<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Cultural informatics research and applications State of the art and open challenges</article-title>
      </title-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>There are currently more than 19.000 museums in Europe and even more
archaeological sites. And given that the preservation of cultural heritage is at the very
core of the foundations of the European Union – the Lisbon treaty, a constitutional basis
of the European Union, states that the Union “shall respect its rich cultural and linguistic
diversity, and shall ensure that Europe's cultural heritage is safeguarded and enhanced”
– it should come as no surprise that in the period 2007-2013 alone the EU invested a
whopping 4.5 billion EUR in cultural heritage and related research.</p>
      <p>In the early days, much of that was directed towards digitization, producing a vast
number of digital documents. Characteristically, Europeana connects more than 50
million objects from over 3 thousand institutions, a number that continues to rise as
more institutions become involved and more collections are included. More recently,
emphasis has also turned to the analysis, presentation, sharing and exploitation of these
resources, as well as to the sustainability of the developed approaches, leading to a large
number of research efforts and funded projects in the broader area combining culture
and technology, giving birth to the scientific field of cultural technology or, as it is more
commonly referred to, cultural informatics.</p>
      <p>Today, we find ourselves at a turning point, with the field of cultural informatics
undergoing vast and rapid changes. From the point of view of humanities, we see new
approaches to the examination and presentation of culture and history, including greater
emphasis in storytelling and in the aim to stimulate reflection and even reinterpretation.
From the point of view of technology, we see previously unimaginable reasoning and
analysis powers via solutions such as deep learning, developments in smart
interconnected devices that have the capacity to revolutionize the notion of space and
the way we interact with it and advances in AR/VR technologies that open new ways to
the delivery of content. And from the point of view of cooperation between humanities
and technology, we are in the era when the boundaries are starting to fall, bridges are
being formed and true, deep, robust synergies are formed, leading to new opportunities
and perspectives.</p>
      <p>Given the rich history, the number of museums and sites, and the unmatched research
pedigree, of course Europe is the leader in the application of cultural informatics and in
the research pushing the field forward. Tellingly, 2018 has been designated as the
European Year of Cultural Heritage, underlining the Union’s intent to further push
forward in this domain.</p>
      <p>Yet, and despite the support and augmented funding, the overall feeling is that we
have not yet managed to unlock the full potential of the implemented research and
produced technology. The fragmentation of the field, with humanities research
published in one set of media and technological research in another, and with the
researchers often working in silos, has not allowed for one to build upon the other’s
achieved results. Research projects find themselves re-inventing and re-developing
vii
solutions already studied by others, and practitioners find themselves experimenting
with solutions that others have already tried.</p>
      <p>As a response, the “Cultural informatics research and applications: State of the art
and open challenges” workshop is a part of a broader effort to consolidate European
research and application efforts in the area of cultural informatics, facilitate the
exchange between projects and promote re-use of tools and resources. The ultimate goal
is that tools, technologies, know-how, methods and best practices can be exchanged,
thus significantly improving our efficiency and management/allocation of public and
private resources.</p>
      <p>Ours is not the only effort in this direction. For example, the COST framework held
the “COST Connect: Cultural Heritage in the Digital Era” in 2017 and this year the
European Commission is organizing the “Fair of European Innovators in Cultural
Heritage”, with both events aiming to facilitate the meeting and cooperation between
researchers and practitioners. What is different in our effort is that, in addition to
providing a medium for exchange, we also strive to achieve a more structured analysis
of the opportunities available and challenges faced by most of those who are active in
our domain, so that overarching solutions can be sought.</p>
      <p>We have been working in this direction through a variety of channels, including
projects and networks that we are involved in. As far as the current workshop is
concerned, to some extent the foundations were set earlier in 2018, during a workshop
organized at the premises of the University of West Attica, in Athens, by European
projects CrossCult and Emotive. In that workshop representatives of EU funded projects
had the opportunity to discuss issues related to technology, humanities, dissemination
and exploitation of project outcomes.</p>
      <p>Based on the outcomes of the first workshop, and also having considered feedback
from the European Commission, we meet again this fall aiming to further and deepen
the discussion in three directions that have been identified as fundamental and critical,
namely a) IPR issues, b) exploitation, impact and sustainability, and c) open challenges.</p>
      <p>This volume includes notes on lessons learnt, open challenges, and available tools
and methodologies by some of the workshop participants. We should note, though, that
this is by no means a full summary of the workshop proceedings. First of all, while an
important number of projects and research groups are represented herein, a considerably
larger number have expressed interest in joining the discussion in Cyprus. More
importantly, this volume describes what is known before the workshop and aims to
serve as a tool to assist participants get familiarized with the issues. It is the actual
exchanges and discussion that will be held in Cyprus that will form the core product of
the workshop; a product that we will make sure to share both with the European
Commission and the broader community, hoping it will help pave the path forward.</p>
      <p>We should clarify that our private effort does not aim to replace the role of the
European Commission in outlining the strategies regarding the format and direction of
European research in cultural informatics. Quite the opposite, our hope is to support the
Commission, by gathering, analyzing and providing insight regarding the issues faced
by researchers and practitioners and the interventions they believe could facilitate their
work and augment its impact and longevity.
Closing, let us not forget to express our gratitude to everyone in the community for
embracing and supporting our efforts. Special thanks are due to Mr. Giorgio Costantino,
REA Project Officer, for providing insight, helping in promoting the event and serving
as a valuable link to the Commission, to Dr. Marinos Ioannides, EU ERA chair on
Digital Cultural Heritage and UNESCO chair on Digital Cultural Hetitage at the Cyprus,
who shares our vision and has kindly hosted our meeting and to the members of the
program committee that provided their feedback towards the development of this
volume.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>We hope you will enjoy reading this</title>
      <p>volume and more importantly we hope to
see you in Cyprus, and in our future
meetings, so that we can together look
for ways to further cultural informatics
research and application in Europe.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Angeliki and Manolis</title>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list />
  </back>
</article>