<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
  <front>
    <journal-meta />
    <article-meta>
      <title-group>
        <article-title>Taking into account semantic similarities in correspondence analysis Mattia Egloff1, François Bavaud1, 2</article-title>
      </title-group>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>Mattia Egloff</string-name>
          <email>megloff1@unil.ch</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author">
          <string-name>François Bavaud</string-name>
          <email>fbavaud@unil.ch</email>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff0">0</xref>
          <xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff0">
          <label>0</label>
          <institution>Department of Language and Information Sciences, University of Lausanne</institution>
          ,
          <country country="CH">Switzerland</country>
        </aff>
        <aff id="aff1">
          <label>1</label>
          <institution>Institute of Geography and Sustainability, University of Lausanne</institution>
          ,
          <country country="CH">Switzerland</country>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <pub-date>
        <year>2018</year>
      </pub-date>
      <fpage>45</fpage>
      <lpage>51</lpage>
      <abstract>
        <p>Term-document matrices feed most distributional approaches to quantitative textual studies, without consideration for the semantic similarities between terms, whose presence arguably reduces content variety. This contribution presents a formalism remedying this omission, and makes an explicit use of the semantic similarities as extracted from WordNet. A case study in similarityreduced correspondence analysis illustrates the proposal.</p>
      </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
  <body>
    <sec id="sec-1">
      <title>1 Introduction</title>
      <p>
        The term-document matrix N = (nik) counts the
occurrences of n terms in p documents, and
constitutes the privileged input of most distributional
studies in quantitative textual linguistics: chi2
dissimilarities between terms or documents,
distancebased clustering of terms or documents,
multidimensional scaling (MDS) on terms or documents;
and, also, latent clustering by non-negative matrix
factorization
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref19">(e.g., Lee and Seung, 1999)</xref>
        or topic
modeling
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref2">(e.g., Blei, 2012)</xref>
        ; as well as nonlinear
variants resulting from transformations of the
independence quotients, as in the Hellinger
dissimilarities, or transformations of the chi2 dissimilarities
themselves (e.g., Bavaud, 2011).
      </p>
      <p>
        When using the term-document matrix, the
semantic link between words is only indirectly
addressed through the celebrated “distributional
hypothesis,” postulating an association between
distributional similarity (the neighbourhood or
closeness of words in a text) and meaning similarity
(the closeness of concepts)
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref14">(Harris, 1954)</xref>
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref24 ref32">(see also,
e.g., Sahlgren, 2008; McGillivray et al., 2008)</xref>
        .
Although largely accepted and much documented, the
study of the distributional hypothesis seems hardly
tackled in an explicit way, by typically
computing and comparing the average semantic similarity
within documents or contexts to the average
semantic similarity between documents or contexts –
which supposes the recourse to some hand-crafted
semantics, fairly unavailable at the time of Harris’
writings.
      </p>
      <p>The present short study distinguishes both kinds
of similarities and constitutes at this stage a proof
of concept oriented towards the formalism and the
conceptualization rather than large-scale
applications – in the general spirit of the COMHUM 2018
conference. It yields a new measure of textual
variety taking explicitly into account the semantic
similarities between terms, and permits to weigh
the usage of the semantic similarity when analyzing
the term-document matrix.
2</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-2">
      <title>Data</title>
      <p>
        After manually extracting the paragraphs of each of
the p = 11 chapters of Book I of “An Inquiry into
the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations”
by Adam Smith
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref33">(Smith, 1776)</xref>
        (a somewhat
arbitrary choice among myriads of other possibilities),
we tagged the parts of speech and lemma for each
word of the corpus using the nlp4j tagger
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref4">(Choi,
2016)</xref>
        . Subsequently we created a lemma-chapter
matrix, retaining only the type of words serving
a specific task, such as verbs. Terms i; j present
in the chapters were then associated to their first
conceptual senses ci; c j, that is to their first
WordNet synsets
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref25">(Miller, 1995)</xref>
        . We inspected several
similarity matrices sˆi j = sˆ(ci; c j) between pairs of
concepts ci and c j.
3
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-3">
      <title>Semantic similarities</title>
      <p>
        A few approaches for computing similarities
between words have been proposed in the literature
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref12">(see, e.g., Gomaa and Fahmy, 2013)</xref>
        . Recent
measures use word embeddings
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref16">(Kusner et al., 2015)</xref>
        ,
and tough these approaches are successful at
resolving other NLP tasks, they suffer some
drawbacks in computing semantic similarity
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref11">(Faruqui
et al., 2016)</xref>
        . Also, the latter methods are directly
based on the distributional hypothesis, and hence
unadapted to distinguish between distributional and
semantic dissimilarities, precisely.
      </p>
      <p>By contrast, the present paper uses WordNet,
that is a humanly constructed ontology. The
classical WordNet similarities sˆ(ci; c j) between two
concepts ci and c j computed on WordNet take on
different forms. The conceptually easiest is the path
similarity, defined from the number `(ci; c j) 0 of
edges of the shortest-path (in the WordNet
hierarchy) between ci and c j as follows:
1
sˆpath(ci; c j)= 1 + `(ci; c j)
(1)</p>
      <p>
        The Leacock Chodorow similarity
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref18">(Leacock and
Chodorow, 1998)</xref>
        is based on the same principle but
considers also the maximum depth D = maxi `(ci; 0)
(where 0 represents the root of the hierarchy,
occuped by the concept subsuming all the others) of
the concepts in the WordNet taxonomy:
      </p>
      <p>sˆlch(ci; c j) = log `(c2iD;c j)</p>
      <p>
        The Wu-Palmer similarity
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref34 ref5">(Wu and Palmer, 1994)</xref>
        is based on the notion of lowest common subsumer
ci _ c j, that is the least general concept in the
hierarchy that is a hypernym or ancestor of both ci and
c j:
sˆwup(ci; c j)=
      </p>
      <p>2`(ci _ c j; 0)
`(ci; 0) + `(c j; 0)</p>
      <p>
        The following similarities are further based on
the concept of Information Content, proposed by
Resnik
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref26 ref28">(Resnik, 1993b,a)</xref>
        . The Information
Content of a concept c is defined as log(p(c)), where
p(c) is the probability to encounter a concept c in
a reference corpus. The Resnik similarity
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref29">(Resnik,
1995)</xref>
        is defined as:
The Lin similarity
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref22">(Lin, 1998)</xref>
        is defined as:
sˆres(ci; c j)= log p(ci _ c j)
      </p>
      <p>2 log p(ci _ c j)
sˆlin(ci; c j)= log p(ci) + log p(c j)</p>
      <p>
        Finally, the Jiang Coranth similarity
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref15">(Jiang and
Conrath, 1997)</xref>
        is defined as:
1
sˆjch(ci; c j)= log p(ci) log p(c j) + 2 log p(ci _ c j)
and obeys sˆjch(ci; ci) = ¥.
      </p>
      <p>Among the above similarities, the path,
WuPalmer and Lin similarities obey the conditions
sˆi j = sˆ ji
0
and
sˆii = 1 :
(2)
In what follows, we shall use the path similarities
when required.
4</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-4">
      <title>A similarity-reduced measure of textual variety</title>
      <p>Let fi 0 be the relative frequency of term i,
normalized to åin=1 fi. Shannon entropy H = åi fi ln fi
constitutes a measure of relative textual variety,
ranging from 0 (a single term repeats itself) to ln n
(all terms are different). Yet, the entropy does not
take into account the possible similarity between
the terms, in contrast to the reduced entropy R (our
nomenclature) defined as</p>
      <p>
        R =
n n
å fi ln bi where bi = å sˆi j f j :
i=1 j=1
(3)
In Ecology, bi is the banality of species i,
measuring its average similarity to other species
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref23">(Marcon,
2016)</xref>
        , proposed by
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref20">Leinster and Cobbold (2012)</xref>
        ,
as well as by
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref30">Ricotta and Szeidl (2006)</xref>
        . By
construction, fi bi 1 and thus R H: the larger
the similarities, the lower the textual variety as
measured by the reduced entropy, as requested.
      </p>
      <p>Returning to the case study, we have, out of
the 643 verb lemmas initially present in the corpus,
retained the n = 234 verb lemmas occurring at least
5 times (“be” and “have” excluded). Overall term
weights fi, chapter weights rk and term weights fik
within a chapter obtain from the n p = 234 11
term-document matrix N = (nik) as
fi =
ni
n
rk =
n k
n
fik = nik
n k
(4)</p>
      <p>The corresponding entropies and reduced
entropies read H = 4:98 &gt; R = 1:60. For each
chapter, the corresponding quantities are depicted in
figure 1. One can observe the so-called
concavity property H &gt; åk rkHk (always verified) and
R &gt; åk rkRk (verified here), which says that the
variety of the whole is larger than the average
variety of its constituents.
5
4
3
2
1
0
0
4
1
0
2
1
0
0
1
0
8
0
6
0
4
0
2
0</p>
      <p>Shannon entropy Hk
reduced entropy Rk
Shannon variety exp(H)
reduced variety exp(R)</p>
      <p>-2.0 -1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5
dimension 1 : proportion of inertia = 0.17</p>
      <p>Shannon variety NShannon = exp(H) n represents
the equivalent number of distinct types in a
uniformly constituted corpus of same richness or
diversity (in the entropy sense) as the currently
examined corpus. Likewise, the reduced variety Nreduced =
exp(R) NShannon measures the equivalent number
of types if the latter were uniformly distributed and
completely dissimilar (that is si j = 0 for i 6= j): see
figure 2.
5</p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-5">
      <title>Ordinary correspondence analysis (recall)</title>
      <p>Correspondence analysis (CA) permits a
simultaneous representation of terms and documents in
the so-called biplot (figure 3). CA results from
weighted multidimensional scaling (MDS) applied
to the chi2 dissimilarities Dkcl between documents
k and l</p>
      <p>n
Dkcl = å fi(qik
i=1
qil )2 where qik = nnikn
i n k
(5)
or equivalently, on MDS applied to the chi2
dissimilarities between terms. Note the qik in (5)
to constitute the independence quotients, that is
the ratio of the observed counts to their expected
value under independence. Figure 3 constitutes
the two-dimensional projection of a weighted
Euclidean configuration of min(234 1; 11 1) = 10
dimensions, expressing a maximal proportion of
0:17 + 0:15 = 32% of dispersion or inertia D =
c
12 åkl rkrlDkl.</p>
      <p>Similarity-reduced correspondence analysis In
the case where documents k and l, differing by the
presence of distinct terms, contain semantically
similar terms, the “naive” chi2 dissimilarity (5),
which implicitly assumes distinct terms to be
completely dissimilar, arguably overestimates their
difference. The latter should be downsized
accordingly, in a way both reflecting the amount of shared
similarity between k and l, and still retaining the
squared Euclidean nature of their dissimilarity – a
crucial requirement for the validity of MDS. This
simple idea leads us to propose the following
reduced squared Euclidean distance Dˆ kl between
documents, taking into account both the distributional
and semantic differences between the documents,
namely</p>
      <p>D˜ kl = å t˜i j(qik
i j
qil )(q jk
q jl )
(6)
seem
appear
-0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10
dimension 1 : proportion of inertia = 0.19
0.15
-0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0.0
dimension 1 : proportion of inertia = 0.05
0.1</p>
      <p>T˜ = diag( f ) for “naive” similarities Sˆ = I
(where I is the identity matrix), in which case
D˜ is the usual chi2-dissimilarity
T˜ = f f 0 for “confounded types” Sˆ = J (where
J is the unit matrix filled with ones), in which
case D˜ is identically zero.</p>
      <p>Also, one can prove D˜ in (6) to be a squared
Euclidean dissimilarity iff S is positive semi-definite,
that is iff all its eigenvalues are non-negative, a
verified condition for path dissimilarities (see the
Appendix). Figure 4 depicts the corresponding
MDS.</p>
      <p>Semantic MDS on terms Positive semi-definite
semantic similarities Sˆ of the form (2), such as
the path similarities, generate squared Euclidean
dissimilarities as
(see the Appendix), and this circumstance allows
a weighted MDS on semantic dissimilarities
between terms, aimed at depicting an optimal
lowdimensional representation of the semantic inertia</p>
      <p>
        A family of similarities interpolating between
totally distinct types and confounded types
The exact form of similarities Sˆ between terms
fully governs the similarity-reduction mechanism
investigated so far. Yet, little systematic
investigation seems to have been devoted to the formal
properties of similarities (by contrast to the study
of the dissimilarities families found, for example,
in
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref5">Critchley and Fichet (1994)</xref>
        or
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref8">Deza and
Laurent (2009)</xref>
        , which may obey much more specific
properties than (2). In particular, sˆiaj satisfies (2)
for a 0 if sˆi j does, and varying a permits to
interpolate between the extreme cases of “naive”
similarities Sˆ = I and “confounded types” Sˆ = J.
      </p>
      <p>Lists of synonyms1 yield binary similarity
matrices si j = 0 or 1. More generally, S can be defined
(7)</p>
      <p>1. For example: http://www.crisco.unicaen.fr/des/
standard C6A
98 7
2
captured by the general concept of exchange
matrix E, giving the joint probability to select a pair
of textual positions through textual navigation (by
reading, hyperlinks or bibliographic zapping, etc.).
E defines a weighted network whose nodes are the
textual positions occupied by terms (Bavaud et al.,
2015).</p>
      <p>
        The parallel with spatial issues (quantitative
geography, image analysis), where E defines the
“where”, and the features dissimilarities between
positions D defines the “what”, is immediate
        <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="ref10">(see,
e.g., Egloff and Ceré, 2018)</xref>
        . In all likelihood,
developing both axes, that is taking into account
semantic similarities on generalized textual networks,
could provide a fruitful extension and renewal of
the venerable term-document matrix paradigm, and
provide a renewed look to the distributional
hypothesis, which can be reframed as a spatial
autocorrelation hypothesis.
      </p>
    </sec>
    <sec id="sec-6">
      <title>Acknowledgments</title>
      <p>The guidelines and organisation of M. Piotrowski,
chair of COMHUM 2018, as well as the
suggestions of two anonymous reviewers are gratefully
acknowledged.</p>
      <p>Bavaud, François (2011). On the Schoenberg
transformations in data analysis: Theory and
illustrations. Journal of Classification, 28(3):297–314.
doi:10.1007/s00357-011-9092-x.
ˆ
di j = 1
sˆi j = 1
=</p>
      <p>`i j
1 + `i j
that is dˆ i j = j (`i j), where j (x) = x=(1 + x). The
function j (x) is non-negative, increasing, concave,
with j (0) = 0. For r 1, its even derivatives
j (2r)(x) are non-positive, and its odd derivatives
j (2r 1)(x) are non-negative. That, is, j (x) is a
Schoenberg transformation, transforming a squared
Euclidean dissimilarity into a squared Euclidean
dissimilarity (see, e.g., Bavaud, 2011), thus
establishing the squared Euclidean nature of D in (7)
(and, by related arguments, the p.s.d. nature of S).
2. Provided no terms possess two direct hypernyms, which
seems to be verified for the verbs considered here</p>
    </sec>
  </body>
  <back>
    <ref-list>
      <ref id="ref1">
        <mixed-citation>
          <source>5 1 .0 .01 = a itr ine .05 f o n itroo .00 p o r :p2 .-50 n o i sen .-10 m i d 5 1 .0 .01 = a itr ine .05 f o n itroo .00 p o r :p2 .-50 n o i sen .-10 m i d 10 10 1 3 Bavaud</source>
          , François,
          <string-name>
            <given-names>Christelle</given-names>
            <surname>Cocco</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Aris Xanthos</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2015</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Textual navigation and autocorrelation</article-title>
          . In G. Mirkros and J. Macutek, eds.,
          <source>Sequences in Language and Text</source>
          , pages
          <fpage>35</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>56</lpage>
          . De Gruyter Mouton.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref2">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Blei</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>David M</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2012</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Probabilistic topic models</article-title>
          .
          <source>Communications of the ACM</source>
          ,
          <volume>55</volume>
          (
          <issue>4</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>77</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>84</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref3">
        <mixed-citation>
          <source>doi:10.1145/2133806</source>
          .2133826.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref4">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Choi</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Jinho D.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2016</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Dynamic Feature Induction: The Last Gist to the State-of-the-Art</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, NAACL'16</source>
          , pages
          <fpage>271</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>281</lpage>
          . San Diego, CA. URL https://aclweb.org/anthology/N/ N16/N16-1031.pdf.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref5">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Critchley</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Frank and Bernard
          <string-name>
            <surname>Fichet</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1994</year>
          ).
          <article-title>The partial order by inclusion of the principal classes of dissimilarity on a finite set, and some of their basic properties</article-title>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref6">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>In</surname>
          </string-name>
          Bernard Van Cutsem, ed.,
          <source>Classification and Dissimilarity Analysis</source>
          , pages
          <fpage>5</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>65</lpage>
          . New York, NY: Springer.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref7">
        <mixed-citation>
          <source>doi:10</source>
          .1007/978-1-
          <fpage>4612</fpage>
          -2686-
          <issue>4</issue>
          _
          <fpage>2</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref8">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Deza</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Michel and Monique
          <string-name>
            <surname>Laurent</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2009</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Geometry of cuts and metrics</article-title>
          , vol.
          <volume>15</volume>
          of Algorithms and Combinatorics. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref9">
        <mixed-citation>
          <source>doi:10</source>
          .1007/978-3-
          <fpage>642</fpage>
          -04295-9.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref10">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Egloff</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Mattia and Raphaël
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ceré</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2018</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Soft textual cartography based on topic modeling and clustering of irregular, multivariate marked networks</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Chantal Cherifi</source>
          , Hocine Cherifi, Márton Karsai, and Mirco Musolesi, eds.,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Complex</surname>
            <given-names>Networks</given-names>
          </string-name>
          &amp; Their
          <string-name>
            <surname>Applications</surname>
            <given-names>VI</given-names>
          </string-name>
          , vol.
          <volume>689</volume>
          of Studies in Computational Intelligence, pages
          <fpage>731</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>743</lpage>
          . Cham: Springer. doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1007/978-3-
          <fpage>319</fpage>
          -72150-7_
          <fpage>59</fpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref11">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Faruqui</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Manaal, Yulia Tsvetkov, Pushpendre Rastogi, and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chris Dyer</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2016</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Problems with evaluation of word embeddings using word similarity tasks</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Evaluating Vector Space Representations for NLP</source>
          , pages
          <fpage>30</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>35</lpage>
          .
          <article-title>Association for Computational Linguistics</article-title>
          . URL https: //aclweb.org/anthology/W/W16/W16-2506.pdf.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref12">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Gomaa</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wael H</surname>
          </string-name>
          . and
          <string-name>
            <surname>Aly</surname>
            <given-names>A Fahmy</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2013</year>
          ).
          <article-title>A survey of text similarity approaches</article-title>
          .
          <source>International Journal of Computer Applications</source>
          ,
          <volume>68</volume>
          (
          <issue>13</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>13</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>18</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref13">
        <mixed-citation>
          <source>doi:10</source>
          .5120/
          <fpage>11638</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>7118</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref14">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Harris</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Zellig S.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1954</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Distributional structure</article-title>
          .
          <source>Word</source>
          ,
          <volume>10</volume>
          (
          <issue>2-3</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>146</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>162</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref15">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Jiang</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>Jay J. and David W.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Conrath</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1997</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Semantic similarity based on corpus statistics and lexical taxonomy</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of International Conference on Research in Computational Linguistics (ROCLING X)</source>
          , pages
          <fpage>19</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>33</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref16">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Kusner</surname>
            , Matt, Yu Sun, Nicholas Kolkin,
            <given-names>and Kilian</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Weinberger</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2015</year>
          ).
          <article-title>From word embeddings to document distances</article-title>
          . In Francis Bach and David Blei, eds.,
          <source>Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Machine Learning</source>
          ,
          <source>vol. 37 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research</source>
          , pages
          <fpage>957</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>966</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref17">
        <mixed-citation>PMLR. URL http://proceedings.mlr.press/ v37/kusnerb15.html.</mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref18">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Leacock</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Claudia and Martin
          <string-name>
            <surname>Chodorow</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1998</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Combining local context and WordNet similarity for word sense identification</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Christiane Fellbaum and George A</source>
          . Miller, eds.,
          <source>WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database, chap. 11</source>
          , pages
          <fpage>265</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>284</lpage>
          . Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref19">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lee</surname>
            , Daniel D. and
            <given-names>H.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sebastian Seung</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1999</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization</article-title>
          .
          <source>Nature</source>
          ,
          <volume>401</volume>
          :
          <fpage>788</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>791</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1038/44565.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref20">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Leinster</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Tom and Christina A.
          <string-name>
            <surname>Cobbold</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2012</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Measuring diversity: the importance of species similarity</article-title>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref21">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ecology</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <volume>93</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>477</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>489</lpage>
          . doi:10.
          <year>1890</year>
          /10-
          <fpage>2402</fpage>
          .1.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref22">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Lin</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Dekang</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1998</year>
          ).
          <article-title>An information-theoretic definition of similarity</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML '98</source>
          , pages
          <fpage>296</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>304</lpage>
          . San Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref23">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Marcon</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Eric</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2016</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Mesurer la Biodiversité et la Structuration Spatiale</article-title>
          . Thèse d'habilitation, Université de Guyane. URL https: //hal-agroparistech.
          <article-title>archives-ouvertes</article-title>
          .fr/ tel-01502970.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref24">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>McGillivray</surname>
            , Barbara,
            <given-names>Christer</given-names>
          </string-name>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Johansson</surname>
          </string-name>
          , and Daniel Apollon (
          <year>2008</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Semantic structure from correspondence analysis</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of the 3rd Textgraphs Workshop on Graph-Based Algorithms for Natural Language Processing</source>
          , pages
          <fpage>49</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>52</lpage>
          .
          <article-title>Association for Computational Linguistics</article-title>
          . URL https://aclweb.org/ anthology/W/W08/W08-2007.pdf.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref25">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Miller</surname>
            ,
            <given-names>George A.</given-names>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1995</year>
          ).
          <article-title>WordNet: a lexical database for English</article-title>
          .
          <source>Communications of the ACM</source>
          ,
          <volume>38</volume>
          (
          <issue>11</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>39</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>41</lpage>
          . doi:
          <volume>10</volume>
          .1145/219717.219748.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref26">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Resnik</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Philip</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1993a</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Selection and information: a class-based approach to lexical relationships</article-title>
          .
          <source>Tech.</source>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref27">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Rep</surname>
          </string-name>
          . IRCS-
          <volume>93</volume>
          -42, University of Pennsylvania Institute for Research in Cognitive Science. URL http: //repository.upenn.edu/ircs_reports/200.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref28">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Resnik</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Philip</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1993b</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Semantic classes and syntactic ambiguity</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of the Workshop on Human Language Technology (HLT '93)</source>
          , pages
          <fpage>278</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>283</lpage>
          .
          <article-title>Association for Computational Linguistics</article-title>
          . URL https: //www.aclweb.org/anthology/H93-1054.pdf.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref29">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Resnik</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Philip</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1995</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Using information content to evaluate semantic similarity in a taxonomy</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference for Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-95)</source>
          , pages
          <fpage>448</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>453</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref30">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Ricotta</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Carlo and Laszlo
          <string-name>
            <surname>Szeidl</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2006</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Towards a unifying approach to diversity measures: bridging the gap between the Shannon entropy and Rao's quadratic index</article-title>
          .
          <source>Theoretical Population Biology</source>
          ,
          <volume>70</volume>
          (
          <issue>3</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>237</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>243</lpage>
          .
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref31">
        <mixed-citation>
          <source>doi:10</source>
          .1016/j.tpb.
          <year>2006</year>
          .
          <volume>06</volume>
          .003.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref32">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Sahlgren</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Magnus</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>2008</year>
          ).
          <article-title>The distributional hypothesis</article-title>
          .
          <source>Rivista di Linguistica</source>
          ,
          <volume>20</volume>
          (
          <issue>1</issue>
          ):
          <fpage>33</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>53</lpage>
          . URL http:// linguistica.sns.it/RdL/20.1/Sahlgren.pdf.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref33">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Smith</surname>
          </string-name>
          ,
          <string-name>
            <surname>Adam</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <volume>1776</volume>
          ).
          <article-title>An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations; Book I. Urbana, Illinois: Project Gutenberg</article-title>
          .
          <article-title>Also known as: Wealth of Nations</article-title>
          . URL http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/ 3300.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref34">
        <mixed-citation>
          <string-name>
            <surname>Wu</surname>
          </string-name>
          , Zhibiao and Martha
          <string-name>
            <surname>Palmer</surname>
          </string-name>
          (
          <year>1994</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Verbs semantics and lexical selection</article-title>
          .
          <source>In Proceedings of the 32nd annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics</source>
          , pages
          <fpage>133</fpage>
          -
          <lpage>138</lpage>
          .
          <article-title>Association for Computational Linguistics</article-title>
          . URL https://www.aclweb.org/ anthology/P94-1019.pdf.
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref35">
        <mixed-citation>
          <article-title>Appendix: Proof of the squared Euclidean nature of D in (7).</article-title>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
      <ref id="ref36">
        <mixed-citation>
          <article-title>The number `i j of edges is the shortest path (in the WordNet hierarchical tree) linking the concepts associated to i and j is a a tree dissimilarity2, and hence a squared Euclidean dissimilarity (see</article-title>
          , e.g.,
          <source>Critchley and Fichet</source>
          ,
          <year>1994</year>
          ).
          <article-title>Hence, (1) and (7) entail</article-title>
        </mixed-citation>
      </ref>
    </ref-list>
  </back>
</article>