=Paper=
{{Paper
|id=Vol-2288/om2018_poster6
|storemode=property
|title=Joint handling of semantic knowledge resources and their alignments
|pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2288/om2018_poster6.pdf
|volume=Vol-2288
|authors=Bruno Thiao-Layel,Vianney Jouhet,Gayo Diallo
|dblpUrl=https://dblp.org/rec/conf/semweb/Thiao-LayelJD18
}}
==Joint handling of semantic knowledge resources and their alignments==
https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2288/om2018_poster6.pdf
Joint Handling of Semantic Knowledge
Resources and their Alignments ?
Bruno Thiao-Layel1,3 , Vianney Jouhet1,2 , and Gayo Diallo1
1
BPH Center, INSERM U1219, Team ERIAS, Univ. Bordeaux, France
2
CHU de Bordeaux, Univ. Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
3
Synapse Medicine, 2 place de la bourse, Bordeaux, France
first.last@u-bordeaux.fr
1 Motivation
With the adoption of the Semantic Web vision , semantic knowledge resources
(KR), which include taxonomies, structured vocabularies and ontologies, acting
as pivotal resources, are nowadays commonly used. This is a direct consequence
of the desire to attach formal semantic meaning to manipulated data. These
KR, developed by different communities with various needs and purposes, are
by nature heterogeneous. This heterogeneity leads to the development of systems
for finding the correspondences between entities of different KR, called alignment
[2]. In addition, KR increasingly involve large volumes of formalized knowledge,
containing hundred of thousand entities, which raises the question of generating
and validating alignments between large resources.
In order to help finding and reusing these more and more available KRs, a
significant effort has been made for providing multi-knowledge resources repos-
itories. This effort is particularly noticeable in the biomedical domain, where
classifying existing objects is a secular tradition.
However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no currently available frame-
work which offers the possibility to handle both multiple KRs together with
their respective alignments, while keeping their native semantics and offering
a support for a transparent visualization of these resources. In addition, with
the development of the ontology matching domain, as different systems could
be used to generate alignments and sometimes relying on user input, either for
mappings validation purpose or initial alignment providing, it is a crucial issue
to keep track of users and involved alignment methods or tools.
To fill this gap, we have designed the K-Ware framework [1] which comple-
ment existing multi-knowledge resources repositories. Its aim is not to provide a
single access point for all available biomedical ontologies and alignments. Rather,
it is a framework which could be embedded within projects that have an exten-
sive use of multiple KRs and their respective alignments. In particular, enabling
a support for multi point of view navigation and hierarchical visualization of any
KR relevant for a dedicated purpose or suitable for a given project.
?
This study is supported by the Drugs Systematized Assessment in real-liFe Environ-
ment (DrugSafe) platform, funded by the French Agency for Drugs Monitoring.
2 B. Thiao-Layel. et al.
2 Joint handling of knowledge resources and alignments
2.1 Alignment management
In order to properly take into account alignments between different KRs, we
have introduced additional properties to the definition of the notion of corre-
spondence introduced in [2]. Therefore, we identify the following components
for a correspondence : i) the two entities to be mapped, linked with a Map-
pingRelation, in an directed order (e1-mappingRelation-e2 ); ii) its confidence
value; iii) the mapping’s author / User; iv) the mapping’s method called Map-
pingMethod, either if it is an alignment provided by an automated method
ComputerizedProcess with an alignment Tool or a manual one; v) finally, a
flag which indicates whether the considered mapping is valid (and validated by
a User) for an Alignment between two KRs.
2.2 Handling structural relations within knowledge resources
KRs often exhibits a structural hierarchical organization : the is-a relationship
translated into rdfs:subClassOf or the part-whole relationship for formal on-
tologies and the narrower/broader relationship for taxonomies, translated into
skos:narrower and skos:broader respectively. We find similar notions when it
comes to express inter relationships between entities in different KRs. For in-
stance, the skos:narrowMatch is used to state a hierarchical mapping link be-
tween two conceptual resources in different concept schemes. Hierarchical aspect
is the the main information to be kept when one wishes to integrate many dif-
ferent semantic resources.
To allow navigating easily KR represented in the OWL or SKOS languages,
we distinguish three types of relations : HierarchicalRelation, LiteralDefi-
nition and MappingRelation. In a given KR, a hierarchical relation could be
rdfs:subClassOf, skos:broader, part of, etc.). A literal definition helps rendering
a human readable description of an entity (rdfs:label, skos:prefLabel, etc.). While
a mapping relation (for instance owl:equivalentTo, skos:exactMatch) handle cor-
respondences between entities.
An API has been implemented for the features defined models of K-Ware4 .
References
1. Thiao-Layel, B., Jouhet, V., Diallo, G. K-Ware: vers une gestion conjointe de
ressources sémantiques et leurs alignements 6ièmes Journées Francophone sur les
Ontologies, Oct 2016, Bordeaux, France
Hepp, M., de Bruijn, J.
2. Shvaiko, P., Euzenat, J.: Ontology Matching: State of the Art and Future Chal-
lenges. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, Volume: 25, Issue:
1, Jan. 2013, Page(s): 158 - 176
4
http://k-wa.re