<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Adapting Disease Vocabularies for Curation at the Rat Genome Database</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Dwinell MR</string-name>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Genomic Sciences and Precision Medicine Center Medical College of Wisconsin Milwaukee</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>WI</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="US">USA</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Laulederkind SJ</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>Hayman GT, Wang SJ, Bolton ER, Smith JR, Tutaj M, De Pons J</addr-line>
          ,
          <institution>Shimoyama M Department of Biomedical Engineering Medical College of Wisconsin and Marquette University Milwaukee</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>WI</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="US">USA</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2018</year>
      </pub-date>
      <fpage>7</fpage>
      <lpage>10</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>- The Rat Genome Database (RGD) has been annotating genes, QTLs, and strains to disease terms for over 15 years. During that time the controlled vocabulary used for disease curation has changed a few times. The changes were necessitated because no single vocabulary or ontology was freely accessible and complete enough to cover all of the disease states described in the biomedical literature.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Rat Genome Database</kwd>
        <kwd>disease</kwd>
        <kwd>vocabularies</kwd>
        <kwd>online resource</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>Meanwhile, the human disease ontology (DO) had slowly been
developing and expanding. As early as 2010, members of RGD
were contributing to the development of DO. However, five
years went by before MGD (mouse genome database) and RGD
joined with DO in an organized attempt to make DO useful for
the model organism community. From that collaboration came a
large addition of OMIM-based terms, expansion of
multiparentage of terms through axiomatic extension, and expansion
of cross-references to clinical vocabularies. Based on the promise
of those improvements, it was determined that the Alliance of
Genome Resources could use the DO as a unifying disease
vocabulary across model organism databases.</p>
      <p>Despite the improvements in DO, RGD still had more than
1000 custom terms and 3800 MEDIC terms with annotations to
deal with if RGD would convert to the use of DO. Those extra
terms originated from OMIM, MeSH, and the biomedical
literature. If RGD mapped those non-DO disease terms to DO,
much granularity of meaning would be lost. For instance the
term “osteoarthritis” in DO has no children terms, but the RGD
version of DO has 11 children terms or variations of
“osteoarthritis” (Figure 1). The extra details of those terms is
lost to users of DO. To avoid the loss of granularity it was
decided to extend the DO beyond the merged, axiomized DO file.
After mapping/adding DO terms completely to the RGD version
of MEDIC, a broader, deeper disease vocabulary has been
achieved, by providing more term branches throughout the
ontology and more child terms within those branches.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list />
  </back>
</article>