<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Claudia Schon</string-name>
        </contrib>
      </contrib-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>Reasoning is a core ability in human cognition. Its power lies in the ability to
theorize about the environment, to make implicit knowledge explicit, to
generalize given knowledge and to gain new insights. There are a lot of ndings in
cognitive science research which are based on experimental data about
reasoning tasks, among others models for the Wason selection task or the suppression
task discussed by Byrne and others. This research is supported also by brain
researchers, who aim at localizing reasoning processes within the brain.</p>
      <p>Early work often used propositional logic as a normative framework.
Central results like ndings from the Wason selection task or the suppression task
inspired a shift from propositional logic and the assumption of monotonicity
in human reasoning towards other reasoning approaches. This includes but is
not limited to models using probabilistic approaches, mental models, or
nonmonotonic logics.</p>
      <p>Automated deduction, on the other hand, is mainly focusing on the
automated proof search in logical calculi. Recently a coupling of the areas of cognitive
science and automated reasoning is addressed in several approaches. For example
there is increasing interest in modeling human reasoning within automated
reasoning systems including modeling with answer set programming, deontic logic
or abductive logic programming.</p>
      <p>Despite a common research interest { reasoning { there are still several
milestones necessary to foster a better inter-disciplinary research. First, to develop
a better understanding of methods, techniques, and approaches applied in both
research elds. Second, to have a synopsis of the relevant state-of-the-art in both
research directions. Third, to combine methods and techniques from both elds
and nd synergies. Fourth, we need more and better experimental data that
can be used as a benchmark system. Fifth, cognitive theories can bene t from a
computational modeling. Hence, both elds { human and automated reasoning
{ can contribute to these milestones and are in fact a conditio sine qua non.</p>
      <p>The goal of this workshop is to bring together leading researchers from arti
cial intelligence, automated deduction, computational logics and the psychology
of reasoning that are interested in a computational foundations of human
reasoning { both as speakers and as audience members. Its ultimate goal is to share
knowledge, discuss open research questions, and inspire new paths.</p>
      <p>In this years edition of the workshop, six papers have been accepted for
presentation. The papers present the following strands: cognitive models, logic
programming approaches to model human reasoning; syllogistic reasoning;
computational models for human reasoning. Apart from the accepted papers, the
workshop program included two keynote presentations: In his talk on Ethical
Decision Making under the Weak Completion Semantics, Ste en Holldobler
illustrated how weak completion semantics extended with equality can be used to
decide questions about the moral permissibility of actions. In his talk on Spatial
Coherence: Why linear formalisms do not capture the essence of space, Christian
Freksa demonstrated the role of simultaneously acting spatial relations in 2- and
3-dimensional spatial substrates for spatial problem solving.</p>
      <p>Finally, the Bridging-18 organizers seize the opportunity to thank the
Program Committee members for their most valuable comments on the submissions,
the authors for inspiring papers, the audience for their interest in this workshop,
and the organizers of the FAIM workshop program and the IJCAI-ECAI-18 for
their support.</p>
      <p>i
Directionality of Attacks in Natural Language Argumentation : : : : : : : : : :
Marcos Cramer and Mathieu Guillaume</p>
      <p>Emmanuelle Diez Saldanha, Technische Universitat Dresden, Germany
Ulrich Furbach, University of Koblenz, Germany
Ste en Holldobler, Technische Universitat Dresden, Germany
Antonis C. Kakas, University Cyprus, Cyprus
Gabriele Kern-Isberner, TU Dortmund, Germany
Sangeet Khemlani, Naval Research Lab, USA
Robert A. Kowalski Imperial College London, GB
Ursula Martin, University of Oxford, GB
Oliver Obst, Western Sydney University, Australia
Lu s Moniz Pereira, Universidade Nova Lisboa, Portugal
Marco Ragni, University of Freiburg, Germany
Claudia Schon, University of Koblenz, Germany
Frieder Stolzenburg, Harz University of Applied Sciences, Germany</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list />
  </back>
</article>