<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Semantic Technologies for the Modeling of Condition Monitoring Knowledge in the Framework of Industry 4.0</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Qiushi Cao</string-name>
          <email>qiushi.cao@insa-rouen.fr</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Normandie Universite</institution>
          ,
          <addr-line>INSA Rouen, LITIS, 76000 Saint-Etienne-du-Rouvray</addr-line>
          ,
          <country country="FR">France</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <abstract>
        <p>Following the trend of Industry 4.0, the demand for high productivity and availability of manufacturing processes has triggered the tendency of automation in various environments. The automation in di erent manufacturing processes and activities has given opportunities to the use of intelligent condition monitoring systems, which have been applied to many subdomains in manufacturing to improve productivity and availability of production systems. To develop such an intelligent system, semantic interoperability among di erent system components and system users is a critical issue. For this reason, semantic technologies are of paramount importance. In this paper, we present our proposal for the formal representation of condition monitoring knowledge using semantic technologies. The proposal is based on an ontological framework which consists of a core reference ontology for representing generic condition monitoring concepts and relations, and a domain ontology for formalizing manufacturing domain-speci c knowledge. Based on the proposed ontological framework, we will develop an intelligent condition monitoring system which will be capable of detecting faulty conditions in machines, machine tools, and manufacturing processes, and providing appropriate decision support for tasks such as fault prognostics, diagnosis and preventive maintenance.</p>
      </abstract>
      <kwd-group>
        <kwd>Industry 4</kwd>
        <kwd>0 Condition monitoring Manufacturing process Availability Fault prognostics Semantic technology Ontology</kwd>
      </kwd-group>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>-</title>
      <p>
        Industry 4.0 is an inter-disciplinary e ort to inter-connect all resource of a
factory and the factory itself with the Internet to build a smart factory. The tools,
machines, workstations, and human operators are all interconnected to
facilitate the traceability of processes, the adaptive and exible control of production
machines, and the real-time and decentralized reactions to unexpected events.
Following the vision of Industry 4.0, the manufacturing industry today is
bene ting from a trend of automation in data exchange. The automatic exchange
and analysis of data open up opportunities for manufacturers to further
optimize the production processes. Collecting data from various components of
a production line and analyzing them in a scalable Cloud infrastructure can
signi cantly improve the productivity, reliability, and availability of production
systems in heterogeneous environments [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]. However, the utilization of these
advanced technologies not only o er the aforementioned bene ts to manufactures
but also brings them challenges such as the management of a large amount of
data generated by networked machines and sensors.
      </p>
      <p>
        The management of big data is considered as a challenging task in the context
of condition monitoring (CM) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref1">1</xref>
        ]. The objective of CM is to determine the
correctness of the operating states of physical assets and manufacturing processes.
Normally, when a propensity of machinery fault or failure is detected, highly
experienced machine operators are capable of performing appropriate actions to
prevent the outage situation of the production system. However, as the structure
and behavior of production systems are getting more and more complex, the
volume of machine operating data grows signi cantly. Thus it is possible that the
domain professionals fail to respond to a machinery fault or failure timely and
accurately. For this reason, manufacturing companies are searching for solutions
through which they can manage this big data e ciently and perform prognostics
tasks intelligently. To this end, the utilization of intelligent condition monitoring
systems (ICMSs) is a promising approach [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">2</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        To develop such an ICMS, semantic interoperability among di erent
system components and system users is a critical issue. Since the data collected
by the ICMSs come from heterogeneous data sources, the \meaning" of these
data varies according to di erent contexts and domains, thus making it di cult
to be harmonized. To deal with this challenge, shared, rigorous and machine
understandable vocabularies with robust structures are needed. In this context,
semantic technologies, especially ontologies, appear as good candidates to cope
with the semantic interoperability problem. An ontology is a formal
representation of certain domain knowledge, which computationally captures and
structures domain concepts and relationships [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref3">3</xref>
        ]. The use of ontologies can ensure
the consistency of semantics, thus providing a shared understanding of
knowledge among di erent participants within a domain. However, in the CM domain,
most of the existing ontologies are only designed to represent a speci c portion
of domain knowledge of CM and lack the formal representation of manufacturing
concepts. Thus, their domain coverage and scope are limited. In this context,
there is a need for an ontology which provides a comprehensive representation
of knowledge in both CM and manufacturing domains.
      </p>
      <p>This paper introduces in detail a proposal for the development of an ICMS.
The development work starts with a formal representation of domain knowledge
that is related to CM tasks performed upon manufacturing processes. An
ontological framework which consists of a core reference ontology for representing
generic CM concepts and relationships and a domain ontology for formalizing
manufacturing domain-speci c knowledge is presented. Based on the proposed
ontological framework, ontology reasoning techniques are adopted for facilitating
decision making related to the fault and failure detection in machines, machine
tools, and manufacturing processes. The detection of machine fault and
failure enables the supervision of optimal preventive maintenance activities, which
aims to guarantee high availability of manufacturing processes. This Ph.D. work
is under the frame of the HALFBACK Project1, and it is at the early stage.
2</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>State of the Art</title>
      <p>
        In recent years, several systems and software have been developed to facilitate
the automation of condition monitoring tasks on machines and machine tools.
In [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">4</xref>
        ], an automatic condition monitoring system for crack detection of rotating
machinery is introduced. The authors process the vibration signals of cracks in
a rotating shaft by combining the Wavelet Packets transform energy with
Articial Neural Networks. The proposed system is able to automate the diagnosis
process without human interventions. However, the developed system is only
capable of detecting crack e ects, not other defects such as assembly errors or
temperature anomalies. For the condition monitoring of cutting tools, an
automatic detector based on vibratory analysis is demonstrated in [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref6">6</xref>
        ]. In their work,
the authors obtained vibratory signatures produced by a turning process, and
the mean power of vibratory signatures is identi ed as the main indicator of the
monitored cutting tool. However, the system is developed merely for the
evaluation of cutting tool states, and it is not capable of providing prognostic and
preventive maintenance decisions, based on the collected vibration signals. An
automatic system for detecting wheel defects of rail vehicles is presented in [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">5</xref>
        ].
The system performs analysis of wheel surface defects based on high-quality
images of the wheel treads and anges, and it has been tested for its usability and
functionality by being used in an operational railway site. The main limitation
of this system is the missing functionality of providing warning signals, such as
alert and alarm. This limitation hinders the launching of maintenance activities.
      </p>
      <p>
        As the manufacturing domain becomes more dynamic and knowledge-intensive,
using ontologies to formally represent the knowledge of CM and manufacturing
turns out to be a notable research topic [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ]. The incorporation of ontologies
to support decision making of condition monitoring in many domains has been
a promising approach to improve the availability of manufacturing processes.
During the last decades, several ontologies and ontological models are
developed under di erent contexts and domains for the goal of facilitating knowledge
formalization, sharing and reuse. In this section, we also review the existing
ontologies and ontological models that are relevant to our work. The review is
carried out according to two aspects: (i) ontologies that model the manufacturing
domain; and (ii) ontologies that model the CM domain.
      </p>
      <p>
        For the rst category of ontologies, the Process Speci cation Language (PSL)
ontology [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">8</xref>
        ] is one of the early-stage contributions. This ontology explicitly
speci es the terminologies for representing manufacturing activities. These
terminologies model the key elements of process scheduling, process modeling,
process planning, production planning, and project management. The
Manufacturing Service Description Language (MSDL) ontology [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref7">7</xref>
        ] aims to describe a wide
      </p>
      <sec id="sec-2-1">
        <title>1 http://halfback.in.hs-furtwangen.de</title>
        <p>
          range of manufacturing services. This ontology incorporates the formalization of
manufacturing processes, machine components, and machine tool capabilities.
Based on the formalization of manufacturing-related knowledge, various
manufacturing processes such as cutting, milling, and feed motions are expressively
described. The MAnufacturings Semantics ONtology (MASON) [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref9">9</xref>
          ] is another
example which drafts the generic and common manufacturing concepts with their
interrelationships. MASON is built upon three head concepts: Entities,
Operations and Resources. Among them, Entities gives an abstract view of
manufacturing products, Operations describes a wide range of manufacturing processes,
and Resources covers all the resources that are related to manufacturing.
        </p>
        <p>
          The second category of ontologies are normally designed for facilitating the
tasks of fault or failure prognostics and machine health monitoring (PHM). The
OntoProg Ontology [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">10</xref>
          ] is a notable contribution which addresses the PHM issue
of machines in smart manufacturing. The ontology is developed based on a set of
international standards, from which the formal terminologies for constructing a
PHM architecture are extracted. The Sensing System Ontology [
          <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">11</xref>
          ] is proposed
to de ne the embedded sensing systems for industrial Product-Service Systems
(PSSs). The ontology provides a comprehensive description of sensors embedded
on PSSs, with the goal of monitoring machine health.
        </p>
        <p>After reviewing the ontologies that are designed for either CM or
manufacturing, we discover that none of them provides satisfactory knowledge
representation of both domains. For example, some ontologies tend to focus on a
narrow eld, such as the product domain, and they do not formalize condition
monitoring-related concepts, e.g. Failure, Fault and Error. Also, none of the
existing ontologies provide knowledge representation of the concepts Warning
Signal in maintenance tasks, e.g. Alert and Alarm, and also the relationships
between them. To perform a CM task on a piece of machinery, the knowledge
base of an ICMS should incorporate not only the machine-interpretable
knowledge for characterizing the manufacturing entities or processes which are being
monitored but also the knowledge about fault or failure detection and
prognostics. To this end, in this Ph.D. project, we present our proposal for the formal
representation of both manufacturing and CM domain knowledge using semantic
technologies. In more detail, we will (i) propose an ontological framework that
encompasses expressive knowledge representations for both CM and
manufacturing domains; and (ii) develop an ICMS for fault prognostics, diagnosis and
preventive maintenance of production lines.
3</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Proposed Approach</title>
      <p>
        The ontological framework is developed through a Middle-Out approach, which
is a combination of the Top-Down and Bottom-Up approaches [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">12</xref>
        ]. For the
Top-Down approach, a set of international standards and textbooks are used
to extract concepts from a general point of view, while for the Bottom-Up
approach, existing domain ontologies are analyzed exhaustively for providing
domain-speci c knowledge. The proposed ontological framework consists of a
core reference ontology for representing generic CM concepts and relationships,
and a domain ontology for formalizing manufacturing domain-speci c
knowledge. Figure 1 shows the three-layered ontological framework.
      </p>
      <p>
        The development of the ontological framework starts with the choice of a
foundational ontology which de ne general and basic notions across a wide range
of domains. The reuse of a foundational ontology enables the integration of other
ontologies that represents more speci c domain concepts and relationships. In
our work, we adopted the Uni ed Foundational Ontology (UFO) [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref13">13</xref>
        ], as it
provides rigorous and expressive representation of general concepts and
relationships. The core ontology we developed is aligned to the UFO ontology, to ensure
a rigorous conceptualization. The UFO ontology is at the top layer of our
ontological framework.
      </p>
      <p>
        For the middle layer, we develope the core reference ontology for condition
monitoring, named CM-core. According to [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">14</xref>
        ], core reference ontologies are
built within the scope of a domain. Normally, they catch central concepts and
relationships of a domain and are considered as an integration of several domain
ontologies. During the development phase, we reuse some existing ontologies
such as the Semantic Sensor Network (SSN) Ontology [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">15</xref>
        ], PSL Ontology and
SWRL Time Ontology [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">16</xref>
        ].
      </p>
      <p>
        At the bottom layer, a domain ontology called Manufacturing CM Ontology
is developed to formalize domain knowledge that is related to condition
monitoring tasks performed upon manufacturing processes. To enhance the reusability
and extensibility of the Manufacturing CM Ontology, we followed the ontology
partitioning and module extraction approaches introduced in [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref17">17</xref>
        ], and
structured our ontology into three modules: the Manufacturing Module, the Context
Module, and the Condition Monitoring Module. A set of domain ontologies are
reused in this step, including the MSDL ontology, MASON ontology, .etc.
      </p>
      <p>To evaluate and validate our domain ontology, which is used as the main
ontology for performing ontological reasoning tasks, we use a web-based
ontology validation tool named OOPS!2 for detecting potential errors in the ontology.
The proposed ontology is evaluated by OOPS! according to three dimensions: (i)
Structural dimension, (ii) Functional dimension, and (iii) Usability-Pro ling
dimension. To examine the robustness, delity, and quality of the ontology, we also
integrate the evaluation conducted by domain experts, for checking its usability
for speci c domain tasks.</p>
      <p>In the near future, we are going to specialize the Manufacturing CM Ontology
into a more speci c domain ontology, named the Production Line CM Ontology,
for representing speci c concepts and relationships of manufacturing production
lines.
4</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>Preliminary Results and Future Work</title>
      <p>Based on the three-layered ontological framework, rule-based reasoning tasks is
performed to propose decision makings about machinery fault and failure
prediction. We instantiated the Manufacturing CM Ontology with di erent examples
of machinery in production lines, and then proposed SWRL rules3 to infer about
the correctness of the machinery operating states. Figure 2 shows two example
rules, in which the rst rule reasons whether a bearing experiences the state
\inner race defect" (Dir). The second rule reasons whether a bearing has a minor
error. The SWRL rules are extracted from real experiments about machinery
defects identi cation. The results of rule-based reasoning tasks shows that the
ontology could be used for the reasoning of machinery operation conditions. The
reasoning capabilities of SWRL rules allowed the condition monitoring tasks
such as machinery state identi cation and error detection to be accomplished.</p>
      <p>
        In the near future, we plan to improve the performance of the logical
inference tasks by applying a fuzzy semantic approach. The rules we mentioned
in the preceding paragraph are based on crisp logic, which may fail to partition
numeric values when the values are considerably close to the partition threshold.
To deal with this kind of uncertainty situations, a fuzzy approach needs to be
implemented. This approach will use fuzzy rules to enhance the representation
of imprecise severity level of machinery faults, errors, or failures. For example,
an identi cation of an error will be associated with a fuzzy index, indicating the
grade of its membership to a minor or medium-level error. The fuzzy
semantic approach will be applied to tackle the symbol anchoring problems [
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">18</xref>
        ], thus
facilitating the condition monitoring tasks of manufacturing processes.
      </p>
      <p>Another direction of future work aims to involve the joint utilization of
machine learning techniques with semantic technologies. To facilitate the prognostic</p>
      <sec id="sec-4-1">
        <title>2 http://oops.linkeddata.es/response-advanced.jsp 3 https://www.w3.org/Submission/SWRL/.</title>
        <p>results of faults and failures in manufacturing processes, machine learning
techniques, especially big data algorithms will be used to mine the collected data in
smart factories. Big data algorithms will use the collected data to understand
the manufacturing processes and to learn from the experience of the operators,
through which a set of predictive rules will be extracted and then used jointly
with the ontology for predicting machine damage, quality loss or maintenance
demands in the future.</p>
      </sec>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Acknowledgements</title>
      <p>I would like to thank my supervisors, Dr. Cecilia Zanni-Merk, Dr. Christoph
Reich, and Dr. Francois de Bertrand de Beuvron for their guidance and
supervision during the PhD work. My work has received funding from INTERREG
Upper Rhine (European Regional Development Fund) and the Ministries for
Research of Baden-Wrttemberg, Rheinland-Pfalz (Germany) and from the Grand
Est French Region in the framework of the Science O ensive Upper Rhine
HALFBACK project.</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          1.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lee</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bagheri</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kao</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>A cyber-physical systems architecture for industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems</article-title>
          .
          <source>Manufacturing Letters</source>
          <volume>3</volume>
          ,
          <issue>18</issue>
          {
          <fpage>23</fpage>
          (
          <year>2015</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          2.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lee</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bagheri</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Cyber-Physical Systems in Future Maintenance</article-title>
          . In: AmadiEchendu J.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hoohlo</surname>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mathew</surname>
            <given-names>J</given-names>
          </string-name>
          . (eds) 9th
          <source>WCEAM Research Papers. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering</source>
          . Springer, Cham (
          <year>2015</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          3.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Usman</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Z.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Young</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.I.M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chungoora</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>N.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Palmer</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Case</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Harding</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Towards a formal manufacturing reference ontology</article-title>
          .
          <source>International Journal of Production Research</source>
          <volume>51</volume>
          (
          <issue>22</issue>
          ),
          <volume>6553</volume>
          {
          <fpage>6572</fpage>
          (
          <year>2013</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          4.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gmez</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Castejn</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Garca-Prada</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Automatic condition monitoring system for crack detection in rotating machinery</article-title>
          .
          <source>Reliability Engineering System Safety</source>
          ,
          <volume>152</volume>
          , 239{
          <fpage>247</fpage>
          (
          <year>2016</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          5.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hyde</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Defossez</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ulianov</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,:
          <article-title>Development and testing of an automatic remote condition monitoring system for train wheels</article-title>
          .
          <source>IET Intelligent Transport Systems</source>
          ,
          <volume>10</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ),
          <volume>32</volume>
          {
          <fpage>40</fpage>
          (
          <year>2016</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          6.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rmili</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>W.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ouahabi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Serra</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Leroy</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.:</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>An automatic system based on vibratory analysis for cutting tool wear monitoring</article-title>
          .
          <source>Measurement</source>
          .
          <volume>77</volume>
          ,
          <issue>117</issue>
          {
          <fpage>123</fpage>
          (
          <year>2016</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          7.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ameri</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>McArthur</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Semantic rule modelling for intelligent supplier discovery</article-title>
          .
          <source>International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing</source>
          <volume>27</volume>
          (
          <issue>6</issue>
          ),
          <volume>570</volume>
          {
          <fpage>590</fpage>
          (
          <year>2014</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          8.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Grninger</surname>
            <given-names>M.:</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>Ontology of the Process Speci cation Language</article-title>
          . In: Staab S.,
          <source>StuderR</source>
          . (eds) Handbook on Ontologies.
          <source>International Handbooks on Information Systems</source>
          . Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (
          <year>2004</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          9.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lemaignan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Siadat</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dantan</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.Y.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Semenenko</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>MASON: A proposal for an ontology of manufacturing domain</article-title>
          .
          <source>In: IEEE Workshop on Distributed Intelligent Systems</source>
          , pp.
          <volume>195</volume>
          {
          <issue>200</issue>
          (
          <year>2006</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          10.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Nuez</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Borsato</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.:</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>An ontology-based model for prognostics and health management of machines</article-title>
          .
          <source>Journal of Industrial Information Integration 6</source>
          <volume>33</volume>
          {
          <issue>46</issue>
          (
          <year>2017</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          11.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Maleki</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>E.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Belkadi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Boli</surname>
          </string-name>
          , N.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>van der Zwaag</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>B.J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Alexopoulos</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Koukas</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Marin-Perianu</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bernard</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Mourtzis</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Ontology-based framework enabling smart Product-Service Systems: Application of sensing systems for machine health monitoring</article-title>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          12.
          <string-name>
            <surname>El Ghosh</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Naja</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Abdulrab</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <article-title>and</article-title>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Khalil</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Towards a Middle-out Approach for Building Legal Domain Reference Ontology</article-title>
          .
          <source>International Journal of Knowledge Engineering</source>
          <volume>23</volume>
          , 109{
          <fpage>114</fpage>
          (
          <year>2016</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          13.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Guizzardi</surname>
            <given-names>G.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , Wagner G.:
          <article-title>Using the Uni ed Foundational Ontology (UFO) as a Foundation for General Conceptual Modeling Languages</article-title>
          . In: Poli R.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Healy</surname>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kameas</surname>
            <given-names>A</given-names>
          </string-name>
          . (eds) Theory and Applications of Ontology: Computer Applications. Springer, Dordrecht (
          <year>2010</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          14.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Roussey</surname>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Pinet</surname>
            <given-names>F.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kang</surname>
            <given-names>M.A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Corcho</surname>
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>An Introduction to Ontologies and Ontology Engineering</article-title>
          . In: Ontologies in Urban Development Projects.
          <source>Advanced Information and Knowledge Processing</source>
          , vol
          <volume>1</volume>
          . Springer, London (
          <year>2011</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          15.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Compton</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Barnaghi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>P.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Bermudez</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>L.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>GarcA-Castro</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>R.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Corcho</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>O.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Cox</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Graybeal</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Hauswirth</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Henson</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Herzog</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Huang</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>V.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>The SSN ontology of the W3C semantic sensor network incubator group</article-title>
          .
          <source>Web semantics: science, services and agents on the World Wide Web</source>
          ,
          <volume>17</volume>
          ,
          <fpage>25</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>32</lpage>
          (
          <year>2012</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          16.
          <string-name>
            <surname>OConnor M.J.</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Das</surname>
            <given-names>A.K.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>A Method for Representing and Querying Temporal Information in OWL</article-title>
          . In: Fred A.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Filipe</surname>
            <given-names>J.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gamboa</surname>
            <given-names>H</given-names>
          </string-name>
          . (
          <article-title>eds) Biomedical Engineering Systems and Technologies</article-title>
          .
          <source>BIOSTEC 2010. Communications in Computer and Information Science</source>
          , vol
          <volume>127</volume>
          . Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (
          <year>2011</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>
          17.
          <string-name>
            <surname>dAquin</surname>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Schlicht</surname>
            <given-names>A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Stuckenschmidt</surname>
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sabou</surname>
            <given-names>M.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          :
          <article-title>Criteria and Evaluation for Ontology Modularization Techniques</article-title>
          . In: Stuckenschmidt H.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Parent</surname>
            <given-names>C.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Spaccapietra</surname>
            <given-names>S</given-names>
          </string-name>
          . (eds) Modular
          <source>Ontologies. Lecture Notes in Computer Science</source>
          , vol
          <volume>5445</volume>
          . Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (
          <year>2009</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation>
          18.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Coradeschi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sa otti</surname>
          </string-name>
          , A.:
          <article-title>An introduction to the anchoring problem</article-title>
          .
          <source>Robotics and Autonomous Systems</source>
          <volume>43</volume>
          (
          <issue>2-3</issue>
          )
          <fpage>85</fpage>
          {
          <fpage>96</fpage>
          (
          <year>2003</year>
          )
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>