Taking into account this information, COBLE must
update the knowledge and competence mastery levels of the learner model.</p>
        <p>
          Literature reports different means to update knowledge and competence models [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12 ref13">12,
13</xref>
          ] In particular, Bayesian Knowledge Tracing (BKT), a type of Hidden Markov
Model, has successfully been used for updating the knowledge model [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14 ref15">14, 15</xref>
          ].
        </p>
        <p>BKT represents the changing knowledge state during skill acquisition based on the
results of the student opportunities to apply the skill. In this model, the student
knowledge is represented by a set of variables, one per topic, that describe the
probability that the topic is either mastered by the student or not. This model considers the
student’s performance on an activity related to a topic to update the probability of the
topic being mastered. The model does not take into account the possibility of the student
forgetting a topic, but it considers that the student might succeed by chance or fail even
when mastering the topic. The model entails four parameters:
• p(Lo) or p-init, which represents the probability of the student knowing the topic
beforehand.
• p(T) or p-transit, which represents the probability of the student having learnt the
topic.
• p(S) or p-slip, the probability the student makes a mistake when working on the
topic.
• p(G) or p-guess, the probability that the student has a lucky guess on an activity
related to an unknown topic.</p>
        <p>These parameters allow updating the students’ mastery for each topic. The initial
probability of a student u mastering topic k is set to the p-init parameter for that topic (1).
(1)
(2)
(3)
($)'&amp; = () )'
After that, computing the conditional probability depends on whether or not the student
succeeded on the task related to that topic.</p>
        <p>If the student correctly solved the task, the conditional probability is computed using
(2). In this equation, the probability of knowing the topic before the assignment and not
slipping is divided by the probability of correctly solving the activity (which also
considers succeeding by chance).
If the student does not pass the task, the conditional probability considers the
probability of knowing the topic before the assignment and slipping divided by the probability
of failing (3).
The conditional probability obtained using (2) or (3), depending on whether the student
succeeded or not, is used in (4) to update the probability of the student knowledge on
the topic. Equation (4) considers the probability of knowing the topic before the activity
plus the probability of not knowing it and having learnt the topic.</p>
        <p>(*)'&amp; = (* − 1|)'&amp; + (1 − (*|)'&amp;)()
(4)
The described model is used in COBLE to update the students’ knowledge level and
the competence model in the Learner Model.
5</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Visualizations</title>
      <p>The main objective of COBLE is to support the main user types in competence-based
learning environments. For that, it currently incorporates a Visualization module that
provides different visualizations for students and lecturers. The visualizations provided
by this module are intended to promote students’ self-reflection and to help lecturers to
adapt their course plan.</p>
      <p>
        COBLE provides diverse simple visualization of the knowledge level of the students,
but it also provides richer visualizations of the competence acquisition level. This
information is always provided in context, providing what is called an Open Social
Student Model [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>
        ]. This social dimension has proven to increase student engagement
and learning effectiveness [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">17</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>Next, some of the visualizations COBLE provides are described.</p>
      <p>For example, lecturers can consult the mastery level of a particular student on each
competence contextualized as a bullet in a boxplot chart that represents the mastery
level of the whole class.</p>
      <p>Lecturers can also analyze the acquisition level of different competences for a group
of students. For example, the system generates a violin-plot chart where the distribution
of the group’s students having each level of mastery for each of the competences is
shown (see Fig. 6).
Competences’ acquisition level for the group
Lecturers have also the possibility to see the information related to a particular
competence, observing the evolution of the mastery level on that competence. For example,
Fig. 7 shows the evolution of a student in a competence and compares it to the class or
group the student belongs to.</p>
      <p>COMPETENCE ACQUISITION
Competence Competence1</p>
      <p>From Week 1</p>
      <p>To</p>
      <p>Week 30
COBLE also provides some customizable visualizations for lecturers, which can help
them detecting interesting information in order to organize their lectures. For example,
a lecturer interested in determining which competence to reinforce in the following
lecture, could be interested in detecting competences with lower mastery levels than
expected. Fig. 8 shows the visualization that summarizes the percentage of students that
have mastery levels above the threshold established by the lecturer (0.8 in this case) for
each competence.
Show competences’ acquisition percentages according to the threshold:
0.8
Competence 3</p>
      <p>9%
Competence 2
Competence 1
96%</p>
      <p>91%
40% 50%</p>
      <p>YES NO
62%
38%
4%
0%
10%
20%
30%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%</p>
      <p>Fig. 8. Customizable interface to obtain group information
6</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Conclusions and Future Work</title>
      <p>This paper has presented the proposal of the system COBLE, which has been designed
to support competence-based learning. The system capabilities have been improved
providing a module that allows integrating domain and student information coming
from different systems.</p>
      <p>The import characteristics have been evaluated, importing student interactions with
Moodle for several courses, and also from files created by lecturers to store information
related to face to face interactions with the students.</p>
      <p>Future work will be devoted to two different aspects. On the one hand, it will be
analyzed the possibility of importing the whole domain data from files extracted from
other systems. On the other hand, we plan to design and implement a new module that
will use recommendation techniques in order to provide customizable automatic alerts
and recommendations both for students and lecturers.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-7">
      <title>Acknowledgments</title>
      <p>This work is supported by the Basque Government (IT980-16), the UPV/EHU (EHUA
16/22) and the Office of the Vice-Chancellor for Innovation, Social Engagement and
Cultural action of the UPV/EHU through the SAE-HELAZ (HBT-Adituak 2018-19/6).</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Guàrdia</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Crisp</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Alsina</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>I.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Trends and Challenges of E-Assessment to Enhance Student Learning in Higher Education</article-title>
          .
          <source>Innov. Pract. High. Educ. Assess. Meas</source>
          .
          <volume>36</volume>
          -
          <fpage>56</fpage>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kay</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bull</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>New Opportunities with Open Learner Models and Visual Learning Analytics</article-title>
          .
          <source>Presented at the Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED</source>
          <year>2015</year>
          ) , Cham (
          <year>2015</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Klerkx</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Verbert</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Duval</surname>
          </string-name>
          , E.:
          <article-title>Enhancing Learning with Visualization Techniques</article-title>
          . In: Spector,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.M.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Merrill</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.D.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Elen</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            , and
            <surname>Bishop</surname>
          </string-name>
          , M.J. (eds.)
          <source>Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology</source>
          . pp.
          <fpage>791</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>807</lpage>
          . Springer New York (
          <year>2014</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bull</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Johnson</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Masci</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Biel</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>C.</surname>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Integrating and Visualising Diagnostic Information for the Benefit of Learning</article-title>
          . In:
          <article-title>Measuring and Visualizing Learning in the Information-Rich Classroom</article-title>
          . Taylor and Francis (
          <year>2015</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pardo</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dawson</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Learning Analytics: How can Data be used to Improve Learning Practice</article-title>
          . In: Reimann,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Bull</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Kickmeier-Rust</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Vatrapu</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
            , and
            <surname>Wasson</surname>
          </string-name>
          , B. (eds.)
          <article-title>Measuring and visualizing learning in the information-rich classroom</article-title>
          . pp.
          <fpage>41</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>55</lpage>
          .
          <string-name>
            <surname>Routledge</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2016</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Vaughan</surname>
          </string-name>
          , N.:
          <article-title>Student Engagement and Blended Learning: Making the Assessment Connection</article-title>
          .
          <source>Educ. Sci. 4</source>
          ,
          <fpage>247</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>264</lpage>
          (
          <year>2014</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Garrison</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Vaughan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Blended Learning in Higher Education: Framework, Principles, and Guidelines</article-title>
          . John Wiley and Sons, San Francisco (
          <year>2007</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          8.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Henri</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Johnson</surname>
          </string-name>
          , M.D.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Nepal</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>A Review of Competency-Based Learning: Tools, Assessments, and Recommendations: A Review of Competency-Based Learning</article-title>
          .
          <source>J. Eng. Educ</source>
          .
          <volume>106</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>607</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>638</lpage>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          9.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Miller</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mork</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>From Data to Decisions: A Value Chain for Big Data</article-title>
          .
          <source>IT Prof</source>
          .
          <volume>15</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>57</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>59</lpage>
          (
          <year>2013</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          10.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Villamañe</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          : Análisis y mejora de los marcos actuales de desarrollo y evaluación de los Trabajos Fin de Grado mediante el uso de las TIC, (
          <year>2017</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          11. Mohammed Khalidi Idrissi, Meriem Hnida, Samir Bennani:
          <article-title>Competency-Based Assessment: From Conceptual Model to Operational Tool</article-title>
          . In: Elena Cano and Georgeta Ion (eds.)
          <article-title>Innovative Practices for Higher Education Assessment and Measurement (</article-title>
          <year>2017</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          12.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Falmagne</surname>
          </string-name>
          , J.-C.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Albert</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Doble</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Eppstein</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hu</surname>
          </string-name>
          , X. eds: Knowledge Spaces. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg (
          <year>2013</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          13.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Woolf</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Building Intelligent Interactive Tutors: Student-centered Strategies for Revolutioniizing E-learning</article-title>
          . Morgan Kauffmann Publishers, Inc. (
          <year>2008</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          14.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Corbett</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Anderson</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User Model</article-title>
          .
          <source>User-Adapt. Interact</source>
          .
          <volume>4</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>253</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>278</lpage>
          (
          <year>1995</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          15.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Yudelson</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Koedinger</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gordon</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Individualized Bayesian Knowledge Tracing Models</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: Artificial Intelligence in Education</source>
          . pp.
          <fpage>171</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>180</lpage>
          . Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (
          <year>2013</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          16.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Brusilovsky</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Somyürek</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Guerra</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hosseini</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zadorozhny</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>The Value of Social: Comparing Open Student Modeling and Open Social Student Modeling</article-title>
          . Presented at the International Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Personalization</surname>
          </string-name>
          (UMAP
          <year>2015</year>
          ) , Dublin June 29 (
          <year>2015</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>
          17.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Brusilovsky</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Somyürek</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Guerra</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hosseini</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zadorozhny</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Durlach</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Open Social Student Modeling for Personalized Learning</article-title>
          .
          <source>IEEE Trans. Emerg. Top. Comput. 4</source>
          ,
          <fpage>450</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>461</lpage>
          (
          <year>2016</year>
          ).
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>