<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Modeling and forecasting the diffusion of ATM/POS terminals and debit/credit cards in Albania</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Alma Braimllari (Spaho)</string-name>
          <email>alma.spaho@unitir.edu.al</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Elva Mezini</string-name>
          <email>elvamezini@hotmail.com</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Data Analysis Specialist</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Alosys Communications</addr-line>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Statistics and Applied Informatics Dept., Faculty of Economy, University of Tirana</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>The advancement of information technology has enhanced delivery of banks' services, and has an enormous effect on development of more flexible payments methods and more user-friendly banking services. Commercial banks in Albania to be competitive have started to offer electronic banking services in year 2004. This paper aims to study the diffusion process of electronic payment instruments in Albania. The main objective of this research is to model and to forecast the diffusion of electronic payment instruments such as ATMs, POS, credit cards and debit cards, using the data from Central Bank of Albania. After it was confirmed that the diffusion of each electronic payment instrument follow the S-shaped curve, the Logistic and Gompertz models were estimated using STATA software. The parameters of Logistic and Gompertz models give information on the diffusion speed and the maximum potential number of each electronic payment instrument, terminals or cards. These findings are useful to regulators, commercial banks, bank customers, other financial institutions, and policy makers.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1. Introduction</title>
      <p>The banking industry has undergone significant
operational changes over the last decade, thanks to
advances in information technology. The information
technology advancement has produced more effective
and efficient channels to deliver banking services. One
of the offspring of information technology in banking
operations is electronic banking (e-banking). This
technology allows banks to get closer to their
customers, to deliver a wider range of services at lower
costs, and offer 24-hour banking support to customers.
Albanian banking has come a long way in electronics
banking in the past years. At the end of 2017, out of 16
commercial banks operating in Albania, 15 are offering
e-banking services (Table 1, Appendix). E-banking
products/services offered by banks include: ATM
(Automated Teller Machine), EPOS (Electronic Point
of Sale), virtual POS, Internet Banking, Phone
Banking, Mobile/SMS banking, Electronic (debit,
credit, prepaid) Cards. Actually, twelve banks offer
Internet banking; eight of them have some form of
Mobile Banking and two banks provide mobile
payments with 3rd party platform operator. Among all
e-banking services offered from banks in Albania,
ATM was the most popular channel, followed by
electronic credit/debit cards, internet banking and
EPOS [SR14].</p>
      <p>The proliferation of bankcards and non-cash payment
technologies, such as ATMs and POS terminals has
been one of the most relevant innovations in payment
systems over the past several decades. In 2004
commercial banks in Albania offered for the first time
card based services. Debit cards are issued against a
current or savings account and their usage is restricted
to funds held in the particular bank account. A credit
card is essentially a payment instrument through which
purchases can be made utilizing credit provided by the
issuing bank. ATMs offer considerable benefits to both
banks and their depositors. The usage of machines
offers depositors cash withdrawal at more convenient
times and places for them, than during working hours at
bank branches. Banks also aimed to foster the use of
cards at the point of sale for purchase transactions,
installing POS card payment devices. With the
adoption of POS machines by merchants, electronic
cards can be alternatively used to make purchases.
Therefore, the final usage of debit cards will depend on
consumers’ attitudes as well as on the availability of
POS systems and ATMs. Debit cards are used for cash
withdrawals at ATMs and for purchasing transactions
at POS terminals. Debit and credit cards have been the
main payment instruments that have substituted cash at
the POS terminals.</p>
      <p>The promotion of the use of electronic payment
instruments for transactions among economic actors is
relatively important to the Albanian economy, when
considering the fact that the use of cash in the economy
has a cost of around 1.7 % of GDP for the Albanian
economy [BoA17]. The use of bank cards in ATM and
POS terminals shows that cash withdrawals from ATM
terminals have the main share in transactions with
cards, an indicator of a largely cash-based economy. In
2017, about 18.91 million cards transactions, equal to
ALL 200 billion, were processed in total. Of total
transactions, about 90% were cash withdrawals from
ATMs and only 9.17% were customer payments
through cards at POS terminals. Card payments at POS
terminals point to a predominant debit card
transactions. However, in terms of value, credit card
transactions are significantly higher than debit card
ones. The low use of cards as a payment instrument
shows the familiarity level of the public, the low level
of financial education, and the limited infrastructure of
POS terminals offered from enterprises.</p>
      <p>Most of the literature approximated the S-shaped curve
for technological diffusion using either the logistic
model or Gompertz model. Both of these models
generate S-shaped curves with a few early adopters,
then a more rapid period of adoption, then a slower
conclusion. The Gompertz curve is less symmetric than
the logistic curve, where in the initial growth rate is not
as high and its decline more gradually. The Logistic
and Gompertz model each have unique characteristics,
making them useful models in empirical studies of
diffusion. In their study, [MI06] reviewed studies on
the modelling and forecasting of the diffusion of
innovations. They cover a large body of literature
which looks at many different mathematical
formulations of an S-shaped diffusion and list fifteen
Sshaped growth curve equations. This study imposes two
extreme hypotheses that explain this shape, which are
those based on the dynamics of a (broadly
homogeneous) population and those based on the
heterogeneity of the population. In their study,
[QCR16] analyzed the diffusion patterns of non-cash
payments in China and based on Logistic and Gompertz
model they found that POS terminals have shown a
higher diffusion rate than ATMs.
Other than the diffusion of an innovation, researchers
also consider technological substitution, where an
existing technology is replaced by a newer one.
Decrease in the price of substitute technology and/or
increase in the price of substituted method increase the
probability of technology diffusion [KMG11]. Also,
the results of the study of [KMG11] provide evidence
that degree of substitutability of teller with ATM in
India is high, but ATM is not a perfect substitute.
The main objective of this research is to model and
predict the electronic payment instruments diffusion in
Albania, in order to help businesses and policy makers
to implement the most suitable strategies. Once it
confirmed that the diffusion of each instrument follows
the S-shaped diffusion curve, it was estimated the
logistic function and Gompertz function with three
parameters, using STATA software. The parameters of
both models give information on the diffusion speed,
and the maximum potential number of each instrument
in the study.</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>2 Material and Methods</title>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>2.1 Diffusion models</title>
        <p>The literature on the diffusion of emerging technology
generally uses S-curves to predict the diffusion process.
Because the new technology typically at first grows
slowly, then exhibits a growth rate greater than 1,
followed by a period of slower growth (growth rate less
than 1) and finally stops developing. The empirical
Scurve literature, in the technology-diffusion context has
tended to focus on just two functional forms: logistic
model and Gompertz model [Fra94, BN06].</p>
        <p>The logistic model is described by the differential
equation
y  ay(c  y)
(1)
where y(t) represent the total diffusion at time t, c the
saturation level (the maximum expected level) of the
technology and a is the coefficient of diffusion which
describes the diffusion speed. The saturation level of
diffusion is a critical and often questionable parameter
[MVS08]. The diffusion speed is proportionate to the
population that has already adopted the service,
denoted by y and the remaining market potential
represented by (c-y).</p>
        <p>The solution the logistic model (1) is given by
c
y(t) 
1 ea(tt0 )
(2)
where y(t) is the estimated diffusion level at time t, c is
the maximum level of diffusion such that c  lim y(t) );
t
a is the speed of convergence of y(t) to its limit and
characterizes the curvature of the diffusion path or
speed of diffusion; t0 is the moment of time when
technology diffusion achieved half of its maximum
level.</p>
        <p>The Gompertz model is described by the differential
equation</p>
        <p>y  a y(ln c  ln y)
The solution of which is given by
y(t)  ceea(tt0)
(a &gt; 0)
(3)
(4)
where c is the upper limit of the solution path or
maximum penetration level, c  lim y(t) ; a is a measure
t
of the speed of convergence of y(t) to its limit and
characterizes the curvature of the diffusion path or
speed of diffusion; t0 is the moment of time when
technology diffusion achieved the share 1/e ≈ 36.8% of
its maximum level.</p>
        <p>The important feature of the Gompertz path is that the
diffusion goes faster at the beginning but becomes
slower over time. This leads to a relatively short period
of rapid expansion and to a relatively long period of
gradual growth up to the maximal level. The logistic
curve is more symmetric, the growth rate (measured
as y / y ) is initially not as high as in the Gompertz
curve and it declines more gradually [JSF07].
2.2 Data
The data used for this analysis are taken from the
Central Bank of Albania database [BoA18]. The
dataset contains information about the number of
ATMs, POS terminals, debit cards and credit cards for
the period of time 2004-2017 in Albania.</p>
        <p>To estimate the parameters of the Logistic and
Gompertz models the nonlinear least squares method
and STATA software were used.</p>
        <p>For forecasting, a model that fits best to the in-sample
data does not necessarily provide more accurate
forecasts. Therefore, the performance of out-of-sample
forecasts is used to help for the selection of a diffusion
model. The out-of-sample data cover the two last year
(2016-2017).</p>
        <p>The choice of functional form for a particular
technology provides important insights. It helps to
characterize the dynamics of the trend. Certain
technologies are described best by one functional form
and other technologies by another. There are many
different model selection criteria. Since our models
have only one explanatory variable, the time, and the
same number of parameters, they are all equivalent to
minimizing the sum of squared errors (SSE). Some
other criteria used here are, Akaike Information Criteria
(AIC) and Bayesian Information Criteria (BIC). The
best model is the model which has the smaller value of
AIC and BIC. To evaluate the performance of the best
fitted or forecasted model is used the Root Mean
Square Error (RMSE) given by the following
equations: RMSE </p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>3 Results</title>
      <sec id="sec-3-1">
        <title>3.1 Descriptive analysis</title>
        <p>1 n</p>
        <p> ( yi  yˆi )2 .</p>
        <p>n i1
According to the Central Bank of Albania data, the
number of ATM terminals was increased from 93 in
2004, to 826 in 2015 and to 747 in 2017. The higher
number of ATMs was in year 2015. The figure 1
indicates that the number of ATM is increased from
2004 to 2015 and then in years 2016 and 2017 the
number of ATMs is decreased. At the end of 2017, the
number of ATMs decreased by 6.63% compared with
2016.
.Figure 1: Development in ATM and POS terminals
The number of POS terminals is increased from 155 in
2004, to 4903 in 2010, and to 7294 in 2017 (Figure 1).
At the end of 2017, the number of POS terminals
increased by 2.57% compared with 2016. The number
of virtual POS terminals is increased from 3 in 2013, to
20 in 2014, and 28 in years 2016 and 2017. Terminals
for the use of electronic money cards recorded very
positive developments. They showed an increase from
597 in 2015, to 680 in 2016 and 1391 in 2017; the
increase was 104.56% compared with the end of 2016.
ATM terminals, the speed of diffusion was 0.522 and
half of its maximum level was achieved in 2005. The
results show that logistic model has the best
performance in describing the ATM technology
diffusion. The fit of each model is measured by the
values of AIC, BIC, and RMSE. These measures
indicated that logistic data fits best to the actual data
and also is the best to predict the number of ATMs.
In-sample
Out-ofsample</p>
        <sec id="sec-3-1-1">
          <title>ATM terminals</title>
        </sec>
        <sec id="sec-3-1-2">
          <title>POS terminals</title>
          <p>The number of cards in circulation is increased, from
33288 debit cards in 2004 to 914119 debit cards in
2017; and from 806 credit cards in 2004 to 96312
credit cards in 2017. In 2017, the number of debit and
credit cards increased by 4.9% and 12.1%,
respectively, compared with 2016. The number of
electronic money cards is increased from 32873 in
2015 to 42860 in 2017.</p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-2">
        <title>3.2 Results of diffusion models</title>
        <p>The results of Logistic model for ATM terminals
number indicated a maximum level of 829 and the
speed of convergence to the saturation (maximum)
level was 0.794. ATM technology has achieved half of
its maximum level in year 2006. The results of
Gompertz model indicated a maximum level of 848</p>
        <p>The results of Logistic model for POS terminals
indicated a maximum level of 6264 and the speed of
diffusion was 0.623. POS technology has achieved half
of its maximum level in year 2008. The results of
Gompertz model indicated a maximum level of 6890
POS terminals, the speed of diffusion was 0.365 and
half of its maximum level was achieved in 2007. The
results indicate that Gompertz model has the best
performance in describing the POS technology
diffusion. The values of AIC, BIC, and RMSE reveal
that Gompertz data fits best to the actual data and also
is the best to predict the number of POS.</p>
        <p>The results of Logistic model for the number of debit
cards indicated a maximum level of 791086 cards and
the speed of diffusion was 0.568 and half of its
maximum level was achieved in year 2007. The results
of Gompertz model indicated a maximum level of
828036 debit cards, the speed of diffusion was 0.370
and half of its maximum level was achieved in 2006.
The results show that Gompertz model has the best
performance in describing the diffusion of debit cards.
The values of AIC, BIC, and RMSE indicate that
Gompertz data fits best to the actual data, and
Gompertz model is the best to predict the number of
debit cards.</p>
        <sec id="sec-3-2-1">
          <title>Note: Significance level: * , p &lt; 1%.</title>
          <p>
            The results of Logistic model for the number of credit
cards in Albania indicated a maximum level of 108504
cards and the speed of diffusion was 0.429. Half of the
maximum level of credit cards was achieved in year
2012. The results of Gompertz model indicated a
saturation (maximum) level of 206043 credit cards, the
speed of diffusion was 0.150 and half of its satur
            <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">ation
level was achieved in 2014</xref>
            . The results show that
Logistic model has the best performance in describing
the diffusion of credit cards. The values of AIC, BIC,
and RMSE indicate that Logistic data fits best to the
actual data and also the Logistic model is the best to
predict the number of credit cards in Albania.
          </p>
        </sec>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-3">
        <title>3.3 Prediction of ATM and POS terminals</title>
        <p>In the figure 3 are shown the actual and predicted data
for ATM terminals. The saturation level of 828 ATMs,
generated by logistic model, was achieved in 2015.
Figure 4 shows the actual and predicted data for POS
terminals using both models. The saturation level of
0
0
0
8
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
2
0
0
8
0
0
6
0
0
4
0
0
2
0</p>
        <p>2005
0
2005
6890 POS terminals, generated by Gompertz model,
was achieved in 2016
2010
ATM
Fitted Gompertz ATM</p>
      </sec>
      <sec id="sec-3-4">
        <title>3.4 Prediction of debit and credit cards</title>
        <p>
          In the figure 5 are shown the actual and predicted data
about the number of debit cards using both models. The
saturation level of 791086 debit cards obtained from
logistic model w
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">as achieved during the period
2014</xref>
          2015.
Debit cards
Fitted Gompertz Debit Cards
2020
        </p>
        <p>2025
Fitted Logistic Debit Cards</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>4 Conclusions</title>
      <p>Developing models that explain the growth process is
critical for policy formulation, capacity planning and
introduction of new products and technologies.
Electronic payment instruments (growth) projection
informs providers of these services/ products about the
potential consumer base.</p>
      <p>In this paper, Logistic and Gompertz models were used
to describe and to forecast the number of ATM/POS
terminals and debit / credit cards in Albania. The
results indicated that:
 related to ATM terminals, logistic data fits best to
the actual data and logistic model is the best to
predict the number of ATMs;
 about POS terminals, Gompertz data fits best to the
actual data and Gompertz model is the best to
predict the number of POS terminals;
 related to debit cards, Gompertz data fits best to
the actual data and Gompertz model is the best to
predict the number of debit cards; and
 about credit cards, logistic data fits best to the
actual data, and logistic model is the best to predict
the number of credit cards in Albania.</p>
      <p>Also, the results indicated that the diffusion of ATMs
and POS terminals, and also debit cards have achieved
their maturity level, whereas the diffusion of credit
cards is increasing and its maturity level is predicted to
achieve around the year 2025.</p>
      <p>In the future research, the factors influencing the
diffusion process of electronic payment instruments can
be studied using panel data modeling. Also, the
diffusion of virtual POS terminals, e-money terminals
and e-money cards can be studied in future research.
[SR14]</p>
      <p>S
/SM ign
e k
ilob anb
M
rd ,t
a i
ic red i)d
c
ton ,tc ap
rc ieb rep
leE (d</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Appendix</title>
      <p>√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√
√</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
            <surname>Spaho</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Ramaj</surname>
          </string-name>
          . “
          <article-title>Electronic Banking usage in Albania: A statistical analysis</article-title>
          .”
          <source>International Journal of Research in Business Management</source>
          , Vol.
          <volume>2</volume>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Issue</surname>
            <given-names>12</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <fpage>1</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>10</lpage>
          ,
          <year>Dec 2014</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          <source>[BoA17] Bank of Albania: Supervision Annual Report</source>
          <year>2017</year>
          , (accessed
          <volume>23</volume>
          .08.
          <year>2018</year>
          ) [MI06] https://www.bankofalbania.org/Publications/ Periodic/Supervision_Annual_Report/ N. Meade, and
          <string-name>
            <given-names>T.</given-names>
            <surname>Islam</surname>
          </string-name>
          . “
          <article-title>Modelling and forecasting the diffusion of innovation-a 25-year review”</article-title>
          .
          <source>International Journal of Forecasting</source>
          ,
          <volume>22</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>519</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>545</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2006</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>[QCR16] M. Qi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Carbó-Valverde</surname>
            , and
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rodríguez-Fernández</surname>
          </string-name>
          . '
          <article-title>The diffusion pattern of non-cash payments: evidence from China'</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Int. J. Technology Management</source>
          , Vol.
          <volume>70</volume>
          , No.
          <volume>1</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>44</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>57</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2016</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          [KMG11]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
            <surname>Kumar</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Malathy</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>L.S.</given-names>
            <surname>Ganesh</surname>
          </string-name>
          .
          <article-title>"The diffusion of ATM technology in Indian banking"</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Journal of Economic Studies</source>
          , Vol.
          <volume>38</volume>
          Issue: 4, pp.
          <fpage>483</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>500</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2011</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>[Fra94] P. H. Franses</surname>
          </string-name>
          , “
          <article-title>A Method to Select Between Gompertz and Logistic Trend Curves”</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Technological Forecasting and Social Change</source>
          <volume>46</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>45</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>49</lpage>
          ,
          <year>1994</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>[BN06] M. Bengisu</surname>
            , and
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Nekhili</surname>
          </string-name>
          , “
          <article-title>Forecasting Emerging Technologies with the Aid of Science</article-title>
          and Technology Databases”,
          <source>Technological Forecasting and Social Change</source>
          <volume>73</volume>
          (
          <issue>7</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>835</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>844</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2006</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          [MVS08]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
            <surname>Michalakelis</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
            <surname>Varoutas</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and T. Sphicopoulos, “
          <article-title>Diffusion models of mobile telephony in Greece”</article-title>
          ,
          <source>Telecommunications Policy</source>
          <volume>32</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>234</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>245</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2008</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          [JSF07]
          <string-name>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
            <surname>Jarne</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
            <surname>Sanchez-Choliz</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <surname>F.</surname>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>FatasVillafranca, “S-shaped curves in economic growth. A theoretical contribution and an application”</article-title>
          .
          <source>Evolutionary and Institutional Economics Review</source>
          ,
          <volume>3</volume>
          (
          <issue>2</issue>
          ),
          <fpage>239</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>259</lpage>
          ,
          <year>2007</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          [BoA18] Bank of Albania, Payment Systems statistics https://www.bankofalbania.org/Payments/Pay ment_
          <source>systems_statistics/ (accessed 23.08</source>
          .
          <year>2018</year>
          ) Raiffeisen Bank Tirana Bank Alpha Albania Source: Bank of Albania,
          <source>Supervision Annual Report</source>
          <year>2017</year>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>