<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Random Models of Very Hard 2QBF and Disjunctive Programs: An Overview?</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Giovanni Amendola</string-name>
          <email>amendolag@mat.unical.it</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Francesco Ricca</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Miroslaw Truszczynski</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>University of Calabria</institution>
          ,
          <country country="IT">Italy</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>University of Kentucky</institution>
          ,
          <country country="US">USA</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>We present an overview of models of random quanti ed boolean formulas and their natural random disjunctive ASP program counterparts that we have recently proposed. The models have a simple structure but also theoretical and empirical properties that make them useful for further advancement of the SAT, QBF and ASP solvers.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>QBF</kwd>
        <kwd>ASP</kwd>
        <kwd>Random models</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>Introduction</title>
      <p>
        The study of theoretical and practical properties of random models has received
substantial attention in Computer Science. The results obtained in these studies
have had major practical impact especially in boolean satis ability (SAT) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1 ref13">1,
13</xref>
        ] and constraint satisfaction problems (CP) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
        ]. Random models are
characterized by intriguing phase-transition phenomena that are often associated
with the inherent hardness of instances. Inherently hard instances for SAT and
QBF solvers are essential for designing and testing search methods employed by
solvers [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]. Thus it is important to study models of random propositional
formulas and QBFs that can reliably generate instances of a desired hardness [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        Previous work in this area mainly focused on random formulas in the
conjunctive normal form (CNF), and random prenex-form QBFs with the matrix in
CNF or disjunctive normal form (DNF) (depending on the quanti er sequence).
The xed-length clause model of k-CNF formulas and its 2QBF extension have
been the subjects of extensive studies. Formulas in the xed-length clause model
consist of m clauses over a ( xed) set of n variables, each clause with k
noncomplementary literals. All formulas are assumed to be equally likely. For that
model it is known that there are reals l(k) and u(k) such that if m=n &lt; l(k),
a formula from the model is almost surely satis able (SAT), and if m=n &gt; u(k),
almost surely unsatis able (UNSAT). It is conjectured that l(k) = u(k). That
conjecture is still open. However, it holds asymptotically, i.e., the two bounds
converge to each other with k ! 1 [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ]. An important empirical property of
these models is called the easy-hard-easy pattern [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
        ]. Basically, instances from
? Results originally published in [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ]
the phase transition region are di cult to be solved (hard in jargon), and so
they are useful for assessing solver performance; whereas those from regions on
both sides of the phase transition are easy to solve and thus, they are well suited
for solver testing and similar purposes [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        The xed-length clause model was extended to QBFs by Chen and Interian
[
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ]. In addition to n and m (understood as above), their model includes
parameters controlling the structure of formulas. Once these parameters are xed,
similar properties as in the case of the k-CNF model emerge. There is a phase
transition region associated with a speci c value of the ratio m=n (that does not
depend on n) and the easy-hard-easy pattern can be experimentally veri ed.
Both the xed-length clause model for SAT and the Chen and Interian model
for QBF are based on formulas in normal forms. However, many applications give
rise to formulas in non-normal forms motivating studies of solvers of non-normal
form formulas and QBFs, and raising the need of models of random non-normal
form formulas. A rst response to that challenge was provided by Navarro and
Voronkov [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12 ref7">12, 7</xref>
        ] with the xed-shape model. The model is similar to the
extension of the k-CNF one to QBFs, but xed shape (and size) non-normal form
formulas are used in place of k-clauses as the key building blocks. Motivated
by the work on random SAT and QBF models, researchers proposed models of
random logic programs, and obtained empirical and theoretical results
concerning their properties [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14 ref15 ref16">16, 14, 15</xref>
        ]. Those results could be of substantial interest to
answer set programming (ASP) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ], a popular computational formalism based
on disjunctive logic programs. However, the rst results in this area were limited
to non-disjunctive logic programs.
      </p>
      <p>
        In [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ] we have presented new models of random non-normal form formulas
and 2QBFs. Speci cally, we considered disjunctions of t k-CNF formulas (in the
case of QBFs, using them as matrices). We called models generating such
formulas multi-component. Instances obtained according to our models are di erent
from the ones originating from the xed-shape model of Navarro and Voronkov,
as their building blocks (k-CNF formulas) do not have a xed size. QBFs from
our model have a natural representation as disjunctive logic programs, obtained
by extending the well-known encoding of [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ]. Thus, a model of random
disjunctive logic programs originates from the multi-component models of QBFs.
      </p>
      <p>
        In this paper we give an overview of the random models presented in [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ], and
in particular we focus on the theoretical properties of our models by recalling the
theoretical bounds on the location of the phase transition. Experimental results
reported in [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ] con rm that our models exhibit the easy-hard-easy pattern in
correspondence of the phase transition. Thus, our results provide new ways to
generate hard and easy instances of SAT, and QBF formulas and ASP programs.
2
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Preliminaries</title>
      <p>
        In this section, we recall the xed-length clause model for random CNF formulas
and the Chen-Interian model for random QBF formulas. We then describe the
models of QBFs and programs proposed by [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ]. By C (k; n; m) we denote the
set of all k-CNF formulas consisting of m clauses over (some xed) set of n
propositional variables. Similarly, D (k; n; m) stands for the set of all k-DNF
formulas of m products (conjunctions of non-complementary literals) over an
n-element set of atoms.
      </p>
      <p>The xed-length clause model. The model is given by the set C (k; n; m)
of CNF formulas, with all formulas assumed equally likely. Formulas from the
model can be generated by selecting m k-literal clauses over a set of n variables
uniformly, independently and with replacement. Let us denote by p(k; n; m) the
probability that a random formula in C (k; n; m) is SAT. We de ne l(k) to be
the supremum over all real numbers x such that for every &lt; x, it holds that
limn!1 p(k; n; b nc) = 1. Similarly, we de ne u(k) to be the in mum over
all real numbers x such that for every &gt; x, limn!1 p(k; n; b nc) = 0. It is
known that l(k) and u(k) are well de ned. Moreover, l(k) u(k) and, it
is conjectured that l(k) = u(k). The conjecture holds asymptotically, that is,
limk!1 l(k) = limk!1 u(k).</p>
      <p>The Chen-Interian model. The model generates QBFs of the form 8X9Y F ,
where sets X and Y are disjoint, jXj = A, jY j = E, and F is a CNF
formula with m clauses, each containing a literals with variables in X and e
literals with variables in Y . We write Q(a; e; A; E; m) for the set of all such
QBFs. The Chen-Interian model generates QBFs from Q(a; e; A; E; m), with
all formulas equally likely. Let q(a; e; A; E; m) be the probability that a
random QBF from Q (a; e; A; E; m) is true. Let r &gt; 0 be a xed real. We set
l(a; e; r) to be the supremum over all real numbers x such that for every &lt; x,
limn!1 q(a; e; A; E; b nc) = 1, where A = brEc and n = A + E. Similarly, we
set u(a; e; r) to be the in mum over all real numbers x such that for every
&gt; x, limn!1 q(a; e; A; E; b nc) = 0, again with A = brEc and n = A + E.
Chen and Interian proved that l(a; e; r) and u(a; e; r) are well de ned. Clearly,
l(a; e; r) u(a; e; r). Whether l(a; e; r) = u(a; e; r) is an open problem.
The quantities l(a; e; r) and u(a; e; r) delineate the phase-transition region.
For QBFs generated from the model Q(a; e; brEc; E; b nc) (with xed r), Chen
and Interian experimentally observed the easy-hard-easy pattern as grows,
showed that the hard region is aligned with the phase transition, and that the
same behavior emerges no matter what concrete r is xed as the ratio A=E.
3</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Multi-component models</title>
      <p>
        Random SAT and QBF. Let F be a class of propositional formulas (or a model of
random formula). By t-F we denote the class of all disjunctions of t formulas from
F (or a model generating disjunctions of random formulas from F ). Similarly,
if Q is a class (model) of QBFs of the form 8X9Y F , where F 2 F , we write
t-Q for the class (model) of all QBFs of the form 8X9Y F , where F 2 t-F . We
refer to models t-F and t-Q as multi-component. For QBFs we also consider the
dual model to t-Q, based on conjunctions of t DNF formulas. It gives rise to
the multi-component model of disjunctive logic programs via the Eiter-Gottlob
translation [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ]. In all cases, we assume that formulas (QBFs, respectively) are
equally likely.
      </p>
      <p>In our work we focus on models based on the model C(k; n; m). First, we
note that the corresponding multi-component model t-C (k; n; m) has similar
satis ability properties and that the phase transition regions in the two models
are closely related. Let pt(k; n; m) be the probability that a random formula in
t-C (k; n; m) is SAT.</p>
      <p>Theorem 1 Let t 1 be a xed integer. Then, for every &lt; l(k), it holds that
limn!1 pt(k; n; b nc) = 1, and for every &gt; u(k), limn!1 pt(k; n; b nc) = 0.</p>
      <p>The proof follows from the identity pt(k; n; m) = 1 (1 p(k; n; m))t.Thus, if
the phase transition conjecture holds for the single component model C (k; n; m),
it also holds for the multi-component model t-C (k; n; m), and the threshold value
is the same for every t.</p>
      <p>We also considered the multi-component model t-Q(a; e; A; E; m) of QBFs,
with the Chen-Interian model as its single-component. Let qt(a; e; A; E; m) be
the probability that a random QBF from t-Q(a; e; A; E; m) is true (in particular,
q1(a; e; A; E; m) = q(a; e; A; E; m)). Extending Chen and Interian's work, we can
prove that the phase transition for di erent values of t coincide (and coincide
with the phase transition in the Chen-Interian model).</p>
      <p>Theorem 2 For every integer t 1 and real number r &gt; 0: if &lt; l(a; e; r),
it holds that limn!1 qt(a; e; A; E; b nc) = 1, and if &gt; u(a; e; r), it holds that
limn!1 qt(a; e; A; E; b nc) = 0 (where A = brEc and n = A + E).</p>
      <p>The theorems above describe the situation when t is xed and n is large.
When n is xed and t grows, the analysis of pt(k; n; m) and qt(a; e; A; E; m)
shows that the region of the transition from SAT to UNSAT shifts to the right. Of
course, once we stop growing t and start increasing n again, the phase transition
region will move back to the left.</p>
      <p>
        Random Disjunctive Programs. Our model of random disjunctive programs is
based on the translation from QBFs to programs due to Eiter and Gottlob [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ].
It works on the model dual to the one we discussed above. The model consists
of QBFs = 9X8Y F , where F 2 D(e; a; E; A; m), the set of formulas dual to
C (e; a; E; A; m). The model clearly has the same properties (modulo a switch
between true and false).
      </p>
      <p>The Eiter-Gottlob translation has a simple extension to QBFs obtained from
the multi-component models. We write t-Ddlp(e; a; E; A; m) for the set of
programs consisting of the following xed part: z _ z0, for each z 2 Z; y w, and
y0 w, for each y 2 Y ; w w1; : : : ; wt, and w not w. And the core of
mt Horn rules of the form wh z1; : : : ; z`, where h = 1; : : : ; t, each wh is the
head of exactly m rules, ` = e + a, and the body of each rule has e atoms z and
z0 with z 2 X (and so, also a atoms of the form z and z0 with z 2 Y ). Note
that programs in 1-Ddlp(e; a; E; A; m) coincide with those in Ddlp(e; a; E; A; m)
modulo a rewriting, where the rule w w1 is removed and w1 is replaced by w.</p>
      <p>Programs in t-Ddlp (e; a; E; A; m) correspond to 98 QBFs whose matrix
belongs to t-D (e; a; E; A; m). They can be seen as the results of translating QBFs
into logic programs dlp , where we use variables wi to represent component
DNF formulas in the matrix of . The correspondence 7! dlp preserves the
semantics in the following sense.</p>
      <p>Theorem 3 Let = 9X8Y F , for F 2 t-D (e; a; E; A; ; m). Then is true if
and only if dlp has an answer set, where dlp is the disjunctive logic program
in t-Ddlp (e; a; E; A; m) corresponding to .</p>
      <p>
        Empirical properties and conclusion. The experimental results on satis ability [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3 ref4">4,
3</xref>
        ], agree with the above-reported theoretical analysis, that is formulas from our
models show the easy-hard-easy pattern and a strong dependence of hardness on
t. Thus, despite their simple structure, our models have theoretical and empirical
properties that make them important for further advancement of solvers.
      </p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Achlioptas</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Random satis ability</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: Handbook of Satis ability</source>
          , pp.
          <volume>245</volume>
          {
          <issue>270</issue>
          (
          <year>2009</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Achlioptas</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Moore</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>The asymptotic order of the random k-sat threshold</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: FOCS 2002</source>
          . pp.
          <volume>779</volume>
          {
          <issue>788</issue>
          (
          <year>2002</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Amendola</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ricca</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Truszczynski</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.:</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>A generator of hard 2qbf formulas and ASP programs</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: KR</source>
          . pp.
          <volume>52</volume>
          {
          <fpage>56</fpage>
          . AAAI Press (
          <year>2018</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Amendola</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ricca</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Truszczynski</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Generating hard random boolean formulas and disjunctive logic programs</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: IJCAI</source>
          . pp.
          <volume>532</volume>
          {
          <fpage>538</fpage>
          . ijcai.
          <source>org</source>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Brewka</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Eiter</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Truszczynski</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Answer set programming at a glance</article-title>
          .
          <source>Commun. ACM</source>
          <volume>54</volume>
          (
          <issue>12</issue>
          ),
          <volume>92</volume>
          {
          <fpage>103</fpage>
          (
          <year>2011</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Interian</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>A model for generating random quanti ed boolean formulas</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: IJCAI 2005</source>
          . pp.
          <volume>66</volume>
          {
          <issue>71</issue>
          (
          <year>2005</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Creignou</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Egly</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>U.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Seidl</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.:</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>A framework for the speci cation of random SAT and QSAT formulas</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: TAP 2012. LNCS</source>
          , vol.
          <volume>7305</volume>
          , pp.
          <volume>163</volume>
          {
          <issue>168</issue>
          (
          <year>2012</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          8.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Eiter</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gottlob</surname>
          </string-name>
          , G.:
          <article-title>On the computational cost of disjunctive logic programming: Propositional case</article-title>
          .
          <source>AMAI</source>
          <volume>15</volume>
          (
          <issue>3-4</issue>
          ),
          <volume>289</volume>
          {
          <fpage>323</fpage>
          (
          <year>1995</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          9.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gent</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>I.P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Walsh</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Beyond NP: the QSAT phase transition</article-title>
          . In: AAAI. pp.
          <volume>648</volume>
          {
          <issue>653</issue>
          (
          <year>1999</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          10. Mitchell, D.G.:
          <article-title>Resolution complexity of random constraints</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: CP</source>
          <year>2002</year>
          .
          <article-title>LNCS</article-title>
          , vol.
          <volume>2470</volume>
          , pp.
          <volume>295</volume>
          {
          <issue>309</issue>
          (
          <year>2002</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          11. Mitchell,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.G.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Selman</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
            ,
            <surname>Levesque</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>H.J.</surname>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Hard and easy distributions of SAT problems</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: AAAI 1992</source>
          . pp.
          <volume>459</volume>
          {
          <issue>465</issue>
          (
          <year>1992</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          12.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Navarro</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Voronkov</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Generation of hard non-clausal random satis ability problems</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: AAAI 2005</source>
          . pp.
          <volume>436</volume>
          {
          <issue>442</issue>
          (
          <year>2005</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          13.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Selman</surname>
            , B., Mitchell,
            <given-names>D.G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Levesque</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.J.:</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Generating hard satis ability problems</article-title>
          . Artif. Intell.
          <volume>81</volume>
          (
          <issue>1-2</issue>
          ),
          <volume>17</volume>
          {
          <fpage>29</fpage>
          (
          <year>1996</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          14.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mu</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Random logic programs: linear model</article-title>
          .
          <source>TPLP</source>
          <volume>15</volume>
          (
          <issue>6</issue>
          ),
          <volume>818</volume>
          {
          <fpage>853</fpage>
          (
          <year>2015</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          15.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wang</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Shen</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lin</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>A model for phase transition of random answer-set programs</article-title>
          .
          <source>ACM Trans. Comput. Log</source>
          .
          <volume>17</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ),
          <volume>22</volume>
          (
          <year>2016</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          16.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Zhao</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lin</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Answer set programming phase transition: A study on randomly generated programs</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: ICLP 2003. LNCS</source>
          , vol.
          <volume>2916</volume>
          , pp.
          <volume>239</volume>
          {
          <issue>253</issue>
          (
          <year>2003</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>