=Paper=
{{Paper
|id=Vol-2323/SKI-Canada-2019-7-3-3
|storemode=property
|title=Using Multi-Criteria Analysis to Estimate Retail Site Attractiveness for the Huff Model
|pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2323/SKI-Canada-2019-7-3-3.pdf
|volume=Vol-2323
|authors=Claus Rinner,Renacin Matadeen,Stephen Swales
}}
==Using Multi-Criteria Analysis to Estimate Retail Site Attractiveness for the Huff Model==
Spatial Knowledge and Information Canada, 2019, 7(3), 3 Using Multi-Criteria Analysis to Estimate Retail Site Attractiveness for the Huff Model CLAUS RINNER RENACIN MATADEEN STEPHEN SWALES Department of Geography Department of Geography Department of Geography Ryerson University Ryerson University Ryerson University crinner@ryerson.ca renacin.matadeen@ryerson.ca sswales@geography.ryerson.ca offerings in a transparent economy, location ABSTRACT plays a crucial role in reducing costs through reducing travel distance. The Huff model is an advanced trade area Geographic analysis techniques such as delineation technique widely used in retail Thiessen polygons, the Huff model, and site selection. It is based on site customer spotting were developed as attractiveness and distance, and models normative representations of consumer probabilities of customers patronizing behaviour (Swales 2008). In a business specific retail locations. In this research, we context, Thiessen (or Voronoi) polygons examine the suitability of multi-criteria separate a region with supply points (such analysis (MCA) to estimate the as retailers or social service centres) into attractiveness parameter in the Huff model. catchment areas, in which each demand In a case study of shopping centres in point is assigned to the closest facility. The Toronto, we illustrate that MCA provides a Huff model allows for more complex gravity suitable framework for retail site modeling of attractiveness of supply attractiveness. However, variations in the locations and competition between them by MCA technique have noticeable impacts on assigning demand to supply points on the the Huff model results. basis of probability (Swales 2008). Finally, customer spotting draws on ever growing 1. Introduction affinity program datasets to facilitate Retail geography, business geomatics, and visualisation, analysis and location location intelligence are some of the strategies related to patronage of facilities concepts that capture the idea that the and services (Swales 2008). location of private sector enterprises has The Huff model (Huff 1964, Huff & Black significant implications on their success 1997) is widely used in the retail business with respect to production, sales, and work sector. It combines principles of distance force (e.g. Jones & Simmons 1993). In a decay with site attractiveness. To model political climate of accountability and retail site attractiveness for potential efficiency in using tax revenues, government customers most accurately, analysts often and not-for-profit organizations use composite metrics (e.g. Lin et al. 2016, increasingly make use of the same Jia et al. 2017). operational and strategic decision support Multi-criteria analysis (MCA) is a normative tools to determine service site locations and modeling approach that integrates decision- resources offered to their “clients”. maker preferences (e.g. criterion weights) in The theoretical framework for retail the evaluation of decision alternatives such geography includes rational choice theory – as retail sites. To support site selection, each the assumption that consumers will make site is assessed by a composite score created cost-effective choices with respect to their from multiple criteria (site attributes). use of retail outlets and services (Swales In this research, we examine the conceptual 2008). Given similar product and service and practical fit of MCA techniques with the 2 Estimating Retail Site Attractiveness creation of composite attractiveness metrics. We estimate site attractiveness for the Huff model using MCA and explore the impact of MCA parameters on the outcome. 2. Methods and Data 2.1 Techniques and Technology One of the most commonly used MCA techniques is the weighted linear combination (WLC), a weighted sum of criterion values (Malczewski 2000). To transform the criteria into a common value range such as 0...1 for comparison and combination, a rescaling procedure is applied (Malczewski & Rinner 2015). The normative aspect of MCA is most obvious in the use of importance weights. These are set by the decision-maker and may include an element of subjectivity along with expert knowledge. Weights are commonly defined as fractions or percentages that add up to 1.0 or 100%. The Huff model calculates a quotient of the attractiveness of a destination site over the distance to a source point or area. Distances Fig.1: User interface of the MCA component of the Huff model may be measured as straight lines or via a plugin for QGIS transportation network, and the distance decay effect can be modelled linearly or 2.2 Case Study exponentially. In retail, the source locations In a case study for the 16 largest indoor often are residential areas representing shopping centres in the Toronto Census potential customers. The destination sites Metropolitan Area, we experimented with are retail locations, the attractiveness of two common multi-criteria rescaling which is often characterized by a techniques: maximum-score and score- combination of size and quality indicators range transformation. For criteria that are such as floor space and type of goods to be maximized, maximum-score offered. The attractiveness-distance transformation divides each criterion value quotient is normalized by the sum of all by the largest value. For minimization quotients to represent the probability of criteria, the quotient of the smallest value customers from the source to shop at the divided by the criterion value at hand is destination over all other destinations. For subtracted from 1.0 to form the rescaled each source, the sum of probabilities is 1.0. criterion value. For maximization criteria, We implemented the Huff model with MCA- score-range transformation assigns the based attractiveness estimation in a plugin smallest value to 0.0, the largest to 1.0, and for the open-source QGIS 3.2 package using all other values in proportion. For Python 3.6 along with QT5 for the minimization criteria, the assignment is development of the user interface shown in reversed. Fig. 1. An earlier version of the underlying The data for the case study included a scripts is available at https://github.com/ hexagonal tessellation of the Toronto ryersongeo/qgis_location_analytics. Census Metropolitan Area to represent source areas (without further attributes) and a point shapefile of shopping centres Estimating Retail Site Attractiveness 3 (Fig. 2) with a sample of nine attractiveness composite attractiveness metrics change indicators sorted from most to least under the score-range procedure. important: Average Google Places score Gross leasable area Number of anchor stores Number of fashion stores Number of technology stores Number of food stores Total number of stores Number of parking spaces Adjacent housing density Weights between 25% and 2.5% were assigned manually for the purpose of the experiment. All criteria were considered as to be maximized, i.e. larger values represent greater utility for potential customers. Primary and secondary trade areas were defined by the commonly used probability thresholds of 60% and 30% (Jones & Simmons 1993; Swales 2008) and mapped Fig. 3: Trade areas after maximum-score transformation of attractiveness criteria for the 16 shopping centres. Fig. 2: Hexagonal tessellation of Toronto Census Metropolitan Area and major shopping centre locations 3. Results Fig. 4: Trade areas after score-range transformation of attractiveness criteria In comparing the results of maximum-score transformation (Fig. 3) and score-range This can be explained by the fact that the transformation (Fig. 4), some differences maximum-score method is “anchored” at are visually noticeable. In particular, some the maximum value, which is transformed of the larger trade areas grow further while to 1.0, while the minimum value only gets some of the smaller trade areas all but down to 0.0 if the original indicator value disappear under the score-range procedure. also was 0.0; other minimum values are Since distances do not change, the transformed to rescaled values between 0.0 and 1.0, thus larger minima than under the 4 Estimating Retail Site Attractiveness score-range procedure, which always uses Acknowledgements the full value range (Young et al. 2010). The Partial funding from the J.W. McConnell score-range procedure therefore results in Foundation through the RECODE at more extreme probabilities and trade areas, Ryerson University program and from while the maximum-score transformation SSHRC’s Geothink Partnership Grant is produces more equally distributed gratefully acknowledged. probabilities (see also Fig. 5). References - Huff DL (1964) Defining and Estimating a Trading Area. Journal of Marketing 23(3): 34-38 - Huff DL, Black WC (1997) The Huff Model in Retrospect. Applied Geographic Studies 1(2): 83-93 - Jia P, Wang F, Xierali IM (2017) Using a Huff-Based Model to Delineate Hospital Fig. 5: Average probabilities per centre under maximum-score Service Areas. The Professional (top) and score-range (bottom) transformations Geographer 69(4): 522-530 - Jones K, Simmons J (1993) Location, 4. Conclusion location, location: analyzing the retail In summary, MCA methods were shown to environment. Scarborough, Ont: Nelson be applicable to the estimation of site Canada attractiveness for the Huff model in retail - Lin T, Xia J, Robinson TP, Olaru D, Smith geography. MCA provides a structured, B, Taplin J, Cao B (2016) Enhanced Huff framework for the combination of multiple, Model for Estimating Park and Ride commensurate criteria. This approach (PnR) Catchment Areas in Perth, WA. integrates decision-maker preferences in a Journal of Transport Geography 54: way that may be considered normative or 336-348 subjective. - Malczewski J (2000) On the Use of We are in the process of expanding the Weighted Linear Combination Method in existing QGIS plugin with additional retail GIS: Common and Best Practice geography functionality, including other Approaches. Transactions in GIS 4(1): 5- trade area delineation techniques and 22 alternative distance calculation. Our goal is - Malczewski J, Rinner C (2015) to create a location analytics toolkit that Multicriteria Decision Analysis in makes market research accessible to smaller Geographic Information. New York: companies, non-profits, academic Springer researchers, and the general public. - Swales S (2008), “Trade Area Analysis” in It would also be of interest to examine the Swales S (ed.) Marketing Geography normative modeling framework of MCA in (3rd. ed.), Boston: Pearson Custom conjunction with crowdsourcing and Publishing volunteered geographic information, which - Young J, Rinner C, Patychuk D (2010) The include elements of subjectivity. In addition, Effect of Standardization in Multicriteria the methods described could benefit from Decision Analysis on Health Policy integrating open data and using geospatial Outcomes. In G Phillips-Wren, LC Jain, Web technology in an online modeling and K Nakamatsu, RJ Howlett (eds) decision support framework. Advances in Intelligent Decision Technologies (Proceedings of the Second KES International Symposium IDT 2010). Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, pp. 299-307 Estimating Retail Site Attractiveness 5