=Paper=
{{Paper
|id=Vol-2331/paper2
|storemode=property
|title=Peruagus - a Transatlantic Autonomous Surface Vessel for the Microtransat Challenge
|pdfUrl=https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2331/paper2.pdf
|volume=Vol-2331
|authors=Elettra Ganoulis,Adam Alcantara,Julian Niedermaier,Robert Winn,Nicholas Jones,Antonio Mazzone Tur,James Blake,Nicholas Townsend,Moritz Bühler,Carsten Heinz,Simon Kohaut,Helmi Abrougui,Samir Nejim
}}
==Peruagus - a Transatlantic Autonomous Surface Vessel for the Microtransat Challenge==
https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2331/paper2.pdf
Peruagus - a Transatlantic Autonomous Surface Vessel
for the Microtransat Challenge
Elettra Ganoulis Adam Alcantara Julian Niedermaier Robert Winn
Nicholas Jones Antonio Mazzone Tur James Blake Nicholas Townsend
The University of Southampton
Abstract
The Microtransat Challenge is a (friendly) transatlantic, unmanned
boat race, aimed to stimulate the development of autonomous boats.
Since the first transatlantic Microtransat race in 2010 there have
been over 20 entries and no successful crossings in all classes (sailing,
non sailing), divisions (autonomous, unmanned) and routes (East to
West, West to East). This paper presents the design and development
of Peruagus, the University of Southampton 2018 Microtransat
transatlantic autonomous surface vessel entry. Peruagus, meaning
Globetrotter in Latin, was developed as part of a final year group
design project at the University of Southampton. The design of the
vessel (a mono-hull, self righting, solar powered vessel) including the
system architecture, hull design, propulsion, steering, power and con-
trol systems and experimental results from a series of self propulsion
tests, sea-keeping tests and autonomous operations are presented. The
results demonstrate that the vessel is able to self right, propel itself
with low power and operate autonomously over a range of conditions.
In addition, performance predictions are presented and based on a fault
tree analysis the vessel is currently predicted to have a 60% chance
of success. The vessel is planned to be launched in the summer of 2018.
1 Introduction
1.1 The Microtransat Competition
The Microtransat Challenge, a transatlantic unmanned boat race (Figure 1), aims to stimulate the development
of autonomous boats through friendly competition. The competition, first conceived by Mark Neal (Aberystwyth
University) and Yves Briere (ISAE) in 2005, was first attempted in 2010 by Pita from Aberystwyth University
(Microtransat, 2018a). Since the first transatlantic Microtransat race in 2010 there have been over 20 entries.
Although the challenge is simple; autonomously travel either between Europe and the Caribbean (east to west
route) or North America and Ireland (west to east route) in the fastest possible time, as of writing there have
been no successful crossings in all classes (sailing/non sailing), divisions (autonomous/unmanned) and routes
(East to West/West to East).
Copyright c by the paper’s authors. Copying permitted for private and academic purposes.
In: S. M. Schillai, N. Townsend (eds.): Proceedings of the International Robotic Sailing Conference 2018, Southampton, United
Kingdom, 31-08-2018
21
ROBOTIC SAILING 2018
Figure 1: The Microtransat Challenge ((a) West to East route (blue), (b) East to West route (red)).
A breakdown of entries by class and division and failures is given in Table 1. The majority of entries are in
the sailing class (using wind as their propulsion power) and entered in the autonomous division. Reviewing the
known failures, the technical failures primarily relate to issues of reliability - surviving in the harsh environment
for a prolonged period of time. While the non-technical failures relate to route hazards - fishing grounds, shipping
lanes and the Sargasso Sea (an ocean gyre off the coast of northern America and the Caribbean characterised
by brown seaweed, which creates obstacles for the vessel).
Sailing Class Non-Sailing class
Only wind power can be used for propulsion, Any type of propulsion can be used,
overall length (LOA) restricted to a maximum overall length (LOA) restricted to a
of 2.4m maximum of 2.4m
Autonomous (Division)
No interaction between the team and Pinta, Snoopy Sloop 10, Snoopy Sloop 11, That’ll do two (Epsom College Entry)
the vessel, only publicly available data Breizh Tigress, Opentransat Erwan 1, Aboat
can be received by the vessel (i.e. no Time, Trawler Bait, Phil’s Boat, Breizh Spirit,
waypoint changes Breizh Spirit DCNS, Snoopy Sloop 8, Snoopy
Sloop 9, That’ll do
Unmanned (Division)
Data can be sent to the boat, including Gortobot V2, SB-wave
course changes
Table 1: Summary of Microtransat classes, divisions and failures by vessel name. (Italics denotes a non-technical
failure e.g., picked up by fishing vessel, Underline denotes technical failure e.g., position report failure, unmarked
denotes unknown or sailed into land). Data from (Microtransat, 2018b)
Furthermore, considering vessel size and performance (time sailed and distance covered) there are no apparent
trends, Figure 2. Neither is there a clear improvement in performance over the years the competition has been
running, although this can be attributed to the small dataset and difficulty of the challenge. In this regard it is
hoped this paper will provide a valuable insight for new teams and entires in the Microtransat.
Figure 2: Comparisons of previous Mircotransat Entries ((a) Length/beam ratio versus distance and time sailed
(b) Year versus distance and time sailed)
22
Vessel Development & Modelling
1.2 The Peruagus Project
Peruagus, meaning Globetrotter in Latin, is the University of Southampton 2018 Microtransat transatlantic
autonomous surface vessel entry. The Peruagus project was a final year engineering group design project at the
University of Southampton. The group design projects (GDPs) at the University of Southampton (University
of Southampton, 2018) aim to provide students with the opportunity to demonstrate their knowledge and skills,
gained during their degree, to a ‘grand’ engineering design challenge. In this regard competitions can be used
to great effect, as reported by (Telegraph, 2016) and exemplified by Xprize (Xprize, 2018), Eurobot (Eurobot,
2018), formula student (IMechE, 2018) and maritime engineering related competitions including the World
Robotic Sailing Championships (WRSC, 2018) and the International HydroContest(Hydros Foundation, 2018).
In particular, the Microtransat competition has provided a multi-faceted, challenging, motivational, open-ended
engineering problem. This has enabled students to demonstrate and integrate knowledge acquired from across
their programs but also provided the opportunity to interact and contribute to an international community.
The aim of the Peruagus project is to design and develop a vessel to cross the Atlantic, as part of the Micro-
transat Challenge. Since the vessel is required to operate unmanned and travel for several months autonomously
without maintenance and with all previous attempts unsuccessful, a failure analysis approach was used to guide
the design of Peruagus, focusing on reliability (minimising the probability of system and subsystem failures to
maximise the chances of success).
1.3 Contribution and Paper Structure
In this paper, the design of Peruagus, a mono-hull, self righting, solar powered vessel, is presented. The system
architecture, hull design, propulsion, steering, power and control systems are detailed in Section 2, including
experimental results from a series of self propulsion tests, sea-keeping tests and autonomous operations. The
final vessel design, targeting the Mircotransat non-sailing class, autonomous division (with the possibility to
convert to unmanned) following an east-west route, is presented in Section 3 and performance predictions are
presented in Section 4.
2 Peruagus Vessel Design
2.1 System Architecture
An overview of Peruagus system architecture is given in Figure 3. The electrical system is split into a pair
of redundant circuits, each comprising of a 100W solar panel made up of SunPower cells, a Victron BlueSolar
MPPT charge controller, a battery bank (2 x 480Wh lithium-ion batteries), control relays and a step down
voltage converter. The solar/battery bank (12-14V) provides power to the drive motors, steering actuators, the
navigation light and the bilge pump. A step-down voltage converter (also powered from the solar/battery bank)
then provides a regulated 5.6V supply for the on-board control systems, including;
1. The navigation controller (Pixhawk), which acts as the navigation controller, and manages the power dis-
tribution and makes decisions based upon the condition monitoring sensors
2. The satellite modem (RockBLOCK+) which transmits telemetry and location data every 6 hours using the
Iridium network
3. The microcontroller (Teensy 3.5), which provides data acquisition, processing, logging and (I2C) communi-
cation with the navigation controller.
Figure 3: Overview of Peruagus Architecture
23
ROBOTIC SAILING 2018
2.2 Hull Design
To house all the systems a mono-hull, self righting, solar powered vessel with passive keel cooling was developed.
The hullform, as shown in Figure 4, was made of a double skinned foam core (Celotex PIR wall insulation foam,
milled from a foam block using a CNC machine) with E-glass (290g/m2 with 100g/m2 finish) infused with EL2
epoxy resin. The foam thickness has a total volume of approximately 100kg displacement. This ensures that if
there is water ingress and the compartment becomes flooded the vessel will maintain positive buoyancy. The
propeller shafts were also angled at 15 degrees, to ensure the stern tubes ends were above the waterline such
that in the event of a seal failure water would not flood the boat.
Figure 4: Peruagus hullform
2.2.1 Stability
Given the slender form, solar panel requirements and potentially severe sea-states, Peruagus was designed to
be self righting and remain self righting in the event of damage and flooding. This was achieved with a keel,
watertight compartments and an asymmetric superstructure. The keel (NACA0010 section) was made from PET
plastic, housing 16kg of lead ingots constructed around an aluminum frame. The GZ curves for the intact vessel
and damaged vessel are given in Figure 5.
Figure 5: Peruagus GZ stability curves ((a) Intact (b) Damaged)
2.2.2 Seakeeping
To assess the seakeeping performance of Peruagus a series of observational experiments were performed in the
University of Southampton towing tank, including a worse case scenario when the wave length was equal to the
LBP, Figure 6. As the vessel is unmanned and the limiting factor for seakeeping performance is the tolerance
of the electronics, this approach which does not necessitate the testing of every possible sea-state that may be
encountered, significantly reduced the number of tests required. The results, Figure 6, show that the accelerations
experienced by the vessel are within tolerance of all electrical systems. For example, the most sensitive system
onboard, the GPS, is rated to withstand up to 4G acceleration. While the wave height is limited in the towing
tank, these tests provided confidence in the seakeeping performance of the vessel.
24
Vessel Development & Modelling
Figure 6: Peruagus Seakeeping ((a) Image of test, (b) Heave acceleration and velocity recorded using an IMU)
2.3 Propulsion System
Propulsion was achieved with two inwards rotating propellers, providing (if necessary) differential thrust for
steering in the event of a rudder malfunction. To establish the resistance and estimate the required propulsion
power for the hull, the viscous resistance was estimated using the ITTC 1957 correlation line (Molland et al., 2017)
with a form factor identified from CFD simulations (using ANSYS Fluent) and the wave resistance coefficients
were determined using Maxsurf resistance Slender Body Analysis (assuming Peruagus can be regarded as a fully
displacement traditionally shaped vessel). The results are shown in Figure 7. The power estimates were made
assuming the following efficiencies; Propeller Angle Efficiency 96.59%, Propeller Efficiency 60%, Transmission
Efficiency 95% and a Weather and Fouling Margin 30%. Based on the results, a 140W design specification was
considered (enabling a nominal 45-55W ‘cruise’ operation and ‘sprint’ ability to maintain progress in adverse
conditions or in the event of an engine, belt, shaft or propeller failure).
Figure 7: Estimated resistance (a) and power (b) over a range of speeds
2.3.1 Drive System
A pair of brushless hobby-grade (Turnigy DST-700kv, 12V ) motors were selected for propulsion. With a nominal
no load speed of 8,400rpm (12V), a 1:4.4 geared belt drive system was implemented to provide the propeller
design speed of 650-800rpm. To check the longevity of the motor and controller, the motor was run for over 3000
hours, with an applied load (an airscrew), cycling between cruise (20-40% throttle) and sprint throttle levels to
provide a representative load cycle. Although, an increase in bearing noise was noted, the motor and controller
ran without fault with no notable increase in power consumption, providing confidence in the selected drive
system.
2.3.2 Propeller Selection
The propeller selection was based on an experimental investigation of 4, 5 and 6 bladed Wageningen B-series
propellers (Van Lammeren et al., 1969) (readily available brass model boat propellers designed to operate at
750 rpm at 1.5knots). The 4, 5 and 6 bladed propellers were 3D printed (for the experiments) in high density
ABS and vessel speed, power (current drawn) and rpm, over a range of throttle settings, in the University of
Southampton Boldrewood towing tank, were recorded, Figure 8. Based on the results, Figure 9, the five bladed
propeller was selected. The results show a slight discrepancy between the theoretical estimates (see section 2.3)
where an installed power requirement of 8.07W at 1.5knots ‘cruise’ speed (0.77m/s, Fn0.168, 4.43N resistance,
25
ROBOTIC SAILING 2018
4.58N thrust), and installed power requirement of 80.8W at 3.0knots ‘sprint’ speed (1.54m/s, Fn0.336, 22.18N
resistance, 22.96N thrust) was calculated.
Figure 8: 3D printed propeller (design, manufacture, assembly, testing)
According to the results of the self-propulsion tests, the motors operate at approximately 40% (each) at normal
cruise speed, drawing a total of 48W. One motor was found to push the vessel at a maximum speed of 2 knots at
full applied power (drawing approximately 80W). While both motors operating at full applied power, produced
a speed of just below 3 knots (drawing 160W total). Based on the results the boat is intended to be operated
for the majority of journey at ‘cruise’ power (45-55W continuous input), with the ability to ‘Sprint’ to maintain
progress when encountering tidal streams, current, or heavy weather.
Figure 9: Propeller test results ((a) Power (b) RPM)
2.4 Steering System
To steer the vessel a doubly redundant system was developed with two linearly actuated control surfaces (rudders)
and two inwards rotating propellers (if necessary in the event of rudder failure) providing differential thrust. The
rudders were designed to manoeuvre the vessel and, in case of a propulsion failure, counteract the moment
produced by a single, one-sided propeller. This approach was adopted, based on advice provided by ASV Global
Ltd and on the main causes of failure of small ocean going craft; failed rudder servos (e.g., from salt water
seizing the electronics or strong forces damaging the actuator) (Microtransat, 2018b) and complete rudder loss
(Seacharger, 2018). In addition, linear actuators also have the added advantage that they can hold their position
without the need for power.
2.5 System Power
To power Peruagus an asymmetric superstructure solar battery charging system was implemented. Since
the transat is in the northern hemisphere and one way - east to west, the asymmetric superstructure max-
imises the incident solar energy and additionally aids in self righting (with a tendency to right itself to
starboard). In total two 100W (18V) Mono-crystalline solar panels (η = 23.5%), were selected and wired
in parallel, with each panel charging two Lithium Ion batteries (12V, 3S 40Ah) (with a Victron solar con-
troller and built-in profile for Lithium Ion cells; lower voltage cutoff of ≈ 8.5V and a maximum voltage of 12.6V).
2.6 System Control
The control system is based on the Ardupilot Rover, using GPS to steer the vessel between waypoints as shown
in Figure 11. A major modification to the Ardupilot Rover basis firmware is the addition of the Director, which
acts as a proxy between the autopilot and the physical hardware. The autopilot code sends a desired throttle
and steering value to the Director. The Director, which continually monitors the vessel to detect failures, then
26
Vessel Development & Modelling
drives the motors and rudders accordingly (given the system status) following prescribed rules. In addition,
the Director also monitors longer term navigational performance e.g., IMU data to detect the severity of boat
motions, ability to maintain headway, capsize events and system failures. This data can be reported to the shore
base and actions including; adding/changing waypoints, overriding autopilot decisions on failure, change the
data sent in the status message, request a full diagnostic to be sent (multiple messages), manually set throttle
or steering angles, switch to drift/loiter mode and conduct a reverse 360, can be taken. Meaning that, in the
event of an unforeseen failure there is the possibility to convert to the unmanned division. Although, the ‘rules’
or thresholds remain to be finalised, initial tests have been conducted to provide confidence in the control, with
Peruagus run autonomously for an hour tracking between waypoints in a local lake.
3 Final Peruagus Design
The final Peruagus design is presented in Figure 10 and Table 2.
Figure 10: Peruagus General Arrangment
HULL PARAMETERS
Length (LOA, LWL) 2.2m, 2.158m
Beam (WL, Max) 0.475m, 0.58m
Draft at FP (at AP) 0.162m (0.14m)
Displacement 80.4kg
Block Coefficient, CB 0.454
LCB, LCF, GMt, Trim 1.16m, 1.071m, 0.167m, -0.021m
PROPULSION SYSTEM
Propellers 2× 5-bladed Raboesch M5 propellers, 110mm diameter
Propeller drive 2× Model DST-700, 140W, 700RPM/volt, brushless
STEERING SYSTEM
Rudder Shape NACA0015 (widened near the stock)
Rudder Material Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS) and Epoxy
Rudder Area 0.014m2
Mean Chord, Span, Sweep 0.10m, 0.14m, 20o
Aspect Ratio 1.4
SYSTEM POWER
Solar Panels 2× 100W (18V), Monocrystalline, 1050mm x 540mm x 2.5mm, η = 23.5%
Batteries 4× 480WH, 12V (Nominal) Lithium Ion (3S 40Ah), rated discharge 40A,
rated charge 10A, 12.50kg (total)
CONTROL SYSTEM
Navigation Controller Pixhawk
Satellite Modem RockBLOCK
Microcontroller Teensy 3.5
Table 2: Peruagus particulars
27
ROBOTIC SAILING 2018
4 The Peruagus Entry
4.1 Vessel Route
Peruagus is planned to be entered into the Mircotransat non-sailing class, autonomous division (with the
possibility to convert to unmanned in the event of a required interaction) following an east-west route.
To minimise the probability of failure the planned route (as much as practically possible) avoids fishing
grounds, shipping lanes and the Sargasso Sea, Figure 11. Although, the east-west route is longer and
arguably more challenging, with a 91% probability that one hurricane will be encountered in the course of
the transit (NOAA, 2018), it is practical for a UK team and the average wind and waves directions are favourable.
Figure 11: Peruagus Route
4.2 Estimated Duration
Using the Haversine formula (Mwemezi and Huang, 2011) to calculate the distances between the planned
waypoints (latitude,longitude) and assuming a constant ‘cruise’ speed of 1.5knots (55W), the total journey is
expected to take around 16 weeks, Table 3. Although neglecting the influence of any current, wind and waves,
these estimates will enable a comparison with the actual performance and potentially highlight performance
issues on route.
Waypoints Latitude Longitude Distance Propulsion Energy Duration
(N) (W) (km) (M J) (Weeks)
Southampton 50.91o 1.40o
Waypoint 1 48.50o 8.50o 565.24 40.3746 1.2138
Waypoint 2 43.50o 13.50o 667.05 47.6461 1.4324
Waypoint 3 38.50o 13.50o 555.97 39.7125 1.1939
Waypoint 4 33.50o 19.50o 762.88 54.4911 1.6381
Waypoint 5 24.50o 24.50o 1103.31 78.8080 2.3692
Waypoint 6 22.00o 30.50o 667.76 47.6972 1.4339
Finish line 23.20o 60.00o 3039.62 217.1155 6.5270
TOTALS 7361.83 525.8451 15.8082
Table 3: Peruagus estimates (assuming a constant cruise speed of 1.5knots at 55W)
4.3 Probability of Success
To determine the probability of success a deductive failure analysis in the form of a fault tree was conducted,
as illustrated in Figure 12. Over 200 identified events (each representing a possible cause of failure of one of the
vessels systems) were identified and probabilities of failure assigned. The probabilities were based on the test
results, available literature, however, some probabilities were difficult to quantify and estimates were made. The
final analysis estimated the probability of success at approximately 60%.
Given the history of the competition this figure seems reasonable, however it is important to note that
there is a degree of uncertainty associated with this number. For example, the largest contribution to
vessel failure (18%) is attributed to the inability of the Pixhawk (and the vessels operating code) to handle
28
Vessel Development & Modelling
Figure 12: Example branch of the fault tree analysis
an event not part of the vessels normal operation and the lack of code specifically designed to handle the
event. Since the probability of such an event is unknown, this is a subjective estimate by the team. Al-
though subjective, this approach does provide a means to quantify the probability of success and, more usefully,
to enable designs to be compared and developed with a quantifiable metric to maximize the probability of success.
5 Conclusion
This paper presented the design of the Peruagus, the University of Southampton 2018 Microtransat transatlantic
autonomous surface vessel entry. The final vessel design is presented, including the system architecture, hull
design, propulsion, steering, power and control systems. Experimental results are presented demonstrating that
the vessel is able to self right, propel itself with low power and operate autonomously over a range of conditions.
Furthermore, performance predictions are presented and based on a fault tree analysis the vessel is currently
predicted to have a 60% chance of success. The vessel, a mono-hull, self righting, solar powered vessel is planned
to be launched in 2018, in the Mircotransat non-sailing class, autonomous division, following an east-west route.
Acknowledgements
The support of BMT Argoss and ASV Unmanned Marine Systems is acknowledged in the development of this
project, in addition to Bertrand Malas, towing tank manager, Andy Robinson in TSRL and Dave and Terry of
the student workshop.
References
Eurobot (2018). Eurobot international robotic contest. http://www.eurobot.org/. Last called on 30th July 2018.
Hydros Foundation (2018). Hydrocontest. ttp://www.hydrocontest.org/en/event.html. Last called on 30th July
2018.
IMechE (2018). About formula student. http://www.imeche.org/events/formula-student/about-formula-student.
Last called on 30th July 2018.
Microtransat (2018a). The microtransat challenge. https://www.microtransat.org/index.php. Last called on
30th July 2018.
Microtransat (2018b). The microtransat challenge history. https://www.microtransat.org/history.php. Last
called on 30th July 2018.
Molland, A. F., Turnock, S. R., and Hudson, D. A. (2017). Ship resistance and propulsion. Cambridge university
press.
Mwemezi, J. J. and Huang, Y. (2011). Optimal facility location on spherical surfaces: algorithm and application.
New York Science Journal, 4(7):21–28.
29
ROBOTIC SAILING 2018
NOAA (2018). National hurricane center data archive. https://www.nhc.noaa.gov/data/. Last called on 30th
July 2018.
Seacharger (2018). Seacharger oceangoing autonomous boat. http://www.seacharger.com/. Last called on 30th
July 2018.
Telegraph (2016). Competitions help students gain real-life skills. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/stem-
awards/energy/competitions-help-students/. Last called on 30th July 2018.
University of Southampton (2018). Uos design show 2018. http://uosdesign.org/designshow2018. Last called on
30th July 2018.
Van Lammeren, W., Van Manen, J., and Oosterveld, M. (1969). The wageningen b-screw series.
WRSC (2018). World robotic sailing championship. https://www.roboticsailing.org/. Last called on 30th July
2018.
Xprize (2018). Xprize homepage. https://www.xprize.org/. Last called on 30th July 2018.
30